PDA

View Full Version : Hollywood Pushes Racial Intermarriage - Overcoming Qualms


Barbara
11-14-2005, 01:20 PM
Hollywood Pushes
Racial Intermarriage
Overcoming Qualms

By Henry Makow PhD
11-14-5

In the film "Guess Who's Coming to Dinner" (1967) Sydney Poitier's dad, a retired postman, objects to his son marrying a White woman. "I walked thousands of miles to bring you up and want some say over my progeny."

The son rejects his father's claims replying: "Dad, to you I am a colored man; to me I am just a man."

This seems to be Hollywood's take on intermarriage and at one level it is true. We are one family, all God's children. My second wife was a Filipina.

At the same time, I am suspicious of Hollywood's motives given the fact that the New World Order is intent on dynamiting the four pillars of our human identity: God (religion), race, nation and family (gender) better to control us. They want to define us as producers and consumers.

Yes Poitier's character is first a man but is that any reason for him to negate his race and culture? Funny how a philosophy that pretends to celebrate differences, actually makes them disappear. If all Blacks and Whites intermarried, both races would cease to exist.

Hollywood studios are owned and financed by mostly Jewish central bankers. Is this their hidden agenda? Some people believe in a "War of the Jews Against the White Race." They quote a 1952 speech by a Rabbi Rabinovich: "Thus, [through intermarriage] the White race will disappear...and our most dangerous enemy will become only a memory."


The main objection to this view is that Jews have suffered more than anyone from intermarriage. Since 1965, US Jewish intermarriage has risen from an average of 9% to roughly 52% today. One third of all American Jews couples are intermarried. At this rate, by the year 2040, most of the world's Jews will live in Israel, the central banker fiefdom where intermarriage is illegal.

I have yet to see a Hollywood movie about a family of European background vindicated for wanting to perpetuate its special heritage. But Jewish families are sometimes an exception.

In the film "Prime," (2005) Meryl Streep plays a frumpy middle-aged Jewish therapist who practically disowns her son for having an affair with a non-Jewish woman (who also is her client.)

The issue of race is camouflaged as a difference in "faith," as if the woman couldn't convert. The Meryl Streep character insists, "Religion is the most important thing in life" though she gives little evidence of this from her own behavior. Being Jewish is portrayed as a matter of family and food.

"It makes sense to marry someone from the same background," Streep tells her son. "Why start something when nothing can come of it?"

She also refers to the problems mixed couples have. (The divorce rate for Jewish mixed marriages is 60% compared to seven per cent for non-mixed.)

I encourage Jews and everyone else to nurture and preserve their racial and cultural heritage. In "Prime," a mediocre movie incidentally, the non-Jewish woman finally withdraws because of the "religious" difference, as well as an age difference.

In "Keeping the Faith" (2000) however, a Jewish rabbi played by Ben Stiller actually marries a non-Jew who plans to convert. His mother, played by Anne Bancroft, had disowned his brother for doing this.

But when push comes to shove, mother relents and gives her rabbi son her blessing. So does his congregation, an indication of the ambivalence Jews must feel on this issue. (In Jewish law, "Jewishness" is determined by the mother's racial background.)

In the comedy "Guess Who" (2005) a Black family voices their objections to their daughter marrying a White man. The father played by Bernie Mack, expresses his preference when he tells a colleague the fiance is Black, a basketball star who just got into medicine and knows the Cosby's.

"No matter what I say, you're going to think I'm a racist," Mack tells his daughter, "but it's human nature to care."

The sister says, "Thanks sis! I can crash the car or do anything now. I won't be the one who brought home a White man." (Could Whites speak like this in the movies?)

The daughter to her father: "Dad I need you to tell me that this is OK. People look at us as if we were strange."

There is an edgy scene at the dinner table where the family coaxes the fiance, played by Ashton Kurchner, into telling Black jokes. The first few are good-natured but after one that stings, the father says, "I think I've lost my appetite."

However dad's reservations are for dramatic effect only. In typical Hollywood fashion, father relents when he learns that Kurchner quit his job over his boss's opposition to his choice of mate.

Similarly, in "Guess Who's Coming to Dinner" the white girl's father does an about-face. While opposing the marriage as "impractical" throughout and vowing to protect his daughter, inexplicably he finally decides the couple's "feelings are the only thing that is important."

Feelings are often driven by hormones and have a tendency to change. I would have ordered a cooling-off period. In this story, the couple had been together for only10 days.

But "Father Knows Best" no longer applies. Hollywood preaches a religion of romantic love and rebellion. Sex is the ultimate experience known to man. As a result, all considerations that make us human (like family and heritage) take second place.

In addition, because of Hollywood (and popular music), people have unrealistic expectations of love and sex, which may be a cause of family breakdown.

We hear a lot about brainwashing but we never consider that WE may have been brainwashed. Hollywood is a weapon of mass deception and its policy is to promote racial intermarriage.


Brainwashing is part of a process of colonialism. The whole world, including the US, is being colonized by a cartel of cartels located in the City of London, which owes no allegiance to the UK or any country. This cartel undermines racial cohesion and sows division as part of its imperialistic design for a banker-run New World Order.

_____

Henry Makow Ph.D. is the inventor of the game Scruples and author of "A Long Way to go for a Date." His articles exposing fe-manism and the New World Order can be found at his web site www.savethemales.ca He enjoys receiving comments, some of which he posts on his site using first names only. hmakow@gmail.com

Thumper
11-14-2005, 04:03 PM
hmm, I guess you were right about the "brown every man" and the Tower of Babel thing, Barbara :-o

Barbara
11-14-2005, 04:56 PM
Thumper, this is just the run-up stage, to check the efficiency, efficacy and time element of their brainwashing techniques.

When they get their "UN Brown Man" is when they get serious and do what they did in the old Soviet Union; they would remove the men from one area, like the Balkans, and replace them with men from another area.

Over time and with all choices removed they will breed and that generation will breed again until, v'iola - UN Brown Man.

Thumper
11-15-2005, 03:50 PM
Barbara wrote:
Thumper, this is just the run-up stage, to check the efficiency, efficacy and time element of their brainwashing techniques.

When they get their "UN Brown Man" is when they get serious and do what they did in the old Soviet Union; they would remove the men from one area, like the Balkans, and replace them with men from another area.

Over time and with all choices removed they will breed and that generation will breed again until, v'iola - UN Brown Man.I still think that level of total miscegenation is at least hundreds of years off. The time of the anti-christ is coming to pass MUCH SOONER than that.

Akbar
11-22-2005, 12:59 PM
This is only a fear of white racists. There will always be races of people. There will always be a white race. The reason why intermarriage is on the rise is due to the taboo of it and the ignorance of other races. As the races start to interact and learn more of each other. I think it will decrease intermarriage more than increase it. Then again if your race is so superior then your race members should not be so willing to find mates outside of it. When whites intermarry it dilutes the white race. White scientists are prepared for the worst. They will just clone more whites.

Ozzy_dopster
11-22-2005, 03:07 PM
For want of a horse the shoe was lost. Horseshoe. Operation Horseshoe was condemed for racism and horrendous tyranny. What are these people thinking that they can dictate who marries who?

Thumper
11-22-2005, 07:18 PM
Akbar wrote:
This is only a fear of white racists. There will always be races of people. There will always be a white race. The reason why intermarriage is on the rise is due to the taboo of it and the ignorance of other races. As the races start to interact and learn more of each other. I think it will decrease intermarriage more than increase it. Then again if your race is so superior then your race members should not be so willing to find mates outside of it. When whites intermarry it dilutes the white race. White scientists are prepared for the worst. They will just clone more whites.

you're all over the map Akbar, but to answer your only coherent point, no, self-determination and maintaining racial identity is not synomous with 'supremacy' or wanting to dominate others.

Some of these arguments, especially from the 'civil rights' crowd are so ridiculous they'd have you believe that if a group of whites were to fly to Mars, and some minorities smuggled themselves into the cargo containers they would be justified in crying 'discrimination' if they weren't allowed to join the colony. :-P

Akbar
11-22-2005, 07:28 PM
Thumper,
The only way you can control it is by dominating others. There will always be people who will marry outside of their race. My point was that this is a small number. Nature itself will maintain each race and insure each race's survival. This unfortunately is a deep seated fear of most whites. In the past,it lead to the history of white inhumanity.

Thumper
11-22-2005, 07:31 PM
Akbar wrote:
Thumper,
The only way you can control it is by dominating others. There will always be people who will marry outside of their race. My point was that this is a small number. Nature itself will maintain each race and insure each race's survival. This unfortunately is a deep seated fear of most whites. In the past,it lead to the history of white inhumanity.

Freedom of association is dominating others? Controlling immigration is dominating others?

Thumper
11-22-2005, 08:18 PM
The thing I don't understand is why so many people are in the opinion that white people aren't allowed sovereignty, and independence from the 'multi-cultural community' because such a thing would lead to spontaneous and sudden 'neo nazism' and hatred, and that the new destiny and duty of whites is to now adopt the non-white world.

I can guarantee you that people living in the Falkland Islands who have never laid eyes upon a Zulu have never had ambitions of taking over Africa, or genociding or enslaving the indigenous community, and yet by virtue of being 'too white' this kind of 'logic' persists...

I think in a normal situation without the racial politics we've been ingrained with over the decades (white=bad, thanks to the ADL), such a situation that led to the forced integration of one group onto another on the premise that the former was wretched, and the latter group 'owed' them something would not be tolerated.

It wouldn't be tolerated by the host society due to indignation, and it wouldn't be tolerated by the immigrant class either, because it would be beneath their dignity to 'force themselves' on others, and live beneath their resentment. This is why 'civil rights' were such a joke. Before Blacks had their own communities, dentists, doctors, towns, universities, professional sports leagues, etc. This is something that was also pointed out by crowneagle, another poster on this forum.

there seems to be a common misconception that blacks are incapable of creating a prosperous economy and need the whites to make it happen for them. but nothing could be farther from the truth. in fact, blacks had a very prosperous economy and society in the state of oklahoma in the early 20th century, so much so that an area of greenwood, oklahoma came to be known as "black wall street", as it was powerful enough to rival the wall street of new york city.

Now they are convinced that they are too stupid to be self-suficient, and instead depends on the white community for all their needs. Essentially liberals are saying that whites are a civilizing influence onto blacks and other races.

That, blacks, left to their own devices will continue the same pattern of degeneracy, violence, unemployment, etc. and it becomes a duty to 'socialize' them like they were pets needing to be house trained.

Not only is this line of thinking ridiculous, but sad since the liberals have made the blacks/minorities self-righteous about this, even though it's so ass-backwards, I don't even know where to begin.

"Because Whitey hasn't properly socialized you, that's why you fail."

"Arggh! Damn Whitey!"

Do minorities realize that's what they're supporting when they listen to these liberal crackpots? Is it a moral victory that you have forced integration, anti-discrimination, and affirmative action so that you can be better 'socialized'?

I don't know how you're supposed to develop any proper self-esteem if you subscribe to this paternalistic relationship, where you need whitey's approval, before you can become a full member of society and human being.

It's only dawned on me now how the Liberals have used minorities as a tool. They've convinced them through indirect subtext that they are incapable of supporting themselves, and that they are inferior, and that it's because of Whitey's fault. The net result is low self-esteem, jealousy, and hatred. All negative emotions. All attitudes that are self-perpetuating.

Liberals are the real 'supremacists'. They enslave the mind, and use it to score politically.

Akbar
11-23-2005, 09:07 AM
Thumper,
I agree with you. There is nothing wrong with you being proud of your race or wanting to associate with your own. It's just that based on the history of whites. It puts all of the other races, especially blacks on alert that they need to be cautious of this type of association. In past history when a group of whites got together and if there was any alcohol involved then 9 times out of 10 something bad was going to happen to someone nonwhite. In situations when there was no alcohol it would be 5 times out of 10 something bad was going to happen to someone nonwhite. So I understand how you feel. The past actions of whites continue to be an ongoing curse for all of the new generations of whites and blacks. In whites, the curse is that whites have to live up to a superman complex. In blacks, the curse is that blacks must depend on whites for their survival. The solution is in what you shared, which is for blacks to be empowered to be responsible for themselves and their actions. The only barrier to this is black leaders. If blacks became independent and self sufficient then black leaders would be out of jobs. They could no longer be poverty pimps.

55132
11-23-2005, 07:30 PM
AK,

Who was it that took by force most of asia north africa and part of europa? killing, raping and pillaging.

Who was it that purchase the negros in africa and then sold them to jew merchants?

Who are the people that are planting bombs and Killing indiscriminatly all over the world?


I can tell its not the whites


The europeans have not donde anything wrong that the asians haven't done worse?


and when you add up the world is a better place because of us.

Thumper
11-23-2005, 10:46 PM
I think over all we have to remember who writes our history books, and who owns the tv networks. We are being played off one another.

The illuminati and their insatiable imperialism, genocide, and oppression, does not represent whites (especially as manifested in the British Empire) just as rap music that glorifies rape, murder, and gangsterism does not represent urban blacks.

truebeliever
11-24-2005, 06:35 AM
No one has the market cornered on decency or debauchery. ALL the races of the world are capable of great destruction. It's just that whitey gets his back up coz he has to think about ALL his faults these days non stop.

I tell you, my views have changed ALOT these last few months. I am no longer under the spell of "tolerance".

With regards Wetern Civilization i am reminded of two quotes. One from Gahndi who said it "might be a good idea" and the other from the Monty Python movie "The Life Of Brian" where three members of the Palestinian Liberation Front are arguing..."apart from better education, running water, a legal system, representation and organised society...what have the Romans EVER done for us?" [paraphrasing].

We could of course say many good things about the world of Islam and their contributions to science and philosophy. In the end I think it is better that Muslims live amongst themselves and so do Christians. We can visit each other and live in co-operative peace sure of our values and place in the world.

I no longer want "multiculturalism" in my country. I will NEVER countenence violence against decent people however. That should be a simple given.

Of course i will have no say in this country as John Howard begins the MASS immigration of low pay workers to Oz in an EXACT repeat of the massive move to America during the 1900's.

Better get my land quick. Before the Globalists get it all.

Akbar
11-24-2005, 09:26 AM
55132,
You misrepresent history. According to most white historians. Whites have been involved in the worst assualts on humanity (holocaust, slave trade, and the crusades). Yes, I agree that Asians have also done evil things and continue to do so. The point is that neither group is living up to the essence of what God wants for them. Until that happens both groups and all the other races will continue to be controlled by the NWO.

Akbar
11-24-2005, 09:34 AM
truebeliever,
It is impossible for all races of people to be divided and sent back to their own countries. God wants all of the races to work together toward a common good. We can work toward stemming the flow of immigration by stopping the western countries from exploiting the resources in the third world, and placing puppet governments in those countries that only serve to oversee the explotation of resources.

Thumper
11-24-2005, 01:29 PM
Akbar wrote:
truebeliever,
It is impossible for all races of people to be divided and sent back to their own countries. God wants all of the races to work together toward a common good. We can work toward stemming the flow of immigration by stopping the western countries from exploiting the resources in the third world, and placing puppet governments in those countries that only serve to oversee the explotation of resources.that working together for a common good almost sounds like that Tower of Babel dream :-P :-P :-P :-P :-P

Thumper
11-24-2005, 01:31 PM
something I've always wondered about. Why did the illuminati take root in Europe in particular?

Akbar
11-25-2005, 09:11 AM
"that working together for a common good almost sounds like that Tower of Babel dream"

Thumper,
The Tower of Babel is symbolic to mean that society would have so many man made ideologies that man would be pulled away from worshipping God to worship idols, which are man made ideologies. When you look at the word Babel, it has the word babe in it. It also reminds you of what babies do, which is babble. So the Bible is saying that man would create ideologies that were foolish and devoid of any intelligent use. There is great wisdom behind the interpretation of the Tower of Babel in the Bible.

truebeliever
11-25-2005, 09:41 AM
We can work toward stemming the flow of immigration by stopping the western countries from exploiting the resources in the third world, and placing puppet governments in those countries that only serve to oversee the explotation of resources.

Yes. The root of the problem.

I am not so based on race but values. If people CANNOT agree on basic values then what hope is their.

In Oz, the local Muslim community is outdoing it's welcome by NOT coming out hard and fast on the idiot element in their midsts. Also, drug dealing is RAMPANT, particularly amongst the Muslim Lebonese community. Why is the Muslim community NOT strongly addressing these issues or is the money from the drugs making for good donations to the various Muslim charities?

There is a group in Oz rubbing their hands with glee at the current state of Muslim/Christian relations.

Thumper
11-25-2005, 11:00 AM
Thumper,
The Tower of Babel is symbolic to mean that society would have so many man made ideologies that man would be pulled away from worshipping God to worship idols, which are man made ideologies. When you look at the word Babel, it has the word babe in it. It also reminds you of what babies do, which is babble. So the Bible is saying that man would create ideologies that were foolish and devoid of any intelligent use. There is great wisdom behind the interpretation of the Tower of Babel in the Bible.

I thought it was about humanity uniting under a single 'world order', and in the story, didn't they want to touch the face of God?

Anyway, my main point is we should be weary of a kind of 'world community' that negates our individual right of self-determination and identity.

Akbar
11-26-2005, 08:07 AM
"I thought it was about humanity uniting under a single 'world order', and in the story, didn't they want to touch the face of God?"

Thumper,
The thought behind all of the man made ideologies is that man feels he is god. This is the single world order that is uniting humanity. This is the thought behind the NWO. All humans want to be free to do their own thing. Sure you have a right to have your own identity and self determination, but God wants your identity and self determination to lead towards human excellence. So far history has shown that man has been inhumane to fellow man while he was in search of identity and self determination. Our identity must first be with God and then we must lead a path of self determination to please God. This is the only way that our identity and self determination will not lead to inhumanity. We are a world community and we must see ourselves as such in order to stop the inhumanity going on in the world.

Thumper
11-26-2005, 11:12 AM
Akbar wrote:
"I thought it was about humanity uniting under a single 'world order', and in the story, didn't they want to touch the face of God?"

Thumper,
The thought behind all of the man made ideologies is that man feels he is god. This is the single world order that is uniting humanity. This is the thought behind the NWO. All humans want to be free to do their own thing. Sure you have a right to have your own identity and self determination, but God wants your identity and self determination to lead towards human excellence. So far history has shown that man has been inhumane to fellow man while he was in search of identity and self determination. Our identity must first be with God and then we must lead a path of self determination to please God. This is the only way that our identity and self determination will not lead to inhumanity. We are a world community and we must see ourselves as such in order to stop the inhumanity going on in the world.

you sound more and more like the UN everyday... :-P :-x :-x :lol:

Thumper
11-27-2005, 11:22 PM
another thing I forgot to mention Akbar, that will PROVE that whites do not run the Illuminati, and that is the unequivocal fact that white south african farmers and white zimbabwe farmers are currently being genocided, and there's nary a word of it in the media.

We're all in this together.

www.boergenocide.com

truebeliever
11-28-2005, 01:34 AM
Yes, i was going to say the same thing.

I was willing to give AHMED a go but when i started to REALLY research the USN i found many references to Freemasonry. Ahmed of course rightly asked for the links. I got them through LF but cannot find them. It may have been a put job but it does awfully smell of "One World Religion".

Akbar
11-28-2005, 01:31 PM
Thumper,
This does not prove that most of the members of the NWO are not white. This group has a history of sacrificing their own in order to further their own agenda. I think what it proves, which you say is UN thinking is that all races must work together to defeat them. Based on my experinces on this site. It does not seem that most members are prepared to do that. Their vision is too narrow. Things are seen from a white Christian point of view. If it is deemed nonwhite or nonChristian, then it is considered a threat. This type of thinking helps the NWO maintain control. It is easier for them to control the masses if the people are divided and geared towards fighting each other. Unfortunately, most members on this site do not have a solution other than whites must have their own homeland without immigrants, which was the case in the United States, but their leaders were wise enough to see that the United States cold not reach it's destiny in that type of situation.

Thumper
11-28-2005, 02:24 PM
I'm just trying to say that the NWO isn't a 'Aryan World Order' as many lefties want to believe, as evidenced by unlimited immigration to the West, nor is it even Jewish.

As such, we have to stop imagining that the West is totally unscathed by their control, or that everything works to their benefit, which is what I see you implying with many of your posts.

Akbar
11-30-2005, 10:53 AM
The people behind the NWO would be consider white and Jewish. I disagree with most conspiracy theorists. This group does not include any gentiles. I prefer to call them Jacubites because in the Bible they identify themselves with Jacob and state that they stole the rights of their brother. I get my theory out of the Bible. Why? because the Bible is their playbook. The Bible has two stories, one for good the other for bad. Their playbook is hidden by symbolism in the Bible. The Jacubites are ungodly Jews. How can one small group of people control humanity? Go to the Bible and look at Noah's Ark. Fools take this story literally. The Jacubites describe how they control mankind in this story. Each animal respresents a type of human being. Male and Female represent leadership (male) and community (female). The ship represents their order. they control the people by keeping the water out. This water is the spirit of God. Human beings were created to submit to God. If we do not submit to God, then we must submit to something. So in the Ark the people are not given water. Also, there is a Jewish myth called the story of Golem, which also shows how the Jacubites control society. Some of this myth is shared in the movie I Robot by the character Spoon.