View Full Version : Paedophilia: An Analysis In Method.

02-12-2005, 03:06 AM
Hey that title sounded pretty good. I should write a book and get on Oprah, or maybe Dr Phil.

I've been thinking about the ridiculous laws that seem to be protecting these freaks.

Why would people encourage this sort of thing beyond whats already been mentioned?

In West Oz recently a man was spotted filming children (brazenly) at a water park in Hillary's Boat Harbour.

A citizens arrest was made. Police were called and the man was charged. I believe he has yet to appear in court.

People commented that it was bizzare. The man was brazenly taking photo's. He had a laptop and had the capability to upload the images onto the net in real time. He seemed to care not one bit about being caught.

Maybe the guy is just an idiotic freak? Or is their something more sinister going on?

One way the Elite wish to weild more control over the web is to introduce a licence to get on the web, including thumb scanning to access a computer.

What with all those high tech weilding Paedophiles getting around what are we to do? And what of the future terrorists who use the web to gather information and communicate? What about them?

There seems to be only one answer..."place your thumb on the scanner citizen or your computer wont work"..."ohhh dear, sorry Cleric, i'm used to the old way, you know before we were saved from the paedophiles and the terorists".

Just a thought.

02-12-2005, 06:51 AM
It happens because the judges and the law-makers are "lenient" towards these crimes, not the public.

Mary XXX

02-12-2005, 07:35 AM
Yes probably but what a great way to scare people into accepting more constraints on the net Miss Poppins.

02-12-2005, 07:43 AM
"Probably"??? Whatever dude.

If you believe the pedophile scare is equal to the terrorist scare, you need to examine reality.

The terrorists are an illusion for the government forces while the pedophiles are a very real threat to children and society.

Scanners for internet access? I doubt it, very much.

02-12-2005, 08:05 AM
Believe me Mary I know all about it.


If you read my original post you would note my amazement that the person arrested was so blaze. Almost like he wanted to get caught. And what was he doing uploading in real time with thousands of dollars of equipment in full public view?

His hard drive was full of pictures.

My amazement also extended to the laws. The fact that they were so ridiculously lenient. Almost like they were encouraging it.

Hence my proposition that it was being encouraged as were other internet activities as a primer to shut down or limit access to the net.

Yes, I know full well the 'Purple Circle' and the way they protect people.

As for thumb scanners and licenses to access the net. Thumb scanners have been here for years in companies for employee's computers.

There is talk as we speak on having people register as internet users.

Please keep the tone for other people.

I dont like bullshit either and I dont like people who fly off the handle with out first thinking about what is before their eyes.

02-12-2005, 08:18 AM
Whatever dude.

02-12-2005, 09:04 AM
Yeh Whatever MAry.

02-12-2005, 09:25 AM
My change in quote at the bottom was not directed at you so stop with the paranoia, eh?

Mary XXX

02-12-2005, 01:08 PM
I saw your computer on TV today. It's called the IBM thinkpad. It has the thumbscanner built right into it. Welcome to the most wonderful world of not having to remember your password anymore. Now we have the marvelous technology of biometrics. Now just hold out your right hand while I stick this mark of the beast chip in you.

02-12-2005, 01:53 PM

Thanx for pointing that out. My mistake. I didn't want to believe folks would actually buy into that type of technology. The day I have to be scanned to come on-line, that'll be the day I shall no longer bother.

02-12-2005, 06:20 PM
biometric scanning for internet use? What the fuck is this world coming to? Oh, nevermind. I think I'm gonna go back to sleep and hope it goes away when I open my eyes. Oh, shit! it's still there! Nohooooooooooooooooooooo! Arrrrrrrrrrrrrghh! :evil: :pint: :-o :oops: :roll: :-? :-(

02-12-2005, 08:42 PM
Thats what they're hoping for Mary.

The net must be controlled/regulated if they're to have any chance of pulling of the police state wish list.

Sorry if I appear paranoid. I'm tired and spending way to much time on the computer and this forum.

I need to get another bad habit...yeh! Thats it, i'll get an amphetamine habit and then i can stay up 3 days straight and think i'm writing brilliant exposes on the NWO when i'm actually writing crap...whats that? I'm already doing that...

Yeh Minute man...they've been around a while on the lap top. Companies are bringing them in on their desk tops as well.

You can actually buy the USB thumb scanner and attach it to your computer so the kids cant get on and find your porn collection...and who said the NWO gadgets wer'nt any good?

03-19-2005, 11:06 AM
I listened to <a href="http://sf.indymedia.org/uploads/decamp4.mp3">Alex Jones interview John De Camp</a> about The Franklin Coverup and read <a href="http://tomflocco.com/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=107&mode=&order=0&thold=0">Tom Flocco's article</a> on the same topic and all I can say at this time is:

May The Almighty GOD, Allah, The Supreme Divine Being forgive me for my actions if I EVER get my hands on these demons of Satan.

03-19-2005, 11:40 AM

I left a country so i would not murder one. i am capable so i left. God forgive me. I wish him dead to this very day, almost every day.

03-19-2005, 01:35 PM
I can't say what I would do, maybe I couldn't take someone's life even if they deserved it.
But I can say this: I'd be PROUD to take a prison sentence for doing whatever to punish their crime.

This is the reason I can't quite say I agree with Christianity. I have a problem with "turning the other cheek." How can you turn the other cheek to someone who's committed such a crime against you or anyone else?

The concept of chivalry in Medieval Europe came from totally non-Christian origins much older; they consistently PUNISHED people for evil deeds, despite the fact that they were "Christians" on surface. But the fact was they never admitted anyone new into the chivalric orders (particularly The Templars) who followed literally the commandment "Thou Shalt Not Kill".

03-19-2005, 01:41 PM
If what goes around, comes around for God - it is far greater than any punishment I could meat upon him and I would settle for nothing less than death.

To me, he is not worth going to jail for or being separated from my kids. The law is their to protect the pedophiles and not the children. That is the sad truth.

03-20-2005, 06:13 AM
Shaved genitalia.

Ok so you don't get a hair caught in your teeth, still, I think it's a youth movement.

Make the genitalia more childlike/youthful.

I looked at porn in the 70's and the sheeple had hair. I looked at porn today and the sheeple were bare.


Too look like children.

04-09-2005, 06:33 PM
I just heard the story of the mother of Johnny Gosh in the rense.com radio show...poor woman, her son was kidnapped and the police tried to cover things up. He was used in sex slave ring by politicians. They say it is the same ring from Larry King's Franklin scandal. I read the book about the case, what a horrible thing. And to think that Bohemian Grove and the White House are into it.
Now they say Jeff Gannon, the homo pimp journalist in the White House is her son. Could that be true? Is Bush a gay pedophile too ?

I have a small son and believe that giving the other cheek does not mean being passive about defending your family. Not at all. It means being able to let go of small offenses and letting pride aside when insulted. It means trying again even when hurt. This passage is often misunderstood.

Mary, which country did you flee from ? Can you elaborate why or is it too personal ?

04-09-2005, 08:03 PM
Have a gander SAT.

Pretty riviting stuff on Gannon and the whole shebang.


04-09-2005, 09:56 PM
explosive stuff ... y'all see why they had to

focus the media headlines on Terri at the time ?

Amazing how they can orchestrate the media

attention away from the real news.

04-10-2005, 03:12 AM
Hey guys, what do you think of this?

<a href="http://judicial-inc.biz/Gannon.htm">Israel's Blackmail Moves Into High Gear
Jeff Gannon
A possible Mossad Sayanim?</a>

Especially this paragraph - apropo Saturnino's comment about Johnny Gosch:

"Dis-info Scheme Points To Israel

Once Gannon was discovered, the Israelis had to distance themselves. Their favorite ploy is to make everyone look like a conspiracy nut. With Gannon, they float the story he is <a href="http://www.johnnygosch.com/">Johnny Gosch</a>, a paperboy kidnapped in 1982."

04-10-2005, 05:47 AM
Hmmmmm...me not so convinced. Time will tell.

This is what my fave Rivero has to say on Gannon...

""I have really heard all I care to about Gannon. But I think a point needs to be made here. Gannon has been outed as a male prostitute and a hired propagandist by the GOP. The more the media treats him like he is a regular journalist, the more it calls into question the legitimacy of the mainstream media as a whole. Gannon is NOT an expert on media or blogging. And for him to sit up there on a panel at the Press Club pretending that he is, and for the Press Club to ALLOW Gannon to sit up there pretending he is, really underscores why America calls all the mainstream media "presstitutes". Real bloggers should make a point of writing The National Press Club and tell them that you are insulted that they think a man who sold himself online represents bloggers"".

So the fact that there is a great deal of circumstancial evidence of Bush and lover boy, as well as the precedents before them....this is all Rivero has to say...Rivero, you are a stooge.