View Full Version : Tramp Stamps - Caution: STD's Ahead

10-29-2005, 12:32 PM
Tatt my crack!

What is it with young women and Slag Stamps? Those are those tattoos above their bottoms that are frequently on display thanks to their skimpy tops and low-slung jeans (they're also called Tramp Stamps in the US, I believe.)

It seems 1-in-5 women under the age of 30 have them these days. Why? Is it just to draw men's eyes? I thought women didn't like us looking at them. Maybe it's to divert attention from their big fat arses. Maybe it's to kindly let us men know to avoid them, because to me, a Slag Stamp - regardless of whether it's some stupid celtic symbol or a Chinese dragon or whatever - simply reads Caution: STDs Ahead.

In fact it doesn't even seem to be the grubby girls who have them these days. I know career women - including one who goes horse-riding and talks all snooty - with these infernal things. It's like a chain-reaction; one woman gets one, so all her friends decide to get one too, to prove their individuality. Do they realise how stupid they look? Do they realise how grotesque they will look in middle-age? Skin sags when you age; that big eagle tattoo a woman has when she is 18 will look like a melting crow when she is 50 and wrinkly.

In fact tattoos just look stupid in general on women. They make them look like whores and disqualify them from being marriage material. Wives and motherhood do not go together with tattoos. Plus women get stupid shit tattooed on them, like this daft tart.

The most ridiculous tattoo I've heard of is a girl I knew at University who boasted of having a tattoo of her late father's portrait on her upper back. All very moving indeed, but her boyfriends will never want to f*ck her doggie-style. I mean, not many guys want to stare at the likeness of their girlfriend's dead dad whilst they're humping her. Daft b*tch.

10-29-2005, 04:34 PM
I've noticed this trend too. I don't like these things, they don't look good now and in 20 or 30 years it's going to be really ugly. A lot of these women will be paying a lot to have these removed - if it's even possible. I'm not sure why women get these but if I had to take a guess I'd say because it's trendy and everyone else is doing it...herd mentality. Many people are desperate to be liked and to do what everyone else is doing, fall in line. It's very sad to see these women mutilate themselves, it's a scar that lasts forever.

I will not date anyone with one of these.

10-29-2005, 09:42 PM
In case no one noticed...being a "slut" is in.

Women are feeling increasingly insecure so if they have to pretend to be bisexual and be a gigantic slut to turn on their moron, teenage level maturity boyfriend then so be it.

There was and is the yo yo craze and this is right up their with them.

Whats so great is the gynocologists are making a KILLING!

With all the genital warts, chlamydia and herpes going around and with women facing REAL major health crisis along with it, the medical mafia is finding this field a growing market...even ahead of "urology". The former big money earner.

With the focus on anal sex too in porno and in general, the great thing is the general surgeons are also making a killing "tightening" men and womens rectal sphincters! Hey, hey! Who ever said arseholes never bring in money!

Ah yes, the gullible fools and that Tavistock Institute. Spread some good drugs about the countryside, focus on fucking and you turn society into a bunch of pathetic insecure teenagers.

I have nothing but contempt for people who cannot keep their dicks and fannies in their pants for longer than 5 minutes. I see tham as no better than the 500 pond slob who cannot stop eating KFC. Pathetic and in denial.

Just to clarify, i love sex and i love women. I also love the world in general and have a hobby outside of my own infantile pleasures.

10-29-2005, 10:16 PM
What was it Sigmund Freud said regarding the anal developmental state? From Wikipedia.

Freud also believed that the libido developed in individuals by changing its object. He argued that humans are born "polymorphously perverse," meaning that any number of objects could be a source of pleasure. He further argued that, as humans developed, they fixated on different and specific objects through their stages of development—first in the oral stage (exemplified by an infant's pleasure in nursing), then in the anal stage (exemplified by a toddler's pleasure in controlling his or her bowels), then in the phallic stage. Freud argued that children then passed through a stage where they fixated on the parent of the opposite sex and thought the same-sexed parent a rival. Freud named his new theory the Oedipus Complex after the famous Greek tragedy by Sophocles.“I found in myself a constant love for my mother, and jealousy of my father. I now consider this to be a universal event in childhood,” Freud said. Freud sought to anchor this pattern of development in the dynamics of the mind. Each stage is a progression into adult sexual maturity, characterized by a strong ego and the ability to delay gratification. (see Three Essays on the Theory of Sexuality.)

10-29-2005, 11:05 PM
Frued was exactly right.

Shame he attempted to turn his sexual theory into a dogma and "fix all".

The fixation on ones parent or parents has nothing to do with sexuality however. It is simply survival. Just like where a hostage will fall in love with their hostage taker...the old "survival" instinct kicks in. Children do not "love" their parents. They "need" their parents as it is a matter of life or death that an adult cares for them. Love is where a free standing adult gives freely of their energy...free of unconscious expectations. This is the love of Christ and indeed the Christian God. IMHO.

Good parenting will result in a child able to stand being alone and able to take the dissapointments of life in their stride.

Little "sluts" are born when parents treat their children overtly or subtly as a fucking nuisence.

What is the greatest abuse of a child possible? They say "indifference" which describes the modern world well.

The modern world HATES children.

10-30-2005, 09:55 AM
trubeliever said:

Little "sluts" are born when parents treat their children overtly or subtly as a fucking nuisence.

What is the greatest abuse of a child possible? They say "indifference" which describes the modern world well.

The modern world HATES children.

While I disagree with many things you say this realy hit the nail on the head! Wow
Why do you think we have birth control and forced monogamy?
I guess the real driveing force behind it hough the real essence is absolute selfishness. People want to be rich and have a fancy house and car so any children they have are often seen as an obstical to their selfishness. I have argued for years the reason people dont have children is selfishness nothing else.
The realy sad part is it seems to get worse with every generation. People need to start looking outside themselves. In time past people were much more satisfied just by raiseing a family. Now were so miserable the only way to tolerate ourselves is to be constantly entertained and distracted with our things.

10-30-2005, 06:57 PM

On Freud, give him his due on the Electra and Oedipus complex as it is a self evident fact. Little boys want to marry their mummy's and little girls their daddy's. Where i get put off Freud is his insistence on "sexuality" which has nothing to do with it.

Ask any woman if her son has ever said, "mummy when i grow up i'm going to marry you". Their is an intense rivalry between son and father and mother and daughter.

The love affair children have with their parents is intense. They literally fall in love with their parents and vice versa.

The easy way through this is for the parents to have a good relationship where the Mother ESPECIALLY has a good relationship with her husband and does not use her son as a weapon against him...literally lavishing the son with the attention the husband should be getting. And vice versa. Anyone been divorced? It's right their in ya face.

And then kids transfer all this unresolved bullshit into their relationships.


As for selfishness? I have no problem with people choosing NOT to have children as they have made the right choice. It's the tossers who have them out of guilt or because it's a box that must be ticked on the Cosmic Resume that piss me off. They too should have the guts to admit they are simply not up to raising children and never should. At least until they have grown up.

There are going to be alot of lonely people around in 20-40 years. If we're still here.