View Full Version : George Soros Slams Terror 'War,' Compares White House to Nazis

09-15-2006, 05:03 PM
George Soros Slams Terror 'War,' Compares White House to Nazis

By Monisha Bansal
CNSNews.com Staff Writer
September 15, 2006

(CNSNews.com) - Billionaire philanthropist George Soros compared the Bush administration to socialist and communist regimes Thursday while criticizing America's war on terror.

The liberal political activist said the U.S. strategy of fighting a "war" against terrorism is "false" and a "dismal and disheartening situation." Critics say Soros is only trying to hurt Republicans' chances in the November elections and warn that he is undermining efforts to protect Americans from terrorists.

Soros told an audience at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, "We are working with a very false frame when we talk about a 'war on terror,' and yet it is universally accepted.

"Everybody now recognizes that invasion of Iraq was a real blunder, but the war on terror is still the frame that is accepted by Democrats and Republicans alike," Soros claimed. "It is a false, misleading, counterproductive, destructive frame."

By using the word "war," he argued, the Bush administration is invoking military terminology in response to a situation that, Soros believes, should be dealt with diplomatically. He also said the "war on terror" is "counterproductive," because there are "innocent victims," which "breeds rage and resentments and feeds into the terrorist case."

"It is a war that cannot be won without lots of adverse consequences," he added.

Soros also accused the president of using the war on terror for political gain and compared the Bush White House to the most murderous regimes in human history.

"President Bush is exploiting it even further ahead of these elections," Soros said. "I would voice my concerns about the similarities between this administration and the Nazis and communist regimes."

In 2004, Soros gave more than $23 million to political advocacy groups known as "527s" to defeat Bush, according to the Center for Responsive Politics.

Matthew Vadum, an analyst with Capital Research Center, said Soros has apparently decided to try a different strategy to influence the upcoming midterm elections.

"Instead of vigorously contesting the election this November," Vadum told Cybercast News Service, "George Soros has apparently opted to attack President Bush and the Republican Party by undermining America's war on terror."

Vadum urged Americans to examine the claims Soros is making from another perspective.

"Soros argues that it is a phony war, an empty advertising slogan that Bush is using to pull the wool over gullible Americans' eyes," Vadum said. "But U.S. soldiers fighting in Iraq and Afghanistan who put their lives on the line every day beg to differ."


09-15-2006, 09:46 PM
So, the Globalist lackey Soros is criticising Bush and his Bolshevik 5th Columnist stooge show?

I guess the Left can step in as saviours now and the U.N can take over after the U.S economic collapse.

SEC- Why do you NEVER debate but only post continuously? It's virtual trolling in my eyes.

09-15-2006, 10:19 PM
Good post truebeliever. The fake left must be woken up.

09-16-2006, 04:34 AM
George Soros Blames Jews for Anti-Semitism

Do we have to listen when the billionaire speaks?

George Soros Addresses a Jewish Audience

George Soros, a Hungarian-born Jew who escaped the Holocaust by fleeing to London as a child, is ranked the 28th richest person in the United States (with a fortune valued at $7 billion) by Forbes magazine.

In November 2003, for the first time ever, the billionaire spoke to a Jewish audience at the conference of the Jewish Funders Network. Many people were dismayed by his call for “regime change” in the United States, his talk of funding projects in “Palestine" and the Geneva Accord, and his ideas about the cause of anti-Semitism.

Soros said European anti-Semitism is the result of the policies of Israel and the United States. “There is a resurgence of anti-Semitism in Europe. The policies of the Bush administration and the Sharon administration contribute to that,” Soros said. “If we change that direction, then anti-Semitism also will diminish,” he said. “I can’t see how one could confront it directly.”

Soros also said that he has personally contributed to anti-Semitism. Soros believes that Malaysian prime minister, Mahathir Mohammad, was referring to people like Soros when he said, “Jews rule the world by proxy.” Soros' projects and funding have influenced governments and promoted various political causes around the world.

Soros' comments were called “absolutely obscene" by Abraham Foxman, national director of the Anti-Defamation League.

“Let’s understand things clearly: Anti-Semitism is not caused by Jews; it’s caused by anti-Semites,” said Elan Steinberg, senior advisor at the World Jewish Congress. “One can certainly be critical of Bush policy or Sharon policy, but any deviation from the understanding of the real cause of anti-Semitism is not merely a disservice, but a historic lie.”

In addition to his unhelpful ideas, Soros has given scant money to Jewish causes. Soros said he has not given much to Jewish or Israel-related causes because Jews take care of their own, so that his financial clout is better directed elsewhere.


09-16-2006, 11:37 AM
Leave SeC alone, I like his gathering...
and his stuff is quality material.

09-16-2006, 03:19 PM
Actually I'm more guilty of doing that than he is, and I have to admit his stuff is better than mine, the idea of a forum is not just to give your view, its also a place to gather knowledge from different sources and put that in the middle of others conciousness, whether we gain from it is happenstance, but if it is keeping us up to date with the days strange activities it does its job, if I find an interresting article, I'll post it.
Although lately I've been doing more in lounge than in the serious boards, it doesn't mean that it isn't needed, I want to see the return of many posters that have left CC that contributed to this site over and over again in the past, I can't name them, because I would no doubt forget someone that should be mentioned, but they probably left because of the so much infighting mentality that this site has become. I hope those of you that had posted in the past, who decided this site got fucked up, but still read the post, come back with your opinions.
If you come across a good article, I want you to post it, or atleast give me the link, I don't need to read it on this site, I am able to click on exterior links. :-D

09-16-2006, 04:29 PM
(Although lately I've been doing more in lounge than in the serious boards, it doesn't mean that it isn't needed)


09-16-2006, 04:46 PM
What do you think their putting on the weed of today, DU ?

We don't want to be like the followers of the main stream media, we need information that can be examined and decyphered.

09-16-2006, 05:47 PM

09-16-2006, 07:24 PM
Torchlithill wrote:
What do you think their putting on the weed of today, DU ?

No, they've been lacing it with formaldahyde in some areas, so yer best bet is to get it from people who grow their own :-P

09-17-2006, 08:42 PM
No, they've been lacing it with formaldahyde in some areas, so yer best bet is to get it from people who grow their own

Shame on you! I have seen the telly and "experts" assure me pot goes to your head and turns you into a raving, piano playing looney (please refer "refer madness"). Also, one puff and you'll be shoving needles into your arm and dying from a smack over dose.

People should stick to alcohol and cigarettes which have never hurt anyone. :-x

09-17-2006, 08:53 PM
I need some female seeds, maybe next season, the one thing I managed to do was to finally quit smoking cigars, and that was one damned hard thing to do.
I understand that when the plants get sprayed by the drug task force, whatever their called, the mexicans Etc.. quickly cut down their plants and start curing them before the paraquat has a chance to kill the plant, thats a nasty thought there, smoking paraquat! :-o

09-17-2006, 08:59 PM
George Soros Blames Jews for Anti-Semitism

Do we have to listen when the billionaire speaks?

George Soros Addresses a Jewish Audience

SEC...Soros is your classic "Hofjude(n), Hoffaktor" or "Court Jew". He could'nt give a damn about ordinary Jews and will say whatever required when it suits the Globalist agenda.

Soros copped a mouthful from Mahattir Mahummed (Malaysian P.M) and did'nt have much to say about the oppression of Palestinians before then though he gives a few shekels Noam Chomsky's way when needed.

In fact...Mahattir said something like "when billionair jews come calling i get worried". He had just thrown Soros out of Malaysia and accused him of massive currency manipulation.

Soros is like a J.P Morgan...an agent of Rothschild. Soros probably owns little if anything of his vast empire. He is a simple "cut out" of the U.K Banking Elite.

He has been busy spreading "democracy" in Russia's southern states. The "Orange Revoloution" they called it where "spontaneous" demonstrations erupted and the oppressed masses of Ukraine and elswhere voiced their outrage of alledged voting manipulations of the heavy communist (read nationalist) leaning party. Soros poured MILLIONS into it with a second to none western intelligence run youth led revoloution. It was staged from start to finish with HEAVY involvement of most western media who openly supported the Soros agenda.

Soros, like the Jewish Oligarchy in Russia, is an endangered species who would do well to follow the rest of the Bolshevik filth who have been run out of Russia and now call Israel home.

Just to reiterate...

Bush and the "neo-cons" are "neo-bolsheviks".

What Is A Neo-conservative?

The exact opposite of a conservative. Neo-conservatives are the Bolsheviks of the Right. Like the Bolsheviks, they appear in restrained groups driven by a simple idology. They seek practical ways to acheive real power in order to make revoloutionary changes. These "practical ways" usually involve creating a misunderstanding over the "revoloutionary changes" to follow.

The first step in the advancement of a Bolshevik movement is the establishement of intellectual respectability. This was acheived by hiring bevies of academic consultants to lay out a marginal idea - that the West could revert to the rough capitalism of the 19th century - as if it were not only an historic nescessity but a natural inevitability. Their determinism literally mimmicked the Marxists. What a few years before had been marginal nonsense was now driven home as received wisdom by right wing newspaper columnists.

The second stage involved a series of coups d'etat within established conservative parties, beginning with those of Britian, the United States and Canada. The movement was then able to enter elections disguised as conservative renewal. They won power with the support of an electorate which would be among the first to suffer from their policies - the middle and lower middle classes.

The third step again mimmicked the Bolsheviks. This was the key to destabilising the opposition - including the now confused and captive conservatives - in order to win re-election. They redefined the political spectrum so that their marginal ideas occupied all of the territory from the extreme right to the center. This left many conservatives redefined as dangerous Liberals (the Wets, moderate Republicans and radical Tories). The Liberals suddenly resembled socialists and the socialists, communists. In other words, the great mainstream which had presided over the remarkable rise of the West was squeezed over to the marginal edge of public debate.

Since the essential characteristics of Neo-Conservatism are revoloutionary, it was perfectly natural for them to begin by disguising their actions behind reassuring phrases. What they believe is that wholesale change in structures is the only way to change society. Continuity, careful progress and memory are their enemy. However, to admit this in the early stages of holding power is to risk losing it. Eventually they felt free to turn on those who rejected their ideas of change and tar them as cowards.

With hindsite it can be seen that the movement was and remains a paradoxiacal mixture of silly abstract ideology andcrude self interest. The Neo-conservative recipe for public action seemed to have been drawn directly from that of Mussolini, which turned on praise of free enterprise, insistence on the need to reduce beauracracy, suggestions that unemployment relief was part of the economic problem, sotto voce hints that social inequalities should be increased not removed, and an aggressive foreign policy.

By the early 1990's they had so successfully redrawn the intellectual map that whenever Liberals returned to power they spent their time mouthing Neo-conservative formulae. At the same time, a growing number of political parties appeared who were openly corporatist or Mussolinian. Thanks to the respectability given their ideology by the Neo-conservatives they could present themselves as moderate conservative reformers. They began to make serious political inroads in Canada, the United States, Germany and, of course, Italy. There, three parties drawn from the Mussolini mould triumphed in the 1994 general elction. No Neo-conservative movements elswhere in the West expressed dispair or concern.

All of this explained why the Neo-conservatives treat cynicism as a sign of wisdom. It is not unreasonable to place them amongst the last true MArxists, since they believe in the inevitability of class warfare, which they are certain they can win by provoking it while they are in power.

John Raulston Saul. The Doubters Companion: A Dictionary Of Aggressive Common Sense. p.220

Though a rabid Secular Humanist, I cannot recommend Sauls books enough.


"The Unconscious Civilization".

"Voltairs Bastards".

They are "5th Columnists" who are to DESTROY the so called Christian Conservative Right and ENERGISE the Left.

The neo-cons (FULL of internationalists types like Armitage, Wolfowitz, Brizinsky, Powel etc...anyone notice this?) are to destroy the U.S economy and usher in a reinvigorated so called "Left Wing" who will dismantle NOT ONE IOTA of the totalitarian apparatus put in by Bush. But they'll blame that nasty right wing for it.

09-17-2006, 09:12 PM
Although I can't find anything in print, I heard a talk show recently that stated that Lech Walesa was secretly a KGB agent.