View Full Version : Bill Maher: Gatekeeper or Coward?

10-22-2007, 04:37 PM
Bill Maher: Gatekeeper or Coward?

Soon after 9/11, Bill Maher lost his job on mainstream television for his remark about the relative cowardice of the alleged hijackers. I have to believe that he’s been warned that any further discussion of 9/11 that does not follow the official Bush/PNAC line will mean the end of his career. It seems that Bill Maher, like so many others, has his price.’

Maher is a comedian who hosts a weekly show on HBO that includes commentary and discussion about relevant political topics. He has no qualms about broaching very controversial matters and is an equal opportunity host to people across the political spectrum who apparently may discuss any issue OTHER THAN 9/11.

Bill Maher has unequivocally labeled as fools all people who raise any questions about the official story of 9/11. He has made his own acceptance of the Bush/PNAC line the last word on the topic. Anyone who would dare to differ is an idiot. Period.

Maher’s histrionics this past Saturday night - running into the audience to personally oust a non violent, albeit somewhat disruptive 9/11 protester - was one for the record books. It seems that he will talk to anyone, no matter how extreme or controversial, from Ann Coulter on, but has zero tolerance for anyone who questions the official explanation of what caused the towers to collapse.

Maher went so far as to say that on this single topic, of all the controversial outrages of this administration… on this ONE topic, he agrees with George Bush. Those were his exact words. Strange, but I don’t recall the President ever offering an explanation of how the towers came down in an averge of ten seconds. Maybe Maher had a private audience at the White House and knows something the rest of us do not. Sure.

You have to wonder why he would totally close the door to any possible discussion of the one event that made all the other horrors possible. Duh….

More in full article:

10-22-2007, 05:26 PM
To answer your question.


Just discussing with some people, the hecklers at his show the other night.

They were escorted out, but were there because of Maher's insistence on calling the 911 truth movers CRAZY.

They were attempting to seek air time on his show in order to present the reality of 911.

Obviously, this won't happen.

I have issue with Bill Maher in another regard.

He made light of the fact that Michael Jackson was a pedophile by saying during a comedy routine outside of his regular show, that if he had a choice as a young boy to be beat up on the playground or be jer*ed off by an older man, he'd prefer the latter.

Seems Maher perfers older men jerking him off rather than throwing a punch or two.

10-22-2007, 05:44 PM
Bill Maher is a political commentator.

The truth about 911 (i.e., that information which I'm sure Bill Maher and most other journalists have read about on the web and elsewhere by the 911 truth movers, intellectuals, researchers, independent reporters, etc.) will never be questioned by anyone within the media, political pundit or otherwise.

Maher's about the same as Chris Matthews.

A radio talk show host called Matthews a "right wing" tool the other night while on his show.

Matthew's was aghast.

They're all GATEKEEPERS.

Keeping their jobs and their luxurious lifestyles; their self importance, is more of a concern than the deep concern they express for America and her people as they sit like KINGS upon a throne each and every night.

10-23-2007, 03:35 PM
Highly Paid “Coward” - ??? - :-o :-o :-o

Highly Paid “Coward”. And the funny thing is that, if you see the videos they were showing in the background when he was talking about the (according to him) “ridiculous allegations” from “911 Truthers” – that the TWC buildings (all 3 of them) came down due to “Controlled Demolitions”, all of the footage looks the same, whether “controlled demolitions” or “WTC buildings on 911”.

Where is the “Inferno” they are talking about? Just a few floors of mostly ”deprived-of-oxygen black smoke”. The few flames that were there disappeared immediately, as the building started coming down at a speed faster than gravitational “free-fall”. Which means, (from a “physics” point of view) there was “no resistance” – in other words, the building itself, w/ all of it walls, steel beams, concrete, furniture, elevators, pipes, & more steel beams, provided “0”, “zero”, “zilch”, “nada”, “no resistance” whatsoever. Exactly what you’d expect from a “controlled demolition”.

7 CIA Veterans Challenge Official 911 Report

Thank God for "Freedom Of Speech"... An “Informed Citizen” makes a good “Patriot.”

10-23-2007, 04:31 PM
Highly paid Coward and Gatekeeper.

Sometimes one precipitates the other.