PDA

View Full Version : Barack Obama???


redrat11
03-08-2008, 11:51 PM
Before I write anything concerning Mr. Obama, and to that extent the 2008 Sham Elections, let me say this article about "Masonry" by Makow, is very well put.

savethemales.ca - Humanity is Under Occult Attack (http://www.henrymakow.com/humanity_in_the_twilight_zone.html)



Now I want you take a GOOD look at this photo of Mr. Obama. Do you discern anything in 'LIGHT' of the article I posted above?


<center>
<img src="http://i30.photobucket.com/albums/c307/reddog11/barack_obama.jpg" alt="Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting"><br><br>
<img src="http://i30.photobucket.com/albums/c307/reddog11/20070215ebony.jpg" alt="Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting"><br><br>
</center>


Now, if you've done your homework, you would see that the 'pose' Mr. Obama is in, is a very carefully orchestrated masonic pose. Now notice how the chairs in the background, and that 'light' up there do resemble a pyramid with a light up top. Do you discern?


So what is my point?

Well this Obama, poses a very challenging Question to me, and you might say, yeah what is that? Well, in 'light' of the Middle-East situation, does it not strike you that the Jews, and I will use that term, since I don't believe in the Illuminatti term,But anyway, the media, the political system, controlled by them, have seemingly propped this unknown figure to MONUMENTAL HEIGHTS would'nt you say? What does this all mean? My thought is they need this shill to do there dirty work in the Middle East, after all, George has ruined that all for them. With a muslim in the White House, and make no mistake about it, Obama is a stealth muslim, but still jew controlled, maybe, just maybe he can 'fool' Ahmadinejad into letting the NWO enter into that countries infrastructure, whether by 'cooperation' or by stealth means.


Think about it, why has this man been given over 100 million dollars in less than a year? There is a FANATISCISM out there for him, and what about his wife, A avowed Marxist, you see this is the core of the problems in this country, here you have a supposedly highly educated man and woman, you would think that after the last 30 years of seeing everything deteriate to a absurd level, that they would have simple solutions like Mr. Paul, but, no far from it, in fact I have'nt heard one substantive plan of anything from him have you? Why is there so much people enamored by him? Too think this man could be the next Prez??? Who knows, can he be worse than Bush? Or could he be a MOLE for the Arabs, he does have many ties there.

What about this strange lady>>>>Michelle<<<<


<object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/JSkd0xrhcQ8"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/JSkd0xrhcQ8" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object>




Very strange indeed



<object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/K1J54St7ZYY"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/K1J54St7ZYY" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object>

redrat11
03-10-2008, 08:49 PM
Barack Speaks...


<object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/Kf0x_TpDris"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/Kf0x_TpDris" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object>

redrat11
03-12-2008, 12:05 PM
Something fishy...



This may be related to the 'PYSCHE" of America, I don't know why but, this black NEW, New York Governor, who is replacing that idiot Spitzer guy, I suspect this is all designed to trigger a "allow Blacks to hold high office positions" in America, you know as Barack Obama as Prez...what other white official will be tossed out of office and replaced with a black one??hmmm::rolleyes: in the near future???.


Legislators have high hopes for Spitzer's successor - CNN.com (http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/03/12/paterson.bio/index.html)

redrat11
03-15-2008, 01:47 PM
The Obama 'Church'





<object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/MnPk9DyJimc&hl=en"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/MnPk9DyJimc&hl=en" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object>



<object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/dTwUWizPrNk&hl=en"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/dTwUWizPrNk&hl=en" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object>

redrat11
03-19-2008, 07:43 PM
Anti-Obama "Church"




'Mack' Daddy Obama

<object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/khuu-RhOBDU&hl=en"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/khuu-RhOBDU&hl=en" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object>









<object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/0HcPcg4JaeU&hl=en"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/0HcPcg4JaeU&hl=en" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object>




<object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/NkVEzQCvpWU&hl=en"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/NkVEzQCvpWU&hl=en" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object>




:rolleyes:



<object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/6Op5or_vkcc&hl=en"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/6Op5or_vkcc&hl=en" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object>

παράνοια
03-24-2008, 09:40 AM
Im very slightly drawn to red lights above the doors which resemble c4. I think the light at the top is a respresentation of allah and he is a blaintent rag head.

Shadow
03-24-2008, 10:58 AM
The women in those vidios look like they are aim to please!

Shadow
03-24-2008, 10:58 AM
I also think Michelle Obama is hawt!

παράνοια
03-24-2008, 11:02 AM
they are baracks 100 virgins

Shadow
03-24-2008, 12:00 PM
Does he really need 100?

παράνοια
03-25-2008, 04:43 AM
The koran demands it apparently.

Shadow
03-26-2008, 12:13 PM
Do they have to be "Obama girls"?

παράνοια
03-27-2008, 12:36 AM
They can be cheeky girls i suppose

Shadow
03-27-2008, 03:36 AM
I think your definition of "cheeky" may be different from ours!

redrat11
04-06-2008, 10:56 PM
Before I write anything concerning Mr. Obama, and to that extent the 2008 Sham Elections, let me say this article about "Masonry" by Makow, is very well put.

savethemales.ca - Humanity is Under Occult Attack (http://www.henrymakow.com/humanity_in_the_twilight_zone.html)



Now I want you take a GOOD look at this photo of Mr. Obama. Do you discern anything in 'LIGHT' of the article I posted above?


<center>
<img src="http://i30.photobucket.com/albums/c307/reddog11/barack_obama.jpg" alt="Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting"><br><br>
<img src="http://i30.photobucket.com/albums/c307/reddog11/20070215ebony.jpg" alt="Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting"><br><br>
</center>


Now, if you've done your homework, you would see that the 'pose' Mr. Obama is in, is a very carefully orchestrated masonic pose. Now notice how the chairs in the background, and that 'light' up there do resemble a pyramid with a light up top. Do you discern?


So what is my point?

Well this Obama, poses a very challenging Question to me, and you might say, yeah what is that? Well, in 'light' of the Middle-East situation, does it not strike you that the Jews, and I will use that term, since I don't believe in the Illuminatti term,But anyway, the media, the political system, controlled by them, have seemingly propped this unknown figure to MONUMENTAL HEIGHTS would'nt you say? What does this all mean? My thought is they need this shill to do there dirty work in the Middle East, after all, George has ruined that all for them. With a muslim in the White House, and make no mistake about it, Obama is a stealth muslim, but still jew controlled, maybe, just maybe he can 'fool' Ahmadinejad into letting the NWO enter into that countries infrastructure, whether by 'cooperation' or by stealth means.


Think about it, why has this man been given over 100 million dollars in less than a year? There is a FANATISCISM out there for him, and what about his wife, A avowed Marxist, you see this is the core of the problems in this country, here you have a supposedly highly educated man and woman, you would think that after the last 30 years of seeing everything deteriate to a absurd level, that they would have simple solutions like Mr. Paul, but, no far from it, in fact I have'nt heard one substantive plan of anything from him have you? Why is there so much people enamored by him? Too think this man could be the next Prez??? Who knows, can he be worse than Bush? Or could he be a MOLE for the Arabs, he does have many ties there.

What about this strange lady>>>>Michelle<<<<


<object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/JSkd0xrhcQ8"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/JSkd0xrhcQ8" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object>




Very strange indeed



<object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/K1J54St7ZYY"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/K1J54St7ZYY" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object>



<center>
<img src="http://i30.photobucket.com/albums/c307/reddog11/pentadollar.jpg" alt="Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting"><br><br>
</center>

Who Controls Obama?

Who (http://judicial-inc.biz/86who_is_%20obama.htm)




Pastor Manning on Obama


<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/RqA_v1fHsyk&hl=en"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/RqA_v1fHsyk&hl=en" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>








<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/rs_-fUDsVSU&hl=en"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/rs_-fUDsVSU&hl=en" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>


White Trash

<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/LA8z39Z8PJY&hl=en"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/LA8z39Z8PJY&hl=en" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>





<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/a-Wr7q27khE&hl=en"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/a-Wr7q27khE&hl=en" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>

redrat11
06-04-2008, 05:54 PM
Obama...Homosexual Allegations?/drug use





larry sinclair

<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/sVeFVtcdSYY&hl=en"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/sVeFVtcdSYY&hl=en" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>



http://www.rense.com/Datapages/sinclairdat.htm

KennyWally
06-05-2008, 12:31 PM
How could anyone in their right mind


vote for a candidate that was picked by the RNC or DNC, not

to mention the Bildergergs...






If I reciprocated ignoring barack the way RON PAUL is ignored

then I wouldn't be able to vent my spleen...



his color don't bother me, it's his cooperation with the globalists that bothers me

KennyWally
06-05-2008, 12:35 PM
BlueAngel


" They all are "

I heard Eustace Mullins say, that anyone you see on teevee

is considered safe by his handlers....in other words he is one of them.

The only way someone no longer gets heard any longer, is if they say something wrong.





Funny how, that simple truth, is so hard to believe by so many people.

redrat11
06-05-2008, 05:37 PM
Why are you so shocked that Obama is one of THEM?

They all are.

Every person who serves as Commander in Chief, President of the United State's of America is beholden to the agenda of their masters.

The "secret/shadow" government. Those behind the curtain. The puppet masters.

It has never been any different.

Period!

Every candidate for the Presidency promises to change everything that is wrong about America and the "sheeple" fall for their false promises because they simply do not understand that the Senate stands in the way of these promises.

The Senate is the major force within this country that keeps us STAGNANT.

Just the way the Powers that Be want it.

The reason most of them have been compromised, born and bred for their jobs and/or members of the very wealthy and elitist families, including the Illuminati and/or ties to these families, such as Obama who is a distant cousin of Cheney's.

BA, I'm not surprised, don't know why you say that, there's a REASON THE JEWS are using him as a puppet for Prez, I already wrote about that in the introductory of this thread. Also, coincidentally I read or heard somewhere that LINCOLN WAS A HOMOSEXUAL, the man who "SET THIS COUNTRY UP" for what we are witnessing today, Yes, I'm now convinced that that there has, nor ever will be a AUTHENTIC AMERICA FIRST PRESIDENT, WHO IS'NT beholden to the Satanic power Structure of the Jew/Zionist/Mason/Satanist of this world. If Lincoln had'nt authorized the MASSACRE OF HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF SECCESSIONIST from this SATANIC FEDERAL MASONIC UNION then none of the JEW timeline as I see happening could never unfold, Obama is a man possesed by DEMONS.

KennyWally
06-05-2008, 06:22 PM
""" If Lincoln had'nt authorized the MASSACRE OF HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF SECCESSIONIST from this SATANIC FEDERAL MASONIC UNION then none of the JEW timeline as I see happening could never unfold, """


Where did you read that?

I've just been reading about that very thing!!!!!

Are you reading "the real lincoln " too ?

Amazon.com: The Real Lincoln: A New Look at Abraham Lincoln, His Agenda, and an Unnecessary War: Thomas Dilorenzo: Books (http://www.amazon.com/Real-Lincoln-Abraham-Agenda-Unnecessary/dp/0761526463/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1212711694&sr=8-1)

redrat11
06-05-2008, 08:37 PM
""" If Lincoln had'nt authorized the MASSACRE OF HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF SECCESSIONIST from this SATANIC FEDERAL MASONIC UNION then none of the JEW timeline as I see happening could never unfold, """


Where did you read that?

I've just been reading about that very thing!!!!!

Are you reading "the real lincoln " too ?

Amazon.com: The Real Lincoln: A New Look at Abraham Lincoln, His Agenda, and an Unnecessary War: Thomas Dilorenzo: Books (http://www.amazon.com/Real-Lincoln-Abraham-Agenda-Unnecessary/dp/0761526463/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1212711694&sr=8-1)

I was just recalling some stuff about Lincoln I read along time ago Kenny Wally. Lincoln was a COLD BLOODED KILLER, he knew damm well that the seccionist movement from the South would hinder the Jewish Timeline, he is GUILTY OF THE MURDERS OF OVER 4OO,OOO PEOPLE from the South, A heinous American Tyrant if there ever was one, he makes all the rest of the MASONS AND SATANIST in power seem tame by comparison, it's interesting to dig into the peoples thoughts from that time frame in the South, most people knew that the North was EVIL.

redrat11
08-01-2008, 04:29 PM
THE BRAINDEAD (CULT) FOLLOWERS/SUPPORTERS OF BARACK OBAMA



Barack has these people under some spell...here he says kindergarden children should be taught SEX EDUCATION 5 year old children.

<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/4pO1dIKgfPw&hl=en&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/4pO1dIKgfPw&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>






here is his official website

Welcome to Obama for America (http://www.barackobama.com/splash/)


Here Barack (the muslim agent) does'nt salute the flag, like the rest of the Americans, remember he's no American, he's a citizen of the world.

<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/hU9iCANi02o&hl=en&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/hU9iCANi02o&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>



here he says he wants to steal money from Oil companies profits and give everyone some of that money.

Barack Obama | Obama HQ Blogger: Barack Obama's Emergency Economic Plan (http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/stateupdates/gG5klN)



Barack Obama is a moron, plain and simple. here he thinks he's some MESSIAH of the world it seems.

Barack Obama | Change We Can Believe In | Barack Obama's Speech in Berlin (http://my.barackobama.com/page/content/berlinvideo/)



here is his cult of moron followers


<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/nP7lUGn7HWk&hl=en&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/nP7lUGn7HWk&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>



cult


<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/PNJ-T1GSkTs&hl=en&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/PNJ-T1GSkTs&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>



the new age messiah

YouTube - Barack Obama the Messiah chosen child SAVIOR Bible Prophecy (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VNFNG3AG0_g)

<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/VNFNG3AG0_g&hl=en&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/VNFNG3AG0_g&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>

redrat11
08-01-2008, 07:20 PM
I don't believe Obama ever said the word kindergartners.

Excerpt:

"But it’s the right thing to do," Obama continued, "to provide age-appropriate sex education, science-based sex education in schools."

Political Radar: Sex Ed for Kindergarteners 'Right Thing to Do,' Says Obama (http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalradar/2007/07/sex-ed-for-kind.html)



He did'nt have to say kindergardners, everyone but you gets the 'jist' of his message. The PTB purposely destroyed this nation UNDER G.W.Bush the last 8 years, this to "set-up" a FAR LEFT WING MARXIST like Obama, to usher in a 'Savior' or Messiah, this to further there aims of destroying not only the Constitution, but the independence of America itself, in that respect G.W. Bush did his job FOR THEM (the PTB) just splendid. I believe the street term for this would be "knock em down, set em up."





























NOTE: The first Bush in the White House, George Herbert Walker Bush, also laid the foundation(the first "GULF WAR",and a terrible economy) for FAR LEFT WING MARXIST Bill Clinton to reign as the "savior" or messiah for eight years, where-in he sold out America to NAFTA and the World Trade Organization, as well as opening the floodgates of illegal immigration.

Ozziecynic
08-31-2008, 05:10 AM
Having read about the Maitreya in Theosophical beliefs. I have reason to believe this man could be the son of perdition. Already he seems to be promising many wonders and the typical american seems to be lapping it all up. And no I am not racist however if you think I am too bad.:cool:

Ozziecynic
09-04-2008, 06:21 AM
:confused: O.k i take that back i was way too harsh on obama i would much rather the US to have its first Black president than some gun toting redneck loon women from hicksville whom would lead the world in www3. Plus her family cant keep the high moral values she expects of everyone else in regards to her daughter a true example of Republican hypocrisy. Whom ever is running the star spangled empire looks like the future belongs the the United States of Ordo Secularum bad news for all whether they realise it or not!.:(

redrat11
09-08-2008, 09:06 PM
:confused: O.k i take that back i was way too harsh on obama i would much rather the US to have its first Black president than some gun toting redneck loon women from hicksville whom would lead the world in www3. Plus her family cant keep the high moral values she expects of everyone else in regards to her daughter a true example of Republican hypocrisy. Whom ever is running the star spangled empire looks like the future belongs the the United States of Ordo Secularum bad news for all whether they realise it or not!.:(


Ozzie, Barack is one CROOKED MFer, he is entirely a product of the Chicago political machinery, if your not familiar with american politics, Chicago is and always has been the most CORRUPT city in America, here are some links you might find worth reading about Obamas ties to scumbags.


Obama ties to terrorist


Wake up America: Barack Obama Dogged by Terrorist Ties (http://wwwwakeupamericans-spree.blogspot.com/2008/04/barack-obama-dogged-by-terrorist-ties.html)


Records Of Obama’s Ties To Terrorist Withheld

Wed, 08/20/2008 - 11:07 — Judicial Watch Blog (http://www.judicialwatch.org/user/judicial-watch-blog) A state-funded university in Illinois is withholding crucial documents that could shed more light on Barack Obama’s close ties to a domestic terrorist who planted bombs in the Capitol, Pentagon and other government buildings to protest U.S. policy.
In an apparent cover up, the University of Illinois at Chicago (http://www.uic.edu/index.html/) (UIC) refuses to make public hundreds of files that document the Democratic presidential candidate’s decades-long relationship with William Ayers, a Vietnam-era radical and former fugitive from U.S. justice who has proudly admitted setting the bombs in the 1970s.
Ayers, a member of the domestic terrorist group Weather Underground, is currently a professor at UIC and the school’s library—named after Chicago’s former longtime corrupt Democrat Mayor Richard J. Daley—houses 132 boxes containing nearly 1,000 folders of records relating to Obama’s ties to Ayers, various radical organizations and other questionable political allies.
Ayers and his wife, a fellow Weather Underground terrorist, have long supported and collaborated with Obama, donating money to his campaign and hosting fundraising events at their home. The Illinois senator and aging radical hang out in the same political and social circles, live in the same Chicago neighborhood and for years served on the board of a renowned Chicago nonprofit.
The mainstream media has largely ignored this quite relevant relationship, but one journalist (http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=MTgwZTVmN2QyNzk2MmUxMzA5OTg0ODZlM2Y2OGI0NDM=&w=MA==) has tried (unsuccessfully) to access the crucial files because they will reveal Obama’s personal, financial and ideological ties with Ayers as well as other radical groups. After all, Obama could be the next commander-in-chief and Americans have the right to know.
After initially agreeing to make the files public, the school reneged claiming that the mystery donor—believed to be Ayers—who provided the collection refuses to make the information public. The UIC professor in charge of the library’s special collections department later provided a rather bizarre explanation for the sudden change of heart by saying that it has come to the school’s attention that there is “restricted” material in the collection.
Americans learned of Obama’s scary relationship (http://www.judicialwatch.org/blog/obama-forced-address-terrorist-ties) with Ayers just a few months ago despite his campaign’s efforts to distance him from the renowned terrorist. After planting the bombs, Ayers was a fugitive from U.S. justice for a decade and his group was officially labeled a terrorist group by the FBI.
None of this stopped Obama from joining forces with the Chicago radical who launched a successful grass roots effort to spearhead the senator’s thriving political career. Now the details of this alarming relationship, kept at a taxpayer-financed university, are being withheld from Americans.

Records Of Obama’s Ties To Terrorist Withheld | Judicial Watch (http://www.judicialwatch.org/blog/2008/aug/records-obama-s-ties-terrorist-withheld)



TONY REZCO AND OBAMA???


Barack Obama and Tony Rezco's Chicago real-estate connection could spell trouble for the candidate | World news | guardian.co.uk (http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2008/feb/04/usa.uselections20081)


YouTube - Sen. Obama, Rev. Wright, Tony Rezco, and Friends (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RdyMfj3bDgs)


OBAMA VOWS TO DISARM AMERICA???



B. Hussein Obama Vows to DISARM America's Military - Video - In his own words folks. (http://www.godlikeproductions.com/forum1/message564329/pg1)


Obama Vows To Disarm America (http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?PHPSESSID=fd03657e74b2538326b4789ca4e207 0b&topic=218127.0)

Leonardo
09-08-2008, 09:14 PM
Having read about the Maitreya in Theosophical beliefs. I have reason to believe this man could be the son of perdition. Already he seems to be promising many wonders and the typical american seems to be lapping it all up. And no I am not racist however if you think I am too bad.:cool:

So you're saying that Barack Obama could be the Maitreya son of Perdition?


WON'T SOMEBODY GIVE A NIGGA A CHANCE!

P.S. Oh come on, people, that was joke..

redrat11
09-08-2008, 09:41 PM
:confused: O.k i take that back i was way too harsh on obama i would much rather the US to have its first Black president than some gun toting redneck loon women from hicksville whom would lead the world in www3. Plus her family cant keep the high moral values she expects of everyone else in regards to her daughter a true example of Republican hypocrisy. Whom ever is running the star spangled empire looks like the future belongs the the United States of Ordo Secularum bad news for all whether they realise it or not!.:(



Here are some links to show that Barack is a corrupt A-hole.

Tony Rezko
8 things you need to know about Obama, Rezko :: CHICAGO SUN-TIMES :: The Watchdogs (http://www.suntimes.com/news/watchdogs/757340,CST-NWS-watchdog24.article)



Obama ties to terrorist

Wake up America: Barack Obama Dogged by Terrorist Ties (http://wwwwakeupamericans-spree.blogspot.com/2008/04/barack-obama-dogged-by-terrorist-ties.html)



Obama vows to disarm America


B. Hussein Obama Vows to DISARM America's Military - Video - In his own words folks. (http://www.godlikeproductions.com/forum1/message564329/pg1)


Obama Vows To Disarm America (http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?topic=218127.0)



If your not familiar with Chicago politics OZZIE, its the most corrrupt city in america, Obama is a product of that system.



Obamas brother he does'nt care about???

BARACK BROTHER IN SHACK SHOCK - New York Post (http://www.nypost.com/seven/08212008/news/nationalnews/barack_brother_in_shack_shock_125404.htm)

Leonardo
09-08-2008, 10:11 PM
Well, you have to ask yourself one question, will Obama be any worse than McCain. All the rebublicans already know McCain is a total fraud. And since Obama has better teeth, nice suits, and a great haircut, I don't see why he shouldn't be the Facilitator in Chief.

--Fra

redrat11
09-08-2008, 10:30 PM
I listened to the video titled:

OBAMA VOWS TO DISARM AMERICA

AND

I didn't hear him say this in his own words.

Please provide the quote.

Thanks.

At the end of the video he said that he vows to use our military to protect America.

He spoke about the military and the steps he would take to cut wasteful spending, but, like I said, I did not hear him say he would disarm the military.

Do you know how ridiculous that statement sounds?



just remember though BA, the MSM main stream media is subtly implanting the message into peoples minds that if they don't vote for Obama, that this is reason to suspect that your a racist person, You mark my words here, Obama loses and jew controlled blacks like Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson will try to forment race riots in magor cities, America is being set up to be labeled as a racist nation by the PTB.

redrat11
09-08-2008, 11:51 PM
You're deflecting.

My point is that the youtube video title is DISINFORMATION.


Regardless, Obama will, along with Feinstein(CA),Boxer(CA) Schumer(NY) Kennedy(MA) and the rest of the gun control skunks in Congress Disarm America, Hillary Clinton by comparison, is conservative compared to this Obama creature, Obama is even more dangerous than McCain to civil liberties, just look at all the info he has REFUSED to answer about his "backers."

Ozziecynic
09-09-2008, 01:44 AM
So you're saying that Barack Obama could be the Maitreya son of Perdition?


:cool:Could be I havent entirely made up my mind on this guy!. He seems to promise the US and the world many wonders and also promises PEACE MAN and PROSPERITY dont they all!. You know the anti christ is meant to be a man of Peace and deception on the one hand however bringing war and pestalence on the other which is kind of what Bill Clinton was like so he could fit the bill who knows but then so could someone like pallin maybe shes the Harlot of babylon.
On another note i wonder what happend to this mysterious Ron Paul fellow that american conspiracy boffins keep hammering on about he seems to have disappeared into his texan dust bowl. Not that we have heard of him much over here Aus the guy had never been in the mainstream media and still isnt a little strange that dont you think!.:confused:

Leonardo
09-09-2008, 01:53 AM
:cool:Could be I havent entirely made up my mind on this guy!. He seems to promise the US and the world many wonders and also promises PEACE MAN and PROSPERITY dont they all!. You know the anti christ is meant to be a man of Peace a deception on the one hand however bringing war and pestalence on the other which is kind of what Bill Clinton was like so he could fit the bill who knows but then so could someone like pallin maybe shes the Harlot of babylon.
On another note i wonder what happend to this mysterious Ron Paul fellow that american conspiracy boffins keep hammering on about he seems to have disappeared into his texan dust bowl. Not that we have heard of him much over here Aus the guy had never been in the mainstream media and still isnt a little strange that dont you think!.:confused:

I have no idea what happened to Ron Paul. He just dropped off the face of the earth. Anyway, I'm not voting this year. It's all a sham. I'm just looking for a girlfriend.

I think I might go to Pennsilvania and look among the Amish. I not sure, but when I was in Pennsylvania last time I saw some really pretty quaker ladies. Maybe I could join them and work on the farm for a while and marry some girl named Rachel or something.

As far as the elections, I really couldn't care less anymore. It's not just me, it's my entire family. I always thought I was the black sheep of the family. But at the family reunion this year all everyone was talking about was the trilateralists and the elections sham.

I guess all my work really did pay off. I actually convinced people whom I thought were beyond convincing.

But I'm not going to worry about the Illuminati. I'm just worrying about keeping myself faithful, paying my bills, and finding a beautiful and lovely woman to make my bride so I can bang her everyday till the day I die.

redrat11
09-09-2008, 05:32 AM
Regardless!

Are you kidding me?

Do you watch or read anything you post before you post it?

I'm not defending any of our politicians, but to post something that is completely FALSE is not what you should be doing if you are, in fact, a conspiracy theorist who seeks to impart the TRUTH about our corrupt government.

You posted a youtube link wherein the title states that Obama will disarm the US military and HE NEVER SAID THIS.


What don't You understand about GUN CONTROL STUPID IDIOT???
Gun Law News - Barack Obama (http://www.gunlawnews.org/Senators/Barack-Obama.html)


Barack Obama -- GOA 2008 Presidential Candidates and the Second Amendment (http://www.gunowners.org/pres08/obama.htm)
who cares whether a utube link did'nt impart the information of disarmment of the military, but if you had as much knowledge as me in this area, you would know the State department and the NWO have been trying to disarm all guns from citizens across the world, private ownership of guns here in america has been a TOP PRIORITY for idiots like Obama.


Nobody else on this forum even comes close to posting things about our corrupt government, take a look around moron, you have a shill posting garbage about new age/new world order religous beliefs, along with your stupid garbage, then the guy from down under trying to not be (offensive) so he wishes Obama to be president, despite monumental info I've posted about his NWO ideals, Again BA, I say to U>>>>>F..U and the horse you rode in on.:)

redrat11
09-09-2008, 06:02 AM
Obama the fool..


The Democrats endorse the "Global War on Terrorism": Obama "goes after" Osama (http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=9995)






______________________________________
Obama's "American Promise" is War.
Barack Obama has embraced the "Global War on Terrorism" (GWOT).
The Obama-Biden campaign has endorsed the very foundations of the Bush administration's foreign policy agenda: "Go after Osama bin Laden, "take him out".
<B>The rhetoric is softer but the substance is almost identical:
"For while Senator McCain was turning his sights to Iraq just days after 9/11, I stood up and opposed this war, knowing that it would distract us from the real threats we face. When John McCain said we could just “muddle through” in Afghanistan, I argued for more resources and more troops to finish the fight against the terrorists who actually attacked us on 9/11, and made clear that we must take out Osama bin Laden and his lieutenants if we have them in our sights. John McCain likes to say that he’ll follow bin Laden to the Gates of Hell – but he won’t even go to the cave where he lives. [APPLAUSE]
</B>
And today, as my call for a time frame to remove our troops from Iraq has been echoed by the Iraqi government and even the Bush Administration, even after we learned that Iraq has a $79 billion surplus while we’re wallowing in deficits, John McCain stands alone in his stubborn refusal to end a misguided war.
That’s not the judgment we need. That won’t keep America safe. We need a President who can face the threats of the future, not keep grasping at the ideas of the past." (The American Promise, August 28, 2008, Democratic Convention. Denver (http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=9988), emphasis added)
The 9/11 Cover-up
The Democrats have endorsed the "Big Lie". Bin Laden is upheld as the "outside enemy" who threatens the American Homeland. The fact that bin Laden is a US sponsored intelligence asset, created and sustained by the CIA, is never mentioned.
<B>The Obama campaign galvanizes public support for the "Global War on Terrorism" (GWOT). In the words of Obama's running mate, Joe Biden:
"The fact of the matter is, al-Qaida and the Taliban - the people who have actually attacked us on 9/11 [note: exactly the same wording as in the Obama speech] -- they've regrouped in the mountains between Afghanistan and Pakistan and are plotting new attacks. And the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff has echoed Barack's call for more troops and John McCain was wrong and Barack Obama was right." (Joe Biden, Democratic Convention, Denver, August 27, 2008, emphasis added)
</B>
In contrast to Iraq, the war on Afghanistan is portrayed by the Obama-Biden campaign as a "Just War", a war of retribution initiated in October 2001 in response to the 9/11 attacks.
This concept of the "Just War" in relation to Afghanistan has been echoed by several prominent Liberal and "Progressive" intellectuals: The war on Iraq, on the other hand, is seen as an "illegal war". In October 2001, the attack on Afghanistan was supported by numerous civil society organizations on humanitarian grounds.
It is by no means coincidental that the prominent "Leftist" scholars and intellectuals, who failed to address the use of the 9/11 attacks as a pretext to wage war, have expressed their support for Barack Obama. The Nation Magazine and Progressive Democrats for America (http://pdamerica.org/) are indelibly behind the Obama-Biden ticket.
The Obama-Biden campaign has endorsed the 9/11 cover-up. Without a shred of evidence, Afghanistan, a nation of 34 million people (the size of Canada), is portrayed as the State sponsor of the 9/11 attacks. This basic premise is accepted by the Democrats.
Obama indelibly upholds 9/11 as an act of war and aggression directed against America, thereby justifying a war of retribution directed against "Islamic terrorists" and their state sponsors.

The "Global War on Terrorism" (GWOT) is the product of a carefully designed military-intelligence agenda, which determines the thrust of US foreign policy.

GWOT is endorsed by both Republicans and Democrats. US intelligence overrides party politics. GWOT is part of the presidential campaign platform of both political parties. Its validity is not questioned, nor are its consequences. The fact that it is predicated on a "Big Lie" is not an issue.
Spiraling Defense Spending
Both Barack Obama and John McCain have signaled that they will increase overall defense spending, while also revamping the system of Pentagon procurement with a view to reducing cost overruns. (See Bloomberg, June 30, 2008 (http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=adXiGrYSU5PA&refer=home) See also Reuters, August 29, 2008 (http://uk.reuters.com/article/topNews/idUKMOL95454020080829)).
For FY 2009, the US Defense Department is asking for a $515 billion defense budget plus a separate $70 billion "to cover war costs into the early months of a new administration... Those amounts combined would represent the highest level of military spending since the end of World War II (adjusted for inflation)." (csmonitor.com February 06, 2008) (http://www.csmonitor.com/2008/0206/p02s02-usmi.html)

<B>Obama's message is crystal clear. He endorses the Bush administration's proposed surge in military spending. He wants to spend more money on weapons and troops. Going after bin Laden and the "Global War on Terrorism" constitute his main justification for increased defense spending:
"[M]ore resources and more troops to finish the fight against the terrorists who actually attacked us on 9/11..."
</B>
<B>But at the same time, Obama promises more resources for education and health.
"Now is the time to finally meet our moral obligation to provide every child a world-class education, ... I’ll invest in early childhood education. I’ll recruit an army of new teachers, and pay them higher salaries and give them more support. ...
</B>
Now is the time to finally keep the promise of affordable, accessible health care for every single American.... (The American Promise, August 28, 2008, Democratic Convention. Denver (http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=9988), emphasis added)
http://www.globalresearch.ca/articlePictures/DiscFY2004Pie.gif

Will there be a shift in spending priorities?

Under the Bush administration, Defense was favored in relation to all other expenditure categories. (See Chart above for FY 2004). Will an Obama administration change the structure of Federal government expenditure?

Will he reduce the absolute size of defense spending which constitutes approximately 47 percent of global defense spending (all countries combined)? The US NATO combined control 70% of global defense spending. (See Chart below)

http://www.globalresearch.ca/articlePictures/military_spending_pie_chart.gif
Guns versus Butter

Visibly Barack Obama does understand the Guns versus Butter dilemma.
He fails to address a fundamental macro-economic relationship, namely the issue of public investment in the war economy versus the funding, through tax dollars, of civilian social programs. More broadly, this also raises the issue of the role of the US Treasury and the US monetary system, in relentlessly financing the military industrial complex and the Middle East war at the expense of most sectors of civilian economic activity.
http://www.globalresearch.ca/articlePictures/gunsbutter.gif



More resources to war and weapons, as proposed by both Obama and McCain, favors the Big Five Defense Contractors (Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grunman, Raytheon, Boeing and General Dynamics), Dick Cheney's Halliburton, British Aerospace, not to mention Blackwater, MPRI et al, at the expense of the civilian sectors, including national, regional and local level economies.
Military Spending Creates Unemployment
Tax dollars allocated, as promised by Obama, to National Defense and Homeland Security will result in unemployment.
In contrast to World War II, the war economy in the 21st Century does not create jobs.
The costs of creating jobs in the military industrial complex are abysmally high when compared to the civilian sectors. In turn, the financial resources channeled by the US government to the DoD defense contractors dramatically reduces public expenditure in favor of all other spending categories.
Lockeed Martin together with Northrop Grumman have been involved in developing the Joint Fighter program (http://www.jsf.mil/news/). Based on initial estimates, 5400 direct jobs were created at a unit cost of $37 million per job. (See Michel Chossudovsky, War is Good for Business, Global Research, September 16, 2001 (http://www.globalresearch.ca/articles/CHO109D.html)). Similarly at Boeing's assembly plant, each job created in the Joint Strike Fighter program costs US taxpayers $66.7 million. (Seattle Post-Intelligencer, 7 September 2001).
With regard to the F22 Raptor fighter, (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/F-22_Raptor)assembled at Lockheed Martin Marietta's plant in Georgia, the F22 Raptor fighters was estimated to have a unit cost of $85 million. Three thousand (3000) direct jobs were to be created at an estimated cost of $20 million a job. (Ibid) The cost of the program once completed in 2005 was of the order of 62 billion dollars. According to 2008 company figures, roughly 2000 jobs remain tied to the production of the F22. (See Free Republic, March 2008 (http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1983939/posts)). Two Thousand Jobs created at the Lockheed-Marietta's plant in Georgia at an initial outlay of 31 million dollars per job.
Imagine how many jobs you could create with 31 million dollars invested in small and medium sized enterprises across America.
http://www.globalresearch.ca/articlePictures/F-22.jpg
These post 9/11 defense expenditures by the Bush administration trigger mass unemployment. Moreover, they are funded by downsizing America's social programs, which in turn contributes to exacerbating the levels of poverty and unemployment.
Obama's War Economy
The Obama campaign accepts the logic of a war economy which triggers unemployment and poverty at home while creating death and destruction in the Middle East war theater.
This post 9/11 direction of the US economy has lined the pockets of a handful of defense contractors corporations, while contributing very marginally to the rehabilitation of the employment of specialized scientific, technical and professional workers laid-off by the civilian economy.
Not surprisingly, the defense contractors, while favoring John McCain are also firm supporter of Barack Obama.

<B>America's largest military contractor Lockheed Martin (and business partner of Dick Cheney's Halliburton) was present at the Denver Democratic Party Convention, among a vast array of powerful corporate sponsors and lobby groups. According to a company spokesperson:
“Lockheed Martin strongly supports our nation’s political process and candidates that support in general national defense, homeland security, high technology and educational initiatives,” (quoted by Bill van Auken, Democrats convene in Denver amid police state security and a sea of corporate cash, Global Research, August 2008)
</B>
The Big Lie
The Obama lies are perhaps more subtle than those of George W. But again in substance, we are dealing with a continuum.
The "Global War on Terrorism" is an integral part of the Obama campaign. "Islamic terrorists" threaten the American way of life. Al Qaeda and its alleged State sponsors are portrayed as the main threat at home and abroad.
The corporate media applauds.
No shift in direction.

The doctrine of preemptive war directed against "Islamic terrorists" and their State sponsors remains functionally intact.

The same applies to the post 9/11 nuclear weapons doctrine as first formulated in the 2002 Nuclear Posture Review (NPR). Nuclear weapons are on the drawing board of the Pentagon, for use in the Middle East war theater. And the Democrats are fully supportive of preemptive nuclear weapons as a means to protect the American Homeland.
Under the "Global War on Terrorism", the Homeland Security apparatus, not to mention the anti-terrorist Patriot legislation, the Big Brother surveillance apparatus would, under a Barack Obama administration, remain intact.

9/11 constitutes for Obama the main justification for waging a humanitarian war in the Middle East and Central Asia. In this regard, his position does not differ from that of the Bush Administration.
Withdraw from Iraq, but remain in Afghanistan.
Bring the troops back from Iraq. Move them to Afghanistan.

<B>Confront Iran, challenge Russia:
"I will end this war in Iraq responsibly, and finish the fight against al Qaeda and the Taliban in Afghanistan. I will rebuild our military to meet future conflicts. But I will also renew the tough, direct diplomacy that can prevent Iran from obtaining nuclear weapons and curb Russian aggression. I will build new partnerships to defeat the threats of the 21st century: terrorism and nuclear proliferation; poverty and genocide; climate change and disease. And I will restore our moral standing, so that America is once again that last, best hope for all who are called to the cause of freedom, who long for lives of peace, and who yearn for a better future.
</B>
These are the policies I will pursue. And in the weeks ahead, I look forward to debating them with John McCain." (The American Promise, August 28, 2008, Democratic Convention. Denver (http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=9988), emphasis added)
"Finishing the fight against Al Qaeda and the Taliban" means extending the "Global War on Terrorism" (GWOT) into new frontiers.

Concretely, the GWOT, which is central to the Obama campaign, provides a pretext and justification for waging a war of conquest, for expanding US influence in the Middle East, Central Asia, Sub-Saharan Africa and South East Asia.
Obama-Biden and The "New Cold War"
The Obama-Biden campaign is committed to reinforcing US-NATO military presence on the Iran-Afghan border, as well as on Afghanistan's border with China's Xinjiang Uigur autonomous region as well as within Pakistan.
Afghanistan is a strategic hub in Central Asia bordering on Iran, the former Soviet Union, China and Pakistan. It is a land bridge and potential oil and gas pipeline corridor which links the Caspian sea basin to the Arabian sea. It is also part of the continued process of militarization and encirclement of the People's Republic of China.
The Obama-Biden campaign has also endorsed the "New Cold War". Russia is explicitly identified in Obama's speech as an Aggressor. Iran is identified as nuclear threat, despite ample evidence to the contrary.
<B>Joe Biden, who if elected, would take over from Dick Cheney, considers Russia, China and India as the main threat to America's National Security:
The Bush foreign policy has dug us into a very deep hole, with very few friends to help us climb out. And for the last seven years, the administration has failed to face the biggest the biggest forces shaping this century. The emergence of Russia, China and India's great powers, the spread of lethal weapons, the shortage of secure supplies of energy, food and water. The challenge of climate change and the resurgence of fundamentalism in Afghanistan and Pakistan, the real central front in the war on terror.
</B>
Ladies and gentlemen, in recent years and in recent days we once again see the consequences of the neglect, of this neglect, of Russia challenging the very freedom of a new democratic country of Georgia. Barack and I will end that neglect. We will hold Russia accountable for its action and we will help Georgia rebuild. I have been on the ground in Georgia, Iraq, Pakistan, Afghanistan, and I can tell you in no uncertain terms, this administration's policy has been an abysmal failure. America cannot afford four more years of this failure. (Democratic Party convention, August 27, 2008 (http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=9975), emphasis added)
The militarization of Afghanistan and Pakistan under the GWOT is directed against two overlapping military alliances: the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) (http://www.sectsco.org/home.asp?LanguageID=2) and the Collective Security Treaty Organization (CSTO) (http://www.dkb.gov.ru/start/index.htm).
The SCO is a military alliance between Russia and China and several Central Asian former Soviet republics including Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan and Uzbekistan. Iran has observer status in the SCO.
The Collective Security Treaty Organization (CSTO) (http://www.dkb.gov.ru/start/index.htm), which plays a key geopolitical role in relation to transport and energy corridors, operates in close liaison with the SCO. The CSTO regroups the following member states: Armenia, Belarus, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Russia, Tajikistan and Uzbekistan.
For Obama-Biden, the war on Iran is still on. The New Cold War is directed against China, Russia and its allies, namely the SCO-CSTO military alliance.
In other words, the Democrats have endorsed the New Cold War
What Prospects under an Obama Presidency?

Apart from the rhetoric of "bringing the troops home" from war torn Iraq, which may or may be carried out, what distinguishes the Democrats from the Republicans?
A more articulate, knowledgeable and charismatic President?
A more dignified and diplomatic approach to US foreign policy?

An opportunity to the US ruling elite "to present a different face to the world that could revive illusions in its democratic pretensions, not only internationally but within the United States as well." (Patrick Martin, Tensions rise in Democratic contest as Obama nears nomination, (http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=8947)Global Research, May 11, 2008)
A spurious and counterfeit "humanitarian" approach to Empire, which serves to mask the truth and gain popular support.
A less reckless Commander in Chief, who has an understanding of geopolitics and is capable of taking foreign policy decisions.

A more carefully thought out military agenda than that experienced during the Bush administration? But with no substantive shift in direction.
A means to quelling mounting dissent and opposition to the ruling corporate establishment by providing the illusion that the Democrats constitute a Real Alternative.
A means to sustaining the illusion that African-Americans can move up the social ladder in America and that their fundamental rights are being upheld.
A means to undermining real progressive movements by further embedding civil society organizations, trade unions, grass-roots organizations not to mention "Leftist" intellectuals into the realm of the Democratic Party.
A distraction from the extensive war crimes committed under successive US administrations.

A "human face" to war and globalization?

________________________________________



Joe Biden Zionist...


Joe Biden's record on US wars (http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=9994)



Biden - Warmonger, Wordmonger And Political Hit Man (http://www.rense.com/general83/biden.htm)




<DT><CENTER>Motormouth Joe Biden -
Warmonger, Wordmonger
And Political Hit Man
By Webster G. Tarpley
8-25-8</CENTER>
<DT><CENTER></CENTER><DT><CENTER><TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width=555 border=0><TBODY><TR><TD vAlign=top width="100%"><DL><DT>WASHINGTON DC -- The vice presidential candidate chosen to run with Obama is Senator Joe Biden of Delaware, a discredited, sleazy, and shopworn political hack -- and therefore an anti-climax for all the callow and feckless youth who got the word via text message at 3am in the morning. The ability of the Trilateral-Bilderberg machine which controls Obama to put up a person like Biden already reflects the further degradation of US political life over the past 9-12 months, largely as a result of Obama's own demagogic, no- issues, personality cult agitation. <DT><DT>A year ago, there was wide agreement in the US middle class that Bush and Cheney should be impeached, that the police state be rolled back, and that the Iraq war should be ended as soon as physically possible. Thanks largely to the advent of the vapid and messianic Obama, these issues have now been thoroughly deflated. Biden is himself an incurable warmonger who voted for the Iraq war and blathered ceaselessly in favor of Bush's aggressive adventure to all who would listen. Naming Biden is a brutal insult to the antiwar majority of the Democratic Party, and Obama is obviously hoping that the Iraq war issue is dead, so nobody will care. Last year, Obama promised that he would work against the mentality that produced Iraq; if anyone incarnates that mentality, it is Biden. Biden is an incurable imperialist and an eager advocate of the discredited Bush-Cheney "war on terror." He even tried to use one of the Democratic debates last year to whip up hysteria in favor of attacking Sudan over the Darfur issue, and with some success. "I went there. I sat in the borders. I went in those camps. They're going to have thousands and thousands and thousands of people die. We've got to stop talking and act," Biden postured in Manchester New Hampshire on June 3, 2007 in an apparent call for bombing Sudan, a coup in Khartoum, or an invasion. Incredibly, the crowd applauded wildly. <DT><DT>Biden remains convinced that it is up to the United States to dictate the form of government and economic system of virtually every country in the world. His specialty is blatant interference in the internal affairs of sovereign states, with left-cover of soft power issues like human rights and humanitarian concerns furnishing his favorite pretexts. Biden has learned nothing from the Iraq debacle except that Iraq was not the right victim; more appropriate victims and more effective methods will have to be found, argues Biden. The real lesson of Iraq (and Lebanon 2006) is that US-British imperialism and world domination are finished historically, but this is lost on Biden. <DT><DT>Biden is the author of the odious plan to balkanize, partition, and subdivide Iraq into three zones: a Kurdish state designed to carve up Iran, Syria and Turkey as well as Iraq; a landlocked and oil- poor Sunni desert entity; and an oil-rich Shiastan in the south that might absorb the Arabistan or Achwaz province of Iran is a later breakup scenario for Iran. Biden's plan is a continuation of the Bernard Lewis plan to break up the existing states of the Middle East in a way destined to create a mosaic of pseudo- independent, squabbling mini-states or micro-states. This approach places Biden squarely behind the Zbigniew Brzezinski "dignity" doctrine of breaking up the existing nation states of the world in favor of a crazy quilt of micro-states based on ethnic and religious parochialism and particularism; not one of these micro- states could stand up to Exxon-Mobil or JP Morgan Chase. <DT><DT>BIDEN IS MORALLY INSANE ON GEORGIA <DT><DT>Biden's ample track record as an agent provocateur against Russia goes back more than a decade to the time he mobilized his mouth to help demonize Milosevic of Serbia as part of the Albright-Holbrooke- Wesley Clark anti-Russian campaign of those years, which ended with the NATO bombing of Serbia, an act of unprecedented historical vandalism. In the past week, warmonger Biden has rushed to the side of the latest tin pot mini-Mussolini of the Brzezinski-Soros faction, the infamous war criminal and gangster Mikhail Saakashvili of Georgia. "I left the country convinced that Russia's invasion of Georgia may be the one of the most significant events to occur in Europe since the end of communism," raved Biden on his return, documenting his own moral insanity by siding with the aggressor. "The claims of Georgian atrocities that provided the pretext for Russia's invasion are rapidly being disproved by international observers, and the continuing presence of Russian forces in the country has severe implications for the broader region," added the Orwellian senator. <DT><DT>BIDEN: $1 BILLION FOR MADMAN SAAKASHVILI <DT><DT>In presenting Biden, Barky reveled in Biden's "tough message" for Russia; we are sure Putin is trembling. Biden wants to prop up the madman Saakashvili with $1 billion of the US taxpayers' money, a gesture which is every bit as obscene as the worst Bush-Cheney excesses. $1 billion would get us on the road to fully funding a program like WIC (high-protein foods for expectant mothers) or Head Start, but this thought does not occur to Biden when he is trying to provoke Russia. We can see the cruel elitism of a financier- controlled Obama regime taking place before our eyes. <DT><DT>Obama and Biden resemble each other closely, Both are insufferable windbags besotted with their own rhetorical verbiage. Biden's celebrated gaffes will provide comic relief, as long as they do not gaffe us into World War III, which is always a distinct possibility. Obama and Biden are addicted to the sound of their own voices, and this may turn out to be the fatal flaw that sinks them when the voters get sick of the endless parade of speeches. Obama and Biden are in danger of drowning in their own endless blabber. Each one has more than a touch of megalomania, which prevents them from seeing their limits. Biden's middle name is Robinette, which is close to the term for a faucet tap in French. Biden has never been able to find the tap to turn off his own mouth. <DT><DT>TWO PLAGIARISTS ON THE DEMOCRATIC TICKET <DT><DT>Obama and Biden are both plagiarists; words are their stock in trade, and even the words are fake. It emerged this spring that Obama was spouting verbatim the canned speeches of Governor Deval Patrick of Massachusetts, his fellow clone from the Trilateral stable. Biden is a picaresque paladin of plagiarism. His 1988 presidential campaign was aborted when he was found to have stolen paragraphs of a speech by the Labour Party leader, Neil Kinnock. He had also embroidered his campaign biography. Biden had also been guilty of plagiarism at the Syracuse University law school which he attended, but he had somehow talked his way out of those charges. <DT><DT>BIDEN A CREATURE OF THE WORST CREDIT CARD GOUGERS <DT><DT>Biden represents Delaware in the US Senate. Delaware is not a state, but a giant post box for Dupont, General Motors, and many of the giant corporations and Wall Street firms. The state politics of Delaware are dictated down to the most minute detail by the bankers and their corporate lackeys, since everything depends on keeping a pro-oligarchical political climate in the state. Biden personally is a tool of MBNA, a credit card issuer that was recently absorbed by the Bank of America, which presumably now also owns Biden. Biden got at least $215,000 from MBNA over the past decade. MBNA is notoriously one of the biggest predatory lenders and interest rate gougers in the entire usurious world of credit cards, and Biden's services to them are precisely in this area: Biden was a big supporter of the 2005 bankruptcy law which makes it much harder for working families to escape debt bondage and debt slavery ­ just what the looters at MBNA ordered. Biden has also boasted that he wrote the ban on assault weapons, a measure that is sure to cause problems among the bitter clingers of Appalachia who are concerned about gun ownership. <DT><DT>Obama has voted for the rotten compromise on FISA illegal wiretaps ordered by Bush that grants retroactive immunity to the telecoms. Biden is also an enthusiastic police state totalitarian. In 1995, after the Oklahoma City false flag bombing, Biden submitted an oppressive police state bill, in many ways a precursor of Bush's infamous Patriot Act. "I drafted a terrorism bill after the Oklahoma City bombing," boasts Biden. "And the bill John Ashcroft sent up was my bill." Biden's only regret is that he was not able to undermine political freedom as much as he wanted to. <DT><DT>Obama's drooling acolytes have argued all summer that to name Senator Clinton to the ticket would negate Barky's profile of youth, change, hope, and so forth. Clinton has been a national figure for almost twenty years, but she has been dumped in favor of Biden, who has been in the US Senate for about 36 years and is about as stale and hackneyed as a political figure could be. The difference is that Biden's track record established him as an obedient servant of the Wall Street banks that have their post box headquarters in his state; the Clintons, by contrast, represent the closest thing we have to political combination not wholly owned by Wall Street and capable of saying no to the bankers when they demand austerity and aggression, as they are assuredly doing now. Rockefeller and Soros do not want Sen. Clinton in the presidential succession under any circumstances, and this is an important positive qualification for the New York senator. <DT><DT>BEAU BIDEN, THE CORRUPT ATTORNEY GENERAL OF DELAWARE <DT><DT>Joe Biden's son is Beau Biden, the current attorney general of Delaware. Beau is involved in one of the dirtiest enemies' list operations in recent memory against Larry Sinclair, who has come forward with explosive charges of gay sex and crack cocaine use in 1999 on the part of Obama. When Sinclair came to the National Press Club in Washington on June 18 to make his case, he was arrested on a trumped-up warrant issued by Beau Biden. Sinclair is being threatened with a long jail term, essentially because he has spoken out against Obama. It was a clear bid to do a favor for Barky and get Joe Biden on the ticket in the veep slot. That has now occurred ­ on the basis of a police state operation against an outspoken political opponent which goes beyond Nixon or Bush- Cheney, since Obama is not yet president and may well never be. <DT><DT>The Biden announcement was thoroughly botched and bungled by Axelrod, Plouffe, and Favreau. The text message gimmick is drawn straight from the Kiev Orange revolution of 2004 and the Tiflis Roses revolution of 2003, the models for Obama's attempt to seize power. The proceedings were a carnival of gaffes and Freudian slips, all ignored by Obama's loyal brigade of media whores. According to Barky, Joe Biden would help enact "a new energy policy to freeze ourselves from our dependence on foreign oil" ­ a chilling prospect. <DT><DT>"BARACK AMERICA" AND OTHER FREUDIAN SLIPS <DT><DT>Barky made another revealing Freudian slip: "the next President the next Vice President ­ Joe Biden." Does Barky know that Biden will act as his resident in-house controller? Biden, evidently mindful that he will have to sell the radical subversive Obama as a wholesome product of the heartland, returned the gaffe by calling the presumptive nominee "Barack America" or "Barack American." Perhaps he was trying to imitate the old Subliminal Man of Saturday Night Live, but was too slow. <DT><DT>Behind Barky's Freudian slip is the fact that Biden will evidently run foreign policy for the clueless Obama in much the same way that Brzezinski ran foreign policy above and behind Carter, or that Cheney has run foreign policy above and behind Bush. Obama is so ignorant and cognitively impaired that he could hardly understand the instructions that bankers' spokesmen like Brzezinski and Soros will be shouting to him on the phone. This is where an experienced hack like Biden is needed. The media, in a transparent attempt to portray an apostolic succession for Biden, are still feeding the illusion that Biden was chosen by Caroline Kennedy. In reality, the choice was probably made by Trilateral-Bilderberg operative Jim Johnson, who was forced to retreat from his announced role as The Vetter by revelations about a sweetheart mortgage, but probably just kept going behind the scenes. <DT><DT>The Obama campaign has repeated ad nauseam its mantra that McCain is running for Bush's third term. McCain has answered that Obama is running for Jimmy Carter's second term. The reality may be that Joe Biden is running for Dick Cheney's third term as the resident controller of a lazy and shallow puppet president ­ Obama, the Manchurian candidate of the Trilateral Commission. <DT><DT>Webster G. Tarpley is the author of Obama: The Postmodern Coup, and Barack H. Obama: The Unauthorized Biography, both published by Progressive Press of California. </DT></DL></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE></CENTER>


<HR>
</DT>

Shadow
09-09-2008, 10:44 AM
Obama the fool..


The Democrats endorse the "Global War on Terrorism": Obama "goes after" Osama (http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=9995)






______________________________________
Obama's "American Promise" is War.
Barack Obama has embraced the "Global War on Terrorism" (GWOT).
The Obama-Biden campaign has endorsed the very foundations of the Bush administration's foreign policy agenda: "Go after Osama bin Laden, "take him out".
<B>The rhetoric is softer but the substance is almost identical:
"For while Senator McCain was turning his sights to Iraq just days after 9/11, I stood up and opposed this war, knowing that it would distract us from the real threats we face. When John McCain said we could just “muddle through” in Afghanistan, I argued for more resources and more troops to finish the fight against the terrorists who actually attacked us on 9/11, and made clear that we must take out Osama bin Laden and his lieutenants if we have them in our sights. John McCain likes to say that he’ll follow bin Laden to the Gates of Hell – but he won’t even go to the cave where he lives. [APPLAUSE]
</B>
And today, as my call for a time frame to remove our troops from Iraq has been echoed by the Iraqi government and even the Bush Administration, even after we learned that Iraq has a $79 billion surplus while we’re wallowing in deficits, John McCain stands alone in his stubborn refusal to end a misguided war.
That’s not the judgment we need. That won’t keep America safe. We need a President who can face the threats of the future, not keep grasping at the ideas of the past." (The American Promise, August 28, 2008, Democratic Convention. Denver (http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=9988), emphasis added)
The 9/11 Cover-up
The Democrats have endorsed the "Big Lie". Bin Laden is upheld as the "outside enemy" who threatens the American Homeland. The fact that bin Laden is a US sponsored intelligence asset, created and sustained by the CIA, is never mentioned.
<B>The Obama campaign galvanizes public support for the "Global War on Terrorism" (GWOT). In the words of Obama's running mate, Joe Biden:
"The fact of the matter is, al-Qaida and the Taliban - the people who have actually attacked us on 9/11 [note: exactly the same wording as in the Obama speech] -- they've regrouped in the mountains between Afghanistan and Pakistan and are plotting new attacks. And the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff has echoed Barack's call for more troops and John McCain was wrong and Barack Obama was right." (Joe Biden, Democratic Convention, Denver, August 27, 2008, emphasis added)
</B>
In contrast to Iraq, the war on Afghanistan is portrayed by the Obama-Biden campaign as a "Just War", a war of retribution initiated in October 2001 in response to the 9/11 attacks.
This concept of the "Just War" in relation to Afghanistan has been echoed by several prominent Liberal and "Progressive" intellectuals: The war on Iraq, on the other hand, is seen as an "illegal war". In October 2001, the attack on Afghanistan was supported by numerous civil society organizations on humanitarian grounds.
It is by no means coincidental that the prominent "Leftist" scholars and intellectuals, who failed to address the use of the 9/11 attacks as a pretext to wage war, have expressed their support for Barack Obama. The Nation Magazine and Progressive Democrats for America (http://pdamerica.org/) are indelibly behind the Obama-Biden ticket.
The Obama-Biden campaign has endorsed the 9/11 cover-up. Without a shred of evidence, Afghanistan, a nation of 34 million people (the size of Canada), is portrayed as the State sponsor of the 9/11 attacks. This basic premise is accepted by the Democrats.
Obama indelibly upholds 9/11 as an act of war and aggression directed against America, thereby justifying a war of retribution directed against "Islamic terrorists" and their state sponsors.

The "Global War on Terrorism" (GWOT) is the product of a carefully designed military-intelligence agenda, which determines the thrust of US foreign policy.

GWOT is endorsed by both Republicans and Democrats. US intelligence overrides party politics. GWOT is part of the presidential campaign platform of both political parties. Its validity is not questioned, nor are its consequences. The fact that it is predicated on a "Big Lie" is not an issue.
Spiraling Defense Spending
Both Barack Obama and John McCain have signaled that they will increase overall defense spending, while also revamping the system of Pentagon procurement with a view to reducing cost overruns. (See Bloomberg, June 30, 2008 (http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=adXiGrYSU5PA&refer=home) See also Reuters, August 29, 2008 (http://uk.reuters.com/article/topNews/idUKMOL95454020080829)).
For FY 2009, the US Defense Department is asking for a $515 billion defense budget plus a separate $70 billion "to cover war costs into the early months of a new administration... Those amounts combined would represent the highest level of military spending since the end of World War II (adjusted for inflation)." (csmonitor.com February 06, 2008) (http://www.csmonitor.com/2008/0206/p02s02-usmi.html)

<B>Obama's message is crystal clear. He endorses the Bush administration's proposed surge in military spending. He wants to spend more money on weapons and troops. Going after bin Laden and the "Global War on Terrorism" constitute his main justification for increased defense spending:
"[M]ore resources and more troops to finish the fight against the terrorists who actually attacked us on 9/11..."
</B>
<B>But at the same time, Obama promises more resources for education and health.
"Now is the time to finally meet our moral obligation to provide every child a world-class education, ... I’ll invest in early childhood education. I’ll recruit an army of new teachers, and pay them higher salaries and give them more support. ...
</B>
Now is the time to finally keep the promise of affordable, accessible health care for every single American.... (The American Promise, August 28, 2008, Democratic Convention. Denver (http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=9988), emphasis added)
http://www.globalresearch.ca/articlePictures/DiscFY2004Pie.gif

Will there be a shift in spending priorities?

Under the Bush administration, Defense was favored in relation to all other expenditure categories. (See Chart above for FY 2004). Will an Obama administration change the structure of Federal government expenditure?

Will he reduce the absolute size of defense spending which constitutes approximately 47 percent of global defense spending (all countries combined)? The US NATO combined control 70% of global defense spending. (See Chart below)

http://www.globalresearch.ca/articlePictures/military_spending_pie_chart.gif
Guns versus Butter

Visibly Barack Obama does understand the Guns versus Butter dilemma.
He fails to address a fundamental macro-economic relationship, namely the issue of public investment in the war economy versus the funding, through tax dollars, of civilian social programs. More broadly, this also raises the issue of the role of the US Treasury and the US monetary system, in relentlessly financing the military industrial complex and the Middle East war at the expense of most sectors of civilian economic activity.
http://www.globalresearch.ca/articlePictures/gunsbutter.gif



More resources to war and weapons, as proposed by both Obama and McCain, favors the Big Five Defense Contractors (Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grunman, Raytheon, Boeing and General Dynamics), Dick Cheney's Halliburton, British Aerospace, not to mention Blackwater, MPRI et al, at the expense of the civilian sectors, including national, regional and local level economies.
Military Spending Creates Unemployment
Tax dollars allocated, as promised by Obama, to National Defense and Homeland Security will result in unemployment.
In contrast to World War II, the war economy in the 21st Century does not create jobs.
The costs of creating jobs in the military industrial complex are abysmally high when compared to the civilian sectors. In turn, the financial resources channeled by the US government to the DoD defense contractors dramatically reduces public expenditure in favor of all other spending categories.
Lockeed Martin together with Northrop Grumman have been involved in developing the Joint Fighter program (http://www.jsf.mil/news/). Based on initial estimates, 5400 direct jobs were created at a unit cost of $37 million per job. (See Michel Chossudovsky, War is Good for Business, Global Research, September 16, 2001 (http://www.globalresearch.ca/articles/CHO109D.html)). Similarly at Boeing's assembly plant, each job created in the Joint Strike Fighter program costs US taxpayers $66.7 million. (Seattle Post-Intelligencer, 7 September 2001).
With regard to the F22 Raptor fighter, (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/F-22_Raptor)assembled at Lockheed Martin Marietta's plant in Georgia, the F22 Raptor fighters was estimated to have a unit cost of $85 million. Three thousand (3000) direct jobs were to be created at an estimated cost of $20 million a job. (Ibid) The cost of the program once completed in 2005 was of the order of 62 billion dollars. According to 2008 company figures, roughly 2000 jobs remain tied to the production of the F22. (See Free Republic, March 2008 (http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1983939/posts)). Two Thousand Jobs created at the Lockheed-Marietta's plant in Georgia at an initial outlay of 31 million dollars per job.
Imagine how many jobs you could create with 31 million dollars invested in small and medium sized enterprises across America.
http://www.globalresearch.ca/articlePictures/F-22.jpg
These post 9/11 defense expenditures by the Bush administration trigger mass unemployment. Moreover, they are funded by downsizing America's social programs, which in turn contributes to exacerbating the levels of poverty and unemployment.
Obama's War Economy
The Obama campaign accepts the logic of a war economy which triggers unemployment and poverty at home while creating death and destruction in the Middle East war theater.
This post 9/11 direction of the US economy has lined the pockets of a handful of defense contractors corporations, while contributing very marginally to the rehabilitation of the employment of specialized scientific, technical and professional workers laid-off by the civilian economy.
Not surprisingly, the defense contractors, while favoring John McCain are also firm supporter of Barack Obama.

<B>America's largest military contractor Lockheed Martin (and business partner of Dick Cheney's Halliburton) was present at the Denver Democratic Party Convention, among a vast array of powerful corporate sponsors and lobby groups. According to a company spokesperson:
“Lockheed Martin strongly supports our nation’s political process and candidates that support in general national defense, homeland security, high technology and educational initiatives,” (quoted by Bill van Auken, Democrats convene in Denver amid police state security and a sea of corporate cash, Global Research, August 2008)
</B>
The Big Lie
The Obama lies are perhaps more subtle than those of George W. But again in substance, we are dealing with a continuum.
The "Global War on Terrorism" is an integral part of the Obama campaign. "Islamic terrorists" threaten the American way of life. Al Qaeda and its alleged State sponsors are portrayed as the main threat at home and abroad.
The corporate media applauds.
No shift in direction.

The doctrine of preemptive war directed against "Islamic terrorists" and their State sponsors remains functionally intact.

The same applies to the post 9/11 nuclear weapons doctrine as first formulated in the 2002 Nuclear Posture Review (NPR). Nuclear weapons are on the drawing board of the Pentagon, for use in the Middle East war theater. And the Democrats are fully supportive of preemptive nuclear weapons as a means to protect the American Homeland.
Under the "Global War on Terrorism", the Homeland Security apparatus, not to mention the anti-terrorist Patriot legislation, the Big Brother surveillance apparatus would, under a Barack Obama administration, remain intact.

9/11 constitutes for Obama the main justification for waging a humanitarian war in the Middle East and Central Asia. In this regard, his position does not differ from that of the Bush Administration.
Withdraw from Iraq, but remain in Afghanistan.
Bring the troops back from Iraq. Move them to Afghanistan.

<B>Confront Iran, challenge Russia:
"I will end this war in Iraq responsibly, and finish the fight against al Qaeda and the Taliban in Afghanistan. I will rebuild our military to meet future conflicts. But I will also renew the tough, direct diplomacy that can prevent Iran from obtaining nuclear weapons and curb Russian aggression. I will build new partnerships to defeat the threats of the 21st century: terrorism and nuclear proliferation; poverty and genocide; climate change and disease. And I will restore our moral standing, so that America is once again that last, best hope for all who are called to the cause of freedom, who long for lives of peace, and who yearn for a better future.
</B>
These are the policies I will pursue. And in the weeks ahead, I look forward to debating them with John McCain." (The American Promise, August 28, 2008, Democratic Convention. Denver (http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=9988), emphasis added)
"Finishing the fight against Al Qaeda and the Taliban" means extending the "Global War on Terrorism" (GWOT) into new frontiers.

Concretely, the GWOT, which is central to the Obama campaign, provides a pretext and justification for waging a war of conquest, for expanding US influence in the Middle East, Central Asia, Sub-Saharan Africa and South East Asia.
Obama-Biden and The "New Cold War"
The Obama-Biden campaign is committed to reinforcing US-NATO military presence on the Iran-Afghan border, as well as on Afghanistan's border with China's Xinjiang Uigur autonomous region as well as within Pakistan.
Afghanistan is a strategic hub in Central Asia bordering on Iran, the former Soviet Union, China and Pakistan. It is a land bridge and potential oil and gas pipeline corridor which links the Caspian sea basin to the Arabian sea. It is also part of the continued process of militarization and encirclement of the People's Republic of China.
The Obama-Biden campaign has also endorsed the "New Cold War". Russia is explicitly identified in Obama's speech as an Aggressor. Iran is identified as nuclear threat, despite ample evidence to the contrary.
<B>Joe Biden, who if elected, would take over from Dick Cheney, considers Russia, China and India as the main threat to America's National Security:
The Bush foreign policy has dug us into a very deep hole, with very few friends to help us climb out. And for the last seven years, the administration has failed to face the biggest the biggest forces shaping this century. The emergence of Russia, China and India's great powers, the spread of lethal weapons, the shortage of secure supplies of energy, food and water. The challenge of climate change and the resurgence of fundamentalism in Afghanistan and Pakistan, the real central front in the war on terror.
</B>
Ladies and gentlemen, in recent years and in recent days we once again see the consequences of the neglect, of this neglect, of Russia challenging the very freedom of a new democratic country of Georgia. Barack and I will end that neglect. We will hold Russia accountable for its action and we will help Georgia rebuild. I have been on the ground in Georgia, Iraq, Pakistan, Afghanistan, and I can tell you in no uncertain terms, this administration's policy has been an abysmal failure. America cannot afford four more years of this failure. (Democratic Party convention, August 27, 2008 (http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=9975), emphasis added)
The militarization of Afghanistan and Pakistan under the GWOT is directed against two overlapping military alliances: the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) (http://www.sectsco.org/home.asp?LanguageID=2) and the Collective Security Treaty Organization (CSTO) (http://www.dkb.gov.ru/start/index.htm).
The SCO is a military alliance between Russia and China and several Central Asian former Soviet republics including Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan and Uzbekistan. Iran has observer status in the SCO.
The Collective Security Treaty Organization (CSTO) (http://www.dkb.gov.ru/start/index.htm), which plays a key geopolitical role in relation to transport and energy corridors, operates in close liaison with the SCO. The CSTO regroups the following member states: Armenia, Belarus, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Russia, Tajikistan and Uzbekistan.
For Obama-Biden, the war on Iran is still on. The New Cold War is directed against China, Russia and its allies, namely the SCO-CSTO military alliance.
In other words, the Democrats have endorsed the New Cold War
What Prospects under an Obama Presidency?

Apart from the rhetoric of "bringing the troops home" from war torn Iraq, which may or may be carried out, what distinguishes the Democrats from the Republicans?
A more articulate, knowledgeable and charismatic President?
A more dignified and diplomatic approach to US foreign policy?

An opportunity to the US ruling elite "to present a different face to the world that could revive illusions in its democratic pretensions, not only internationally but within the United States as well." (Patrick Martin, Tensions rise in Democratic contest as Obama nears nomination, (http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=8947)Global Research, May 11, 2008)
A spurious and counterfeit "humanitarian" approach to Empire, which serves to mask the truth and gain popular support.
A less reckless Commander in Chief, who has an understanding of geopolitics and is capable of taking foreign policy decisions.

A more carefully thought out military agenda than that experienced during the Bush administration? But with no substantive shift in direction.
A means to quelling mounting dissent and opposition to the ruling corporate establishment by providing the illusion that the Democrats constitute a Real Alternative.
A means to sustaining the illusion that African-Americans can move up the social ladder in America and that their fundamental rights are being upheld.
A means to undermining real progressive movements by further embedding civil society organizations, trade unions, grass-roots organizations not to mention "Leftist" intellectuals into the realm of the Democratic Party.
A distraction from the extensive war crimes committed under successive US administrations.

A "human face" to war and globalization?

________________________________________



Joe Biden Zionist...


Joe Biden's record on US wars (http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=9994)



Biden - Warmonger, Wordmonger And Political Hit Man (http://www.rense.com/general83/biden.htm)




<DT><CENTER>Motormouth Joe Biden -
Warmonger, Wordmonger
And Political Hit Man
By Webster G. Tarpley
8-25-8</CENTER>
<DT><CENTER></CENTER><DT><CENTER><TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width=555 border=0><TBODY><TR><TD vAlign=top width="100%"><DL><DT>WASHINGTON DC -- The vice presidential candidate chosen to run with Obama is Senator Joe Biden of Delaware, a discredited, sleazy, and shopworn political hack -- and therefore an anti-climax for all the callow and feckless youth who got the word via text message at 3am in the morning. The ability of the Trilateral-Bilderberg machine which controls Obama to put up a person like Biden already reflects the further degradation of US political life over the past 9-12 months, largely as a result of Obama's own demagogic, no- issues, personality cult agitation. <DT><DT>A year ago, there was wide agreement in the US middle class that Bush and Cheney should be impeached, that the police state be rolled back, and that the Iraq war should be ended as soon as physically possible. Thanks largely to the advent of the vapid and messianic Obama, these issues have now been thoroughly deflated. Biden is himself an incurable warmonger who voted for the Iraq war and blathered ceaselessly in favor of Bush's aggressive adventure to all who would listen. Naming Biden is a brutal insult to the antiwar majority of the Democratic Party, and Obama is obviously hoping that the Iraq war issue is dead, so nobody will care. Last year, Obama promised that he would work against the mentality that produced Iraq; if anyone incarnates that mentality, it is Biden. Biden is an incurable imperialist and an eager advocate of the discredited Bush-Cheney "war on terror." He even tried to use one of the Democratic debates last year to whip up hysteria in favor of attacking Sudan over the Darfur issue, and with some success. "I went there. I sat in the borders. I went in those camps. They're going to have thousands and thousands and thousands of people die. We've got to stop talking and act," Biden postured in Manchester New Hampshire on June 3, 2007 in an apparent call for bombing Sudan, a coup in Khartoum, or an invasion. Incredibly, the crowd applauded wildly. <DT><DT>Biden remains convinced that it is up to the United States to dictate the form of government and economic system of virtually every country in the world. His specialty is blatant interference in the internal affairs of sovereign states, with left-cover of soft power issues like human rights and humanitarian concerns furnishing his favorite pretexts. Biden has learned nothing from the Iraq debacle except that Iraq was not the right victim; more appropriate victims and more effective methods will have to be found, argues Biden. The real lesson of Iraq (and Lebanon 2006) is that US-British imperialism and world domination are finished historically, but this is lost on Biden. <DT><DT>Biden is the author of the odious plan to balkanize, partition, and subdivide Iraq into three zones: a Kurdish state designed to carve up Iran, Syria and Turkey as well as Iraq; a landlocked and oil- poor Sunni desert entity; and an oil-rich Shiastan in the south that might absorb the Arabistan or Achwaz province of Iran is a later breakup scenario for Iran. Biden's plan is a continuation of the Bernard Lewis plan to break up the existing states of the Middle East in a way destined to create a mosaic of pseudo- independent, squabbling mini-states or micro-states. This approach places Biden squarely behind the Zbigniew Brzezinski "dignity" doctrine of breaking up the existing nation states of the world in favor of a crazy quilt of micro-states based on ethnic and religious parochialism and particularism; not one of these micro- states could stand up to Exxon-Mobil or JP Morgan Chase. <DT><DT>BIDEN IS MORALLY INSANE ON GEORGIA <DT><DT>Biden's ample track record as an agent provocateur against Russia goes back more than a decade to the time he mobilized his mouth to help demonize Milosevic of Serbia as part of the Albright-Holbrooke- Wesley Clark anti-Russian campaign of those years, which ended with the NATO bombing of Serbia, an act of unprecedented historical vandalism. In the past week, warmonger Biden has rushed to the side of the latest tin pot mini-Mussolini of the Brzezinski-Soros faction, the infamous war criminal and gangster Mikhail Saakashvili of Georgia. "I left the country convinced that Russia's invasion of Georgia may be the one of the most significant events to occur in Europe since the end of communism," raved Biden on his return, documenting his own moral insanity by siding with the aggressor. "The claims of Georgian atrocities that provided the pretext for Russia's invasion are rapidly being disproved by international observers, and the continuing presence of Russian forces in the country has severe implications for the broader region," added the Orwellian senator. <DT><DT>BIDEN: $1 BILLION FOR MADMAN SAAKASHVILI <DT><DT>In presenting Biden, Barky reveled in Biden's "tough message" for Russia; we are sure Putin is trembling. Biden wants to prop up the madman Saakashvili with $1 billion of the US taxpayers' money, a gesture which is every bit as obscene as the worst Bush-Cheney excesses. $1 billion would get us on the road to fully funding a program like WIC (high-protein foods for expectant mothers) or Head Start, but this thought does not occur to Biden when he is trying to provoke Russia. We can see the cruel elitism of a financier- controlled Obama regime taking place before our eyes. <DT><DT>Obama and Biden resemble each other closely, Both are insufferable windbags besotted with their own rhetorical verbiage. Biden's celebrated gaffes will provide comic relief, as long as they do not gaffe us into World War III, which is always a distinct possibility. Obama and Biden are addicted to the sound of their own voices, and this may turn out to be the fatal flaw that sinks them when the voters get sick of the endless parade of speeches. Obama and Biden are in danger of drowning in their own endless blabber. Each one has more than a touch of megalomania, which prevents them from seeing their limits. Biden's middle name is Robinette, which is close to the term for a faucet tap in French. Biden has never been able to find the tap to turn off his own mouth. <DT><DT>TWO PLAGIARISTS ON THE DEMOCRATIC TICKET <DT><DT>Obama and Biden are both plagiarists; words are their stock in trade, and even the words are fake. It emerged this spring that Obama was spouting verbatim the canned speeches of Governor Deval Patrick of Massachusetts, his fellow clone from the Trilateral stable. Biden is a picaresque paladin of plagiarism. His 1988 presidential campaign was aborted when he was found to have stolen paragraphs of a speech by the Labour Party leader, Neil Kinnock. He had also embroidered his campaign biography. Biden had also been guilty of plagiarism at the Syracuse University law school which he attended, but he had somehow talked his way out of those charges. <DT><DT>BIDEN A CREATURE OF THE WORST CREDIT CARD GOUGERS <DT><DT>Biden represents Delaware in the US Senate. Delaware is not a state, but a giant post box for Dupont, General Motors, and many of the giant corporations and Wall Street firms. The state politics of Delaware are dictated down to the most minute detail by the bankers and their corporate lackeys, since everything depends on keeping a pro-oligarchical political climate in the state. Biden personally is a tool of MBNA, a credit card issuer that was recently absorbed by the Bank of America, which presumably now also owns Biden. Biden got at least $215,000 from MBNA over the past decade. MBNA is notoriously one of the biggest predatory lenders and interest rate gougers in the entire usurious world of credit cards, and Biden's services to them are precisely in this area: Biden was a big supporter of the 2005 bankruptcy law which makes it much harder for working families to escape debt bondage and debt slavery * just what the looters at MBNA ordered. Biden has also boasted that he wrote the ban on assault weapons, a measure that is sure to cause problems among the bitter clingers of Appalachia who are concerned about gun ownership. <DT><DT>Obama has voted for the rotten compromise on FISA illegal wiretaps ordered by Bush that grants retroactive immunity to the telecoms. Biden is also an enthusiastic police state totalitarian. In 1995, after the Oklahoma City false flag bombing, Biden submitted an oppressive police state bill, in many ways a precursor of Bush's infamous Patriot Act. "I drafted a terrorism bill after the Oklahoma City bombing," boasts Biden. "And the bill John Ashcroft sent up was my bill." Biden's only regret is that he was not able to undermine political freedom as much as he wanted to. <DT><DT>Obama's drooling acolytes have argued all summer that to name Senator Clinton to the ticket would negate Barky's profile of youth, change, hope, and so forth. Clinton has been a national figure for almost twenty years, but she has been dumped in favor of Biden, who has been in the US Senate for about 36 years and is about as stale and hackneyed as a political figure could be. The difference is that Biden's track record established him as an obedient servant of the Wall Street banks that have their post box headquarters in his state; the Clintons, by contrast, represent the closest thing we have to political combination not wholly owned by Wall Street and capable of saying no to the bankers when they demand austerity and aggression, as they are assuredly doing now. Rockefeller and Soros do not want Sen. Clinton in the presidential succession under any circumstances, and this is an important positive qualification for the New York senator. <DT><DT>BEAU BIDEN, THE CORRUPT ATTORNEY GENERAL OF DELAWARE <DT><DT>Joe Biden's son is Beau Biden, the current attorney general of Delaware. Beau is involved in one of the dirtiest enemies' list operations in recent memory against Larry Sinclair, who has come forward with explosive charges of gay sex and crack cocaine use in 1999 on the part of Obama. When Sinclair came to the National Press Club in Washington on June 18 to make his case, he was arrested on a trumped-up warrant issued by Beau Biden. Sinclair is being threatened with a long jail term, essentially because he has spoken out against Obama. It was a clear bid to do a favor for Barky and get Joe Biden on the ticket in the veep slot. That has now occurred * on the basis of a police state operation against an outspoken political opponent which goes beyond Nixon or Bush- Cheney, since Obama is not yet president and may well never be. <DT><DT>The Biden announcement was thoroughly botched and bungled by Axelrod, Plouffe, and Favreau. The text message gimmick is drawn straight from the Kiev Orange revolution of 2004 and the Tiflis Roses revolution of 2003, the models for Obama's attempt to seize power. The proceedings were a carnival of gaffes and Freudian slips, all ignored by Obama's loyal brigade of media whores. According to Barky, Joe Biden would help enact "a new energy policy to freeze ourselves from our dependence on foreign oil" * a chilling prospect. <DT><DT>"BARACK AMERICA" AND OTHER FREUDIAN SLIPS <DT><DT>Barky made another revealing Freudian slip: "the next President the next Vice President * Joe Biden." Does Barky know that Biden will act as his resident in-house controller? Biden, evidently mindful that he will have to sell the radical subversive Obama as a wholesome product of the heartland, returned the gaffe by calling the presumptive nominee "Barack America" or "Barack American." Perhaps he was trying to imitate the old Subliminal Man of Saturday Night Live, but was too slow. <DT><DT>Behind Barky's Freudian slip is the fact that Biden will evidently run foreign policy for the clueless Obama in much the same way that Brzezinski ran foreign policy above and behind Carter, or that Cheney has run foreign policy above and behind Bush. Obama is so ignorant and cognitively impaired that he could hardly understand the instructions that bankers' spokesmen like Brzezinski and Soros will be shouting to him on the phone. This is where an experienced hack like Biden is needed. The media, in a transparent attempt to portray an apostolic succession for Biden, are still feeding the illusion that Biden was chosen by Caroline Kennedy. In reality, the choice was probably made by Trilateral-Bilderberg operative Jim Johnson, who was forced to retreat from his announced role as The Vetter by revelations about a sweetheart mortgage, but probably just kept going behind the scenes. <DT><DT>The Obama campaign has repeated ad nauseam its mantra that McCain is running for Bush's third term. McCain has answered that Obama is running for Jimmy Carter's second term. The reality may be that Joe Biden is running for Dick Cheney's third term as the resident controller of a lazy and shallow puppet president * Obama, the Manchurian candidate of the Trilateral Commission. <DT><DT>Webster G. Tarpley is the author of Obama: The Postmodern Coup, and Barack H. Obama: The Unauthorized Biography, both published by Progressive Press of California. </DT></DL></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE></CENTER>


<HR>
</DT>


You lost me on your butter analogy!

redrat11
09-22-2008, 09:39 AM
Obama will "crack" by mid October???
http://i30.photobucket.com/albums/c307/reddog11/obama.png


Qp0hU1THjuc

YouTube - Barack Obama Stuttering Uh Montage (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qp0hU1THjuc)
:rolleyes:


Obama is becoming Mentally Il, will probably "Crack" before November. (http://www.godlikeproductions.com/forum1/message612592/pg1)

Ozziecynic
09-24-2008, 06:30 AM
Message to all americans on cc scrolling through here this organisation Think Tank - Council on Foreign Relations (http://www.cfr.org/thinktank)
pulls your strings dont be ignorant dont be naive like the common goyim mass your elections are rigged and a circus.

It aint Obama or Palin that runs anything they are merely tenured caretakers for your Ordo Novo Secularum your CFR/(SKULL&BONES) Republic.
Pointless threads like this one are hence a complete waste of space and time

redrat11
09-25-2008, 10:36 AM
BUMPITY:p

redrat11
09-25-2008, 10:36 AM
Bump, Bump...:(

redrat11
09-25-2008, 10:47 AM
OK, I'll try to not post on BARACK THE CON ARTIST anymore, we all know they're all scumbag elitist NWO cronies, yes, ok. I just want to add that what will happen under his administration, he is a avowed MARXIST, so, if Bush is Tyrannical, Barack will make his dictatorship seem gentle by comparison.


here read this...

Barack Obama's Stealth Socialism

INVESTOR'S BUSINESS DAILY

Posted 7/28/2008
Election '08: Before friendly audiences, Barack Obama speaks passionately about something called "economic justice." He uses the term obliquely, though, speaking in code — socialist code.


---------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------

IBD Series: The Audacity Of Socialism


---------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------

During his NAACP speech earlier this month, Sen. Obama repeated the term at least four times. "I've been working my entire adult life to help build an America where economic justice is being served," he said at the group's 99th annual convention in Cincinnati.
And as president, "we'll ensure that economic justice is served," he asserted. "That's what this election is about." Obama never spelled out the meaning of the term, but he didn't have to. His audience knew what he meant, judging from its thumping approval.
It's the rest of the public that remains in the dark, which is why we're launching this special educational series.
"Economic justice" simply means punishing the successful and redistributing their wealth by government fiat. It's a euphemism for socialism.
In the past, such rhetoric was just that — rhetoric. But Obama's positioning himself with alarming stealth to put that rhetoric into action on a scale not seen since the birth of the welfare state.
In his latest memoir he shares that he'd like to "recast" the welfare net that FDR and LBJ cast while rolling back what he derisively calls the "winner-take-all" market economy that Ronald Reagan reignited (with record gains in living standards for all).
Obama also talks about "restoring fairness to the economy," code for soaking the "rich" — a segment of society he fails to understand that includes mom-and-pop businesses filing individual tax returns.
It's clear from a close reading of his two books that he's a firm believer in class envy. He assumes the economy is a fixed pie, whereby the successful only get rich at the expense of the poor.
Following this discredited Marxist model, he believes government must step in and redistribute pieces of the pie. That requires massive transfers of wealth through government taxing and spending, a return to the entitlement days of old.
Of course, Obama is too smart to try to smuggle such hoary collectivist garbage through the front door. He's disguising the wealth transfers as "investments" — "to make America more competitive," he says, or "that give us a fighting chance," whatever that means.
Among his proposed "investments":
• "Universal," "guaranteed" health care.
• "Free" college tuition.
• "Universal national service" (a la Havana).
• "Universal 401(k)s" (in which the government would match contributions made by "low- and moderate-income families").
• "Free" job training (even for criminals).
• "Wage insurance" (to supplement dislocated union workers' old income levels).
• "Free" child care and "universal" preschool.
• More subsidized public housing.
• A fatter earned income tax credit for "working poor."
• And even a Global Poverty Act that amounts to a Marshall Plan for the Third World, first and foremost Africa.
His new New Deal also guarantees a "living wage," with a $10 minimum wage indexed to inflation; and "fair trade" and "fair labor practices," with breaks for "patriot employers" who cow-tow to unions, and sticks for "nonpatriot" companies that don't.
That's just for starters — first-term stuff.
Obama doesn't stop with socialized health care. He wants to socialize your entire human resources department — from payrolls to pensions. His social-microengineering even extends to mandating all employers provide seven paid sick days per year to salary and hourly workers alike.
You can see why Obama was ranked, hands-down, the most liberal member of the Senate by the National Journal. Some, including colleague and presidential challenger John McCain, think he's the most liberal member in Congress.
But could he really be "more left," as McCain recently remarked, than self-described socialist Sen. Bernie Sanders (for whom Obama has openly campaigned, even making a special trip to Vermont to rally voters)?
Obama's voting record, going back to his days in the Illinois statehouse, says yes. His career path — and those who guided it — leads to the same unsettling conclusion.
The seeds of his far-left ideology were planted in his formative years as a teenager in Hawaii — and they were far more radical than any biography or profile in the media has portrayed.
A careful reading of Obama's first memoir, "Dreams From My Father," reveals that his childhood mentor up to age 18 — a man he cryptically refers to as "Frank" — was none other than the late communist Frank Marshall Davis, who fled Chicago after the FBI and Congress opened investigations into his "subversive," "un-American activities."
As Obama was preparing to head off to college, he sat at Davis' feet in his Waikiki bungalow for nightly bull sessions. Davis plied his impressionable guest with liberal doses of whiskey and advice, including: Never trust the white establishment.
"They'll train you so good," he said, "you'll start believing what they tell you about equal opportunity and the American way and all that sh**."
After college, where he palled around with Marxist professors and took in socialist conferences "for inspiration," Obama followed in Davis' footsteps, becoming a "community organizer" in Chicago.
His boss there was Gerald Kellman, whose identity Obama also tries to hide in his book. Turns out Kellman's a disciple of the late Saul "The Red" Alinsky, a hard-boiled Chicago socialist who wrote the "Rules for Radicals" and agitated for social revolution in America.
The Chicago-based Woods Fund provided Kellman with his original $25,000 to hire Obama. In turn, Obama would later serve on the Woods board with terrorist Bill Ayers of the Weather Underground. Ayers was one of Obama's early political supporters.
After three years agitating with marginal success for more welfare programs in South Side Chicago, Obama decided he would need to study law to "bring about real change" — on a large scale.
While at Harvard Law School, he still found time to hone his organizing skills. For example, he spent eight days in Los Angeles taking a national training course taught by Alinsky's Industrial Areas Foundation. With his newly minted law degree, he returned to Chicago to reapply — as well as teach — Alinsky's "agitation" tactics.
(A video-streamed bio on Obama's Web site includes a photo of him teaching in a University of Chicago classroom. If you freeze the frame and look closely at the blackboard Obama is writing on, you can make out the words "Power Analysis" and "Relationships Built on Self Interest" — terms right out of Alinsky's rule book.)
Amid all this, Obama reunited with his late father's communist tribe in Kenya, the Luo, during trips to Africa.
As a Nairobi bureaucrat, Barack Hussein Obama Sr., a Harvard-educated economist, grew to challenge the ruling pro-Western government for not being socialist enough. In an eight-page scholarly paper published in 1965, he argued for eliminating private farming and nationalizing businesses "owned by Asians and Europeans."
His ideas for communist-style expropriation didn't stop there. He also proposed massive taxes on the rich to "redistribute our economic gains to the benefit of all."
"Theoretically, there is nothing that can stop the government from taxing 100% of income so long as the people get benefits from the government commensurate with their income which is taxed," Obama Sr. wrote. "I do not see why the government cannot tax those who have more and syphon some of these revenues into savings which can be utilized in investment for future development."
Taxes and "investment" . . . the fruit truly does not fall far from the vine.
(Voters might also be interested to know that Obama, the supposed straight shooter, does not once mention his father's communist leanings in an entire book dedicated to his memory.)
In Kenya's recent civil unrest, Obama privately phoned the leader of the opposition Luo tribe, Raila Odinga, to voice his support. Odinga is so committed to communism he named his oldest son after Fidel Castro.
With his African identity sewn up, Obama returned to Chicago and fell under the spell of an Afrocentric pastor. It was a natural attraction. The Rev. Jeremiah Wright preaches a Marxist version of Christianity called "black liberation theology" and has supported the communists in Cuba, Nicaragua and elsewhere.
Obama joined Wright's militant church, pledging allegiance to a system of "black values" that demonizes white "middle classness" and other mainstream pursuits.
(Obama in his first book, published in 1995, calls such values "sensible." There's no mention of them in his new book.)
With the large church behind him, Obama decided to run for political office, where he could organize for "change" more effectively. "As an elected official," he said, "I could bring church and community leaders together easier than I could as a community organizer or lawyer."
He could also exercise real, top-down power, the kind that grass-roots activists lack. Alinsky would be proud.
Throughout his career, Obama has worked closely with a network of stone-cold socialists and full-blown communists striving for "economic justice."
He's been traveling in an orbit of collectivism that runs from Nairobi to Honolulu, and on through Chicago to Washington.
Yet a recent AP poll found that only 6% of Americans would describe Obama as "liberal," let alone socialist.
Public opinion polls usually reflect media opinion, and the media by and large have portrayed Obama as a moderate "outsider" (the No. 1 term survey respondents associate him with) who will bring a "breath of fresh air" to Washington.
The few who have drilled down on his radical roots have tended to downplay or pooh-pooh them. Even skeptics have failed to connect the dots for fear of being called the dreaded "r" word.
But too much is at stake in this election to continue mincing words.
Both a historic banking crisis and 1970s-style stagflation loom over the economy. Democrats, who already control Congress, now threaten to filibuster-proof the Senate in what could be a watershed election for them — at both ends of Pennsylvania Avenue.
A perfect storm of statism is forming, and our economic freedoms are at serious risk.
Those who care less about looking politically correct than preserving the free-market individualism that's made this country great have to start calling things by their proper name to avert long-term disaster.


______________________________________________:coo l:


A few things that will happen if Obama gets elected to the Presidency (http://www.godlikeproductions.com/forum1/message608548/pg1)

redrat11
01-31-2014, 10:35 AM
This is for all the STUPID (fill in blank) Socialist/Communist who voted and or supported Obama. How does it feel now?

http://i738.photobucket.com/albums/xx25/77769/liberal_mind.gif

I am one of a handful of bloggers/posters on the web to lay out ALL HIS/HANDLERS Agenda up until I stopped a year ago or so.{ NSA } Look at how Obama has TOTALLY DESTROYED the" Health Care Industry" in America, just for starters.

Thanks to the Net, the young/old foolish wide eyed Zombie Socialist of America are now seeing the "Fruits of Obama" wither on the vine.

By the way, you ain't seen nothing yet! Last year 6+ million people lost there private health insurance because of ObamaCare, which decoded means DEATHCARE FOR AMERIKA! This year it is estimated that at least 80 to 100 million people who are getting health insurance through there employers will LOSE IT because of skyrocketing cost all due to Obama Care.Of course people like me told you this a full two years before it even became law, but Wait! The Master Plan all along along was to....to be continued.
------

http://i738.photobucket.com/albums/xx25/77769/roberts_scherer_lazarus.jpg

Chief Justice Roberts Blackmailed by Obama.

http://www.libertycaucus.net/forum/index.php?topic=113.msg755

How Roberts Was Blackmailed To Support ObamaCareMany of us have questioned what caused*Roberts* to switch his vote on ObamaCare at the last minute, as reported by CBS, and doing so,* so late that the Conservative Justices were forced to rewrite their majority opinion to be minority dissent. These facts may answer that question.*In 2000 Justice Roberts and his wife Jane adopted two children. Initially it was apparent that the adoptions were "from a Latin American country", but over time it has become apparent that the adopted children were not Latin American, but were Irish.* Why this matters will become evident.In 2005 the NY Times began investigating Roberts life as a matter of his nomination to the Supreme Court by George Bush.* The Times was shortly accused of trying to unseal the adoption papers and intending to violate* the anonymity of the adoption process... however there is more to the story.Drudge did an article in 2005http://patterico.com/2005/08/04/drudge-says-new-york-times-is-investigating-robertss-adoption-records/* * * * * * The NEW YORK TIMES is looking into the adoption records of the children of Supreme Court Nominee John G. Roberts, the DRUDGE REPORT has learned.* * * * * * The TIMES has investigative reporter Glen Justice hot on the case to investigate the status of adoption records of Judge Roberts’ two young children, Josie age 5 and Jack age 4, a top source reveals.* * * * * * Judge Roberts and his wife Jane adopted the children when they each were infants.* * * * * * Both children were adopted from Latin America.* * * * * * A TIMES insider claims the look into the adoption papers are part of the paper’s “standard background check.”* * * * * * Bill Borders, NYT senior editor, explains: “Our reporters made initial inquiries about the adoptions, as they did about many other aspects of his background. They did so with great care, understanding the sensitivity of the issue.”

http://i738.photobucket.com/albums/xx25/77769/images-7.jpg

http://i738.photobucket.com/albums/xx25/77769/John_G_Roberts_Jane_Roberts_John_Roberts_Confirmat ion_zNcgTkUknQxl.jpg

Roberts Donated Help to Gay Rights Case

In 1996, activists won a landmark anti-bias ruling with the aid of the high court nominee.

August 04, 2005|Richard A. Serrano*|*Times Staff WriterEmailShareWASHINGTON — Supreme Court nominee John G. Roberts Jr. worked behind the scenes for gay rights activists, and his legal expertise helped them persuade the Supreme Court to issue a landmark 1996 ruling protecting people from discrimination because of their sexual orientation.

-------



Nothing less than the fate of the United States rests on this decision



January 30th, 2014 by DrJohn


http://m.floppingaces.net/2014/01/30/nothing-less-than-the-fate-of-the-united-states-rests-on-this-decision/?wpmp_switcher=mobile

Obamacare is*unpopular. It’s becoming*more unpopular*with the uninsured.Scott Pruitt, Attorney General of the state of Oklahoma,*filed a lawsuit*against Kathleen Sibelius over the implementation of Obamacare.In an*article*in last month’s WSJ, he explained why:While the president’s health law is vast and extraordinarily complex, it is in one respect very simple. Subsidies are only to be made available, and tax penalties for not signing up for health insurance are only to be assessed, in states that create their own health-care exchange. The IRS, however, is attempting to enforce tax penalties in all states—including Oklahoma and the majority of the other states that have declined to create their own exchanges. Citizens and businesses in these states must use the federal exchange instead.



The "Eugenics Plan"...

http://21stcenturywire.com/2014/01/24/human-cull-how-to-decode-elite-eugenics-propaganda/

‘Human Cull’: How to Decode Elite Eugenics Propaganda

JANUARY 24, 2014*BY*21WIRE18 COMMENTS



DemoRats abandoning ship

http://hotair.com/archives/2014/01/30/abandon-ship-henry-waxman-to-retire/

redrat11
01-31-2014, 10:52 AM
Proof!


Watch: Employees in Pennsylvania Company Learn of Increased Health Costs Due to Obamacare10:43 AM, Jan 30, 2014BY*DANIEL HALPER

A local news station brings viewers inside one Pennsylvania company as the employees there learn about their new health care plans under Obamacare:

Look at the numbers," says the reporter of two employees. "Jeff and Dave used to have a $1,250 deductible. Since Obamacare went into effect, it's now jumped 60 percent to $2,000. That's nothing compared to Brian, Kristi, and Judy who have kids. they are going to pay twice that, four grand." The reporter adds that co-pays are being increased, too."I don't know how President Obama thinks he's helping us because we can't afford this, we can't afford to pay these co-pays, to pay these deductibles on what we're making," says one of the workers.Another worker adds, "They call it the affordable health plan. There's nothing affordable about it. I can't afford it."


http://youtu.be/UuA2_P-m4Sk







http://m.weeklystandard.com/blogs/watch-employees-pennsylvania-company-learn-increased-health-costs-due-obamacare_775944.html

ObamaCare a Really Big SCAM!

How the Authors of Obamacare Protected Insurance Companies

Three provisions in the law offset the crisis they might face if too few healthy people and too many sick ones enroll.



http://www.nationaljournal.com/magazine/how-the-authors-of-obamacare-protected-insurance-companies-20131110

redrat11
02-01-2014, 12:48 PM
http://www.stupid.com/assets/images/obamacare_pill_box_1.jpg


http://www.aei.org/article/health/healthcare-reform/ppaca/obamacares-mandate-meltdown/

Obamacare's 'mandate' meltdownJames C. Capretta,*Jeffrey H. Anderson*|New York PostJanuary 19, 2014

The president and his Democratic allies are finding it harder to make people buy insurance than they’d expected. Will Obamacare’s individual mandate survive?Last month, the administration announced that anyone with a canceled 2013 individual insurance plan would be exempt from the “individual-responsibility requirement” this year, and would be allowed to buy the catastrophe-only insurance previously offered to those age 30 or under.This exemption is likely only the first of many. How, for one, can the administration exempt people who had insurance last year but not exempt people who were uninsured because they couldn’t afford coverage?Obamacare’s architects were always ambivalent about the mandate. They knew compulsion was necessary to make their system work — but, fearing a backlash, opted for a fairly weak penalty for those who didn’t obey. Oops: They wound up with a mandate that still provokes resentment, yet probably won’t work.The US Supreme Court weakened the mandate even as it was saving Obamacare. The law’s authors hoped that the mandate would create the perception that insurance enrollment is now obligatory, but the high court made it clear that Congress has no authority to institute such a requirement. The justices ruled that the mandate could stand only as an optional tax, not as a fine for noncompliance.So you’re not breaking the law by not buying (overpriced) Obamacare-compliant insurance; you’re just making the legal choice to pay the tax instead.And that tax will generally be far lower than Obamacare premiums. That’s the clear conclusion of a new study by the 2017 Project, which compares premiums in the Obamacare exchanges in the 50 most populous US counties to the tax that households could pay instead.This year, that tax equals the greater of two numbers: 1) $95 per adult in a household, plus half of that amount for each child, up to $285 for an entire household, or 2) 1 percent of household income in excess of the tax-filing threshold ($10,150 for singles, and $20,300 for married couples).So, for instance, a 31-year-old single man making $30,000 in Columbus, Ohio faces a tax of $198.50, more than $2,000 less than the cheapest option in Ohio’s Obamacare exchange, even including his taxpayer-funded subsidy. For a 36-year-old San Diego woman making $40,000, the tax is $298.50, or nearly $2,400 less than the cheapest policy on the California exchange. She’s not eligible for a subsidy.Obamacare can’t work if the young and healthy don’t sign up in large numbers — yet the law creates a clear incentive for them to opt out.There’s more: The law also guarantees that you can always choose to buy during the next annual enrollment period — so if you fall seriously ill and find that Obamacare has become a better investment, you can buy it then.The Obamacare law thus made insurance a less valuable product for most people, even as it pushed up the cost of buying it.The coercion of the individual mandate was supposed to balance the equation, but it’s far too weak to do so — and it’s getting weaker each time the administration proclaims another exemption.Yes, the tax for opting out is scheduled to rise in coming years. In 2015 and 2016, the tax rate for those paying based on their household income will rise to 2.0 and 2.5 percent, respectively. But many middle-income families will still find that cheaper than buying Obamacare insurance.

------


Happy ObamaCare for everyone!


http://twitchy.com/2014/02/01/sarah-palin-finally-found-someone-excited-about-obamacare-someone-really-excited-pic/

redrat11
02-07-2014, 08:53 AM
The ObamaCare Map

http://www.forbes.com/special-report/2013/what-will-obamacare-cost-you-map.html


http://i738.photobucket.com/albums/xx25/77769/obamacare.jpg


February 5, 2014 12:00 AM
The Obamacare Security Nightmare: It Gets Worse
Malicious code may lurk in HealthCare.gov.

By Michelle Malkin


http://www.nationalreview.com/article/370358/obamacare-security-nightmare-it-gets-worse-michelle-malkin


Fraudsters on the inside, hackers on the outside. Here we are, stuck in the middle with the security nightmare called Obamacare. Can it get any worse? Yes, it can.

After the spectacular website crashes during last fall’s federal-health-insurance-exchange rollout, enrollees will soon wish the entire system had stayed down and dead. “404 Error” messages and convicted-felon Obamacare navigators may be the least of our health-care tech problems now. The latest? U.S. intelligence agencies notified the Department of Health and Human Services last week that the HealthCare.gov infrastructure could be infected with malicious code.

Who’s responsible? Washington Free Beacon national-security reporter Bill Gertz writes that U.S. officials have “warned that programmers in Belarus, a former Soviet republic closely allied with Russia, were suspected” of possible sabotage. A government tech bureaucrat in the Belarusian regime bragged last summer on Russian radio that HHS is “one of our clients” and that “we are helping Obama complete his insurance reform.”

Gulp. When an authoritarian minion from the country known as “Europe’s last dictatorship” boasts about “helping” the Obama White House, be afraid. One of our intel people spelled it out for Gertz: “The U.S. Affordable Care Act software was written in part in Belarus by software developers under state control, and that makes the software a potential target for cyber attacks.”

No kidding. The friends of Vladimir Putin are not our friends. If you’ve been paying attention, you know that Belarus and other Eastern European hacking gangs have been at the center of several recent international cybercrimes. These aren’t merely schemes to steal credit-card numbers or vandalize websites with annoying graffiti. They’re acts of espionage and sabotage — like using malware in a phishing scheme aimed at White House employees to gather military intelligence and pilfer sensitive government documents.

It’s not just the federal health-care system’s problem. Former Obamacare website contractor CGI still holds dozens of contracts with other federal agencies and state governments worth billions of dollars — and wide access to health and financial data. In my state of Colorado, for example, CGI has a $78 million contract to “modernize, host and manage” the state’s financial system. Have they checked to see whether Belarus hackers are standing by?

For their part, Obamacare officials are making their usual “don’t worry about it, the problem’s under control” noises. But we already know the problem is far out of control. Last month, GOP oversight hearings exposed persistent failures by Obamacare overseers to fix security lapses.

Former most-wanted cybercriminal Kevin Mitnick concluded in a letter to Capitol Hill: “It’s shameful the team that built the Healthcare.gov site implemented minimal, if any, security best practices to mitigate the significant risk of a system compromise.” If the latest warnings from our intel agencies are any indication, it appears that Obamacare Keystone Kops didn’t just leave out security protections, but also may have allowed foreign programmers to write in cyber-traps.

David Kennedy, head of computer-security consulting firm TrustedSec LLC and a former cybersecurity official with the National Security Agency and the U.S. Marine Corps, warned that “HealthCare.gov is not secure today” and said nothing had changed since he gave Congress that assessment two months before. Among the vulnerabilities that the Obama administration still hasn’t fixed:

TrustedSec “identified the ability to enumerate user information (first, last, email, user id, profile, etc.) through one of the sub-sites that directly integrates into the healthcare.gov website.”

“Tens of thousands of user-based data appears to be vulnerable on the specified website and has not been addressed. There are a number of other exposures that have been reported privately that continue to expose users of the healthcare.gov website.”

Another exposure identified is “the ability to perform an open redirect.” In fact, “there are multiple open redirects still vulnerable on the healthcare.gov website and supporting sub-sites.” What this means is that “an attacker can send a targeted email to an individual that has signed up for healthcare.gov or is looking to and have it appear valid and legitimate and originate from the healthcare.gov website.” These can open avenues so that victims click on links “redirecting to a malicious website that hacks the computer and takes complete control over it.”

Out: “Got Covered?” In: “Got Hacked?”

— Michelle Malkin is the author of Culture of Corruption: Obama and His Team of Tax Cheats, Crooks and Cronies (Regnery, 2010). Her e-mail address ismalkinblog@gmail.com. © 2014 Creators.com

redrat11
02-16-2014, 04:26 PM
http://i738.photobucket.com/albums/xx25/77769/obama-book.jpg


ObamaCare Enrollment Slows To Crawl, State Data Show

24 CommentsBy*JED GRAHAM,*INVESTOR'S BUSINESS DAILY*Posted*02/10/2014 06:13 PM ETRead More At

Investor's Business Daily:*http://news.investors.com/politics-obamacare/021014-689516-obamacare-enrollment-signups-stagnate-lag-2014-targets.htm#ixzz2tWwcOJCi*Follow us:*@IBDinvestors on Twitter*|*InvestorsBusinessDaily on Facebook



seven weeks of open enrollment to go, ObamaCare enrollment — and payments — have slowed to a near-crawl in some states.Minnesota's exchange enrollment goal of 67,000 seemed within reach on Jan. 4, when signups stood at 25,860.But after surging by more than 4,000 per week in the prior five weeks, signups collapsed back to November's pace of less than 700 per week.As of Feb. 1, Nevada had just 14,999 paid enrollees — vs. the state's March 31 goal of 115,000.Washington state, meanwhile, was slightly more than halfway to its goal of 340,000 signups — but only 88,071 had paid as of Feb. 1.The January data available from a handful of states raise new doubts about whether ObamaCare's downgraded first-year prospects are still too optimistic.Further, a spotty payment rate (50% in Washington and 66% in Nevada) creates a risk that the demographics of the paid exchange population may be older — and possibly sicker — than even the national signup data have signaled.Health care consultant Robert Laszewski wrote that he believes about 20% of*ObamaCare enrollees haven't paid. The administration said that exchange signups hit the 3 million mark around Jan. 23 — up from 2.2 million on Dec. 28. Laszewski figures the paid total through Feb. 1 will likely be about 2.5 million.More will be known about how pervasive these trends are when the Obama administration releases January data for all of the exchanges in coming days.Late January SlumpBut January data from New York, Colorado, Maryland and Kentucky (easily accessible via*acasignups.net) all suggest that the momentum which carried from December into January substantially faded in the second half of the month.To some extent, this isn't surprising. Those who missed the deadline for January coverage — some due to technical glitches — would have been expected to try to complete enrollment by Jan. 15 to attain coverage effective Feb. 1.But the extent of the drop-off in signups in states like Nevada,*Minnesota*and*Maryland*that have made little progress toward their goals does highlight an important question: Is demand lagging mainly because of informational hurdles — or because the subsidies and policies aren't well designed to attract broad participation?No state has provided as much detail about its enrollment through Feb. 1 as Minnesota, and the details are somewhat concerning. (The state counts people who have completed their application and chosen a payment method.)Minnesota Goes 'Platinum'Only 21% of signups were in the key 18-34 demographic vs. 35% ages 55 to 64. Minnesota officials have been taken by surprise at the share of people signing up for ObamaCare's richest "platinum" coverage, which reimburses 90% of the covered group's qualifying expenses.Fully 29% have signed up for low-deductible platinum policies — compared to a projection of 5%. Such policies would tend to be favored by people who want to guard against high medical expenses, while someone expecting minimal costs might go for a high-deductible bronze plan.Minnesota is different than other states because households earning less than 200% of the poverty level qualify for MinnesotaCare, meaning they don't go through the exchanges.Thus, the lack of participation in ObamaCare in the state is among those earning more than 200% of poverty ($23,095 for a single person).This shouldn't be unexpected. Just above that level, an individual would have to pay about 6.3% of income ($1,500) to buy a silver policy with a significant deductible. The idea of spending less up front to buy a bronze plan also has a drawback — a typical deductible of $4,000 to $5,000 before benefits kick in.Some experts have predicted a late March enrollment surge, as procrastinators decide to attain coverage to avoid going uninsured for eight months or having to pay the mandate tax penalty — 1% of income in the first year.But there are reasons to be skeptical. The precedent they cite is RomneyCare's Massachusetts rollout in 2007, but coverage there carried no deductible for up to 300% of the poverty level. Nor is it clear how aware people are of the individual mandate, which only got attention recently when the White House delayed it in December for those with canceled policies.Some policy analysts expect the Obama administration to suspend the individual mandate in 2014 for for everyone, once the March 31 deadline is passed.Read More At Investor's Business Daily:*http://news.investors.com/politics-obamacare/021014-689516-obamacare-enrollment-signups-stagnate-lag-2014-targets.htm#ixzz2tWxOB0QF*Follow us:*@IBDinvestors on Twitter*|*InvestorsBusinessDaily on Facebook

------

http://i738.photobucket.com/albums/xx25/77769/YE-Supreme-Court-Kaga_Gree_20101215110149_640_480.jpg

Obamacare Court Ruling in*Halbig*a Major Blow to Opt-Out States

by*SAM KAZMAN*on*JANUARY 15, 2014in*HEALTHCARE,*LEGAL,*REGULATION

http://www.openmarket.org/2014/01/15/obamacare-court-ruling-in-halbig-a-major-blow-to-opt-out-states/

The*court’s ruling today in*Halbig v. Sebelius*delivers a major blow to the states that chose not to participate in the Obamacare insurance exchange program. It is also a blow to the small businesses, employees and individuals who live in those states as well. In upholding this IRS regulation that is contrary to the law enacted by Congress, this decision guts the choice made by a majority of the states to stay out of the exchange program. It imposes Obamacare penalties on employers and on many individuals in those states, penalties that Congress never authorized, putting their livelihoods and the jobs of their employees at risk. Worst of all, it gives a stamp of approval to the Administration’s attempt to substitute its version of Obamacare for the law that Congress enacted.The court does all this despite its own finding that our arguments were supported by, in its words, “the plain language” of the law’s key provision regarding state-established exchanges.* And by erasing the distinction between functions carried out by states and functions carried out by the federal government on behalf of states, the ruling undercuts some basic aspects of federalism. We have appealed this decision, and will shortly move to expedite the appeal.> View more about the lawsuit at*cei.org/obamacare

redrat11
02-26-2014, 02:36 PM
http://i738.photobucket.com/albums/xx25/77769/OneBigAssMistakeAmerica.jpg


http://i738.photobucket.com/albums/xx25/77769/421.jpg

ObamaCare Embarrassment: More Lose Insurance Than Gain It

News LinksFeb 20, 2014

Good morning folks,How embarrassing is this for President Obama and Senate Democrats?* As the enrollment period for ObamaCare sputters to a close, it turns out that in many key 2014 battleground states, more people received health care cancellation notices than have actually signed up under ObamaCare (and it wasn’t really close).* Have a look:

North Carolina: 160,161 North Carolinians had*selected*an ObamaCare plan as of 2/1/14.* According to the NC department of insurance, 473,724 residents*received insurance cancellation*letters thanks to ObamaCare.
Colorado: 68,454 Coloradans had*selected*an ObamaCare plan as of 2/1/14.* According to the Colorado Division Of insurance, 335,484 residentsreceived insurance cancellation*letters thanks to ObamaCare.
Michigan: 112,013 Michiganders had*selected*an ObamaCare plan as of 2/1/14.* According to the Associated Press, 225,000 residentsreceived insurance cancellation*letters thanks to ObamaCare.
Oregon: 33,808 Oregonians hadselected*an ObamaCare plan as of 2/1/14.* According to the Associated Press, 145,000 residents*received insurance cancellation*letters thanks to ObamaCare.
Louisiana: 32,864 Louisianans had*selected*an ObamaCare plan as of 2/1/14.* According to the Louisiana Insurance Commissioner, more than 92,739*residents received insurance cancellation*letters thanks to ObamaCare.
New Hampshire: 16,863 Granite Staters had*selected*an ObamaCare plan as of 2/1/14.* According to reports, more than* 22,000 residents*received insurance cancellation*letters thanks to ObamaCare.

We’re not mathematicians, but it sure appears that in these pivotal states, 371,780 men and women signed up for ObamaCare while a whopping 1,293,947 people received notices that their health care plans were being canceled thanks to the law.* OUCH.* It begs the question, how many of the people who signed up for ObamaCare did so because their plans were canceled? In other words, how many of the 424,163 actually got coverage for the first time?“So many of the promises Democrats like Mark Udall, Gary Peters and Kay Hagan repeatedly made about ObamaCare have proven false, and now it turns out that far more families and workers had their health insurance cancelled than signed up for ObamaCare – a total embarrassment for Democrats and President Obama.* Over the last few months, Americans have learned that ObamaCare means higher costs, cancelled health care policies, and fewer hours for workers across the country. They’ve also realized that Democrats weren’t being honest about ObamaCare five years ago and they’re still not shooting straight today when talking about “fixing” the disastrous law. As a result, voters no longer trust them or their judgment.* Democrats have a credibility problem.Seize the day,Brad Dayspring@BDayspringBrook Hougesen@Brook_H

http://www.theminorityreportblog.com/2014/02/20/obamacare-embarrassment-more-lose-insurance-than-gain-it/



http://i738.photobucket.com/albums/xx25/77769/wake_up_america_imgmapzoom.jpg

redrat11
03-05-2014, 08:34 PM
Health Insurance

Obamacare enrollment ends March 31

If you haven't enrolled by the end of this month, it could be a long wait until the next enrollment period.

By*QuinStreet*Mon 2:03 PM


http://i738.photobucket.com/albums/xx25/77769/iStock_000013863469XSmall.jpg

http://money.msn.com/health-and-life-insurance/article.aspx?post=781d6728-86d6-4525-80b8-8090aef5fd83

If you've been putting off shopping for health insurance for 2014, beware that you'll miss your chance if you wait too long.Open enrollment -- the time when you can purchase*an individual or individual family health plan*for this year -- will end March 31. This open enrollment period does not apply to people who buy their health insurance through work; your employer will still hold its own open enrollment period, usually in the fall.For those seeking individual plans, if you haven't bought a health plan by end of the day on March 31, then you'll have to wait until the next open enrollment period, unless you have a special circumstance, such as losing coverage at work or having a baby, and qualify for "special enrollment."The open enrollment for*2015 health plans*is set to run from Nov. 15, 2014, through Jan. 15, 2015.


You can enroll in Medicaid or the Children's Health Insurance Program, state and federal insurance programs for low-income families, at any time during the year -- but only if your income is low enough to qualify.Although a limited open enrollment period is customary for people covered by Medicare and for employees enrolling in health plans at work, it's a new concept for the individual health insurance market.A new way of doing thingsBefore this year, you could shop for an individual health plan at any time. But starting with 2014 health plans you're limited to purchasing coverage during the open enrollment period, which began Oct. 1, 2013."We caution consumers that it may take a while to get through the enrollment process, so they should start it as soon as they can," says Cheryl Fish-Parcham, deputy director of health policy at Families USA, a health care advocacy group.Through March 31, you can buy a health plan directly from an insurance company, health insurance agent, insurance website or through the government-run marketplace in your state. If you qualify for tax credits or cost-saving subsidies to make coverage more affordable, you must enroll through the government-run marketplace to get them.Health policy experts expect a rush to buy coverage as the open enrollment deadline nears, much as there was a surge at the end of December to buy coverage to begin Jan. 1."As there is tremendous media attention on that date, we'll see a similar phenomenon in March," says Sara Collins, vice president for health care coverage and access at the Commonwealth Fund, a foundation that supports an improved health care system.A Commonwealth Fund survey conducted in December 2013 found that 59 percent of people potentially eligible for coverage who had not yet enrolled in health insurance said they were likely to try to enroll in a plan or find out if they were eligible for financial help by the end of March.What's the deal with open enrollment?It's no coincidence that an open enrollment period was introduced as part of the Affordable Care Act. Starting this year, individual health plans must cover a set of standard benefits, and insurers cannot deny coverage or charge higher premiums for people with health conditions. The Affordable Care Act also requires almost everyone to have insurance this year.


http://i738.photobucket.com/albums/xx25/77769/obama_brownshirts_tpc.jpg

A time period for enrollment was set to prevent people from waiting until they got sick to buy coverage, Collins says. Health insurers need a large pool of people -- not just those with illnesses - to buy coverage in order to spread risk and keep premiums low.If you miss the March 31 deadline to purchase coverage for 2014, you could get another chance to enroll if you have a special circumstance, known as a "qualifying life event." In most cases you have 60 days after the event to enroll.Those events include:Getting marriedHaving or adopting a childPermanently moving to a new area that offers different health plansLosing other health coverage because of job loss, divorce, loss of eligibility for Medicaid or the Children's Health Insurance Program, expiration of COBRA coverage or decertification of a health plan. (A plan is decertified if it no longer meets federal and state standards for health plans.) Losing coverage because you didn't pay the premiums does not qualify you for special enrollment.A change in your household that affects eligibility for tax credits or cost-sharing subsidies, if you're already enrolled in a marketplace plan.There will be a few plans available between March and November. Some insurers will still offer short-term and temporary health plans.This year's open enrollment period was purposely set longer to give the marketplaces, insurers and the public time to come to terms with the new rules.More from Insure.com:How to buy individual health insuranceCustomer satisfaction ratings of health insurance companiesHow to buy health insurance before March 31, 2014


------


http://i738.photobucket.com/albums/xx25/77769/51MDkFAlZuL__SS500_.jpg

What to Know About the March 31 Health Insurance Deadline

Obamacare open enrollment ends this month. Here's what you need to know if you haven't signed up.



the March 31 enrollment deadline approaches to sign up for health insurance under the Affordable Care Act, many consumers may be thinking, “another month, another Obamacare deadline.” But this date will be a defining one for consumers without affordable health insurance, as well as for the law’s critics and advocates. The March deadline will mark the end of the open enrollment period for consumers looking to purchase health insurance plans on the federal health insurance marketplace. After March 31, Americans without health care plans will have to pay theObamacare penalty. For the Obama administration, the enrollment numbers on that date will help to gauge the early impact of the president's signature health care law. Things are looking up since OctoberSome of the biggest criticism the Obama administration has faced since the law took effect has been centered on the botched rollout of healthcare.gov. The online marketplace has beenplagued with technical issues since it launched on Oct. 1, prompting outcry from both consumers and lawmakers. Users complained of outages, slow response times, error messages and system crashes. Consumers can expect a relatively smooth experience on the site now, though the administration has admitted that issues still persist. In December, the White House completed a series of fixes that allows the site to handle up to 50,000 users at once, and the system was working 90 percent of the time, according to a Health and Human Services report. Furthermore, about 4 million Americans have enrolled in health insurance plans through the federal and state exchanges since Oct. 1, the administration announced last week. This is a big jump from the approximately 106,000 Americans who enrolled in plans during the first month the online marketplace was open, signaling a turnaround from the earlier technical challenges with healthcare.gov and many of the state marketplace sites. Still a long way to goStill, the recent enrollment figures don’t come close to the 7 million Americans the White House originally projected would sign up for health care before the March 31 deadline. The Congressional Budget Office recently modified the estimation to 6 million, citing the glitches in the online marketplace.However, health care experts say there will likely be an increase in enrollment as the deadline nears, and last-minute shoppers search for plans.Another changing deadline? The enrollment deadline could be extended again for any number of reasons. The administration previously pushed back the deadline for those enrolling in coverage that would start on New Year’s Day from Dec. 15 to Dec. 23. Then, on Dec. 23, it extended the deadline another 24 hours. It has also extended deadlines for those with pre-existing conditions, as well as the employer mandate, a key provision of the law. In this case, employers with 50 to 99 employees were granted another year before they have to offer health insurance to workers. There’s a strong suspicion among Americans that the deadline may be pushed back again. In a January poll by Bankrate, about 62 percent of more than 1,000 respondents believed the March 31 deadline would be extended. Only 29 percent said they believed it would stand. Still, there’s much confusion about what the deadline actually means. Roughly 55 percent of Americans don’t know that March 31 is the cutoff date to purchase health insurance under the individual mandate provision of the law, according to the poll. Missing the deadlineDon’t be caught off guard about the consequences of missing the deadline. After March 31, consumers looking to purchase plans through the marketplace won’t be able to do so until open enrollment begins again in October. If you miss the deadline, you can purchase insurance outside of the marketplace at any time – but be aware that you won’t receive any premium subsidies(think “discounts”), and you will likely be subject to a penalty for the time you were uninsured. If you are without coverage come March 31, you may face a penalty on your 2014 tax return. The fine will be $95 per adult and $47.50 per child or 1 percent of your household income, whichever is greater. In 2015, that will increase to $325 per adult or 2 percent of income.*




http://money.usnews.com/money/blogs/my-money/2014/02/28/what-to-know-about-the-march-31-health-insurance-deadline

http://i738.photobucket.com/albums/xx25/77769/Obama_trampling_Constitution.jpg

redrat11
03-18-2014, 12:25 PM
http://i738.photobucket.com/albums/xx25/77769/obamanation_imgmap.jpg


Drudge posts photo of 'van offering free Obamacare' in Spanish as deadline looms

*March 18, 2014

Devonia SmithPolitical Transcripts ExaminerAn eye-catching photo of a traveling Obamacare ad plus an explanation byDrudge Report's creator*Matt Drudge*on hisTwitter page*was interesting enough thatDrudge*received a nod for*"Tweet of the Day,"*on Monday. Drudge explained, "Govt looking van offering free Obamacare hit Miami streets today." Drudge also quipped, "Can you throw in pair of season tickets for Heat?"

http://i738.photobucket.com/albums/xx25/77769/0ae52d31d2bed849509510ecf6c3da7b.jpg


The rear doors of the white van, striped in red and blue, were wrapped in yellow with black text in Spanish which translated in English to:You can still subscribe to ObamacareApply today!800 - 419-6318Qualify and receive callsTotally freeA busy signal was the only response to attempts to call the number advertised repeatedly for over an hour this morning. However, Drudge also posted a photo of some of the targets for the mobile Obamacare ads seated in a large room with Obamacare signs.Drudge struck a compassionate tone as he included a cryptic reference to the presidential elections of 2016 in his post. Drudge wrote, "Watched as they lined up for Obamacare this morning in Miami. Warehouse setting, sad faces. No English. Hillary'16.*pic.twitter.com/DeG6ycsAdE."Over on his*Drudge Report*page, amid a constant storyboard of articles focusing on President Obama's signature legislation, the Affordable Healthcare Act (ACA), an article written by one of his two additional editors, Joseph Curl, was included yesterday. Curl's conclusion was, that "Obamacare is already finished before it started," because although Democrats and the president sold the concept of the need for insurance reform based on "46 million uninsured," less than five million have now signed up for Obamacare as the deadline for open enrollment looms, ending March 31. (Refer to:*Drudge editor urges American revolt: 'Take to the street' for 'real change')Numerous reports have been made about the effort by the Obama administration to encourage*Latinos*to sign up for Obamacare.*According to Politico, of the large numbers of uninsured Latinos residing in California, Florida and Texas, nearly one in three Latinos is uninsured, a higher proportion than the national rate. The Obama administration has estimated approximately 10 million Latinos, who must be citizens or legal residents to get benefits, are eligible for coverage in those exchanges. It is also accepted fact that most will be eligible to receive premium subsidies as well.It was December before the Spanish language site,*CuidadoDeSalud.gov,*was even launched. Then attacks were quickly made claiming the site was riddled with translation errors and applicants still couldn't browse plan options in Spanish.Attempts to reach the Latino population have not been limited to the mobile ad which Drudge referenced. Outreach has included navigators and volunteers working in-person plus media outreach and community town halls. Still, tapping this population has proved difficult and across the board, "advocates of the law don’t expect enrollment among Spanish speakers to be high in the first year."Matt Drudge, himself, has vowed that he was not signing up for Obamacare. Drudge referred to the tax penalty as "Monopoly money," a comment which quickly drewangry responses. Among those who questioned his meaning, Ezra Klein wanted to know, "Are you going to be unisured?"

http://www.examiner.com/article/drudge-posts-photo-of-van-offering-free-obamacare-spanish-as-deadline-looms

--------


First lady Michelle Obama visits Miami to promote Affordable Care Act

http://www.miamiherald.com/2014/03/05/3975966/first-lady-michelle-obama-visits.html

LANCE DIXON




LDIXON@MIAMIHERALD.COM




First lady Michelle Obama returned to Miami for the second time in two weeks, stopping at the Jessie Trice Community Health Center Wednesday to encourage people to enroll in an insurance plan under the Affordable Care Act.With less than four weeks left to enroll by the March 31 deadline, the Obama administration’s outreach and enrollment efforts have kicked into high gear with President Barack Obama, Vice President Joe Biden and other high-profile White House officials fanning out across the country.In Miami, Michelle Obama joked that she just happened to be in the neighborhood and then spoke about getting people — especially young people and minorities — enrolled.“In the African-American community, unfortunately, one in five of us are not insured,” she said, “and the numbers are no better in the Hispanic community.’’Obama added that federally qualified health centers, such as the Jessie Trice Center, will play a key role in the future.“Because of your work,’’ she said, “we've got four million people who have signed up for healthcare, and that is a milestone.’’The first lady said that the average adult pays less than $100 a month for health insurance under the ACA.“That's a pair of gym shoes. That's less than a cell phone bill,” she said.Obama walked around speaking with four Certified Application Counselors, who sat at tables with individuals already enrolled in health plans and four others who had yet to sign up.The counselors sat with computers, sifted through paperwork and helped consumers through the enrollment process on the healthcare.gov website.Obama spoke with one counselor, Paul Salazar, who said it takes about 20 minutes to sign up one person. Obama stressed that those who have signed up should encourage others to do the same.She also spoke to Vernon Twyne, who had already enrolled in a health plan, and Terry Rutherford, who was signing up Wednesday. Both said they did not have health coverage before the ACA passed.The first lady greeted Rutherford with a hug and kiss and thanked Suzy Diogene, the counselor working with Rutherford, for “changing lives.”“No one in this country should have to go without insurance, and now you don't have to,” Obama said.The first lady also spoke to Allen Zullinger, a law student at Florida International University, who said he signed up for insurance after an automobile collision last December.“Young people, you are not invincible,” Obama said. “Mr. Allen got hit by a car; he is now insured.”With that, the first lady thanked the group for letting her “intrude” and then left.Read more here: http://www.miamiherald.com/2014/03/05/3975966/first-lady-michelle-obama-visits.html#storylink=cpy

-----


http://i738.photobucket.com/albums/xx25/77769/creditcards.jpg


Shocker: Federal government’s fiscal deterioration almost 5 times official deficit

POSTED AT 8:01 PM ON MARCH 5, 2014 BY DUSTIN SIGGINS



In Fiscal Year 2013, the official federal deficit was $680 billion. Liberals have cheered this drop while subsequently ignoring how this deficit is both larger than all of Bush’s pre-recession deficits*and*is expected to grow dramatically over the next several decades.However, the Treasury Department’s annual report on the finances of the U.S. federal government shows that not only is $680 billion an incomplete measure of the federal government’s finances, it’s off by nearly a factor of five.

From Just Facts Daily:The U.S. Treasury has just released its annual “Financial Report of the United States Government,” which provides an account of the federal government’s finances using accounting standards like those that the government*requiresof large corporations. Because the federal budget is not bound by these standards, it does not have to account for all of its fiscal obligations.For example, the Treasury report reveals that the federal government owes $6.5 trillion in retirement and health benefits to federal employees and veterans. This legal responsibility amounts to $53,000 for every*household*in the United States, but none of these liabilities are reflected in the 2013 budget deficit or national debt.….During the federal government’s 2013 fiscal year, the official federal deficit was*$680 billion, but this comprehensive accounting reveals that the federal government’s fiscal position deteriorated by $3.3 trillion or an average of $27,000 for every household in the U.S.

http://hotair.com/good-enough-for-government-work/2014/03/05/shocker-federal-governments-fiscal-deterioration-almost-5-times-official-deficit/



------

http://i738.photobucket.com/albums/xx25/77769/article-0-0EE7E8F100000578-321_634x408.jpg

http://touch.latimes.com/#section/-1/article/p2p-79247432/

Obama administration to further delay healthcare employer mandate




2015. They will have to provide coverage to 95% of full-time workers in 2016.The requirement that companies with more than 50 full-time workers provide insurance or pay a fine is designed to prevent firms from dropping health benefits once the government offers subsidies to help individuals buy coverage.The law's authors worried that firms would be tempted to stop offering coverage, shifting the cost of healthcare to the government.Under the law, large employers that do not provide insurance will be fined $2,000 per employee beyond the first 30 employees.The new regulations are almost certain to provide new fuel to Republican critics of the law, who have charged repeatedly that the administration has exceeded its authority in selectively implementing parts of the law.But administration officials said Monday that the law allows such adjustments.“The secretary has very broad authority to implement the tax law in a way that benefits tax administration, and we think the phase-in approach really is a way to administer the law better and enhance overall compliance,” a senior Treasury Department official said.

redrat11
03-18-2014, 07:53 PM
http://i738.photobucket.com/albums/xx25/77769/OBAMA_S-OCTOBER-SURPRISE-guardian-express-265x300.jpg

March 12, 2014 6:58 PM

ObamaCare's Secret Mandate Exemption

HHS quietly repeals the individual purchase rule for two more years.




ObamaCare's implementers continue to roam the battlefield and shoot their own wounded, and the latest casualty is the core of the Affordable Care Act—the individual mandate. To wit, last week the Administration quietly excused millions of people from the requirement to purchase health insurance or else pay a tax penalty.This latest political reconstruction has received zero media notice, and the Health and Human Services Department didn't think the details were worth discussing in a conference call, press materials or fact sheet. Instead, the mandate suspension was buried in an unrelated rule that was meant to preserve some health plans that don't comply with ObamaCare benefit and redistribution mandates. Our sources only noticed the change this week.


That seven-page*technical bulletin*includes a paragraph and footnote that casually mention that a rule in a separate December 2013 bulletin would be extended for two more years, until 2016. Lo and behold, it turns out this*second rule, which was supposed to last for only a year, allows Americans whose coverage was cancelled to opt out of the mandate altogether.In 2013, HHS decided that ObamaCare's wave of policy terminations qualified as a "hardship" that entitled people to a special type of coverage designed for people under age 30 or a mandate exemption. HHS originally defined and reserved hardship exemptions for the truly down and out such as battered women, the evicted and bankrupts.But amid the post-rollout political backlash, last week the agency created a new category: Now all you need to do is fill out a form attesting that your plan was cancelled and that you "believe that the plan options available in the [ObamaCare] Marketplace in your area are more expensive than your cancelled health insurance policy" or "you consider other available policies unaffordable."


This lax standard—no formula or hard test beyond a person's belief—at least ostensibly requires proof such as an insurer termination notice. But people can also qualify for hardships for the unspecified nonreason that "you experienced another hardship in obtaining health insurance," which only requires "documentation if possible." And yet another waiver is available to those who say they are merely unable to afford coverage, regardless of their prior insurance. In a word, these shifting legal benchmarks offer an exemption to everyone who conceivably wants one.Keep in mind that the White House argued at the Supreme Court that the individual mandate to buy insurance was indispensable to the law's success, and President*Obamacontinues to say he'd veto the bipartisan bills that would delay or repeal it. So why are ObamaCare liberals silently gutting their own creation now?


The answers are the implementation fiasco and politics. HHS revealed Tuesday that only 940,000 people signed up for an ObamaCare plan in February, bringing the total to about 4.2 million, well below the original 5.7 million projection. The predicted "surge" of young beneficiaries isn't materializing even as the end-of-March deadline approaches, and enrollment decelerated in February.Meanwhile, a McKinsey & Company survey reports that a mere 27% of people joining the exchanges were previously uninsured through February. The survey also found that about half of people who shopped for a plan but did not enroll said premiums were too expensive, even though 80% of this group qualify for subsidies. Some substantial share of the people ObamaCare is supposed to help say it is a bad financial value. You might even call it a hardship.


HHS is also trying to pre-empt the inevitable political blowback from the nasty 2015 tax surprise of fining the uninsured for being uninsured, which could help reopen ObamaCare if voters elect a Republican Senate this November. Keeping its mandate waiver secret for now is an attempt get past November and in the meantime sign up as many people as possible for government-subsidized health care. Our sources in the insurance industry are worried the regulatory loophole sets a mandate non-enforcement precedent, and they're probably right. The longer it is not enforced, the less likely any President will enforce it.The larger point is that there have been so many unilateral executive waivers and delays that ObamaCare must be unrecognizable to its drafters, to the extent they ever knew what the law contained.

full article

http://m.us.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052702304250204579433312607325596?mobile =y


-------

http://i738.photobucket.com/albums/xx25/77769/the_pied_piper.jpg


Young People Are Falling Into A Health Insurance Subsidy Gap

by*ELANA GORDONMarch 18, 2014*4:00 PM


Some young people seeking to buy health insurance are finding themselves falling into a subsidy gap that leaves them ineligible for financial assistance that was heavily advertised.Subsidies in the health law were designed to lower insurance costs for people who make around $11,000 to $46,000 a year.But for young people earning toward the higher end of that range, it's more complicated than that.*A new study*shows that in major cities, some young people fall in that salary range but don't actually qualify for government help to pay their insurance premiums.And as the Affordable Care Act barrels toward its March 31 enrollment deadline, insurers need people ages 18 to 34 to sign up.Brian Loughnane is 26 and was making $36,000 a year when he looked for a policy onHealthCare.gov*in December.

article continues below


http://www.npr.org/blogs/health/2014/03/18/291162837/some-young-people-won-t-get-help-for-affordable-care-act-insurance

redrat11
05-22-2015, 10:31 PM
Eurasia-WW3-Jade Helm-Martial Law-False Flag in Europe???Australia???




http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X4g9WocftFg&sns=em


What In The World Is Happening In Macedonia?



Thursday, May 21, 2015


By Brandon Turbeville


In May 2015, protests began erupting in Skopje, Macedonia against the Prime Minister Nikola Gruevski and his government. The protests, led by Zoran Zaev, were allegedly in response to the massive spying and surveillance of Macedonian officials and other individuals as well as an alleged cover-up of a killing of a young man by police in 2011. The protests were largely focused on the issue of government corruption, with tens of thousands of people in the streets of Skopje, demanding the Prime Minister’s resignation as well as that of other members of his government.

A major protest occurred on May 5 and several other anti-government protests have taken place since then. While some protests have remained peaceful, there has been widespread violence from other demonstrations. On the May 5 protest alone, violent clashes took place between protesters and police with injuries taking place on both sides.

In the days that followed, several Macedonian ministers resigned from their posts, including the Interior Minister. Prime Minister Gruevski, however, has refused to resign, characterizing such a move as cowardly behavior.

On May 17, thousands of protesters once again descended upon the streets of Skopje to demand the ouster of the current government. On May 18, however, thousands more took to the streets to protest in support of the current government and Prime Minister Gruevski.


An anti-government, anti-Gruevski camp has been set up outside government offices and remains there indefinitely with several hundred inhabitants on average.

With such social unrest taking place in Macedonia, one need only look to the NATO/US and George Soros-funded networks to see the hidden hand of the Western Color Revolution apparatus at work.

Macedonia may at first seem an unlikely target of the Anglo-American color revolution apparatus, but the truth is that the small country is now the latest battleground in a proxy war between Russia and the West. Not only are the two sides competing for influence over the domestic affairs and political decisions of the Macedonian government, there is also the question of geopolitical positions and the agenda of the creation of micro-states and mini-states. Most notably, however, is the interest regarding the Balkan Stream pipeline (aka the Turkish Stream Pipeline).




George Soros, NATO, US Color Revolution Apparatus Behind the Unrest In Macedonia

George Soros is most well-known for playing a major role in the funding and facilitating of the "Bulldozer Revolution" in Serbia that overthrew Slobodan Milosevic in 2000, Georgia’s "Rose Revolution" of 2003, the 2006 push to move Turkey toward a more Islamist governing structure, and even the Occupy movement in the United States among a great many others – none of which brought anything other than greater misery, impoverishment, and police state mechanisms to bear on the general public. The Occupy movement, being the only exception, still brought nothing to its participants except the opportunity to burn off excess anger and energy along with a few cracked protester skulls. It was otherwise an incredible waste of time.

In addition, George Soros has been heavily involved in the social unrest and movement-wrecking activity that has taken place all across the United States in recent months. From Florida to Ferguson and then on to Baltimore, George Soros’ Foundations have been involved in making sure that not only are American citizens unable to overcome racial divisions with mutual cooperation but that even the racially isolated participants are unable to accomplish anything of substance.

In Macedonia, like in the United States, Soros organizations work under the pretense of left cover. In other words, Soros NGOs fund and operate organizations and movements that are seen as Left in nature but are, in reality, revolutionary organizations designed to push a political agenda, change Macedonian culture, install puppet regimes, and ultimately serve the purpose of the Anglo-American oligarchy.




full article at link


http://www.activistpost.com/2015/05/what-in-world-is-happening-in-macedonia.html

---

NWO FINAL PLANS PUT IN MOTION BY??? (Not Soros)

Total Global Warfare

Total Global Economic Collapse

A Total Global Catastrophic Event (All Man Made-Famine- Plagues, Massive Earthquake) will lead to the total enslavement of humanity, and the Mark of the Beast, on every Human being. And the Final SATANIC ONE WORLD ORDER! All of this, THEY want ASAP!


Secret Pentagon Report Reveals US "Created" ISIS As A "Tool" To Overthrow Syria's President Assad


Submitted by*Tyler Durdenon 05/23/2015 20:06 -0400

From the first sudden, and quite dramatic, appearance of the fanatical Islamic group known as ISIS which was largely unheard of until a year ago, on the world's stage and which promptly replaced the worn out and tired al Qaeda as the world's terrorist bogeyman, we suggested that the "straight to beheading YouTube clip" purpose behind the*Saudi Arabia-funded Islamic Statewas a simple one: use the Jihadists as the vehicle of choice to achieve a political goal: depose of Syria's president Assad, who for years has stood in the way of a*critical Qatari natural gas pipeline, one which could dethrone Russia as Europe's dominant - and belligerent - source of energy, reaching an interim climax with the unsuccessful Mediterranean Sea military build up of 2013, which nearly resulted in quasi-world war.

The narrative and the plotline were so transparent, even Russia saw right through them.*Recall from September of last year:

Full article at link

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-05-23/secret-pentagon-report-reveals-us-created-isis-tool-overthrow-syrias-president-assad


http://www.whale.to/c/protocols_of_zion.jpg

----


Former CIA deputy director: Absolute risk of US-China war over South China Sea

Posted on May 20, 2015 by StMA | 8 Comments

This evening, May 20, 2015, former CIA Deputy Director Michael Morell told CNN’s Erin Burnett that the confrontation of U.S. and China over the latter’s increasingly aggressive moves in the South China Sea indicates there is “absolutely” a risk of the U.S. and China going to war sometime in the future.

article below

https://cofda.wordpress.com/2015/05/20/former-cia-deputy-director-absolute-risk-of-us-china-war-over-south-china-sea/

-----

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y6ysthZCBDk&sns=em


Soros sees risk of another world war

Published: May 19, 2015 4:27 p.m. ET


Much depends on Chinese economy

WASHINGTON (MarketWatch) — Billionaire investor George Soros said flatly that he’s concerned about the possibility of another world war

Much depends on the health of the Chinese economy, Soros said in remarks at a Bretton Woods conference at the World Bank.

If China’s efforts to transition to a domestic-demand led economy from an export engine falter, there is a “likelihood” that China’s rulers would foster an external conflict to keep the country together and hold on to power.

“If there is conflict between China and a military ally of the United States, like Japan, then it is not an exaggeration to say that we are on the threshold of a third world war,” Soros said.

Military spending is on the rise in Russia and China, he said.

To avoid this scenario, Soros called on the U.S. to make a “major concession” and allow China’s currency to join the International Monetary Fund’s basket of currencies. This would make the yuan a potential rival to the dollar as a global reserve currency.

In return, China would have to make similar major concessions to reform its economy, such as accepting the rule of law, Soros said.

Allowing China’s yuan to be a market currency would create “a binding connection” between the two systems.

An agreement along these lines will be difficult to achieve, Soros said, but the alternative is so unpleasant

“Without it, there is a real danger that China will align itself with Russia politically and militarily, and then the threat of third world war becomes real, so it is worth trying.”

http://www.marketwatch.com/story/soros-sees-risk-of-another-world-war-2015-05-19


http://commieblaster.com/images/Soros/soros_puppet.jpg

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cofm6l-9upQ&sns=em


China thinks it can defeat America in battle

Posted by Craig Hill ⋅ July 8, 2014 ⋅ 7 Comments


First the bad news: The People’s Republic of China now believes it can successfully prevent the United States from intervening in the event of a Chinese invasion of Taiwan or some other military assault by Beijing.

Now the good news: China is wrong — and for one major reason. It apparently disregards the decisive power of America’s nuclear-powered submarines.

Moreover, for economic and demographic reasons Beijing has a narrow historical window in which to use its military to alter the world’s power structure. If China doesn’t make a major military move in the next couple decades, it probably never will.

The U.S. Navy’s submarines — the unsung main defenders of the current world order — must hold the line against China for another 20 years. After that, America can declare a sort of quiet victory in the increasingly chilly Cold War with China.


http://chinadailymail.com/2014/07/08/china-thinks-it-can-defeat-america-in-battle/

-----

Pentagon: China’s military advances to overtake U.S. in 5 years

Posted on January 28, 2014 by StMA | 15 Comments

China’s recent test of a new ultra-high speed strike vehicle highlights growing concerns that Chinese military advances will overtake those of the United States in as few as five years, a senior Pentagon official told Congress Tuesday.

Frank Kendall, undersecretary of defense for acquisition, technology, and logistics, said during a House Armed Services Committee hearing that he is concerned by large-scale cuts in U.S. defense spending that are undermining efforts to maintain U.S. military superiority.

“On hypersonics, this is a good example of an area of technology that is going to move forward whether we invest in it or not,” Kendall told a hearing on the United States shift toward Asia. “China is doing work in this area.”

article at link



https://cofda.wordpress.com/2014/01/28/pentagon-chinas-military-advances-to-overtake-u-s-in-5-years/

-----

Pentagon: China's 'Three Warfares' Seek to Drive US From Asia

Wednesday, 26 Mar 2014 05:09 PM

By Todd Beamon



China is battling the United States in three non-military areas in hopes of driving U.S. troops out of Asia and tightening its grip on the seas near its coasts, says a Pentagon study.

The "Three Warfares" described in the report are on psychological, media, and legal fronts, the Washington Free Beacon reports. The report was developed for the Pentagon's Office of Net Assessment, which examines issues related to future warfare scenarios.

"The Three Warfares is a dynamic three-dimensional war-fighting process that constitutes war by other means," Cambridge University professor Stefan Halper, who directed the study, told the Free Beacon. "It is China’s weapon of choice in the South China Sea."

Halper was among eight China experts who contributed to the 566-page, unclassified report. Others included Michael Pillsbury, who served at the Pentagon during the Reagan administration, the Free Beacon reports.

Though the Pentagon's report was completed in May 2013, news of it comes on the heels of moves announced last month by Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel to slash the size of the U.S. military to its smallest levels since before World War II and to scrap a class of Air Force attack jets.

Hagel's efforts would cut military spending to meet government austerity objectives resulting from President Barack Obama's promise to end U.S. involvement in wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.

article below

http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/China-Pentagon-Three-Warfares/2014/03/26/id/561937/

---

http://nerd6.fr33bas3.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/kissinger-nwo.jpg

Friday, May 22, 2015

Special Forces Veteran Tells the Truth About Joining the Military

By Isaac Davis

“They’re not sending you out there to be a hero…” – Stan Goff


As world leaders work feverishly to bring about World War III, the need for front line cannon fodder will only increase, and more of the world’s youth will called to duty by the traitors and cowards who make peace an impossibility.

The propaganda machine and mainstream media is very sophisticated at selling war, and military recruiters have unfettered access to the minds of the young. They want YOU to be their next disposable hero.

The effort to make joining the military seem attractive will intensify as the economy worsens and college tuition rises, so it’s important to remember that no matter what they offer in exchange, it is your life and conscience that are truly at stake, and these are both priceless and irreplaceable.

In this age of interconnectedness, a small piece of truth finally has the potential to amplify itself and compete with the over-funded mouthpieces of the military industrial complex. Retired U.S. Army Master Sergeant Stan Goff is a courageous truth teller whose message needs to be heard.


That organization [The US Military] does not exist to give you money for school. That organization exists to assert the political will of the United States government against other people by force of arms. And what they do is not like it’s portrayed in the movies. They’re not sending you out there to be a hero, they’re sending you out there to be a bully.


Having served over 20 years in the U.S. Army, much of it in Special Forces, he has been to numerous combat zones including Vietnam. He’s also written several books about his experiences and reflections on war including Hideous Dream: A Soldier’s Memoir of the U.S. Invasion of Haiti and Full Spectrum Disorder: The Military in the New American Century, and speaks publicly about the moral failures of war policy and he true nature of soldiering for a corporate oligarchy.

Sure, they’ll offer you money, travel, excitement, adventure. They’ll pitch you ideas like honor, glory, service, and pride, but the dissonance between what you sign up to do and what you actually do is severe.


full article at link

http://www.activistpost.com/2015/05/special-forces-veteran-tells-truth.html#more

----

CONSERVATIVE REPUBLICANS' IMMUTABLE AMERICA
PART 2


By Servando Gonzalez
May 21, 2015
NewsWithViews.com

Part II: The Military

The flag follows the dollar and the soldiers follow the flag. —Gen. Smedley Butler, 1933 speech.

In Part I of this series, I mentioned how the conservative Republicans’ view of the world is focused on immutability. To them, nothing evolves, nothing changes. Everything remains the same, forever and ever.

Nothing exemplifies more my point than the view Republicans have of the U.S. military. According to them, the military is the utmost example of honor, integrity, patriotism, honesty, truthfulness and high ethical standards. It is evident that their view of the military stopped around WWII, when, with a few exceptions, those were the terms that better described the U.S. military. To most Americans, the military was bedrock of trust, and they were proud of them.




http://www.newswithviews.com/Gonzalez/servando144.htm

-----


Pressure grows on Marines to consider lowering combat standards for women

By Rowan Scarborough - The Washington Times - Sunday, April 19, 2015


Two years ago, Army Gen. Martin E. Dempsey, the nation’s top military officer, laid down an edict on the Obama administration’s plan to open direct land combat jobs to women: If women cannot meet a standard, senior commanders better have a good reason why it should not be lowered.

Today, the “Dempsey rule” appears to have its first test case.

The Marine Corps just finished research to see if female officers could successfully complete its rigorous Infantry Officer Course.


A IOC diploma is a must to earn the designation of infantry officer. Of 29 women who tried, none graduated; only four made it through the first day’s combat endurance test.

Corps public affairs said it did not have the data on which tasks proved the toughest for women. But one particularly demanding upper-body strength test is climbing a 25-foot rope with a backpack full of gear. A candidate who cannot crawl to the top fails the test.



A physical demands study concluded that of the 29 women who tried to complete the intense Infantry Officer Course, none graduated. (Associated Press)
A physical demands study concluded that of the 29 women who tried ... more >
Traditionalists see the 0-29 performance as a call to arms by those inside the Pentagon who are determined to have significant numbers of women in the infantry. They are on the lookout for standards they believe are no longer relevant in today’s battlefield.

full article at link

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/apr/19/marine-corps-weighs-lower-standards-for-women-afte/

----



Rumors of China Buying Russian Mistrals Could be US' Worst Nightmare


Military & Intelligence
15:11 20.05.2015(updated 19:20 21.05.2015)

The United States is sure to be alarmed by the circulating but as of yet unconfirmed rumors that China could be thinking about buying the two Mistral ships built in France for Russia, according to the Diplomat.

Purchasing the assault ships makes sense, the news magazine noted. "China has both the use scenarios and the military infrastructure necessary to make effective use of the ships," the Diplomat said.




http://sputniknews.com/military/20150520/1022365406.html


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uBnBUioIrYo&sns=em


U.S. Aircraft Carrier Killer: China deploys anti-ship ballistic missile along southern coast, facing Taiwan



April 20, 2013 – CHINA – The Chinese military has deployed its new anti-ship ballistic missile along its southern coast facing Taiwan, the Pentagon’s top military intelligence officer said today. The missile, designated the DF-21D, is one of a “growing number of conventionally armed” new weapons China is deploying to the region, adding to more than 1,200 short-range missiles opposite the island democracy, U.S. Army Lieutenant General Michael Flynn, the Defense Intelligence Agency director, said in a statement to the Senate Armed Services Committee. Flynn’s reference to the DF-21D follows one made by U.S. Navy Admiral Samuel Locklear, head of the U.S. Pacific Command, in congressional testimony on April 9. He highlighted the “initial deployment of a new anti-ship missile that we believe is designed to target U.S. aircraft carriers.” Flynn’s brief reference to the DF-21D today is significant because it advances the DIA’s assessment last year, when U.S. Army Lieutenant General Ronald Burgess, then the agency’s director, said China’s military is “probably preparing to deploy” the weapon. The disclosure may spark increased scrutiny in Congress this year about the vulnerability of the Navy’s aircraft carriers, including the new Gerald R. Ford class being built by Newport News, Virginia-based Huntington Ingalls Industries Inc. The Navy estimates that the first new carrier will cost at least $12.3 billion,


https://theextinctionprotocol.wordpress.com/2013/04/20/u-s-aircraft-killer1-china-deploys-anti-ship-ballistic-missile-along-southern-coast-facing-taiwan/


---
Chinese army colonel says avian flu is an American plot against China

By Max Fisher April 9, 2013 Follow @Max_Fisher


Colonel Dai Xu of the People's Liberation Army wrote online that the new strain of bird flu hitting China, known as H7N9, is an American "bio-psychological weapon" meant to destabilize China. The rant, posted to Dai's account on the Twitter-like service Weibo, had already been shared by more than 30,000 fellow users by the time that the South China Morning Post reported it on Monday. Dai now has a quarter million followers on Weibo, which is quite a platform.

In general, Chinese Web users appear to have rejected Dai's argument. In response to the criticism, though, he's only dug in. "It is common knowledge that a group of people in China have been injected with mental toxin by the U.S.," he wrote at one point. "I will not retreat even half a step." He urged Chinese officials to ignore the virus's apparent spread and argued that the disastrous 2003 SARS outbreak was also an American plot


http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/worldviews/wp/2013/04/09/chinese-army-colonel-says-avian-flu-is-an-american-plot-against-china/



----


U.S. and China square off at Asia security forum

Reuters
By David Brunnstrom and Lee Chyen Yee
May 31, 2014 8:06 AM


By David Brunnstrom and Lee Chyen Yee

SINGAPORE (Reuters) - The United States and China squared off at an Asian security forum on Saturday, with the U.S. defense secretary accusing Beijing of destabilizing the region and a top Chinese general retorting that his comments were "threat and intimidation".

Using unusually strong language, U.S. Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel took aim at Beijing's handling of territorial disputes with its Asian neighbors.

"In recent months, China has undertaken destabilizing, unilateral actions asserting its claims in the South China Sea," Hagel said.



http://news.yahoo.com/u-backs-japans-abe-tells-china-stop-destabilizing-022309858.html;_ylt=AwrBEiHMyolTByUAbUbQtDMD

----

China’s Reaction: America Is A “Disgusting Thief Spying Over His Neighbor’s Fence”



Tyler Durden's picture
Submitted by Tyler Durden on 08/23/2014 23:41 -0400


Only hours ago the US government announced that a Chinese fighter jet had intercepted an American military patrol plane over international waters east of China’s Hainan Island.

A Pentagon spokesman called China’s actions “unsafe and unprofessional”, and blasted such unprovoked aggression.

There was no mention as to why a US surveillance plane was just off the Chinese coast to begin with. They’re just playing the victim… and rather loudly at that.



article below


http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2014-08-23/china%E2%80%99s-reaction-america-%E2%80%9Cdisgusting-thief-spying-over-his-neighbor%E2%80%99s-fence%E2%80%9D

----


Pacific Cmdr.: U.S. lacks ability to conduct successful amphibious assaults

By Douglas Ernst - The Washington Times - Tuesday, March 25, 2014


The head of U.S. Pacific Command believes America does not possess the capacity to conduct amphibious assaults in the wake of a crisis, as it did during World War II.

Adm. Samuel Locklear III, commander of U.S. Pacific Command gave his assessment of the deficiency in readiness on Tuesday, Stars and Stripesreported.

“We have had a good return of our Marines back to the Asia-Pacific, particularly as the activities in the Middle East wind down in Afghanistan. … But the reality is, is that to get Marines around effectively, they require all types of lift. They require the big amphibious ships, but they also require connectors (meaning landing craft and other amphibious vehicles). The lift is the enabler that makes that happen, so we wouldn’t be able to [successfully carry out a contested amphibious assault without additional resources],” Adm. Locklear said, Stars and Stripes reported


http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2014/mar/25/pacific-commander-us-lacks-resources-conduct-succe/

---

WW3, Jade Helm, Martial Law, Mark of the Beast Bio Chips, NSA Spying on U.S. Citizens(Simulated BIO Terrorist Attacks???) all written into LAW and codified in the MAMMOTH OBAMA CARE LEGISLATION-AKA Affordable Care Act !


http://www.publiusforum.com/images/Obamacares_7foottallpapers.jpg

Military ops on U.S. soil raise martial-law fears

Wal-Mart closures have citizens concerned

Published: 04/20/2015 at 2:16 PM

Jade Helm 15 is set to kick off in seven states this summer, sending Special Operations forces from all four main branches of the military onto civilian soil to conduct hostile take-over training – and civil-rights advocates are sounding the alarms.

This is how the military describes it:

“The nature of warfare is always changing and U.S. Army Special Operations Command’s mission is to make certain the Army’s various Special Operations Forces are trained, equipped and organized to successfully conduct worldwide special operations in support of our nation’s interests,” said command spokesman Army Lt. Col. Mark Lastoria, in a statement to the Washington Post a few weeks ago. “Training exercise Jade Helm is going to assist our Special Operations Soldiers and leadership in refining the skills needed against an ever changing foreign threat.”


But plenty on social media aren’t calmed by the explanation, in part remembering the recent similar operation in Broward County, Florida, that saw Blackhawk helicopters flying above community streets while soldiers loaded citizen participants into white vans for transport to internment camps. It was all a staged exercise but for those watching, the scenes that unfolded were alarming.

“Police State USA: How Orwell’s Nightmare Is Becoming Our Reality” chronicles how America has arrived at the point of being a de facto police state, and what led to an out-of-control government that increasingly ignores the Constitution. Order today!

The looming Jade Helm exercise, set for July 15 through Sept. 15, labels Texas and Utah as hostile areas. Global Research also reported the military says New Mexico “isn’t much friendlier.” Other states participating: California, Colorado, Arizona and Nevada.

Some of the social media commentary so far: “The Pentagon’s ‘Operations Jade Helm 15′: The Floodgate towards Martial Law and World War III?”

And another: “Using Foreign Troops with Jade Helm Martial Law is TREASON.”


Yet one more poster pointed to recent reported Wal-Mart closures in Texas, California, Florida and Oklahoma with concern, saying the cited “plumbing problems” cited as the reason for the sudden shut-downs just don’t meet the smell test.



full article at link

http://www.wnd.com/2015/04/military-ops-on-u-s-soil-raise-martial-law-fears/

----

Military Vehicles to Crowd Highways During Colorado’s Largest Military Convoy Since WWII
By Star Fox

Friday, May 22, 2015

Nearly 650 military vehicles are set to crowd Colorado highways as they travel from Fort Carson to the Piñon Canyon Maneuver Site east of Trinidad in a training exercise taking place from May 26 – 30.

The convoy, the largest in Colorado since World War II, will consist of 300 Stryker armored vehicles, hundreds of trucks and humvees and will transport more then 4,000 soldiers, reports the Colorado Gazette.

Military planners have taken eight months to draw up the convoy’s plan and work with local authorities to ease the impact on commuters as the massive convoy rolls approximately 154 miles through the state.

The trek will consist of dozens of 15 – 30 vehicle convoys that will depart every half hour on “convoy days”.

According to the Colorado Gazette the exact route of the convoy has not yet been released due to security concerns but it is expected to run down Interstate 25 or Colorado 115.


The long drive is the first part of a simulated war called Raider Focus that the soldiers will spend weeks taking part in presumably at the Piñon Canyon Maneuver Site. There are no specifics as to what Raider Focus will entail.


As reports of Raider Focus surface along with the Jade Helm Military exercise on the horizon, there is no doubt the weariness spreading across America over the recent spree of military activity will intensify.

•PREP DRILL FOR JADE HELM 15 INCLUDES CHILDREN

•Special Forces Train With Cops For House to House Raids

Interestingly, billionaire investor George Soros told the World Bank this week that the planet is on the verge of a third world war that will arise out of a economic catastrophe in China.


Paul Joseph Watson of Propaganda Matrix reports:

The billionaire warned that China’s difficulty in transitioning from an export economy to a domestic demand-led system could force Beijing to whip up a conflict with an external enemy in a bid to keep the country from collapsing.

Soros said the only solution to the prospect was to allow China to join the IMF’s basket of global currencies so that it could compete with the dollar.

Without this measure, Soros warned that, “there is a real danger that China will align itself with Russia politically and militarily, and then the threat of third world war becomes real, so it is worth trying.”

Could Soros being hinting as to what all this domestic military activity is preparing for?

Star Fox is a U.S. based journalist who contributes to Eyesopenreport.com, where this article first appeared.
Follow @StarFoxReport

This article may be re-posted in full with attribution.



http://www.activistpost.com/2015/05/military-vehicles-to-crowd-highways.html#more

-----

May 22, 2015

Obama Massacres Innocent Waco Bikers Over Putin Fears


http://www.whatdoesitmean.com/index1870.htm

----

First They Came For The Bikers…

Posted on May 20, 2015 | 157 Comments

https://westernrifleshooters.wordpress.com/2015/05/20/first-they-came-for-the-bikers/
---


WE MUST CHOOSE BETWEEN A MASS AWAKENING AND THE DESTRUCTION OF AMERICA
PART 1 of 2

article below

http://www.newswithviews.com/McGuire/paul247.htm

---


AMERICA 2015: CONVERGENCE OF CATASTROPHIC EVENTS – THE PERFECT STORM


By Paul McGuire
November 10, 2014
NewsWithViews.com

http://www.newswithviews.com/McGuire/paul234.htm
----

Bizarre lung virus hospitalizing hundreds of kids across the Midwest, with 30 children admitted each day in Kansas City alone

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2746531/Bizarre-lung-virus-hospitalizing-hundreds-kids-Midwest-30-children-admitted-day-Kansas-City-alone.html

---

How Will You Protect Yourself From Heavily Armed Organized Gangs?



Mac Slavo
July 25th, 2011
SHTFplan.com

Comments (326)

Read by 3,579 people


In his article The Strategic Advantages Of Community Building Brandon Smith wrote “community networking is our best available solution in the wake of inevitable economic chaos.” Many of our readers responded in agreement, though there was also discussion of how advertising your survival and preparedness know-how could pose a danger to your family’s health and well being. We won’t disagree with the concept of operational security, especially prior to an economic collapse or TEOTWAWKI scenario. But, there is something to be said for getting to know your neighbors, interacting with them, learning their political and religious leanings, and having non-traditional conversations that center, in one way or another, on personal, neighborhood and community defense.

When we discuss home or bug-out location defense and the seemingly inevitable attacks that may happen in a post-SHTF world we usually resign ourselves to the idea that we have enough guns, ammo and people in our survival group to stop any incursions on our land. We assume that most of those who would attack, steal and kill us will be stupid gang bangers or idiot criminals.

The reality, however, is starkly different than our perceptions may allow us to contemplate before it hits the fan.

The following picture was taken when the leaders of a Mexican drug cartel were recently arrested:

article at link



http://www.shtfplan.com/emergency-preparedness/how-will-you-protect-yourself-from-heavily-armed-organized-gangs_07252011

redrat11
05-25-2015, 06:44 PM
http://i738.photobucket.com/albums/xx25/77769/china_army_zpsc64cf443.jpg


Tensions rise between Washington and Beijing over man-made islands


By Simon Denyer May 13  Follow @simondenyer


BEIJING — China said it was “deeply concerned” on Wednesday about a reported U.S. proposal to consider sending naval ships and aircraft toward man-made islands in the South China Sea as tensions escalate between the two nations over the vital waters.

The Obama administration has looked on with mounting frustration in recent months as China has undertaken a vast program of land reclamation in the South China Sea, turning rocks and submerged reefs into islands capable of supporting airstrips and military facilities across some of the world’s busiest shipping lanes.

The fear, expressed by President Obama last month, is that China is using its “muscle” to bully smaller nations into accepting its sovereignty over disputed waters. But a volley of verbal protests from the United States has fallen on deaf ears, and administration officials have been agonizing over how to rein China in without escalating military tensions to dangerous levels, experts say.

Until now, Washington has also appeared reluctant to impose real costs on Beijing over the issue and risk damaging other aspects of a wide-ranging bilateral relationship, foreign policy experts say. But the administration now appears to be seeking other options to counter the threat that China’s assertive — and at times aggressive — stance poses to vital U.S. interests.

“Reclamation isn’t necessarily a violation of international law, but it’s certainly violating the harmony, the feng shui, of Southeast Asia, and it’s certainly violating China’s claim to be a good neighbor and a benign and non-threatening power,” Daniel Russel, assistant secretary of state for East Asia, said in a telephone interview.


With Secretary of State John F. Kerry due in Beijing on Saturday, a high-level dialogue between the two nations scheduled for June in Washington and Chinese President Xi Jinping paying a state visit to the United States in September, Russel said there were still plenty of diplomatic avenues open to influence China’s decision-making.


“Not every problem is best dealt with by imposing harsh and heavy consequences,” he said. “But sure, we are looking at the options available to us if persuasion and diplomacy doesn’t work.”

However, persuasion is not working, many experts say, and there are not many other easy options available. Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) has been among those advocating a more robust response but has not made many concrete suggestions, apart from disinviting China from the Rim of the Pacific, or RIMPAC, military exercise in 2016.


article continues at link below


http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/asia_pacific/tensions-rise-between-washington-and-beijing-over-man-made-islands/2015/05/13/e88b5de6-f8bd-11e4-a47c-e56f4db884ed_story.html

-----



How It All Began: The Belgrade Embassy Bombing

Sunday, May 24, 2015


When I was in Beijing during the protests in 1989, a middle-aged man came up to me and asked, “Couldn’t America send some B-52s here and…” and he made a swooping motion with his hand.

Ten years later, on May 7, 1999, the American bombers did show up.

Instead of showering freedom ordnance on China’s dictators, however, they dropped five bombs on the Chinese embassy in Belgrade.

As to why this happened, the United States has always declared it was an accident.


http://chinamatters.blogspot.com/2015/05/how-it-all-began-belgrade-embassy.html

---

Chinese Navy Stars in Latest U.S.Intelligence Report

By Jeffrey Lin and P.W. Singer Posted April 27, 2015


In April 2015, the Office of Naval Intelligence (ONI), the U.S. Navy's intelligence arm, released its latest report on the PLAN, titled "The PLA Navy New Capabilities and Missions for the 21st Century". In it, ONI identified several key PLAN trends of concern to the US military, including the development of new anti-access/area denial (A2/AD) systems with additional power projection capabilities, and increases in PLAN training and global deployment.

http://www.popsci.com/chinese-navy-stars-latest-usintelligence-report

---

http://i738.photobucket.com/albums/xx25/77769/CHINA_OPENING_013_r350x200.jpg





Kazakhstan breaks ground on China’s New Silk Road

Author: AT Editor May 25, 2015


By Sergei Blagov

Kazakhstan authorities are pledging to speed up implementation of China’s New Silk Road project. Their efforts will focus on the Western Europe-Western China road system, as well as other transit routes spanning Central Asia.

Russia, meanwhile, despite its “Ostpolitik” eastward policy shift, remains slow to develop its section of the Western Europe-Western China road system. Major showcase projects, such as the Western Europe-Western China road system, are suffering as a result.

For Kazakhstan, efforts to become a major transit route between Asia and Europe are a priority. On May 22, President Nursultan Nazarbayev mooted plans to finish Kazakhstan’s section of the Western Europe-Western China road system by the end of 2015.

His government expects to benefit in major ways from the New Silk Road. Kazakhstan sees up to 30 million tons annually of freight being funneled to its section of the Western Europe-Western China corridor, Nazarbayev said.

The Kazakhstan’s president also intends to create what he described as a new multi-modal high-speed Eurasian transportation route around the nexus of the new Silk Road. However, such plans to boost transit freight between China and Western Europe via the new Silk Road may prove far too optimistic given Russia’s ongoing crisis with the West.

Kazakhstan, nonetheless, has other Central Asian transit projects on the burner. Apart from the Western Europe-Western China system of highways, it has also built Dzhezkazgan-Beineu rail link between Western China and Caspian Sea ports. The Dzhezkazgan-Beineu railway was connected to the existing Kazakhstan-Turkmenistan-Iran rail link. This gives Kazakhstan access to Iranian ports in the Persian Gulf. As a result, Kazakhstan plans to increase grain exports to Iran significantly this year

All these projects are designed to increase Kazakhstan’s potential to become part of the New Silk Road. A planned Western Europe-Western China International Transit Corridor is due to connect China and Russia’s Baltic port of St. Petersburg. The 8,445-kilometer-long route includes 2,787 kilometers that passes through passing through Kazakh territory.

Kazakhstan’s efforts to finish portions of its road network remain subject to delays. The road system in South Kazakhstan was expected to be finished in 2013. It was then moved to September 2015. It is now slated for completion by the end of 2015.

The delays are traceable to the recent weakness in international oil and gas prices which have adversely affected Kazakhstan’s spending plans. Kazakhstan currently plans to spend $14 billion to finance the country’s infrastructure development projects between 2016-2018.

This marks a deceleration from what was spent previously on infrastructure projects. The nation’s earlier infrastructure blueprint envisioned implementing about 60 projects in 2012-2014 at an estimated cost of about $20 billion. The goal was to modernize the country’s 148,000-kilometer road network, including Almaty-Kapshagai, Almaty-Khorgos, and Astana-Karaganda.

Another looming handicap is that while Kazakhstan and China have been moving on the move towards the Western Europe-Western China project, the Russian authorities have remained slow to develop their 2,233-kilometer section of the New Silk Road system.

In 2011, Russia’s government said the country’s section of the Western Europe-Western China project would be completed by 2018. The construction of the Western Europe-Western China road system in Russia’s Orenburg region that neighbors Kazakhstan only began last year. Now, the Russian authorities aim to finish the Western Europe-Western China project by 2019-2020.

Sergei Blagov is a Moscow-based independent journalist and researcher. In the past three decades, he has been covering Asian affairs from Moscow, Russia, as well as Hanoi, Vietnam and Vientiane, Laos. He is the author of non-fiction books on Vietnam, and a contributor of a handbook for reporters.



http://atimes.com/2015/05/kazakhstan-breaks-ground-on-chinas-new-silk-road/

----


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sHLqxs3DK_w&sns=em


This Centerpiece Of China’s Plans For World Domination Will Shock People In The West


April 01, 2015

Today one of the top money managers in the world warned King World News about earth-shaking events that are taking place in the East. He also discussed the centerpiece of China's plans for world domination that will shock people in the West.

Stephen Leeb: “Eric, as you know, for quite some time I have focused on East vs West and the East is really kicking our rears right now. The latest thing everyone is talking about is what China is doing with its infrastructure bank (AIIB). But even more significant than that, in my memory and I’m not a young guy, I’ve never hard of Great Britain thumbing their nose at the United States….

“But Great Britain did. They said, ‘We’re joining this bank.’ This is a bank that will be very competitive with the World Bank and it’s dedicated to infrastructure throughout Asia – throughout the Silk Road. This is going to give China a tremendous amount of clout throughout the entire Eastern part of the world, even extending to Saudi Arabia.



China/Pakistani Corridor


Another interesting development is this Pakistani Corridor, which is going to be a multi-billion dollar ($10 billion to $30 billion) expenditure on China’s part. It will not be easy getting this work done through Pakistan but the Chinese are doing it because on the other side is Saudi Arabia and that’s a very important part of this whole Silk Road Initiative.

Another important part of the puzzle is this port in Greece from which China plans to start trains running that will head up to Hungary. Hungary has always been sort of a dividing line between the West and the East.




article at link

http://kingworldnews.com/this-centerpiece-of-chinas-plans-for-world-domination-will-shock-people-in-the-west/

----




U.S. Campaigns against China’s Plan for International Bank that Could Rival the World Bank
submit to reddit
Saturday, October 11, 2014


China is starting a new infrastructure investment bank and the United States, the largest shareholder of the World Bank, doesn’t like the competition.

China has pledged $50 billion in capital to start the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB), which as the name suggests, will offer loans to developing countries to build roads, bridges and other public works projects.

The United States has opposed financing by the World Bank and the Manila, Philippines-based Asian Development Bank (ADB) of projects that would involve building coal-fired power plants or dams that would displace large populations. Now, the Obama administration’s concern is that the new Chinese bank would be more likely to fund such projects.




http://www.allgov.com/news/top-stories/us-campaigns-against-chinas-plan-for-international-bank-that-could-rival-the-world-bank-141011?news=854507

----


BRICS Trample US in South America
By Pepe Escobar

Global Research, May 23, 2015

RT


It started in April with a rash of deals between Argentina and Russia during President Cristina Kirchner’s visit to Moscow.

And it continues with a $53 billion investment bang as Chinese Premier Li Keqiang visits Brazil during the first stop of yet another South American commercial offensive – complete with a sweet metaphor: Li riding on a made in China subway train that will ply a new metro line in Rio de Janeiro ahead of the 2016 Olympics.

Where is the US in all this? Nowhere; little by little, yet inexorably, BRICS members China – and in a smaller measure, Russia – have been no less than restructuring commerce and infrastructure all across Latin America.

Countless Chinese commercial missions have been plying these shores non-stop, much as the US did between World War I and II. In a key meeting in January with Latin American business leaders, President Xi Jinping promised to channel $250 billion for infrastructure projects in the next 10 years.


article at link

http://www.globalresearch.ca/brics-trample-us-in-south-america/5451427


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C_ByWFC7loM&sns=em

-----




AMERICA'S ACUPUNCTURE POINTS
PART 1: Striking the US where it hurts
By Victor N Corpus



Oct 19, 2006


A noted Chinese theorist on modern warfare, Chang Mengxiong, compared China's form of fighting to "a Chinese boxer with a keen knowledge of vital body points who can bring an opponent to his knees with a minimum of movements". It is like key acupuncture points in ancient Chinese medicine. Puncture one vital point and the whole anatomy is affected. If America ever goes to war with China, say, over Taiwan, then America should be prepared for the following "acupuncture points" in its anatomy to be "punctured". Each of the vital points can bring America to its knees with a minimum of effort.


I Electro-magnetic Pulse (EMP) attack


China and Russia are two potential US adversaries that have the capability for this kind of attack. An EMP attack can either come from an intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM), a submarine-launched ballistic missile (SLBM), a long-range cruise missile, or an orbiting satellite armed with a nuclear or non-nuclear EMP warhead. A nuclear burst of one (or more) megaton some 400 kilometers over central United States (Omaha, Nebraska) can blanket the whole continental US with electro-magnetic pulse in less than one second.

An EMP attack will damage all electrical grids on the US mainland. It will disable computers and other similar electronic devices with microchips. Most businesses and industries will shut down. The entire US economy will practically grind to a halt. Satellites within line of sight of the EMP burst will also be damaged, adversely affecting military command, control, communications, computers, intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance (C4ISR). Land-based intercontinental ballistic missiles will be rendered unserviceable in their silos. Anti-ballistic missile defenses will suffer the same fate. In short – total blackout. And American society as we know it will be thrown back to the Dark Ages.

Of course, the US may decide to strike first, but China and Russia now have the means of striking back with submarine-launched ballistic missiles with the same or even more devastating results. But knowing China's strategy of "active defense", when war with the US becomes imminent, China will surely not allow itself to be targeted first. It will seize the initiative as mandated by its doctrine by striking first.

China has repeatedly announced that it will not be the first to use nuclear weapons. But as an old Chinese saying goes: "There can never be too much deception in war." If it means the survival of the whole Chinese nation that is at stake, China will surely not allow a public statement to tie its hands and prevent it from seizing the initiative. As another saying goes: "All is fair in love and war."

2 Cyber attack

America is the most advanced country in the world in the field of information technology (IT). Practically all of its industries, manufacturing, business and finance, telecommunications, key government services and defense establishment rely heavily on computers and computer networks.

But this heavy dependence on computers is a double-edged sword. It has thrust the US economy and defense establishment ahead of all other countries; but it has also created an Achilles' heel that can potentially bring the superpower to its knees with a few keystrokes on a dozen or so laptops.

China's new concept of a "people's war" includes IT warriors coming, not only from its military more than 2-million strong, but from the general citizenry of some 1.3 billion people. If we add the hackers and information warriors from Russia, Iran, North Korea, Venezuela, Cuba, Syria and other countries sympathetic to China, the cyber attack on the US would be formidable indeed.

So, if a major conflict erupts between China and America, more than a few dozen laptops will be engaged to hack America's military establishment; banking system; stock exchange; defense industries; telecommunication system; power grids; water system; oil and gas pipeline system; air traffic and train traffic control systems; C4ISR system, ballistic missile system, and other systems that prop up the American way of life.

America, on the whole, has not adequately prepared itself for this kind of attack. Neither has it prepared itself for a possible EMP attack. Such attacks can bring a superpower like America to its knees with a minimum of movement.

3 Interdiction of US foreign oil supply

America is now 75% dependent on foreign imported oil. About 23.5% of America's imported oil supply comes from the Persian Gulf. To cut off this oil supply, Iran can simply mine the Strait of Hormuz, using bottom-rising sea mines. It is worthwhile to note that Iran has the world's fourth-largest inventory of sea mines, after China, Russia and the US.

Combined with sea mines, Iran can also block the narrow strait with supersonic cruise missiles such as Yakhonts, Moskits, Granits and Brahmos deployed on Abu Musa Island and all along the rugged and mountainous coastline of Iran fronting the Persian Gulf. This single action can bring America to its knees. Not only America but Japan (which derives 90% of its oil supply) and Europe (which derives about 60% of its oil supply from the Persian Gulf ) will be adversely affected.

In the event of a major conflict involving superpower America and its allies (primarily Japan and Britain) on the one hand and China and its allies (primarily Russia and Iran) on the other, Iran's role will become strategically crucial. Iran can totally stop the flow of oil coming from the Persian Gulf. This is the main reason why China and Russia are carefully nurturing intimate economic, cultural, political, diplomatic and military ties with Iran, which at one time was condemned by US President George W Bush as belonging to that "axis of evil", along with Iraq and North Korea.

This is also the reason why Iran is so brave in daring the US to attack it on the nuclear proliferation issue. Iran knows that it has the power to hurt the US. Without oil from the Gulf, the war machines of the US and its principal allies will literally run out of gas.

A single blow from Iran or China or Russia, or a combination of the three at the Strait of Hormuz can paralyze America. In addition, Chinese and Russian submarines can stop the flow of oil to the US and Japan by interdicting oil tanker traffic coming from the Middle East, Africa and Latin America. On the other hand, US naval supremacy will have minimal effect on China's oil supply because it is already connected to Kazakhstan with a pipeline and will soon be connected to Russia and Iran as well.

One wonders: what will be the price of oil if Iran blocks the Strait of Hormuz. It will surely drive oil prices sky high. Prolonged high oil prices can, in turn, trigger inflation in the US and a sharp decline of the dollar, possibly even a dollar free-fall. The collapse of the dollar will have a serious impact on the entire US economy.

This brings us to the next "acupuncture point" in the US anatomy: dollar vulnerability.


4 Attack on the US dollar


One of the pillars propping up US superpower status and worldwide economic dominance is the dollar being accepted as the predominant reserve currency. Central banks of various countries have to stock up dollar reserves because they can only buy their oil requirements and other major commodities in US dollars.

This US economic strength, however, is a double-edged sword and can turn out to be America's economic Achilles' heel. A run of the US dollar, for instance, which would cause a dollar free-fall, can bring the entire US economy toppling down.

What is frightening for the US is the fact that China, Russia and Iran possess the power to cause a run on the US dollar and force its collapse.

China is now the biggest holder of foreign exchange reserves in the world, accumulating $941 billion as of June 30 and expected to exceed a trillion dollars by the end of 2006 - a first in world history. A decision by China to shift a major portion of its reserve to the euro or the yen or gold could trigger other central banks to follow suit. Nobody would want to be left behind holding a bagfull of dollars rapidly turning worthless. The herd psychology would be very difficult to control in this case because national economic survival would be at stake.

This global herd psychology motivated by the survival instinct will be strongly reinforced by the latent anger of many countries in the Middle East, Eurasia, Southeast Asia, Africa and Latin America that silently abhor the pugnacious arrogance displayed by the lone Superpower in the exercise of its unilateral and militaristic foreign policies. They will just be too happy to dump the dollar and watch the lone Superpower squirm and collapse.

The danger of the dollar collapsing is reinforced by the mounting US current account deficit, which sky-rocketed to $900 billion at an annual rate in the fourth quarter of 2005. This figure is 7% of US gross domestic product (GDP), the largest in US history. The current account deficit reflects the imbalance of US imports to its exports. The large imbalance shows that the US economy is losing its competitiveness, with US jobs and incomes suffering as a result.

These record deficits in external trade and current accounts mean that the US has to borrow from foreign lenders (mostly Japan and China) $900 billion annually or nearly $2.5 billion every single day to finance the gap between payments and receipts from the rest of the world. In financial year 2005, $352 billion was spent on interest payment of national debt alone - a national debt that has ballooned to $8.5 trillion as of August 24.

The International Monetary Fund has warned: "The US is on course to increase its net external liabilities to around 40% of its GDP within the next few years - an unprecedented level of external debt for a large industrial country."

The picture of the US federal budget deficit is equally grim. Dennis Cauchon, writing for USA Today said:
The federal government keeps two sets of books. The set the government promotes to the public has a healthier bottom line: a $318 billion deficit in 2005. The set the government doesn't talk about is the audited financial statement produced by the government's accountants following standard accounting rules. It reports a more ominous financial picture: a $760 billion deficit for 2005. If social security and medicare were included - as the board that sets accounting rules is considering - the federal deficit would have been $3.5 trillion. Congress has written its own accounting rules - which would be illegal for a corporation to use because they ignore important costs such as the growing expense of retirement benefits for civil servants and military personnel. Last year, the audited statement produced by the accountants said the government ran a deficit equal to $6,700 for every American household. The number given to the public put the deficit at $2,800 per household ... The audited financial statement - prepared by the Treasury Department - reveals a federal government in far worse financial shape than official budget reports indicate, a USA Today analysis found. The government has run a deficit of $2.9 trillion since 1997, according to the audited number. The official deficit since then is just $729 billion. The difference is equal to an entire year's worth of federal spending.
The huge US current account and trade deficits, the mounting external debt and the ever-increasing federal budget deficits are clear signs of an economy on the edge. They have dragged the dollar to the brink of the precipice. Such a state of economic affairs cannot be sustained for long, and the stability of the dollar is put in grave danger. One push and the dollar will plunge into free-fall. And that push can come from China, Russia or Iran, whom superpower America has been pushing and bullying all along.

We have seen what China can do. How can Russia or Iran, in turn, cause a dollar downfall? On September 2, 2003, Russia and Saudi Arabia signed an agreement on oil and gas cooperation. Russia and Saudi Arabia have agreed "to exercise joint control over the dynamics of prices for raw materials on foreign markets". The two biggest oil and gas producers, in cooperation, say, with Iran, could control oil production and sales to keep the price of oil relatively high. Sustained high oil prices, in turn, could trigger a high inflation rate in the US and put extreme pressure on the already weak dollar to trigger a more rapid decline.

Russia is now the world's biggest energy supplier, surpassing Saudi Arabia in energy exports measured in barrel oil equivalent or boe (13.3 million boe per day for Russia vs 10 million boe per day for Saudi Arabia). Russia has the biggest gas reserves in the world. Iran, on the other hand, runs second in the world to Russia in gas reserves, and also ranks among the top oil producers. If and when either Russia or Iran, or both, shift away from a rapidly declining dollar in energy transactions, many oil producers will follow suit. These include Venezuela, Indonesia, Norway, Sudan, Nigeria and the Central Asian Republics.

There is a good chance that even Saudi Arabia and the other oil-exporting countries in the Middle East may follow suit. They wouldn't want to be left with fast-shrinking dollars when the shift from petro-dollar to euro-dollar occurs. Again, the herd psychology will come into play, and the US will eventually be left with a dollar that is practically worthless. Considering the strong anti-American sentiments in the world caused by American unilateralism, especially in the Middle East, a concerted effort to dump the dollar in favor of the euro becomes even more plausible.

When the dollar was removed from the gold standard in August 1971, the dollar gained its strength through its use as the currency of choice in oil transactions. Once the dollar is rejected in favor of the euro or another currency for global oil transactions, the dollar will rapidly lose its value and central banks all over the world will be racing to diversify to other currencies. The shift from petro-dollar to petro-euro will have a devastating effect on the dollar. It could cause the dollar to collapse; and the whole US economy crushing down with it - a scene reminiscent of the collapse of the Twin Towers on September 11, 2001. But this one will be a thousand times more devastating.

A successful assault on the US dollar will make America crawl on its knees with a minimum of movements. And this assault can come from China, Russia or Iran - or a combination of the three - if they ever decide that they have had enough of US bullying.

article continues below


http://www.atimes.com/atimes/China/HJ19Ad01.html

----

The Dragon’s Spear: China’s Asymmetric Strategy

China’s asymmetric capabilities have the potential to lessen US military advantage

Loro Horta

YaleGlobal, 17 October 2013

Stealthy defense: Chinese shore-to-ship DF-21A missile could hit US aircraft carriers, top; Chinese designed stealth fighter J20 unveiled




As the world’s leading military powers invent new weapons systems, other nations develop countermeasures. “China has no illusions about its military inferiority via-à-vis the United States and knows that the status is likely to endure for at least two decades,” explains security analyst Loro Horta. “As such the PLA has been developing a full range of asymmetric strategies to deter the US until its military reaches maturity.” Horta describes the rapid modernization of China’s military and its study of history, especially the experiences of underdogs who prevailed in war. China's ambitious projects include anti-satellite missiles, lasers and the DF-21A anti-ship ballistic missile that could target aircraft carriers. Asymmetric strategies are the dominant force of China’s military, even as the country invests in and builds technological capability. Horta urges the United States and other nations to recognize and appreciate China's full range of asymmetric strategies even as technology matures. – YaleGlobal

article below

http://yaleglobal.yale.edu/content/dragon%E2%80%99s-spear-china%E2%80%99s-asymmetric-strategy


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kOSf5n9mOi8&sns=em


AMERICA'S ACUPUNCTURE POINTS
PART 2: The assassin's mace
By Victor N Corpus


Oct 20, 2006

If America ever goes to war with China, Chinese military doctrine suggests the US should expect attacks on a number of key points where it is particularly vulnerable - where a single jab would paralyze the entire nation. China would aim at targets such as the US electricity grid, its computer networks, its oil supply routes, and the dollar. Other vital "acupuncture" points are outlined below.


1 A powerful triumvirate

No one ever imagined before 1991 that China and Russia would



come together to form a close-knit alliance politically, diplomatically and, most important of all, militarily. For more than three decades before the break-up of the Soviet Union, China and the USSR had been bitter rivals, even going into a shooting war with each other along their common border.

But now the picture has changed completely. China and Russia have embraced one another and help each other ward off the military advances of the lone superpower in their respective backyards. In fact, it was a series of strategic blunders by the superpower that forced China and Russia into each other's arms. How so?

When the Soviet Union disintegrated in 1991, it would have been the best time for the US to use soft power to win over Russia into the Western fold. Russia at that time was an economic basket case, with the price of oil at $9 per barrel. But the promises of economic assistance from the US and Europe proved empty, and the Russian oligarchs were the main beneficiaries of relations with the Western powers.

NATO and EU then slowly advanced eastward, absorbing many of the countries making up the former Warsaw Pact alliance. Serbia, a close ally of Russia, was subjected to 78 days of continuous air bombardment. Regime changes were instigated by US and Western-financed non-governmental organizations in Georgia, Ukraine and Kyrgyzstan - all former Soviet republics and considered Russia’s backyard - giving Russia a feeling of strategic encirclement by the US and its allies. There was also the invasion of Afghanistan and Iraq, followed by the establishment of US bases and deployment of troops in Uzbekistan and Kyrgyzstan.

These aggressive geopolitical moves by the US pushed Russia into the waiting arms of China, which badly needed Russian energy resources, modern weapon systems and military technology as a consequence of the US-led arms embargo imposed after the Tienanmen incident. Furthermore, China also needed a reliable and militarily capable ally in Russia because of the perceived threat of the US.

Reinforcing this Chinese perception was the outrageously wanton bombing of the Chinese Embassy in Belgrade by US-led NATO forces in 1999; the spy plane incident in 2001; the unilateral withdrawal of the US from the ABM Treaty in 2002; the enhanced military cooperation between the US and Japan; the inclusion of Taiwan in the Theater Missile Defense program.; the setting up of a military base in Kyrgyzstan which is only some 250 miles from the Chinese border near Lop Nor, China’s nuclear testing ground.

Add to that the announcement of President George W Bush that the US would come to the aid of Taiwan in the event that China uses force against it; the sending of two aircraft carrier battle groups to waters near Taiwan in 1995-1996; and the naval show of strength of seven aircraft carrier battle groups converging off the China coast in August 2004. All these aggressive moves by superpower America pushed China to embrace its former bitter rival, Russia.

Both China and Russia needed a secure and reliable rear; and both are ideally positioned to provide it. Moreover, their strengths ideally complement each other. It must be borne in mind that both are nuclear powers. The abundant energy resources of Russia ensures that China will not run out of gas in a major conflict - a strategic advantage over the US and its key allies.

Russia is also supplying China with many of the modern armaments and military technology it needs to modernize its defense sector. This effectively militates against the arms embargo imposed by the US and the EU on China. Russia in turn needs the increased trade with China, China’s financial clout and assistance, and manufactured goods.

The coming together of China and Russia was one of the most earth-shaking geopolitical events of modern times. Yet hardly anyone noticed the transition from bitter enemity to a solid geopolitical, economic, diplomatic and military alliance. The combined strengths of the two regional powers surely surpass that of the former Warsaw Pact. If we add Iran to the equation, we have a triumvirate that can pose a formidable challenge to the lone superpower. Iran is the most industrialized and the most populous nation in the Middle East. It is second only to Russia in terms of gas resources and also one of the largest oil producers in the world. It is also one of the most mountainous countries in the world, which makes it ideal for the conduct of asymmetric and guerrilla warfare against a superior adversary.

Iran borders both the Persian Gulf and the Caspian Sea, two of the richest oil and gas regions of the world. Most importantly, it controls the gateway to the Persian Gulf - the Strait of Hormuz. Modern bottom-rising, rocket propelled sea mines and supersonic cruise missiles deployed along the long mountainous coastline of Iran, manned by "invisible" guerrillas, could indefinitely stop the flow of oil from the Gulf, from which the US gets 23% of its imported oil.

Japan also derives 90% of its oil from the Persian Gulf area, and Europe about 60%. In a major conflict, Iran can effectively deprive the US war machine and those of its key allies of much needed energy supplies.

Imagine the war machine of the superpower running out of gas. Imagine also a US economy minus 23% of its imported oil. This 23% can rise considerably once Chinese and Russian submarines start sinking US-bound oil tankers. The triumvirate of China, Russia, and Iran could bring the US to its knees with a minimum of movement.


article continues at link below

http://www.atimes.com/atimes/China/HJ20Ad01.html


------




New Chinese Threats to U.S. Space Systems Worry Officials
July 2014

By Yasmin Tadjdeh



Last year, China launched a mysterious missile from its southwest region. While Chinese news sources said it was a scientific experiment, there is widespread speculation that the payload was a more advanced anti-satellite test.

Satellites are vulnerable to an array of weapons and disruptive technologies like anti-satellite missiles and sophisticated cyber attacks that can have potentially devastating results from degrading capabilities to complete annihilation, experts said.

There is strong evidence that the anti-satellite weapon China tested in May 2013 went higher than low-Earth orbit, said Charles Miller, president of NextGen Space LLC, a space and public policy consulting group. If China continues to make strides and develops weapons that reach farther, it could one day threaten key satellites in geosynchronous orbit.




http://www.nationaldefensemagazine.org/archive/2014/July/pages/NewChineseThreatstoUSSpaceSystemsWorryOfficials.as px


----


Future Bombers Under Study In China And Russia
Aviation Week & Space Technolog

by Richard Fisher, Jr., Bill Sweetman
Published on September 18th, 2014
ARTICLES

While the U.S. Air Force pursues development of the Long-Range Strike Bomber project, striving to launch full-scale development next year, both Russia and China are also proceeding with bomber plans. In the case of Russia, the PAK-DA (perspektivnyi aviatsionnyi kompleks dal’ney aviatsii, or future long-range air system) is the first all-new bomber to start development since the Tupolev Tu-160, in 1977, while China’s prospective new system would be the nation’s first indigenous bomber.

PAK-DA is under development by the Tupolev unit of United Aircraft Corp. (UAC), which has been responsible for almost all of Russia’s long-range bombers since the end of World War II. The basic decision to pursue development of a new bomber was taken in 2007. At that point, the Russian military started to define upgrades to the existing bomber force, which would bridge the gap until a new aircraft could be ready, alongside an analysis of alternative configurations and approaches.

Out of dozens of potential candidates, including supersonic and hypersonic technologies, four finalists emerged, and a preferred design—featuring a subsonic all-wing or blended-wing body with stealth characteristics—was submitted to the customer in early 2012. It is likely to be the first Russian aircraft designed with all-aspect, broadband stealth—the key feature introduced by the B-2 when it entered service in 1997.


http://www.strategycenter.net/research/pubID.339/pub_detail.asp

------



China's Anti-Stealth Radars and Sensors

Discussion in 'Chinese Defence & Industry' started by Martin, Mar 10, 2015.



http://www.worlddefence.com/threads/chinas-anti-stealth-radars-and-sensors.7177/

----


http://i738.photobucket.com/albums/xx25/77769/bd3dcabc65.jpg



China’s Eagle Strike-Eight Anti-Ship Cruise Missiles: The YJ-83, C803, and the Family Tree

Part 3

By Christopher P. Carlson - February 8, 2013


Series: China's Eagle Strike-Eight Anti-Ship Cruise Missiles
•Part 1: China’s Eagle Strike-Eight Anti-Ship Cruise Missiles: Designation Confusion and the Family Members from YJ-8 to YJ-8A
•Part 2: China’s Eagle Strike-Eight Anti-Ship Cruise Missiles: YJ-81, YJ-82, and C802
•Part 3: China’s Eagle Strike-Eight Anti-Ship Cruise Missiles: The YJ-83, C803, and the Family Tree




http://www.defensemedianetwork.com/stories/chinas-eagle-strike-eight-anti-ship-cruise-missiles-the-yj-83-c803-and-the-family-tree/

------


China says it is able to track and kill US stealth aircraft

Posted by chankaiyee2 ⋅ December 5, 2014 ⋅ 4 Comments


In my article “Chinese Radar Detects, Locks on F-22, Causes US Withdrawal of F-22s from Japan” on April 2, 2014, I quoted an Italian media report that the major reason for the F-22’s withdrawal from Japan to Guam was that an F-22 was discovered and locked on by China’s radar.


As the Italian media is not an authority of military news, people perhaps ignored that.

However, on May 11, in my article “China Showcases Advanced Radars Able to Detect Stealth Aircrafts”, I described the three radars that are capable of detecting stealth aircraft that China showcased in its 2014 9th China International Defence Electronics Exhibition, which opened on May 8 at the China International Exhibition Centre (the old exhibition hall at Jingan Village), Beijing.

They were: the JY-50 passive radar for detecting and tracking stealth aircraft; the JYL-1A radar to detect and track with high precision stealth aircraft and tactical ballistic missiles; and the JY-27A air surveillance & guidance radar to detect and track stealth aircraft and missiles.

Details of the three radars are given in my book “Space Era Strategy: The Way China Beats The U.S.”

However, the Pentagon either is ignorant of the exhibition or keeps the information secret in order so as not to cause panic among American people.



full article at link

http://chinadailymail.com/2014/12/05/china-says-it-is-able-to-track-and-kill-us-stealth-aircraft/

-----

Pentagon Reports On China’s Satellite Killers
By Sydney J. Freedberg Jr.
on May 11, 2015 at 3:39 PM



China certainly has space hawks in high places. In 2009, PLA Air Force chief Xu Qiliang said “competition between military forces” in space is “a historical inevitability.” Qiliang had to retract his statements after then-president Hu Jintao “swiftly contradicted him,” the Pentagon report notes. But far from being punished, Qiliang became the first air force officer promoted to a vice-chairmanship on the Central Military Committee, a body helmed by Xi Jinping himself that serves as a combination of the National Security Council and Joint Chiefs of Staff.

Chinese military doctrine sees counter-space weapons as “central” to what they call “informationalized” warfare, an appalling neologism but an insightful concept that unifies what Americans (at least outside the Navy) still tend to see in separate categories of space, cyber, and electronic warfare. If you want to deny an enemy access to satellite intelligence and communications, after all, there are many ways to skin that cat: shoot down the spy satellite, shoot down the communications satellite relaying its data, jam their transmissions, or hack the whole network. The weapons of such warfare include not just missiles but lasers, jamming, and hacking — the latter an area of significant Chinese successes: “In a single year,” the report says, “actors associated with the Chinese Government successfully penetrated US Transportation Command (USTRANSCOM) contractors (not the command itself) about twenty times.” Moore’s Law and global trade let Beijing exploit rapid advances in information technology.



http://breakingdefense.com/2015/05/pentagon-reports-on-chinas-satellite-killers/