View Full Version : Atheist Apocalypse 2

08-23-2009, 06:40 PM
Hey Richard:

Just wanted to let you know I have posted this on every forum on the internet. Some good came out of you after all.


nothing you liars ever say or do means anything:

Million Dollar Challenge Update: It's not ending! (http://www.randi.org/site/index.php/jref-news/640-million-dollar-challenge-update-its-not-ending.html)


SCEPCOP Forum • View topic - How we *WON* the James Randi Million Dollar Challenge (http://www.debunkingskeptics.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=264)

the objective was simple:

1) to reveal that Nostradamus was a genuine prophet who could predict
the future with 100% accuracy;

2) to demonstrate that prophecy and atheism are not compatible with
each other and are mutually exclusive;

3) therefore dawkins, pz, randi and their skeptic atheist followers
were deluded liars...

and we achieved our MISSION 100%...

Nostradamus: Preface (http://www.zerotime.com/lostbook/nospre.htm)

"For God's mercy will be poured forth only for a certain time, my son,
until the majority of my prophecies are fulfilled and this fulfillment
is complete. Then *****several times***** in the course of the doleful
tempests the Lord shall say: Therefore I shall crush and destroy and
show no mercy; and many other circumstances shall result from floods
and continual rain of which I have written more fully in my other
prophecies, composed at some length, not in a chronological sequence,
in prose, limiting the places and times and ****EXACT DATES**** so
that future generations will see, while experiencing these
****inevitable events****, how I have listed others in clearer
language, so that despite their obscurities these things shall be
understood: When the time comes for the removal of ignorance, the
matter will be clearer still."


08-23-2009, 10:12 PM

You've posted the content of this thread on EVERY FORUM on the Internet.

Must have taken a great deal of time.

I think your efforts were in vain.

I have no clue as to the relevance of the content matter contained within your thread and I highly doubt anyone else who reads its does either.

Care to summarize for the FORUM whatever it is you want to disseminate about RICHARD to us, whomever he is and, as if we care?