View Full Version : Moon Landing Hoax

03-19-2006, 08:50 PM

You need speakers to listen to the conversation.

Select "Replay Intro" to view again.
Neil Armstrong won't swear that
he walked on the moon.

03-21-2006, 06:08 PM
FFS! this is a piss take......you need to read the British comic "Viz".......

Jesus - Irony is really lost on our American brethren isn't it?

03-22-2006, 01:26 PM
Quit having us on and tell us, mate, what's on the dark side of the moon? You had to get that one right to get out, no?

03-22-2006, 05:09 PM

or go to www.moonmovie.com and click on FAQs

Frequently Asked Questions:

Q: How could such a secret be kept from the world with so many people involved? (Didn't NASA have tens of thousands of people working on the Apollo project?)

A: This is the same logical question I asked before I did any research. Yet after having done eight years of investigation, I discovered that, in fact, very few people were involved in the actual faking. NASA, indeed, did have tens of thousands of people working constructing the nuts and bolts of the project. One team worked on the spacecraft hatch, another on the astronaut's boot, yet none of them saw an overview of the entire project, only those at the very top of the bureaucratic pyramid. All of those NASA guys at the computer consoles that you saw prior to the launch were receiving the exact same information as their colleagues sitting beside them, which was fed to all of them by a simulation computer program. If you look at the footage ten seconds prior to launch, they are all kicked back watching television, just like the rest of us. Apollo astronauts from later or previous missions were the ones at the real consoles. We know from the newly discovered behind-the-scenes footage that each crew was on the rocket during the launch. They went up in front of witnesses, splashed down in front of witnesses, yet the evidence recently uncovered proves that they never left Earth orbit. Apollo 11 was supposed to be the greatest event in human history, yet there were only three (government employee) witnesses and, for the first time ever, no independent press coverage of such an historical event.

With Cold War tensions running high, those who knew the truth went along with the deception to fool the Soviets that we had technological superiority.

In 1957 Time Magazine had on its cover "The Smartest Man in America" (the latest winner of the most popular TV trivia game show at that time.) It was later uncovered that the contestant received the answers in advance from the show's producers because he was widely loved by the viewers. In fact, one hundred twenty contestants and staff initially swore on the Bible during a grand jury investigation that the television show was not rigged. Most later recanted, and it is now known they all lied. If all these people were willing to lie for a little money, how much more for alleged national security? The fact is, Time Magazine was wrong. The best way to fool the world was to fool the media.

Q: What about all of the people refuting your accusations point-by-point?

A: Given the pride associated with this alleged accomplishment, it is natural that many people seek to refute our claims. It is not difficult to make up a plausible-sounding argument to refute almost any claim. However, we have yet to see any such argument that does not fail under critical examination.

"The likelihood of one individual being right increases in direct proportion to the intensity to which others are trying to prove him wrong."
- - Harry Segall

Q: What about the moon rocks?

A: NASA chief scientist James Garvin recently appeared on C-SPAN (4-17-2005.) A viewer called in for the live, audience response, program. He stated that his father worked for the Defense Department and told him that we never went to the moon, that the technology didn't exist back then, and that Apollo was a Hollywood-type production. The caller asked NASA chief scientist Garvin what proof he had that the Apollo moon missions were real. Garvin said the proof is in the statements made by the astronauts, and also in the moon rocks.

While it is possible that the moon rocks were manufactured (NASA has the best ceramics labs on the planet), in reality these rocks are probably just meteorites that were retrieved on Earth. Von Braun, the director of the program, visited Antarctica a few months before the missions to retrieve these meteorites. (By the way, it is a federal crime for a civilian to be in possession of an Apollo moon rock, so how can there truly be independent verification?)

Q: Can't you see the artifacts left from the alleged moon missions through a powerful telescope?

A: No. This is folklore. No Earth-based telescope is powerful enough to see manmade materials on the lunar surface. The newly released photos of the moon taken by the Hubble telescope cannot discern any objects on the moon's surface that are smaller than a football field in length.

Japan, however, sent a probe to the moon several years ago that did have this capability. Unfortunately, as soon as it entered lunar orbit all five of its cameras simultaneously malfunctioned. Further disappointment is in the fact that the most recent European lunar probe cannot see the moon's surface in enough detail to answer this persistent question.

Q: Wouldn't the Russians find out and then tell the world?

A: This is another, very logical, yet superficial question. After thinking about it for some time, I believe that one of the major reasons for faking the moon missions was to fool the Soviets about US strategic and space capability during the height of the Cold War (like a bluff in poker.) In addition, the Soviets did not have the capability to track deep spacecraft until late in 1972, immediately after which, the last three Apollo missions were abruptly cancelled.

Even if the Russians did suspect the landings were not authentic, the act of calling us liars of this magnitude at the height of the Cold War could have instigated a war, and perhaps they thought it better not to chance that.

Q: Why hasn't someone come forward?

A: Who would listen, and who would believe them? This illusion is so pridefully ingrained in everyone’s mind that it isn’t even questioned. Furthermore, would you want to be the one to ruin the international reputation of America? (Plus the likely blackmail, bribes, and death threats . . . to family members as well.) In addition, one astronaut coming forward to clear his own conscious is an inadvertent condemnation of all of the other astronauts as well. It is one thing to ruin your own life and reputation, yet what about others who are not willing to do so? All of them have built fame and wealth on their celebrity of having supposedly walked on the moon.

Q: What about laser reflectors on the moon (allegedly left by Apollo) that scientists bounce light beams off of?

A: The Russians have successfully placed such reflectors on the surface of the moon, yet they have never claimed to have put a man on the moon. The reflectors were dropped there by unmanned probes. It should also be noted that the moon's surface will naturally reflect signals; communications were carried out as early as the 1950s by bouncing signals off of the moon.

Q: How could the scientists of the world be fooled?

A: When scientists fail to require independent duplication of such an outlandish claim after over 30 years have passed, science is degraded to the status of being just another religion. They claim to have gone 240,000 miles in 1969. However, since 1972 no one has gone more than 400 miles from the Earth. This is a case of the scientists of the world not doing their jobs and otherwise being caught asleep at the wheel.

The leading scientists today who say that the Van Allen Radiation Belt is not lethal (who were generally in preschool at the time of the first alleged moon landing) do so by the following deduction: "The Apollo astronauts went through the radiation belt on their way to the moon and survived, so it must not be lethal." They are, of course, assuming that the missions were authentic, when, in fact, they were not. The leading scientists are wrong. Has this ever historically happened?

Q: If the evidence you have is so compelling, what hasn't CNN picked it up?

A: In reality, news media organizations are in the entertainment business. They figure that confronting such an emotional issue is not likely to boost their ratings. Since only a small percentage of those in the U.S. believe the landings were not authentic, most news media organizations don't want to risk offending their viewers.

Q: What about Apollo 13?

A: The fact is, none of the Apollo missions ever left earth orbit. After interest petered out following Apollo 12 (the second trip), an element of "jeopardy" was introduced to draw attention back to the alleged drama of the missions.

This makes Apollo 13 the most deplorable of all the missions. The nation held midnight prayer vigils for the astronaut's safe return, all the while they casually coasted around the earth in a completely sound orbiting vehicle.

Q: If A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Moon is such Earth-shattering evidence, why are you selling it instead of offering it for free?

A: The film is Earth-shattering evidence, indeed. The fact is that investors put up five hundred thousand dollars to produce the film, and they would like to recoup a little of it. This is simply the concept of exchange; when someone does work to provide you with something of value, you compensate them when you receive benefit from that work.

Thirty bucks for a half a million dollar film is not bad, if you ask me.
(The lie cost every citizen $800--the truth... $30.)

Q: What are the running times for each of the DVD's?

A: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Moon is 47 minutes in length. Astronauts Gone Wild is 53 minutes long. Apollo 11 Post-Flight Press Conference is 1hour, 23 minutes long. Apollo 11 Monkey Business is 1 hour, 48 minutes long.

- Bart Sibrel -

06-29-2006, 08:28 PM
The truth about the Moon landing (http://opposingdigits.com/vlog/?p=94) 00:34 - June 28, 2005

Astronauts Gone Wild (http://opposingdigits.com/vlog/?p=256) 53 min 15 sec - Mar 21, 2006

Did we really land Men on the Moon? (http://opposingdigits.com/vlog/?p=197) 51 min 16 sec - Mar 21, 2006

A Funny Thing Happened On The Way To The Moon (http://opposingdigits.com/vlog/?p=183) 46 min 56 sec - Mar 15, 2006

Google vids available as avi, ipod, psp, flv. Youtube are flv.

Check faqs if you have any problems. ;)

06-30-2006, 07:08 AM
What Happened on the Moon (http://opposingdigits.com/vlog/?p=327)

07-07-2006, 04:40 AM
the clangers were the first life form on the moon, then walice and gromit (a grand day out) finaly me i live there now i am curently plaing to ust the moon as an endless suply of chease to sell on the black market. so there mr. poo!
:lol: :-D 8-)

07-21-2006, 04:35 AM
seriously mr how are the babies, it is this kind of repulsive behaviour that ruins forums like this for everyone else. honestly, stop posting and get yourself a life, this is a place of refuge for intelligent and enlightened souls, and we do not appreciate your silliness. go away, and leave us in peace.

07-21-2006, 04:36 AM
mr mongo, why dont you take your own advice and leave yourself?

07-21-2006, 10:17 AM
No please, take my advice: I'm not using it.

07-22-2006, 02:40 PM


08-04-2006, 10:02 PM
The only "high resolution" tapes of the moon landings have gone missing... (http://www.smh.com.au/news/national/one-giant-blunder-for-mankind-how-nasa-lost-moon-pictures/2006/08/04/1154198328978.html)

08-05-2006, 12:13 AM
How can anyone believe anything NASA says when they were exposed for sacrificing their own astronaus to Moloch? when they name their missions after demigods

I can't wait for the staged discovery of life on mars, people are going to eat it all up hook line and sinker.

08-14-2006, 09:23 PM
It's just toooooooooo funny and must be reiterated...

Has anyone looked under the bed? Someone ring the guy who knew where all the WMD's in Iraq were...

NASA can't find moon landing tape

From correspondents in Washington

August 15, 2006 10:29am
Article from: Reuters

THE US Government has misplaced the original recording of the first moon landing, including astronaut Neil Armstrong's famous "one small step for man, one giant leap for mankind," NASA said today.
Armstrong's famous space walk, seen by millions of viewers on July 20, 1969, is among transmissions that NASA has failed to turn up in a year of searching, spokesman Grey Hautaloma said.

“We haven't seen them for quite a while. We've been looking for over a year and they haven't turned up,” Mr Hautaloma said.

The tapes also contain data about the health of the astronauts and the condition of the spacecraft. In all, some 700 boxes of transmissions from the Apollo lunar missions are missing, he said.

“I wouldn't say we're worried – we've got all the data," he said.

“Everything on the tapes we have in one form or another.”

NASA has retained copies of the television broadcasts and offers several clips on its web site.

But those images are of lower quality than the originals stored on the missing magnetic tapes.

Because NASA's equipment was not compatible with TV technology of the day, the original transmissions had to be displayed on a monitor and re-shot by a TV camera for broadcast.

Mr Hautaloma said it is possible the tapes will be unplayable even if they are found, because they have degraded significantly over the years – a problem common to magnetic tape and other types of recordable media.

The material was held by the National Archives but returned to NASA sometime in the late 1970s, he said.

“We're looking for paperwork to see where they last were,” he said.

Link (http://www.news.com.au/story/0,23599,20134141-38198,00.html)

One giant blunder for mankind: how NASA lost moon pictures

THE heart-stopping moments when Neil Armstrong took his first tentative steps onto another world are defining images of the 20th century: grainy, fuzzy, unforgettable.

But just 37 years after Apollo 11, it is feared the magnetic tapes that recorded the first moon walk - beamed to the world via three tracking stations, including Parkes's famous "Dish" - have gone missing at NASA's Goddard Space Centre in Maryland.

A desperate search has begun amid concerns the tapes will disintegrate to dust before they can be found.

It is not widely known that the Apollo 11 television broadcast from the moon was a high-quality transmission, far sharper than the blurry version relayed instantly to the world on that July day in 1969.

Among those battling to unscramble the mystery is John Sarkissian, a CSIRO scientist stationed at Parkes for a decade. "We are working on the assumption they still exist," Mr Sarkissian told the Herald.

"Your guess is a good as mine as to where they are."

Mr Sarkissian began researching the role of Parkes in Apollo 11's mission in 1997, before the movie The Dish was made. However, when he later contacted NASA colleagues to ask about the tapes, they could not be found.

"People may have thought 'we have tapes of the moon walk, we don't need these'," said the scientist who hopes a new, intensive hunt will locate them.

If they can be found, he proposes making digitalised copies to treat the world to a very different view of history.

But the searchers may be running out of time. The only known equipment on which the original analogue tapes can be decoded is at a Goddard centre set to close in October, raising fears that even if they are found before they deteriorate, copying them may be impossible.

"We want the public to see it the way the moon walk was meant to be seen," Mr Sarkissian said.

"There will only ever be one first moon walk."

Originally stored at Goddard, the tapes were moved in 1970 to the US National Archives. No one knows why, but in 1984 about 700 boxes of space flight tapes there were returned to Goddard.

"We have the documents to say they were withdrawn, but no one knows exactly where they went," Mr Sarkissian said.

Many people involved had retired or died.

Also among tapes feared missing are the original recordings of the other five Apollo moon landings. The format used by the original pictures beamed from the moon was not compatible with commercial technology used by television networks. So the images received at Parkes, and at tracking stations near Canberra and in California, were played on screens mounted in front of conventional television cameras.

"The quality of what you saw on TV at home was substantially degraded" in the process, Mr Sarkissian said, creating the ghostly images of Armstrong and Aldrin that strained the eyes of hundreds of millions of people watching around the world.

Even Polaroid photographs of the screen that showed the original images received by Parkes are significantly sharper than what the public saw. While the technique looks primitive today, Mr Sarkissian said it was the best solution that 1969 technology offered.

Among the few who saw the original high-quality broadcast was David Cooke, a Parkes control room engineer in 1969.

"I can still see the screen," Mr Cook, 74, said. "I was amazed, the quality was fairly good."

From SHANNOW's link.

08-15-2006, 12:00 AM
Man never made it to the moon ... otherwise

the Russians would have done it, the Japanese

would have gone 10 times already and India and

China would quit delaying when they would go ...

not to mention that the U.S. would have gone

back already instead of claiming they need to

do safety tests before going ???

08-15-2006, 08:33 PM
Man never made it to the moon ... otherwise

the Russians would have done it, the Japanese

would have gone 10 times already and India and

China would quit delaying when they would go ...

not to mention that the U.S. would have gone

back already instead of claiming they need to

do safety tests before going ???

I say they went. The photographic evidence put about is easily explainable...
Are The Moon Landing Photo's Faked? (http://www.badastronomy.com/bad/tv/iangoddard/moon01.htm)

I am not so convinced the WHOLE debate is "planted" like a David Icke "lizard theory" to keep us distracted and largely discredited. They probably have the tapes...it just keeps us posting on it and distracted.

HOWEVER...the ONE thing that keeps me wondering is the media interview when the Apollo 11 astronaughts look like they've just been told they will be shot at dawn. They dont look very happy. In fact you could say they are not happy about being involved in a fraud.

Who knows...I think about it when i need a break from thinking about how i'm gonna avoid taking the "Australia Card" with it's biometric thingies. :-)

08-16-2006, 11:35 AM
I really do wonder how the "high quality" tapes went missing just now.

I think I read that one of Oliver Stones people were asking to see them.

02-01-2012, 06:37 AM
I just released a one-hour film on Stanley Kubrick's participation in the moon landings. If interested, you can download here: Download | The Shining Code (http://theshiningcode.com/wordpress/?page_id=45)