PDA

View Full Version : The Great Seal of American Freemasonry


G4bster
08-29-2006, 04:50 AM
I've noticed something interesting about the United States Great Seal that I made a GIF animation of.

http://www.lolhome.com/img_big/funny-picture-4886354733.gif
"Annuit Coeptis Novus Ordo Seclorum" is Latin for "Announcing the birth of the New World Order".

They
08-29-2006, 05:57 AM
"Annuit Coeptis Novus Ordo Seclorum" is Latin for "Announcing the birth of the New World Order".

Uh, no it isn't.

They are actually two mottos and both are taken from Vergil. "Annuit Coeptis" comes from the Aeneid and means "He favors our (daring) undertakings". In the Aeneid, it referred to Jupiter, but here there is no subject, although many think the 'eye of providence' is the subject.

"Novus Ordo Seclorum" does not mean "New World Order", but "New Order of the Ages". It comes from one of Vergil's Eclogues and relates to a prophecy of a child that comes from the heavens and starts a new order of the ages. This was commonly thought to refer to Christ, which is why Vergil's work has survived better than many Roman literature. The Christians didn't destroy it.

"Novus Ordo Mundi" is "New World Order"

G4bster
08-29-2006, 03:44 PM
it's true actually, sorry guess I better double check my sources next time. Essentially it means the same thing though

http://axe.acadiau.ca/~058875h/Mason%20Seal.gif

Tor
08-29-2006, 08:46 PM
Essentially the moon is related to the sun because they are both round. That is about where the similarity ends though.

09-01-2006, 01:02 AM
http://home.iprimus.com.au/mightyarmy/BTM2_files/image024.jpg

Tor
09-01-2006, 06:08 AM
What are you trying to show with this picture? Don't you like money?

Shadow
09-01-2006, 07:16 AM
I think he is saying that we are the New World Order

09-01-2006, 10:15 PM
I am not saying anything. I find the symmetry of the combined seals interesting. Read into it if you wish. I only posted it because in all likeliness, you've never seen it before.

09-05-2006, 09:14 AM
i find it interesting how there are jewish connections to our own money no doubt because of the zionist cabal and the rosenbergs

09-06-2006, 12:17 AM
To answer your question I feel I "tolerate" money. I require money to survive, as do you. I also appreciate the artistic value in tangible money.

Not one single bullet in and of itself has ever killed a living thing. The same can be said of money. It's all about the intent.

Underneath it all... it's all a big lie. We think we want it... It's worth ONLY what they tell you it is.

Does more harm or good come from it's existence?

This is for you to judge.

The best things in life truly ARE free.

09-06-2006, 12:21 AM
Tor wrote:
What are you trying to show with this picture? Don't you like money?
I am surprised that this would be your response to what I posted. I refuse to point out the obvious and draw you a map of how to "get it". Some pictures are worth more than a thousand words... or a thousand points of light.

Quit trying to figure me out. You won't.

09-06-2006, 01:12 PM
spectre wrote:

Tor wrote:
What are you trying to show with this picture? Don't you like money?
I am surprised that this would be your response to what I posted. I refuse to point out the obvious and draw you a map of how to "get it". Some pictures are worth more than a thousand words... or a thousand points of light.

Quit trying to figure me out. You won't.

ive got you totally figured out you jew

09-07-2006, 12:39 AM
DamnTheMan wrote:

spectre wrote:

Tor wrote:
What are you trying to show with this picture? Don't you like money?
I am surprised that this would be your response to what I posted. I refuse to point out the obvious and draw you a map of how to "get it". Some pictures are worth more than a thousand words... or a thousand points of light.

Quit trying to figure me out. You won't.

ive got you totally figured out you jew

Sorry... Wrong again! Anglo-Saxon. Christian.

Am I now to stoop to your level and fire back with an accusation such as "White Supremacist" or "Nazi"? No such luck...

There is an exception to every rule. No one asked to be born Jewish, black, white, gay, straight, intelligent, mentally challenged, athletic or crippled. None of us were given a choice. You on the other hand choose your own ignorance. You choose hatred. Luckily for you and unfortunately for the rest of us, there are others out there just like you, lacking and afraid... who will reinforce all of these little misconceived beliefs of yours. You will side with one another out of fear masking it with comradery and laughter. Fear is an incrediblly motivating force. It governs your words. See for yourself.

09-07-2006, 12:57 AM
I was born here in the US and will probably die here. I love this country but I am NOT proud of ALL of it's history... and that IS my right.

http://home.iprimus.com.au/mightyarmy/BTM2_files/image024.jpg

Whatever this image conveys to you is on you.

I wouldn't label you... I'd appreciate the same in return.

<edited for typos>

Rockyroad
09-08-2006, 11:01 AM
Did someone say "Wounded Knee"?

09-09-2006, 09:27 AM
Did someone say "Protocols of the Elders of Zion"?

http://img20.imageshack.us/img20/1003/911goatsedh8.gif

Tor
09-09-2006, 02:23 PM
Another fake picture like the sphere.

sysop
10-22-2006, 02:30 PM
I wrote an article on the dollar bill here (http://www.geocities.com/newstatesascendant/dollarbill/dollarbill.html) if anyone is interested.

01-02-2007, 04:24 PM
Thanks for posting.

01-02-2007, 04:28 PM
I guess you like that image.

In Peace,
BlueAngel

01-02-2007, 04:55 PM
Like it? Don't be too sure.

01-02-2007, 05:00 PM
So, why'd you pull up this thread without making any serious comment?

In Peace,
BlueAngel

01-02-2007, 05:25 PM
I did not intend to bump this thread up in any way but only to acknowledge a comment posted by another.

01-02-2007, 05:28 PM
Who was the poster you were reponding to? You didn't quote them. You made a blanket, "thank you for posting" comment.

How long since the post was made and the time you came here to say thank you?

In Peace,
BlueAngel

Shadow
01-04-2007, 08:21 AM
Who was the responder you were responding to? You didn't quote them. You made a blanket "I just want to stick my ass where it doesn't belong but I will anyway which is the only thing I do anyway other than the fake crap about some musican that did me" comment.

How long since the post was made and the time you came here to say thank you?

01-04-2007, 08:23 AM
Oh, yes, the FAMOUS musician. You must know of him.

In Peace,
BlueAngel

Shadow
01-04-2007, 08:30 AM
BlueAngel wrote:
Oh, yes, the FAMOUS musician. You must know of him.

In Peace,
BlueAngel

No, I don't. And in truth neither do you!

01-04-2007, 08:31 AM
How would you KNOW what I KNOW?

What is the name of this famous musician of whom I speak?

In Peace,
BlueAngel

Shadow
01-04-2007, 08:34 AM
No, I don't. And in truth neither do you!

01-04-2007, 08:40 AM
What is his name?

In Peace,
BlueAngel

01-04-2007, 08:32 PM
...

01-04-2007, 09:12 PM
.....

What do the dots represent?

In Peace,
BlueAngel

01-13-2007, 07:58 AM
Ellipsis Έλλειψις (plural: ellipses ελλείψεις, Greek for "omission") in linguistics refers to any omitted part of speech that is understood; i.e. the omission is intentional. Analogously, in printing and writing, the term refers to the row of three dots (...) or asterisks (* * *) indicating such an intentional omission. This punctuation mark is also called a suspension point, points of ellipsis, periods of ellipsis, or colloquially, dot-dot-dot.

An ellipsis is sometimes used to indicate a pause in speech, an unfinished thought or, at the end of a sentence, a trailing off into silence (aposiopesis). Ellipses are often used in this manner for internet chat, email, and forum posts.

Ellipsis (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki)

01-13-2007, 07:59 AM
...

01-13-2007, 08:43 AM
What are you intentionally omitting?

In Peace,
BlueAngel

01-13-2007, 08:51 AM
Why this level of curiosity?

Those who such comments are intended for will understand them. All that matters.

It is all really very simple. Were I communicating to you I would be more forthcoming and precise.

Just not sure what you're getting at or why this many ongoing questions.

You asked, "what are you intentionally omitting?" and my response would have to be "absolutely nothing!"

Cheers, Spectre

01-13-2007, 09:02 AM
Just wondering what three dots mean. That's all. People normally post comments that include text. You know, something that can be read and understood.

In Peace,
BlueAngel

01-13-2007, 09:10 AM
If you MUST know... I had duplicate entries and since the delete feature is not enabled to us, I
changed it how I saw fit... ;)

-Spec

01-13-2007, 09:19 AM
Oh, okay. That clears that up. Ask a simple question and receive a simple answer.

Thank you.

In Peace,
BlueAngel

01-16-2007, 03:19 AM
My intention is not to be vague in anyway. If you look through this thread, you will see a number of questions directed at me, by you, and I didn't want to answer for myself yet again. Your point is taken however... a simple answer for a simple question. ;)

01-16-2007, 07:49 AM
spectre wrote:
My intention is not to be vague in anyway. If you look through this thread, you will see a number of questions directed at me, by you, and I didn't want to answer for myself yet again. Your point is taken however... a simple answer for a simple question. ;)

Exactly. A simple question deserves a simple answer.

When one doesn't want to give the true answer to a question such as "what do the dots mean?", they give many answers as you have done here.

If you don't answer for yourself, who then answers for you?

In Peace,
BlueAngel

01-17-2007, 03:20 AM
BlueAngel wrote:

spectre wrote:
My intention is not to be vague in anyway. If you look through this thread, you will see a number of questions directed at me, by you, and I didn't want to answer for myself yet again. Your point is taken however... a simple answer for a simple question. ;)

Exactly. A simple question deserves a simple answer.

When one doesn't want to give the true answer to a question such as "what do the dots mean?", they give many answers as you have done here.

If you don't answer for yourself, who then answers for you?

In Peace,
BlueAngel

Ughh. To explain myself yet again...

First off, I pointed you to an excellent reference regarding "..."


BlueAngel wrote:
So, why'd you pull up this thread without making any serious comment?

In Peace,
BlueAngel

BlueAngel wrote:
Who was the poster you were reponding to? You didn't quote them. You made a blanket, "thank you for posting" comment.

How long since the post was made and the time you came here to say thank you?

In Peace,
BlueAngel

BlueAngel wrote:
How would you KNOW what I KNOW?

What is the name of this famous musician of whom I speak?

In Peace,
BlueAngel


BlueAngel wrote:
What is his name?

In Peace,
BlueAngel

BlueAngel wrote:
.....

What do the dots represent?

In Peace,
BlueAngel

BlueAngel wrote:
What are you intentionally omitting?

In Peace,
BlueAngel

question upon question upon question upon...

I simply didn't feel like answering yet another question about something that had NOTHING to do with you whatsoever.

something out of nothing out of...

This isn't constructive in anyway and the general tone from the beginning was in no way welcoming or positive. I did not appreciate the accusatory tone, assumptions and overall critique of all that was a comment I left in this thread not directed to you. They accepted my acknowledgement of their contribution to what was a discussion before all of this inquiry and negativity took over.

I seemed to have sparked some reaction out of you though. You seem to desire conflict... which I'm not opposed to where it is constructive in some form. Whatever the reason/s for your need to question what I say, when I say it, why I say it, what it means, who I am saying it to, etc. by my own choice is none of my business. For this reason, please don't continue to make make it my business.

Why? Why why?

If you have a problem with me for any reason at all - just ignore me! Otherwise, I will continue to attempt communication with you.

Who answers for me? I.

Only I and the devil can answer for me.

01-17-2007, 07:08 AM
Spectre said:

"Only I and the devil can answer for me."

A simple question receives a mound of garbage.

In Peace,
BlueAngel

redrat11
01-17-2007, 10:04 AM
http://home.iprimus.com.au/mightyarmy/BTM2_files/image024.jpg


<center>
<img src="http://i30.photobucket.com/albums/c307/reddog11/05defee4.gif" alt="Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting"><br><br>
</center>

01-17-2007, 07:49 PM
Well, now, Spectre, as I've stated before, the art of extraction, a very fine one indeed.

I know what the "dots" represent, but thank you for allowing all others on the board the opportunity to learn what significance the dots have insofar as that famous musician is concerned.

You have provided a very nice example in your last comment.

I will explain it for the rest of the readers.

Where I have asked another poster on the board "what is his name" (referring to the musician who was my handler/controller), the next comment on the thread was made by Spectre and they were the infamous dots.

This means, the name of the musician should not be spoken. Omit. Leave out. Just as the definition for dots is explained when used within text...ommission.

These dots were used very often on HIS site while I was being held there against my own free will.

In Peace,
BlueAngel

You really only needed the following quotes, however.

It went like this:

BlueAngel said to Shadow:

What is his name?

Spectre said:
...

01-17-2007, 08:30 PM
This also lends a clue as far as Shadow is concerned.

It's clear what his/her purpose is, but nonethless.

As I was asking Shadow repeatedly the name of the musician, Spectre came in with the dots.

So, we may be able to make an assumption that, as I have suspected, and, I'm sure the rest of you as well, he/she is being controlled. Yes, as in "mind controlled."

Had the dots not been posted, Shadow may have answered my question.

In Peace,
BlueAngel

Shadow
01-26-2007, 11:23 AM
You are a pathetic little troll in need of attention.

Thanks to you and the other teeny trolls, you have destroyed this site!

01-26-2007, 05:04 PM
Yo Da DuNg BunG, Ass

01-26-2007, 06:56 PM
Shadow wrote:
You are a pathetic little troll in need of attention.

Thanks to you and the other teeny trolls, you have destroyed this site!

Why don't you write Dr. Makow. Maybe he'll ban me and keep you on.

In Peace,
BlueAngel

01-26-2007, 07:59 PM
BlueAngel wrote:
Spectre said:

"Only I and the devil can answer for me."

A simple question receives a mound of garbage.

In Peace,
BlueAngel

Well but I somehow do not foresee Christ making excuses for the insignicant tendencies of mankind. The devil would of course. The devil is always willing to offer sympathy and justification.

You get no less from my responses than what you desire to. Isn't everything what we make of it?

01-26-2007, 08:36 PM
spectre wrote:

BlueAngel wrote:
Spectre said:

"Only I and the devil can answer for me."

A simple question receives a mound of garbage.

In Peace,
BlueAngel

Well but I somehow do not foresee Christ making excuses for the insignicant tendencies of mankind. The devil would of course. The devil is always willing to offer sympathy and justification.

You get no less from my responses than what you desire to. Isn't everything what we make of it?

Well, then, go talk to the devil cause there isn't any sympathy here.

I want nothing from you and that would include a response.

Everything is what THEY/HIM tried to make of ME and did not.

In Peace,
BlueAngel

01-26-2007, 08:49 PM
BlueAngel wrote:

Everything is what THEY/HIM tried to make of ME and did not.

In Peace,
BlueAngel

Wrong again.

Since we're making so many assumptions, I want to give it a shot. Let's assume for one millisecond that there is a shred of truth in any of what you are claiming. Whether you can remember it or not, you allowed for this to happen to you. You allowed for your temptation to get the best of you. It would seem this is an ongoing inner battle and I truly wish you the best of luck with it.

01-26-2007, 08:54 PM
spectre wrote:

BlueAngel wrote:

Everything is what THEY/HIM tried to make of ME and did not.

In Peace,
BlueAngel

Wrong again.

Since we're making so many assumptions, I want to give it a shot. Let's assume for one millisecond that there is a shred of truth in any of what you are claiming. Whether you can remember it or not, you allowed for this to happen to you. You allowed for your temptation to get the best of you. It would seem this is an ongoing inner battle and I truly wish you the best of luck with it.

First of all, WE'RE not making any assumptions. YOU ARE.

Secondly, the twisted logic you give is just that TWISTED.

The abuser is never at fault. The abused always allows it to happen.

In Peace,
BlueAngel

01-26-2007, 09:02 PM
BlueAngel wrote:

First of all, WE'RE not making any assumptions. YOU ARE.
BlueAngel

We?


BlueAngel wrote:

Secondly, the twisted logic you give is just that TWISTED.

The abuser is never at fault. The abused always allows it to happen.

In Peace,
BlueAngel

True enough. Noone EVER deserves to be abused and when one leaves themselves open to such abuse it is almost always due to some form of prior abuse whether emotional or physical.

I wasn't generalizing to the degree that you have.

I thought we were discussing you (and however many additional you's there may be).

Though you won't accept it, I wholeheartedly wish you the best.

01-26-2007, 09:09 PM
spectre wrote:

BlueAngel wrote:

First of all, WE'RE not making any assumptions. YOU ARE.
BlueAngel

We?


BlueAngel wrote:

Secondly, the twisted logic you give is just that TWISTED.

The abuser is never at fault. The abused always allows it to happen.

In Peace,
BlueAngel

True enough. Noone EVER deserves to be abused and when one leaves themselves open to such abuse it is almost always due to some form of prior abuse whether emotional or physical.

I wasn't generalizing to the degree that you have.

I thought we were discussing you (and however many additional you's there may be).

Though you won't accept it, I wholeheartedly wish you the best.

You said "WE" in your last comment.

Spectre said, "ONE leaves themselves OPEN to abuse."

There are no additional ME's.

In Peace,
BlueAngel

igwt
01-26-2007, 10:14 PM
spectre wrote:

BlueAngel wrote:

Everything is what THEY/HIM tried to make of ME and did not.

In Peace,
BlueAngel

Wrong again.

Since we're making so many assumptions, I want to give it a shot. Let's assume for one millisecond that there is a shred of truth in any of what you are claiming. Whether you can remember it or not, you allowed for this to happen to you. You allowed for your temptation to get the best of you. It would seem this is an ongoing inner battle and I truly wish you the best of luck with it.

This is the same logic people say about women being provocative re being raped, assulted etc.

01-27-2007, 08:55 AM
The twisted logic of an abuser. They must blame the one they abuse. How else can they justify their behavior? How else can they attempt to control them? This is true of those who are abused and not mind control victims.

When you are a mind control victim, FEAR of him and what he would do to me if I didn't behave, follow orders, do as I was told, give in to his desires, is the control mechanism that is put in place.

Physical abuse is applied and referred to as "suffering the consequences of your actions" for misbehavior or for not behaving as they/HE deemed appropriate. This to keep you in line.

Same sick logic as triggering your sexual programming and then calling you a "dirty little girl" when you are forced through their control to engage in sexual behavior as a young child against your own free will.

You have NO CHOICE because all choices are made for you through their control using triggers, commands, altered states of consciousness, etc.

In Peace,
BlueAngel

spectre
02-28-2007, 10:24 PM
I understand where you'd come to these conclusions but they couldn't be further from the truth. There are "predators" and then there are "prey" out there. I would fall into the latter category. My comment was in reference to something on a more personal level that I have gathered from reading through BA's posts. It was a highly generalized statement on my part and not meant in the "global" sense.

I'd try to clarify more but eh I won't go there.

The only potential harm I have ever caused another would have to be something I was doing to myself. Likely one of those behavior issues stemming from childhood. I will try to emphasize context in the future.

I'm harmless.

TheLucifer
03-17-2008, 08:28 PM
They are actually two mottos and both are taken from Vergil. "Annuit Coeptis" comes from the Aeneid and means "He favors our (daring) undertakings". In the Aeneid, it referred to Jupiter, but here there is no subject, although many think the 'eye of providence' is the subject.

"Novus Ordo Seclorum" does not mean "New World Order", but "New Order of the Ages". It comes from one of Vergil's Eclogues and relates to a prophecy of a child that comes from the heavens and starts a new order of the ages. This was commonly thought to refer to Christ, which is why Vergil's work has survived better than many Roman literature. The Christians didn't destroy it.
"Novus Ordo Mundi" is "New World Order"

The above is from a post in this thread in regards to the Latin phrases (above and below the pyramid) on the Great Seal of the USA, that I believe to be accurate.

Annuit Coeptis, the subject as stated above is Jupiter.
Jupiter is king of all gods and governs all the deeds of man.
The eye of providence (the Blazing Star of Freemasonry, the upside down 5 pointed star, the image of the King in the OES, the Star of Bethlehem) represents Jupiter/Satan as the King/Lucifer, enlightening man and governing all the deeds of man.
The Lucifer = the Christ/King of kings.
Satan is set up as the Christ but is not, therefore it is Antichrist, the instead of Christ.
It/they are not the bringer of light but darkness.

Morals and Dogma by Albert Pike
page 14
“The blazing Star…an emblem of Divine Providence, and commemorative of the star which appeared to guide the wise men of the East”
Page 15
According to English masonry,
“The Blazing Star…refers us to that grand luminary, the sun, which enlightens the earth”
“The Blazing Star…as an emblem of…the ALL-seeing Eye”

KJV Bible, Masonic Edition, 1932 copy by A. J. Holman, in the section titled "History and Facts concerning the Order of The Eastern Star" these words are found,
"The Star of Bethlehem...as the emblem of the Order...its five points" and at the end of this section, in the "CONCLUSION" these words are found,
"the initiate...are stamped with the image of the King."

So, according to Freemasonry (Robert Morris, the founder of the OES) the Star of Bethlehem is the upside down 5 pointed star and this star is the image of the King.

The subject Jupiter = Satan.

To understand what Satan is, is to understand it is not a conscious freewill entity therefore it cant favor anything.
The one that actually does the favoring is the one the likeness thereof stands in New York, Ishtar.
As mentioned in the Bible a woman rides the beast.
She rides (controls/guides) the beast Satan.

The men behind Satan (which is not a conscious freewill entity, it is a symbol of an agenda/religion) are saying, via the eye in the capstone that, they and Satan are the rulers/King of the world.
The agenda is world domination.
They/Satan are the Chief Cornerstone.
The dc beast is the abomiNATION of desolation.

Novus Ordo Seclorum (new order of the ages) as stated above from Vergil’s Eclogues is in regards to a child that comes from the heavens and starts a new order of the ages, thought to be Christ i.e. Jesus Christ.
In the Masonic Lodge Jesus is a symbol for the Lodge/d.c. beast Satan.
This child that comes down from heaven is not Jesus but Satan.
heavens = planned, it was a concept/plan.
Comes from = actually set up in the real world, no longer a plan.

In the bible the New Jerusalem comes down from heaven, that New Jerusalem is Washington D.C./America, where the Masonic child Satan is.
Heaven = concept/plan.
Comes down from = actually set up in the real world.

Woe to those (minions/patriots) who are with child, the child Satan.

Seclorum is where we get our word secular (world) from.
Satan/Masonic Lodge is the new order of the ages, for the world.

To see a highlighted map of Washington DC showing an UPSIDE DOWN CROSS with Satan atop the upside down cross click the link. I use the map showing east up so as to make the beast and upside down cross easier to view, so north is to the left.
img1.jpg - Image - Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting (http://photobucket.com/albums/ee60/thelucifer_rp/?action=view&current=img1.jpg)

KSigMason
12-30-2008, 12:56 PM
"Annuit Coeptis Novus Ordo Seclorum" is Latin for "Announcing the birth of the New World Order".
Your Latin is horrible. Annuit Coeptis is Latin for: He approves our undertakings. Novus Ordo Seclorum is Latin for: New Order of the Ages. If did take them together, it would basically say God approves this New Order of the Ages (New Order being America in a time when the British empire controlled most of the world).

You should see this thread (http://www.clubconspiracy.com/forum/f32/conspiracies-6510.html).

BlueAngel
12-30-2008, 08:01 PM
Your Latin is horrible. Annuit Coeptis is Latin for: He approves our undertakings. Novus Ordo Seclorum is Latin for: New Order of the Ages. If did take them together, it would basically say God approves this New Order of the Ages (New Order being America in a time when the British empire controlled most of the world).

You should see this thread (http://www.clubconspiracy.com/forum/f32/conspiracies-6510.html).

Unless you've talked to GOD in person, you don't know if he approves of this NEW ORDER or not.

KSigMason
12-30-2008, 08:30 PM
Unless you've talked to GOD in person, you don't know if he approves of this NEW ORDER or not.
But I can say what the bill says in Latin.

BlueAngel
12-30-2008, 08:43 PM
But I can say what the bill says in Latin.

Yes, sir, indeed.

You can absolutely, positively say what the bill says.

I wonder how the BILL knows GOD approves?

Please enlighten us.

KSigMason
12-30-2008, 09:14 PM
I wonder how the BILL knows GOD approves?

Please enlighten us.
You'd have to ask the guys that designed the seal and dollar bill, I'm sad to say they have passed on.

BlueAngel
12-30-2008, 09:16 PM
You'd have to ask the guys that designed the seal and dollar bill, I'm sad to say they have passed on.

I wouldn't ask them even if they were alive because they wouldn't know anyway.

KSigMason
12-30-2008, 09:43 PM
I wouldn't ask them even if they were alive because they wouldn't know anyway.
The designers wouldn't know what they designed themselves?

BlueAngel
12-30-2008, 09:45 PM
The designers wouldn't know what they designed themselves?

Really?

Why not?

KSigMason
12-30-2008, 09:47 PM
Really?

Why not?
No I was questing why they wouldn't know because of your post:

I wouldn't ask them even if they were alive because they wouldn't know anyway.
Again, why wouldn't they know?

BlueAngel
12-30-2008, 09:52 PM
No I was questing why they wouldn't know because of your post:


Again, why wouldn't they know?

You're getting off track here.

The statement I made was that NO ONE would know whether GOD approved of the NEW ORDER or not.

Even those who designed the bill because NO ONE asked of GOD in his presence whether or not he approved.

KSigMason
02-09-2009, 04:07 PM
Maybe God did approve of our undertaking. You don't know whether or not.

BlueAngel
02-09-2009, 10:41 PM
Maybe God did approve of our undertaking. You don't know whether or not.

Yeah.

Maybe in your delusional world, you were sitting at a table with GOD and he approved.

In my world of REALITY, I know for sure that didn't happen.