PDA

View Full Version : Barack Obama???


redrat11
03-08-2008, 11:51 PM
Before I write anything concerning Mr. Obama, and to that extent the 2008 Sham Elections, let me say this article about "Masonry" by Makow, is very well put.

savethemales.ca - Humanity is Under Occult Attack (http://www.henrymakow.com/humanity_in_the_twilight_zone.html)



Now I want you take a GOOD look at this photo of Mr. Obama. Do you discern anything in 'LIGHT' of the article I posted above?


<center>
<img src="http://i30.photobucket.com/albums/c307/reddog11/barack_obama.jpg" alt="Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting"><br><br>
<img src="http://i30.photobucket.com/albums/c307/reddog11/20070215ebony.jpg" alt="Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting"><br><br>
</center>


Now, if you've done your homework, you would see that the 'pose' Mr. Obama is in, is a very carefully orchestrated masonic pose. Now notice how the chairs in the background, and that 'light' up there do resemble a pyramid with a light up top. Do you discern?


So what is my point?

Well this Obama, poses a very challenging Question to me, and you might say, yeah what is that? Well, in 'light' of the Middle-East situation, does it not strike you that the Jews, and I will use that term, since I don't believe in the Illuminatti term,But anyway, the media, the political system, controlled by them, have seemingly propped this unknown figure to MONUMENTAL HEIGHTS would'nt you say? What does this all mean? My thought is they need this shill to do there dirty work in the Middle East, after all, George has ruined that all for them. With a muslim in the White House, and make no mistake about it, Obama is a stealth muslim, but still jew controlled, maybe, just maybe he can 'fool' Ahmadinejad into letting the NWO enter into that countries infrastructure, whether by 'cooperation' or by stealth means.


Think about it, why has this man been given over 100 million dollars in less than a year? There is a FANATISCISM out there for him, and what about his wife, A avowed Marxist, you see this is the core of the problems in this country, here you have a supposedly highly educated man and woman, you would think that after the last 30 years of seeing everything deteriate to a absurd level, that they would have simple solutions like Mr. Paul, but, no far from it, in fact I have'nt heard one substantive plan of anything from him have you? Why is there so much people enamored by him? Too think this man could be the next Prez??? Who knows, can he be worse than Bush? Or could he be a MOLE for the Arabs, he does have many ties there.

What about this strange lady>>>>Michelle<<<<


<object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/JSkd0xrhcQ8"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/JSkd0xrhcQ8" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object>




Very strange indeed



<object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/K1J54St7ZYY"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/K1J54St7ZYY" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object>

redrat11
03-10-2008, 08:49 PM
Barack Speaks...


<object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/Kf0x_TpDris"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/Kf0x_TpDris" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object>

redrat11
03-12-2008, 12:05 PM
Something fishy...



This may be related to the 'PYSCHE" of America, I don't know why but, this black NEW, New York Governor, who is replacing that idiot Spitzer guy, I suspect this is all designed to trigger a "allow Blacks to hold high office positions" in America, you know as Barack Obama as Prez...what other white official will be tossed out of office and replaced with a black one??hmmm::rolleyes: in the near future???.


Legislators have high hopes for Spitzer's successor - CNN.com (http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/03/12/paterson.bio/index.html)

redrat11
03-15-2008, 01:47 PM
The Obama 'Church'





<object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/MnPk9DyJimc&hl=en"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/MnPk9DyJimc&hl=en" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object>



<object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/dTwUWizPrNk&hl=en"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/dTwUWizPrNk&hl=en" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object>

redrat11
03-19-2008, 07:43 PM
Anti-Obama "Church"




'Mack' Daddy Obama

<object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/khuu-RhOBDU&hl=en"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/khuu-RhOBDU&hl=en" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object>









<object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/0HcPcg4JaeU&hl=en"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/0HcPcg4JaeU&hl=en" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object>




<object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/NkVEzQCvpWU&hl=en"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/NkVEzQCvpWU&hl=en" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object>




:rolleyes:



<object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/6Op5or_vkcc&hl=en"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/6Op5or_vkcc&hl=en" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object>

παράνοια
03-24-2008, 09:40 AM
Im very slightly drawn to red lights above the doors which resemble c4. I think the light at the top is a respresentation of allah and he is a blaintent rag head.

Shadow
03-24-2008, 10:58 AM
The women in those vidios look like they are aim to please!

Shadow
03-24-2008, 10:58 AM
I also think Michelle Obama is hawt!

παράνοια
03-24-2008, 11:02 AM
they are baracks 100 virgins

Shadow
03-24-2008, 12:00 PM
Does he really need 100?

παράνοια
03-25-2008, 04:43 AM
The koran demands it apparently.

Shadow
03-26-2008, 12:13 PM
Do they have to be "Obama girls"?

παράνοια
03-27-2008, 12:36 AM
They can be cheeky girls i suppose

Shadow
03-27-2008, 03:36 AM
I think your definition of "cheeky" may be different from ours!

redrat11
04-06-2008, 10:56 PM
Before I write anything concerning Mr. Obama, and to that extent the 2008 Sham Elections, let me say this article about "Masonry" by Makow, is very well put.

savethemales.ca - Humanity is Under Occult Attack (http://www.henrymakow.com/humanity_in_the_twilight_zone.html)



Now I want you take a GOOD look at this photo of Mr. Obama. Do you discern anything in 'LIGHT' of the article I posted above?


<center>
<img src="http://i30.photobucket.com/albums/c307/reddog11/barack_obama.jpg" alt="Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting"><br><br>
<img src="http://i30.photobucket.com/albums/c307/reddog11/20070215ebony.jpg" alt="Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting"><br><br>
</center>


Now, if you've done your homework, you would see that the 'pose' Mr. Obama is in, is a very carefully orchestrated masonic pose. Now notice how the chairs in the background, and that 'light' up there do resemble a pyramid with a light up top. Do you discern?


So what is my point?

Well this Obama, poses a very challenging Question to me, and you might say, yeah what is that? Well, in 'light' of the Middle-East situation, does it not strike you that the Jews, and I will use that term, since I don't believe in the Illuminatti term,But anyway, the media, the political system, controlled by them, have seemingly propped this unknown figure to MONUMENTAL HEIGHTS would'nt you say? What does this all mean? My thought is they need this shill to do there dirty work in the Middle East, after all, George has ruined that all for them. With a muslim in the White House, and make no mistake about it, Obama is a stealth muslim, but still jew controlled, maybe, just maybe he can 'fool' Ahmadinejad into letting the NWO enter into that countries infrastructure, whether by 'cooperation' or by stealth means.


Think about it, why has this man been given over 100 million dollars in less than a year? There is a FANATISCISM out there for him, and what about his wife, A avowed Marxist, you see this is the core of the problems in this country, here you have a supposedly highly educated man and woman, you would think that after the last 30 years of seeing everything deteriate to a absurd level, that they would have simple solutions like Mr. Paul, but, no far from it, in fact I have'nt heard one substantive plan of anything from him have you? Why is there so much people enamored by him? Too think this man could be the next Prez??? Who knows, can he be worse than Bush? Or could he be a MOLE for the Arabs, he does have many ties there.

What about this strange lady>>>>Michelle<<<<


<object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/JSkd0xrhcQ8"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/JSkd0xrhcQ8" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object>




Very strange indeed



<object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/K1J54St7ZYY"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/K1J54St7ZYY" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object>



<center>
<img src="http://i30.photobucket.com/albums/c307/reddog11/pentadollar.jpg" alt="Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting"><br><br>
</center>

Who Controls Obama?

Who (http://judicial-inc.biz/86who_is_%20obama.htm)




Pastor Manning on Obama


<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/RqA_v1fHsyk&hl=en"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/RqA_v1fHsyk&hl=en" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>








<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/rs_-fUDsVSU&hl=en"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/rs_-fUDsVSU&hl=en" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>


White Trash

<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/LA8z39Z8PJY&hl=en"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/LA8z39Z8PJY&hl=en" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>





<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/a-Wr7q27khE&hl=en"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/a-Wr7q27khE&hl=en" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>

redrat11
06-04-2008, 05:54 PM
Obama...Homosexual Allegations?/drug use





larry sinclair

<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/sVeFVtcdSYY&hl=en"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/sVeFVtcdSYY&hl=en" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>



http://www.rense.com/Datapages/sinclairdat.htm

BlueAngel
06-04-2008, 06:11 PM
Why are you so shocked that Obama is one of THEM?

They all are.

Every person who serves as Commander in Chief, President of the United State's of America is beholden to the agenda of their masters.

The "secret/shadow" government. Those behind the curtain. The puppet masters.

It has never been any different.

Period!

Every candidate for the Presidency promises to change everything that is wrong about America and the "sheeple" fall for their false promises because they simply do not understand that the Senate stands in the way of these promises.

The Senate is the major force within this country that keeps us STAGNANT.

Just the way the Powers that Be want it.

The reason most of them have been compromised, born and bred for their jobs and/or members of the very wealthy and elitist families, including the Illuminati and/or ties to these families, such as Obama who is a distant cousin of Cheney's.

KennyWally
06-05-2008, 12:31 PM
How could anyone in their right mind


vote for a candidate that was picked by the RNC or DNC, not

to mention the Bildergergs...






If I reciprocated ignoring barack the way RON PAUL is ignored

then I wouldn't be able to vent my spleen...



his color don't bother me, it's his cooperation with the globalists that bothers me

KennyWally
06-05-2008, 12:35 PM
BlueAngel


" They all are "

I heard Eustace Mullins say, that anyone you see on teevee

is considered safe by his handlers....in other words he is one of them.

The only way someone no longer gets heard any longer, is if they say something wrong.





Funny how, that simple truth, is so hard to believe by so many people.

redrat11
06-05-2008, 05:37 PM
Why are you so shocked that Obama is one of THEM?

They all are.

Every person who serves as Commander in Chief, President of the United State's of America is beholden to the agenda of their masters.

The "secret/shadow" government. Those behind the curtain. The puppet masters.

It has never been any different.

Period!

Every candidate for the Presidency promises to change everything that is wrong about America and the "sheeple" fall for their false promises because they simply do not understand that the Senate stands in the way of these promises.

The Senate is the major force within this country that keeps us STAGNANT.

Just the way the Powers that Be want it.

The reason most of them have been compromised, born and bred for their jobs and/or members of the very wealthy and elitist families, including the Illuminati and/or ties to these families, such as Obama who is a distant cousin of Cheney's.

BA, I'm not surprised, don't know why you say that, there's a REASON THE JEWS are using him as a puppet for Prez, I already wrote about that in the introductory of this thread. Also, coincidentally I read or heard somewhere that LINCOLN WAS A HOMOSEXUAL, the man who "SET THIS COUNTRY UP" for what we are witnessing today, Yes, I'm now convinced that that there has, nor ever will be a AUTHENTIC AMERICA FIRST PRESIDENT, WHO IS'NT beholden to the Satanic power Structure of the Jew/Zionist/Mason/Satanist of this world. If Lincoln had'nt authorized the MASSACRE OF HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF SECCESSIONIST from this SATANIC FEDERAL MASONIC UNION then none of the JEW timeline as I see happening could never unfold, Obama is a man possesed by DEMONS.

KennyWally
06-05-2008, 06:22 PM
""" If Lincoln had'nt authorized the MASSACRE OF HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF SECCESSIONIST from this SATANIC FEDERAL MASONIC UNION then none of the JEW timeline as I see happening could never unfold, """


Where did you read that?

I've just been reading about that very thing!!!!!

Are you reading "the real lincoln " too ?

Amazon.com: The Real Lincoln: A New Look at Abraham Lincoln, His Agenda, and an Unnecessary War: Thomas Dilorenzo: Books (http://www.amazon.com/Real-Lincoln-Abraham-Agenda-Unnecessary/dp/0761526463/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1212711694&sr=8-1)

redrat11
06-05-2008, 08:37 PM
""" If Lincoln had'nt authorized the MASSACRE OF HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF SECCESSIONIST from this SATANIC FEDERAL MASONIC UNION then none of the JEW timeline as I see happening could never unfold, """


Where did you read that?

I've just been reading about that very thing!!!!!

Are you reading "the real lincoln " too ?

Amazon.com: The Real Lincoln: A New Look at Abraham Lincoln, His Agenda, and an Unnecessary War: Thomas Dilorenzo: Books (http://www.amazon.com/Real-Lincoln-Abraham-Agenda-Unnecessary/dp/0761526463/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1212711694&sr=8-1)

I was just recalling some stuff about Lincoln I read along time ago Kenny Wally. Lincoln was a COLD BLOODED KILLER, he knew damm well that the seccionist movement from the South would hinder the Jewish Timeline, he is GUILTY OF THE MURDERS OF OVER 4OO,OOO PEOPLE from the South, A heinous American Tyrant if there ever was one, he makes all the rest of the MASONS AND SATANIST in power seem tame by comparison, it's interesting to dig into the peoples thoughts from that time frame in the South, most people knew that the North was EVIL.

redrat11
08-01-2008, 04:29 PM
THE BRAINDEAD (CULT) FOLLOWERS/SUPPORTERS OF BARACK OBAMA



Barack has these people under some spell...here he says kindergarden children should be taught SEX EDUCATION 5 year old children.

<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/4pO1dIKgfPw&hl=en&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/4pO1dIKgfPw&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>






here is his official website

Welcome to Obama for America (http://www.barackobama.com/splash/)


Here Barack (the muslim agent) does'nt salute the flag, like the rest of the Americans, remember he's no American, he's a citizen of the world.

<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/hU9iCANi02o&hl=en&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/hU9iCANi02o&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>



here he says he wants to steal money from Oil companies profits and give everyone some of that money.

Barack Obama | Obama HQ Blogger: Barack Obama's Emergency Economic Plan (http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/stateupdates/gG5klN)



Barack Obama is a moron, plain and simple. here he thinks he's some MESSIAH of the world it seems.

Barack Obama | Change We Can Believe In | Barack Obama's Speech in Berlin (http://my.barackobama.com/page/content/berlinvideo/)



here is his cult of moron followers


<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/nP7lUGn7HWk&hl=en&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/nP7lUGn7HWk&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>



cult


<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/PNJ-T1GSkTs&hl=en&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/PNJ-T1GSkTs&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>



the new age messiah

YouTube - Barack Obama the Messiah chosen child SAVIOR Bible Prophecy (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VNFNG3AG0_g)

<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/VNFNG3AG0_g&hl=en&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/VNFNG3AG0_g&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>

BlueAngel
08-01-2008, 05:12 PM
The Star Spangled Banner is being performed during the time Obama does not have his hand on his chest.

BlueAngel
08-01-2008, 05:23 PM
I don't believe Obama ever said the word kindergartners.

Excerpt:

"But it’s the right thing to do," Obama continued, "to provide age-appropriate sex education, science-based sex education in schools."

Political Radar: Sex Ed for Kindergarteners 'Right Thing to Do,' Says Obama (http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalradar/2007/07/sex-ed-for-kind.html)

redrat11
08-01-2008, 07:20 PM
I don't believe Obama ever said the word kindergartners.

Excerpt:

"But it’s the right thing to do," Obama continued, "to provide age-appropriate sex education, science-based sex education in schools."

Political Radar: Sex Ed for Kindergarteners 'Right Thing to Do,' Says Obama (http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalradar/2007/07/sex-ed-for-kind.html)



He did'nt have to say kindergardners, everyone but you gets the 'jist' of his message. The PTB purposely destroyed this nation UNDER G.W.Bush the last 8 years, this to "set-up" a FAR LEFT WING MARXIST like Obama, to usher in a 'Savior' or Messiah, this to further there aims of destroying not only the Constitution, but the independence of America itself, in that respect G.W. Bush did his job FOR THEM (the PTB) just splendid. I believe the street term for this would be "knock em down, set em up."





























NOTE: The first Bush in the White House, George Herbert Walker Bush, also laid the foundation(the first "GULF WAR",and a terrible economy) for FAR LEFT WING MARXIST Bill Clinton to reign as the "savior" or messiah for eight years, where-in he sold out America to NAFTA and the World Trade Organization, as well as opening the floodgates of illegal immigration.

BlueAngel
08-02-2008, 09:31 AM
He did'nt have to say kindergardners, everyone but you gets the 'jist' of his message. The PTB purposely destroyed this nation UNDER G.W.Bush the last 8 years, this to "set-up" a FAR LEFT WING MARXIST like Obama, to usher in a 'Savior' or Messiah, this to further there aims of destroying not only the Constitution, but the independence of America itself, in that respect G.W. Bush did his job FOR THEM (the PTB) just splendid. I believe the street term for this would be "knock em down, set em up."


NOTE: The first Bush in the White House, George Herbert Walker Bush, also laid the foundation(the first "GULF WAR",and a terrible economy) for FAR LEFT WING MARXIST Bill Clinton to reign as the "savior" or messiah for eight years, where-in he sold out America to NAFTA and the World Trade Organization, as well as opening the floodgates of illegal immigration.

Look, I understand what BUSH has accomplished for his masters.

My comment was that OBAMA did not say kindergartners.

If he is elected and wants to pass some type of sex education in school that is inappropriate, I'm certain there will be plenty of people who object.

You can't actually say that the drug education and sex education programs in place now steer children away from such.

They're more designed to inform them and set them on the path.

The Constitution has already been destroyed.

Ozziecynic
08-31-2008, 05:10 AM
Having read about the Maitreya in Theosophical beliefs. I have reason to believe this man could be the son of perdition. Already he seems to be promising many wonders and the typical american seems to be lapping it all up. And no I am not racist however if you think I am too bad.:cool:

Ozziecynic
09-04-2008, 06:21 AM
:confused: O.k i take that back i was way too harsh on obama i would much rather the US to have its first Black president than some gun toting redneck loon women from hicksville whom would lead the world in www3. Plus her family cant keep the high moral values she expects of everyone else in regards to her daughter a true example of Republican hypocrisy. Whom ever is running the star spangled empire looks like the future belongs the the United States of Ordo Secularum bad news for all whether they realise it or not!.:(

redrat11
09-08-2008, 09:06 PM
:confused: O.k i take that back i was way too harsh on obama i would much rather the US to have its first Black president than some gun toting redneck loon women from hicksville whom would lead the world in www3. Plus her family cant keep the high moral values she expects of everyone else in regards to her daughter a true example of Republican hypocrisy. Whom ever is running the star spangled empire looks like the future belongs the the United States of Ordo Secularum bad news for all whether they realise it or not!.:(


Ozzie, Barack is one CROOKED MFer, he is entirely a product of the Chicago political machinery, if your not familiar with american politics, Chicago is and always has been the most CORRUPT city in America, here are some links you might find worth reading about Obamas ties to scumbags.


Obama ties to terrorist


Wake up America: Barack Obama Dogged by Terrorist Ties (http://wwwwakeupamericans-spree.blogspot.com/2008/04/barack-obama-dogged-by-terrorist-ties.html)


Records Of Obama’s Ties To Terrorist Withheld

Wed, 08/20/2008 - 11:07 — Judicial Watch Blog (http://www.judicialwatch.org/user/judicial-watch-blog) A state-funded university in Illinois is withholding crucial documents that could shed more light on Barack Obama’s close ties to a domestic terrorist who planted bombs in the Capitol, Pentagon and other government buildings to protest U.S. policy.
In an apparent cover up, the University of Illinois at Chicago (http://www.uic.edu/index.html/) (UIC) refuses to make public hundreds of files that document the Democratic presidential candidate’s decades-long relationship with William Ayers, a Vietnam-era radical and former fugitive from U.S. justice who has proudly admitted setting the bombs in the 1970s.
Ayers, a member of the domestic terrorist group Weather Underground, is currently a professor at UIC and the school’s library—named after Chicago’s former longtime corrupt Democrat Mayor Richard J. Daley—houses 132 boxes containing nearly 1,000 folders of records relating to Obama’s ties to Ayers, various radical organizations and other questionable political allies.
Ayers and his wife, a fellow Weather Underground terrorist, have long supported and collaborated with Obama, donating money to his campaign and hosting fundraising events at their home. The Illinois senator and aging radical hang out in the same political and social circles, live in the same Chicago neighborhood and for years served on the board of a renowned Chicago nonprofit.
The mainstream media has largely ignored this quite relevant relationship, but one journalist (http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=MTgwZTVmN2QyNzk2MmUxMzA5OTg0ODZlM2Y2OGI0NDM=&w=MA==) has tried (unsuccessfully) to access the crucial files because they will reveal Obama’s personal, financial and ideological ties with Ayers as well as other radical groups. After all, Obama could be the next commander-in-chief and Americans have the right to know.
After initially agreeing to make the files public, the school reneged claiming that the mystery donor—believed to be Ayers—who provided the collection refuses to make the information public. The UIC professor in charge of the library’s special collections department later provided a rather bizarre explanation for the sudden change of heart by saying that it has come to the school’s attention that there is “restricted” material in the collection.
Americans learned of Obama’s scary relationship (http://www.judicialwatch.org/blog/obama-forced-address-terrorist-ties) with Ayers just a few months ago despite his campaign’s efforts to distance him from the renowned terrorist. After planting the bombs, Ayers was a fugitive from U.S. justice for a decade and his group was officially labeled a terrorist group by the FBI.
None of this stopped Obama from joining forces with the Chicago radical who launched a successful grass roots effort to spearhead the senator’s thriving political career. Now the details of this alarming relationship, kept at a taxpayer-financed university, are being withheld from Americans.

Records Of Obama’s Ties To Terrorist Withheld | Judicial Watch (http://www.judicialwatch.org/blog/2008/aug/records-obama-s-ties-terrorist-withheld)



TONY REZCO AND OBAMA???


Barack Obama and Tony Rezco's Chicago real-estate connection could spell trouble for the candidate | World news | guardian.co.uk (http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2008/feb/04/usa.uselections20081)


YouTube - Sen. Obama, Rev. Wright, Tony Rezco, and Friends (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RdyMfj3bDgs)


OBAMA VOWS TO DISARM AMERICA???



B. Hussein Obama Vows to DISARM America's Military - Video - In his own words folks. (http://www.godlikeproductions.com/forum1/message564329/pg1)


Obama Vows To Disarm America (http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?PHPSESSID=fd03657e74b2538326b4789ca4e207 0b&topic=218127.0)

Leonardo
09-08-2008, 09:14 PM
Having read about the Maitreya in Theosophical beliefs. I have reason to believe this man could be the son of perdition. Already he seems to be promising many wonders and the typical american seems to be lapping it all up. And no I am not racist however if you think I am too bad.:cool:

So you're saying that Barack Obama could be the Maitreya son of Perdition?


WON'T SOMEBODY GIVE A NIGGA A CHANCE!

P.S. Oh come on, people, that was joke..

redrat11
09-08-2008, 09:41 PM
:confused: O.k i take that back i was way too harsh on obama i would much rather the US to have its first Black president than some gun toting redneck loon women from hicksville whom would lead the world in www3. Plus her family cant keep the high moral values she expects of everyone else in regards to her daughter a true example of Republican hypocrisy. Whom ever is running the star spangled empire looks like the future belongs the the United States of Ordo Secularum bad news for all whether they realise it or not!.:(



Here are some links to show that Barack is a corrupt A-hole.

Tony Rezko
8 things you need to know about Obama, Rezko :: CHICAGO SUN-TIMES :: The Watchdogs (http://www.suntimes.com/news/watchdogs/757340,CST-NWS-watchdog24.article)



Obama ties to terrorist

Wake up America: Barack Obama Dogged by Terrorist Ties (http://wwwwakeupamericans-spree.blogspot.com/2008/04/barack-obama-dogged-by-terrorist-ties.html)



Obama vows to disarm America


B. Hussein Obama Vows to DISARM America's Military - Video - In his own words folks. (http://www.godlikeproductions.com/forum1/message564329/pg1)


Obama Vows To Disarm America (http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?topic=218127.0)



If your not familiar with Chicago politics OZZIE, its the most corrrupt city in america, Obama is a product of that system.



Obamas brother he does'nt care about???

BARACK BROTHER IN SHACK SHOCK - New York Post (http://www.nypost.com/seven/08212008/news/nationalnews/barack_brother_in_shack_shock_125404.htm)

BlueAngel
09-08-2008, 10:05 PM
Here are some links to show that Barack is a corrupt A-hole.

Tony Rezko
8 things you need to know about Obama, Rezko :: CHICAGO SUN-TIMES :: The Watchdogs (http://www.suntimes.com/news/watchdogs/757340,CST-NWS-watchdog24.article)



Obama ties to terrorist

Wake up America: Barack Obama Dogged by Terrorist Ties (http://wwwwakeupamericans-spree.blogspot.com/2008/04/barack-obama-dogged-by-terrorist-ties.html)



Obama vows to disarm America


B. Hussein Obama Vows to DISARM America's Military - Video - In his own words folks. (http://www.godlikeproductions.com/forum1/message564329/pg1)


Obama Vows To Disarm America (http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?topic=218127.0)



If your not familiar with Chicago politics OZZIE, its the most corrrupt city in america, Obama is a product of that system.



Obamas brother he does'nt care about???

BARACK BROTHER IN SHACK SHOCK - New York Post (http://www.nypost.com/seven/08212008/news/nationalnews/barack_brother_in_shack_shock_125404.htm)

I listened to the video titled:

OBAMA VOWS TO DISARM AMERICA

AND

I didn't hear him say this in his own words.

Please provide the quote.

Thanks.

At the end of the video he said that he vows to use our military to protect America.

He spoke about the military and the steps he would take to cut wasteful spending, but, like I said, I did not hear him say he would disarm the military.

Do you know how ridiculous that statement sounds?

Leonardo
09-08-2008, 10:11 PM
Well, you have to ask yourself one question, will Obama be any worse than McCain. All the rebublicans already know McCain is a total fraud. And since Obama has better teeth, nice suits, and a great haircut, I don't see why he shouldn't be the Facilitator in Chief.

--Fra

redrat11
09-08-2008, 10:30 PM
I listened to the video titled:

OBAMA VOWS TO DISARM AMERICA

AND

I didn't hear him say this in his own words.

Please provide the quote.

Thanks.

At the end of the video he said that he vows to use our military to protect America.

He spoke about the military and the steps he would take to cut wasteful spending, but, like I said, I did not hear him say he would disarm the military.

Do you know how ridiculous that statement sounds?



just remember though BA, the MSM main stream media is subtly implanting the message into peoples minds that if they don't vote for Obama, that this is reason to suspect that your a racist person, You mark my words here, Obama loses and jew controlled blacks like Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson will try to forment race riots in magor cities, America is being set up to be labeled as a racist nation by the PTB.

BlueAngel
09-08-2008, 11:34 PM
just remember though BA, the MSM main stream media is subtly implanting the message into peoples minds that if they don't vote for Obama, that this is reason to suspect that your a racist person, You mark my words here, Obama loses and jew controlled blacks like Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson will try to forment race riots in magor cities, America is being set up to be labeled as a racist nation by the PTB.

You're deflecting.

My point is that the youtube video title is DISINFORMATION.

redrat11
09-08-2008, 11:51 PM
You're deflecting.

My point is that the youtube video title is DISINFORMATION.


Regardless, Obama will, along with Feinstein(CA),Boxer(CA) Schumer(NY) Kennedy(MA) and the rest of the gun control skunks in Congress Disarm America, Hillary Clinton by comparison, is conservative compared to this Obama creature, Obama is even more dangerous than McCain to civil liberties, just look at all the info he has REFUSED to answer about his "backers."

BlueAngel
09-09-2008, 12:51 AM
Regardless, Obama will, along with Feinstein(CA),Boxer(CA) Schumer(NY) Kennedy(MA) and the rest of the gun control skunks in Congress Disarm America, Hillary Clinton by comparison, is conservative compared to this Obama creature, Obama is even more dangerous than McCain to civil liberties, just look at all the info he has REFUSED to answer about his "backers."

Regardless!

Are you kidding me?

Do you watch or read anything you post before you post it?

I'm not defending any of our politicians, but to post something that is completely FALSE is not what you should be doing if you are, in fact, a conspiracy theorist who seeks to impart the TRUTH about our corrupt government.

You posted a youtube link wherein the title states that Obama will disarm the US military and HE NEVER SAID THIS.

Ozziecynic
09-09-2008, 01:44 AM
So you're saying that Barack Obama could be the Maitreya son of Perdition?


:cool:Could be I havent entirely made up my mind on this guy!. He seems to promise the US and the world many wonders and also promises PEACE MAN and PROSPERITY dont they all!. You know the anti christ is meant to be a man of Peace and deception on the one hand however bringing war and pestalence on the other which is kind of what Bill Clinton was like so he could fit the bill who knows but then so could someone like pallin maybe shes the Harlot of babylon.
On another note i wonder what happend to this mysterious Ron Paul fellow that american conspiracy boffins keep hammering on about he seems to have disappeared into his texan dust bowl. Not that we have heard of him much over here Aus the guy had never been in the mainstream media and still isnt a little strange that dont you think!.:confused:

Leonardo
09-09-2008, 01:53 AM
:cool:Could be I havent entirely made up my mind on this guy!. He seems to promise the US and the world many wonders and also promises PEACE MAN and PROSPERITY dont they all!. You know the anti christ is meant to be a man of Peace a deception on the one hand however bringing war and pestalence on the other which is kind of what Bill Clinton was like so he could fit the bill who knows but then so could someone like pallin maybe shes the Harlot of babylon.
On another note i wonder what happend to this mysterious Ron Paul fellow that american conspiracy boffins keep hammering on about he seems to have disappeared into his texan dust bowl. Not that we have heard of him much over here Aus the guy had never been in the mainstream media and still isnt a little strange that dont you think!.:confused:

I have no idea what happened to Ron Paul. He just dropped off the face of the earth. Anyway, I'm not voting this year. It's all a sham. I'm just looking for a girlfriend.

I think I might go to Pennsilvania and look among the Amish. I not sure, but when I was in Pennsylvania last time I saw some really pretty quaker ladies. Maybe I could join them and work on the farm for a while and marry some girl named Rachel or something.

As far as the elections, I really couldn't care less anymore. It's not just me, it's my entire family. I always thought I was the black sheep of the family. But at the family reunion this year all everyone was talking about was the trilateralists and the elections sham.

I guess all my work really did pay off. I actually convinced people whom I thought were beyond convincing.

But I'm not going to worry about the Illuminati. I'm just worrying about keeping myself faithful, paying my bills, and finding a beautiful and lovely woman to make my bride so I can bang her everyday till the day I die.

redrat11
09-09-2008, 05:32 AM
Regardless!

Are you kidding me?

Do you watch or read anything you post before you post it?

I'm not defending any of our politicians, but to post something that is completely FALSE is not what you should be doing if you are, in fact, a conspiracy theorist who seeks to impart the TRUTH about our corrupt government.

You posted a youtube link wherein the title states that Obama will disarm the US military and HE NEVER SAID THIS.


What don't You understand about GUN CONTROL STUPID IDIOT???
Gun Law News - Barack Obama (http://www.gunlawnews.org/Senators/Barack-Obama.html)


Barack Obama -- GOA 2008 Presidential Candidates and the Second Amendment (http://www.gunowners.org/pres08/obama.htm)
who cares whether a utube link did'nt impart the information of disarmment of the military, but if you had as much knowledge as me in this area, you would know the State department and the NWO have been trying to disarm all guns from citizens across the world, private ownership of guns here in america has been a TOP PRIORITY for idiots like Obama.


Nobody else on this forum even comes close to posting things about our corrupt government, take a look around moron, you have a shill posting garbage about new age/new world order religous beliefs, along with your stupid garbage, then the guy from down under trying to not be (offensive) so he wishes Obama to be president, despite monumental info I've posted about his NWO ideals, Again BA, I say to U>>>>>F..U and the horse you rode in on.:)

redrat11
09-09-2008, 06:02 AM
Obama the fool..


The Democrats endorse the "Global War on Terrorism": Obama "goes after" Osama (http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=9995)






______________________________________
Obama's "American Promise" is War.
Barack Obama has embraced the "Global War on Terrorism" (GWOT).
The Obama-Biden campaign has endorsed the very foundations of the Bush administration's foreign policy agenda: "Go after Osama bin Laden, "take him out".
<B>The rhetoric is softer but the substance is almost identical:
"For while Senator McCain was turning his sights to Iraq just days after 9/11, I stood up and opposed this war, knowing that it would distract us from the real threats we face. When John McCain said we could just “muddle through” in Afghanistan, I argued for more resources and more troops to finish the fight against the terrorists who actually attacked us on 9/11, and made clear that we must take out Osama bin Laden and his lieutenants if we have them in our sights. John McCain likes to say that he’ll follow bin Laden to the Gates of Hell – but he won’t even go to the cave where he lives. [APPLAUSE]
</B>
And today, as my call for a time frame to remove our troops from Iraq has been echoed by the Iraqi government and even the Bush Administration, even after we learned that Iraq has a $79 billion surplus while we’re wallowing in deficits, John McCain stands alone in his stubborn refusal to end a misguided war.
That’s not the judgment we need. That won’t keep America safe. We need a President who can face the threats of the future, not keep grasping at the ideas of the past." (The American Promise, August 28, 2008, Democratic Convention. Denver (http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=9988), emphasis added)
The 9/11 Cover-up
The Democrats have endorsed the "Big Lie". Bin Laden is upheld as the "outside enemy" who threatens the American Homeland. The fact that bin Laden is a US sponsored intelligence asset, created and sustained by the CIA, is never mentioned.
<B>The Obama campaign galvanizes public support for the "Global War on Terrorism" (GWOT). In the words of Obama's running mate, Joe Biden:
"The fact of the matter is, al-Qaida and the Taliban - the people who have actually attacked us on 9/11 [note: exactly the same wording as in the Obama speech] -- they've regrouped in the mountains between Afghanistan and Pakistan and are plotting new attacks. And the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff has echoed Barack's call for more troops and John McCain was wrong and Barack Obama was right." (Joe Biden, Democratic Convention, Denver, August 27, 2008, emphasis added)
</B>
In contrast to Iraq, the war on Afghanistan is portrayed by the Obama-Biden campaign as a "Just War", a war of retribution initiated in October 2001 in response to the 9/11 attacks.
This concept of the "Just War" in relation to Afghanistan has been echoed by several prominent Liberal and "Progressive" intellectuals: The war on Iraq, on the other hand, is seen as an "illegal war". In October 2001, the attack on Afghanistan was supported by numerous civil society organizations on humanitarian grounds.
It is by no means coincidental that the prominent "Leftist" scholars and intellectuals, who failed to address the use of the 9/11 attacks as a pretext to wage war, have expressed their support for Barack Obama. The Nation Magazine and Progressive Democrats for America (http://pdamerica.org/) are indelibly behind the Obama-Biden ticket.
The Obama-Biden campaign has endorsed the 9/11 cover-up. Without a shred of evidence, Afghanistan, a nation of 34 million people (the size of Canada), is portrayed as the State sponsor of the 9/11 attacks. This basic premise is accepted by the Democrats.
Obama indelibly upholds 9/11 as an act of war and aggression directed against America, thereby justifying a war of retribution directed against "Islamic terrorists" and their state sponsors.

The "Global War on Terrorism" (GWOT) is the product of a carefully designed military-intelligence agenda, which determines the thrust of US foreign policy.

GWOT is endorsed by both Republicans and Democrats. US intelligence overrides party politics. GWOT is part of the presidential campaign platform of both political parties. Its validity is not questioned, nor are its consequences. The fact that it is predicated on a "Big Lie" is not an issue.
Spiraling Defense Spending
Both Barack Obama and John McCain have signaled that they will increase overall defense spending, while also revamping the system of Pentagon procurement with a view to reducing cost overruns. (See Bloomberg, June 30, 2008 (http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=adXiGrYSU5PA&refer=home) See also Reuters, August 29, 2008 (http://uk.reuters.com/article/topNews/idUKMOL95454020080829)).
For FY 2009, the US Defense Department is asking for a $515 billion defense budget plus a separate $70 billion "to cover war costs into the early months of a new administration... Those amounts combined would represent the highest level of military spending since the end of World War II (adjusted for inflation)." (csmonitor.com February 06, 2008) (http://www.csmonitor.com/2008/0206/p02s02-usmi.html)

<B>Obama's message is crystal clear. He endorses the Bush administration's proposed surge in military spending. He wants to spend more money on weapons and troops. Going after bin Laden and the "Global War on Terrorism" constitute his main justification for increased defense spending:
"[M]ore resources and more troops to finish the fight against the terrorists who actually attacked us on 9/11..."
</B>
<B>But at the same time, Obama promises more resources for education and health.
"Now is the time to finally meet our moral obligation to provide every child a world-class education, ... I’ll invest in early childhood education. I’ll recruit an army of new teachers, and pay them higher salaries and give them more support. ...
</B>
Now is the time to finally keep the promise of affordable, accessible health care for every single American.... (The American Promise, August 28, 2008, Democratic Convention. Denver (http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=9988), emphasis added)
http://www.globalresearch.ca/articlePictures/DiscFY2004Pie.gif

Will there be a shift in spending priorities?

Under the Bush administration, Defense was favored in relation to all other expenditure categories. (See Chart above for FY 2004). Will an Obama administration change the structure of Federal government expenditure?

Will he reduce the absolute size of defense spending which constitutes approximately 47 percent of global defense spending (all countries combined)? The US NATO combined control 70% of global defense spending. (See Chart below)

http://www.globalresearch.ca/articlePictures/military_spending_pie_chart.gif
Guns versus Butter

Visibly Barack Obama does understand the Guns versus Butter dilemma.
He fails to address a fundamental macro-economic relationship, namely the issue of public investment in the war economy versus the funding, through tax dollars, of civilian social programs. More broadly, this also raises the issue of the role of the US Treasury and the US monetary system, in relentlessly financing the military industrial complex and the Middle East war at the expense of most sectors of civilian economic activity.
http://www.globalresearch.ca/articlePictures/gunsbutter.gif



More resources to war and weapons, as proposed by both Obama and McCain, favors the Big Five Defense Contractors (Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grunman, Raytheon, Boeing and General Dynamics), Dick Cheney's Halliburton, British Aerospace, not to mention Blackwater, MPRI et al, at the expense of the civilian sectors, including national, regional and local level economies.
Military Spending Creates Unemployment
Tax dollars allocated, as promised by Obama, to National Defense and Homeland Security will result in unemployment.
In contrast to World War II, the war economy in the 21st Century does not create jobs.
The costs of creating jobs in the military industrial complex are abysmally high when compared to the civilian sectors. In turn, the financial resources channeled by the US government to the DoD defense contractors dramatically reduces public expenditure in favor of all other spending categories.
Lockeed Martin together with Northrop Grumman have been involved in developing the Joint Fighter program (http://www.jsf.mil/news/). Based on initial estimates, 5400 direct jobs were created at a unit cost of $37 million per job. (See Michel Chossudovsky, War is Good for Business, Global Research, September 16, 2001 (http://www.globalresearch.ca/articles/CHO109D.html)). Similarly at Boeing's assembly plant, each job created in the Joint Strike Fighter program costs US taxpayers $66.7 million. (Seattle Post-Intelligencer, 7 September 2001).
With regard to the F22 Raptor fighter, (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/F-22_Raptor)assembled at Lockheed Martin Marietta's plant in Georgia, the F22 Raptor fighters was estimated to have a unit cost of $85 million. Three thousand (3000) direct jobs were to be created at an estimated cost of $20 million a job. (Ibid) The cost of the program once completed in 2005 was of the order of 62 billion dollars. According to 2008 company figures, roughly 2000 jobs remain tied to the production of the F22. (See Free Republic, March 2008 (http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1983939/posts)). Two Thousand Jobs created at the Lockheed-Marietta's plant in Georgia at an initial outlay of 31 million dollars per job.
Imagine how many jobs you could create with 31 million dollars invested in small and medium sized enterprises across America.
http://www.globalresearch.ca/articlePictures/F-22.jpg
These post 9/11 defense expenditures by the Bush administration trigger mass unemployment. Moreover, they are funded by downsizing America's social programs, which in turn contributes to exacerbating the levels of poverty and unemployment.
Obama's War Economy
The Obama campaign accepts the logic of a war economy which triggers unemployment and poverty at home while creating death and destruction in the Middle East war theater.
This post 9/11 direction of the US economy has lined the pockets of a handful of defense contractors corporations, while contributing very marginally to the rehabilitation of the employment of specialized scientific, technical and professional workers laid-off by the civilian economy.
Not surprisingly, the defense contractors, while favoring John McCain are also firm supporter of Barack Obama.

<B>America's largest military contractor Lockheed Martin (and business partner of Dick Cheney's Halliburton) was present at the Denver Democratic Party Convention, among a vast array of powerful corporate sponsors and lobby groups. According to a company spokesperson:
“Lockheed Martin strongly supports our nation’s political process and candidates that support in general national defense, homeland security, high technology and educational initiatives,” (quoted by Bill van Auken, Democrats convene in Denver amid police state security and a sea of corporate cash, Global Research, August 2008)
</B>
The Big Lie
The Obama lies are perhaps more subtle than those of George W. But again in substance, we are dealing with a continuum.
The "Global War on Terrorism" is an integral part of the Obama campaign. "Islamic terrorists" threaten the American way of life. Al Qaeda and its alleged State sponsors are portrayed as the main threat at home and abroad.
The corporate media applauds.
No shift in direction.

The doctrine of preemptive war directed against "Islamic terrorists" and their State sponsors remains functionally intact.

The same applies to the post 9/11 nuclear weapons doctrine as first formulated in the 2002 Nuclear Posture Review (NPR). Nuclear weapons are on the drawing board of the Pentagon, for use in the Middle East war theater. And the Democrats are fully supportive of preemptive nuclear weapons as a means to protect the American Homeland.
Under the "Global War on Terrorism", the Homeland Security apparatus, not to mention the anti-terrorist Patriot legislation, the Big Brother surveillance apparatus would, under a Barack Obama administration, remain intact.

9/11 constitutes for Obama the main justification for waging a humanitarian war in the Middle East and Central Asia. In this regard, his position does not differ from that of the Bush Administration.
Withdraw from Iraq, but remain in Afghanistan.
Bring the troops back from Iraq. Move them to Afghanistan.

<B>Confront Iran, challenge Russia:
"I will end this war in Iraq responsibly, and finish the fight against al Qaeda and the Taliban in Afghanistan. I will rebuild our military to meet future conflicts. But I will also renew the tough, direct diplomacy that can prevent Iran from obtaining nuclear weapons and curb Russian aggression. I will build new partnerships to defeat the threats of the 21st century: terrorism and nuclear proliferation; poverty and genocide; climate change and disease. And I will restore our moral standing, so that America is once again that last, best hope for all who are called to the cause of freedom, who long for lives of peace, and who yearn for a better future.
</B>
These are the policies I will pursue. And in the weeks ahead, I look forward to debating them with John McCain." (The American Promise, August 28, 2008, Democratic Convention. Denver (http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=9988), emphasis added)
"Finishing the fight against Al Qaeda and the Taliban" means extending the "Global War on Terrorism" (GWOT) into new frontiers.

Concretely, the GWOT, which is central to the Obama campaign, provides a pretext and justification for waging a war of conquest, for expanding US influence in the Middle East, Central Asia, Sub-Saharan Africa and South East Asia.
Obama-Biden and The "New Cold War"
The Obama-Biden campaign is committed to reinforcing US-NATO military presence on the Iran-Afghan border, as well as on Afghanistan's border with China's Xinjiang Uigur autonomous region as well as within Pakistan.
Afghanistan is a strategic hub in Central Asia bordering on Iran, the former Soviet Union, China and Pakistan. It is a land bridge and potential oil and gas pipeline corridor which links the Caspian sea basin to the Arabian sea. It is also part of the continued process of militarization and encirclement of the People's Republic of China.
The Obama-Biden campaign has also endorsed the "New Cold War". Russia is explicitly identified in Obama's speech as an Aggressor. Iran is identified as nuclear threat, despite ample evidence to the contrary.
<B>Joe Biden, who if elected, would take over from Dick Cheney, considers Russia, China and India as the main threat to America's National Security:
The Bush foreign policy has dug us into a very deep hole, with very few friends to help us climb out. And for the last seven years, the administration has failed to face the biggest the biggest forces shaping this century. The emergence of Russia, China and India's great powers, the spread of lethal weapons, the shortage of secure supplies of energy, food and water. The challenge of climate change and the resurgence of fundamentalism in Afghanistan and Pakistan, the real central front in the war on terror.
</B>
Ladies and gentlemen, in recent years and in recent days we once again see the consequences of the neglect, of this neglect, of Russia challenging the very freedom of a new democratic country of Georgia. Barack and I will end that neglect. We will hold Russia accountable for its action and we will help Georgia rebuild. I have been on the ground in Georgia, Iraq, Pakistan, Afghanistan, and I can tell you in no uncertain terms, this administration's policy has been an abysmal failure. America cannot afford four more years of this failure. (Democratic Party convention, August 27, 2008 (http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=9975), emphasis added)
The militarization of Afghanistan and Pakistan under the GWOT is directed against two overlapping military alliances: the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) (http://www.sectsco.org/home.asp?LanguageID=2) and the Collective Security Treaty Organization (CSTO) (http://www.dkb.gov.ru/start/index.htm).
The SCO is a military alliance between Russia and China and several Central Asian former Soviet republics including Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan and Uzbekistan. Iran has observer status in the SCO.
The Collective Security Treaty Organization (CSTO) (http://www.dkb.gov.ru/start/index.htm), which plays a key geopolitical role in relation to transport and energy corridors, operates in close liaison with the SCO. The CSTO regroups the following member states: Armenia, Belarus, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Russia, Tajikistan and Uzbekistan.
For Obama-Biden, the war on Iran is still on. The New Cold War is directed against China, Russia and its allies, namely the SCO-CSTO military alliance.
In other words, the Democrats have endorsed the New Cold War
What Prospects under an Obama Presidency?

Apart from the rhetoric of "bringing the troops home" from war torn Iraq, which may or may be carried out, what distinguishes the Democrats from the Republicans?
A more articulate, knowledgeable and charismatic President?
A more dignified and diplomatic approach to US foreign policy?

An opportunity to the US ruling elite "to present a different face to the world that could revive illusions in its democratic pretensions, not only internationally but within the United States as well." (Patrick Martin, Tensions rise in Democratic contest as Obama nears nomination, (http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=8947)Global Research, May 11, 2008)
A spurious and counterfeit "humanitarian" approach to Empire, which serves to mask the truth and gain popular support.
A less reckless Commander in Chief, who has an understanding of geopolitics and is capable of taking foreign policy decisions.

A more carefully thought out military agenda than that experienced during the Bush administration? But with no substantive shift in direction.
A means to quelling mounting dissent and opposition to the ruling corporate establishment by providing the illusion that the Democrats constitute a Real Alternative.
A means to sustaining the illusion that African-Americans can move up the social ladder in America and that their fundamental rights are being upheld.
A means to undermining real progressive movements by further embedding civil society organizations, trade unions, grass-roots organizations not to mention "Leftist" intellectuals into the realm of the Democratic Party.
A distraction from the extensive war crimes committed under successive US administrations.

A "human face" to war and globalization?

________________________________________



Joe Biden Zionist...


Joe Biden's record on US wars (http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=9994)



Biden - Warmonger, Wordmonger And Political Hit Man (http://www.rense.com/general83/biden.htm)




<DT><CENTER>Motormouth Joe Biden -
Warmonger, Wordmonger
And Political Hit Man
By Webster G. Tarpley
8-25-8</CENTER>
<DT><CENTER></CENTER><DT><CENTER><TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width=555 border=0><TBODY><TR><TD vAlign=top width="100%"><DL><DT>WASHINGTON DC -- The vice presidential candidate chosen to run with Obama is Senator Joe Biden of Delaware, a discredited, sleazy, and shopworn political hack -- and therefore an anti-climax for all the callow and feckless youth who got the word via text message at 3am in the morning. The ability of the Trilateral-Bilderberg machine which controls Obama to put up a person like Biden already reflects the further degradation of US political life over the past 9-12 months, largely as a result of Obama's own demagogic, no- issues, personality cult agitation. <DT><DT>A year ago, there was wide agreement in the US middle class that Bush and Cheney should be impeached, that the police state be rolled back, and that the Iraq war should be ended as soon as physically possible. Thanks largely to the advent of the vapid and messianic Obama, these issues have now been thoroughly deflated. Biden is himself an incurable warmonger who voted for the Iraq war and blathered ceaselessly in favor of Bush's aggressive adventure to all who would listen. Naming Biden is a brutal insult to the antiwar majority of the Democratic Party, and Obama is obviously hoping that the Iraq war issue is dead, so nobody will care. Last year, Obama promised that he would work against the mentality that produced Iraq; if anyone incarnates that mentality, it is Biden. Biden is an incurable imperialist and an eager advocate of the discredited Bush-Cheney "war on terror." He even tried to use one of the Democratic debates last year to whip up hysteria in favor of attacking Sudan over the Darfur issue, and with some success. "I went there. I sat in the borders. I went in those camps. They're going to have thousands and thousands and thousands of people die. We've got to stop talking and act," Biden postured in Manchester New Hampshire on June 3, 2007 in an apparent call for bombing Sudan, a coup in Khartoum, or an invasion. Incredibly, the crowd applauded wildly. <DT><DT>Biden remains convinced that it is up to the United States to dictate the form of government and economic system of virtually every country in the world. His specialty is blatant interference in the internal affairs of sovereign states, with left-cover of soft power issues like human rights and humanitarian concerns furnishing his favorite pretexts. Biden has learned nothing from the Iraq debacle except that Iraq was not the right victim; more appropriate victims and more effective methods will have to be found, argues Biden. The real lesson of Iraq (and Lebanon 2006) is that US-British imperialism and world domination are finished historically, but this is lost on Biden. <DT><DT>Biden is the author of the odious plan to balkanize, partition, and subdivide Iraq into three zones: a Kurdish state designed to carve up Iran, Syria and Turkey as well as Iraq; a landlocked and oil- poor Sunni desert entity; and an oil-rich Shiastan in the south that might absorb the Arabistan or Achwaz province of Iran is a later breakup scenario for Iran. Biden's plan is a continuation of the Bernard Lewis plan to break up the existing states of the Middle East in a way destined to create a mosaic of pseudo- independent, squabbling mini-states or micro-states. This approach places Biden squarely behind the Zbigniew Brzezinski "dignity" doctrine of breaking up the existing nation states of the world in favor of a crazy quilt of micro-states based on ethnic and religious parochialism and particularism; not one of these micro- states could stand up to Exxon-Mobil or JP Morgan Chase. <DT><DT>BIDEN IS MORALLY INSANE ON GEORGIA <DT><DT>Biden's ample track record as an agent provocateur against Russia goes back more than a decade to the time he mobilized his mouth to help demonize Milosevic of Serbia as part of the Albright-Holbrooke- Wesley Clark anti-Russian campaign of those years, which ended with the NATO bombing of Serbia, an act of unprecedented historical vandalism. In the past week, warmonger Biden has rushed to the side of the latest tin pot mini-Mussolini of the Brzezinski-Soros faction, the infamous war criminal and gangster Mikhail Saakashvili of Georgia. "I left the country convinced that Russia's invasion of Georgia may be the one of the most significant events to occur in Europe since the end of communism," raved Biden on his return, documenting his own moral insanity by siding with the aggressor. "The claims of Georgian atrocities that provided the pretext for Russia's invasion are rapidly being disproved by international observers, and the continuing presence of Russian forces in the country has severe implications for the broader region," added the Orwellian senator. <DT><DT>BIDEN: $1 BILLION FOR MADMAN SAAKASHVILI <DT><DT>In presenting Biden, Barky reveled in Biden's "tough message" for Russia; we are sure Putin is trembling. Biden wants to prop up the madman Saakashvili with $1 billion of the US taxpayers' money, a gesture which is every bit as obscene as the worst Bush-Cheney excesses. $1 billion would get us on the road to fully funding a program like WIC (high-protein foods for expectant mothers) or Head Start, but this thought does not occur to Biden when he is trying to provoke Russia. We can see the cruel elitism of a financier- controlled Obama regime taking place before our eyes. <DT><DT>Obama and Biden resemble each other closely, Both are insufferable windbags besotted with their own rhetorical verbiage. Biden's celebrated gaffes will provide comic relief, as long as they do not gaffe us into World War III, which is always a distinct possibility. Obama and Biden are addicted to the sound of their own voices, and this may turn out to be the fatal flaw that sinks them when the voters get sick of the endless parade of speeches. Obama and Biden are in danger of drowning in their own endless blabber. Each one has more than a touch of megalomania, which prevents them from seeing their limits. Biden's middle name is Robinette, which is close to the term for a faucet tap in French. Biden has never been able to find the tap to turn off his own mouth. <DT><DT>TWO PLAGIARISTS ON THE DEMOCRATIC TICKET <DT><DT>Obama and Biden are both plagiarists; words are their stock in trade, and even the words are fake. It emerged this spring that Obama was spouting verbatim the canned speeches of Governor Deval Patrick of Massachusetts, his fellow clone from the Trilateral stable. Biden is a picaresque paladin of plagiarism. His 1988 presidential campaign was aborted when he was found to have stolen paragraphs of a speech by the Labour Party leader, Neil Kinnock. He had also embroidered his campaign biography. Biden had also been guilty of plagiarism at the Syracuse University law school which he attended, but he had somehow talked his way out of those charges. <DT><DT>BIDEN A CREATURE OF THE WORST CREDIT CARD GOUGERS <DT><DT>Biden represents Delaware in the US Senate. Delaware is not a state, but a giant post box for Dupont, General Motors, and many of the giant corporations and Wall Street firms. The state politics of Delaware are dictated down to the most minute detail by the bankers and their corporate lackeys, since everything depends on keeping a pro-oligarchical political climate in the state. Biden personally is a tool of MBNA, a credit card issuer that was recently absorbed by the Bank of America, which presumably now also owns Biden. Biden got at least $215,000 from MBNA over the past decade. MBNA is notoriously one of the biggest predatory lenders and interest rate gougers in the entire usurious world of credit cards, and Biden's services to them are precisely in this area: Biden was a big supporter of the 2005 bankruptcy law which makes it much harder for working families to escape debt bondage and debt slavery ­ just what the looters at MBNA ordered. Biden has also boasted that he wrote the ban on assault weapons, a measure that is sure to cause problems among the bitter clingers of Appalachia who are concerned about gun ownership. <DT><DT>Obama has voted for the rotten compromise on FISA illegal wiretaps ordered by Bush that grants retroactive immunity to the telecoms. Biden is also an enthusiastic police state totalitarian. In 1995, after the Oklahoma City false flag bombing, Biden submitted an oppressive police state bill, in many ways a precursor of Bush's infamous Patriot Act. "I drafted a terrorism bill after the Oklahoma City bombing," boasts Biden. "And the bill John Ashcroft sent up was my bill." Biden's only regret is that he was not able to undermine political freedom as much as he wanted to. <DT><DT>Obama's drooling acolytes have argued all summer that to name Senator Clinton to the ticket would negate Barky's profile of youth, change, hope, and so forth. Clinton has been a national figure for almost twenty years, but she has been dumped in favor of Biden, who has been in the US Senate for about 36 years and is about as stale and hackneyed as a political figure could be. The difference is that Biden's track record established him as an obedient servant of the Wall Street banks that have their post box headquarters in his state; the Clintons, by contrast, represent the closest thing we have to political combination not wholly owned by Wall Street and capable of saying no to the bankers when they demand austerity and aggression, as they are assuredly doing now. Rockefeller and Soros do not want Sen. Clinton in the presidential succession under any circumstances, and this is an important positive qualification for the New York senator. <DT><DT>BEAU BIDEN, THE CORRUPT ATTORNEY GENERAL OF DELAWARE <DT><DT>Joe Biden's son is Beau Biden, the current attorney general of Delaware. Beau is involved in one of the dirtiest enemies' list operations in recent memory against Larry Sinclair, who has come forward with explosive charges of gay sex and crack cocaine use in 1999 on the part of Obama. When Sinclair came to the National Press Club in Washington on June 18 to make his case, he was arrested on a trumped-up warrant issued by Beau Biden. Sinclair is being threatened with a long jail term, essentially because he has spoken out against Obama. It was a clear bid to do a favor for Barky and get Joe Biden on the ticket in the veep slot. That has now occurred ­ on the basis of a police state operation against an outspoken political opponent which goes beyond Nixon or Bush- Cheney, since Obama is not yet president and may well never be. <DT><DT>The Biden announcement was thoroughly botched and bungled by Axelrod, Plouffe, and Favreau. The text message gimmick is drawn straight from the Kiev Orange revolution of 2004 and the Tiflis Roses revolution of 2003, the models for Obama's attempt to seize power. The proceedings were a carnival of gaffes and Freudian slips, all ignored by Obama's loyal brigade of media whores. According to Barky, Joe Biden would help enact "a new energy policy to freeze ourselves from our dependence on foreign oil" ­ a chilling prospect. <DT><DT>"BARACK AMERICA" AND OTHER FREUDIAN SLIPS <DT><DT>Barky made another revealing Freudian slip: "the next President the next Vice President ­ Joe Biden." Does Barky know that Biden will act as his resident in-house controller? Biden, evidently mindful that he will have to sell the radical subversive Obama as a wholesome product of the heartland, returned the gaffe by calling the presumptive nominee "Barack America" or "Barack American." Perhaps he was trying to imitate the old Subliminal Man of Saturday Night Live, but was too slow. <DT><DT>Behind Barky's Freudian slip is the fact that Biden will evidently run foreign policy for the clueless Obama in much the same way that Brzezinski ran foreign policy above and behind Carter, or that Cheney has run foreign policy above and behind Bush. Obama is so ignorant and cognitively impaired that he could hardly understand the instructions that bankers' spokesmen like Brzezinski and Soros will be shouting to him on the phone. This is where an experienced hack like Biden is needed. The media, in a transparent attempt to portray an apostolic succession for Biden, are still feeding the illusion that Biden was chosen by Caroline Kennedy. In reality, the choice was probably made by Trilateral-Bilderberg operative Jim Johnson, who was forced to retreat from his announced role as The Vetter by revelations about a sweetheart mortgage, but probably just kept going behind the scenes. <DT><DT>The Obama campaign has repeated ad nauseam its mantra that McCain is running for Bush's third term. McCain has answered that Obama is running for Jimmy Carter's second term. The reality may be that Joe Biden is running for Dick Cheney's third term as the resident controller of a lazy and shallow puppet president ­ Obama, the Manchurian candidate of the Trilateral Commission. <DT><DT>Webster G. Tarpley is the author of Obama: The Postmodern Coup, and Barack H. Obama: The Unauthorized Biography, both published by Progressive Press of California. </DT></DL></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE></CENTER>


<HR>
</DT>

Shadow
09-09-2008, 10:44 AM
Obama the fool..


The Democrats endorse the "Global War on Terrorism": Obama "goes after" Osama (http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=9995)






______________________________________
Obama's "American Promise" is War.
Barack Obama has embraced the "Global War on Terrorism" (GWOT).
The Obama-Biden campaign has endorsed the very foundations of the Bush administration's foreign policy agenda: "Go after Osama bin Laden, "take him out".
<B>The rhetoric is softer but the substance is almost identical:
"For while Senator McCain was turning his sights to Iraq just days after 9/11, I stood up and opposed this war, knowing that it would distract us from the real threats we face. When John McCain said we could just “muddle through” in Afghanistan, I argued for more resources and more troops to finish the fight against the terrorists who actually attacked us on 9/11, and made clear that we must take out Osama bin Laden and his lieutenants if we have them in our sights. John McCain likes to say that he’ll follow bin Laden to the Gates of Hell – but he won’t even go to the cave where he lives. [APPLAUSE]
</B>
And today, as my call for a time frame to remove our troops from Iraq has been echoed by the Iraqi government and even the Bush Administration, even after we learned that Iraq has a $79 billion surplus while we’re wallowing in deficits, John McCain stands alone in his stubborn refusal to end a misguided war.
That’s not the judgment we need. That won’t keep America safe. We need a President who can face the threats of the future, not keep grasping at the ideas of the past." (The American Promise, August 28, 2008, Democratic Convention. Denver (http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=9988), emphasis added)
The 9/11 Cover-up
The Democrats have endorsed the "Big Lie". Bin Laden is upheld as the "outside enemy" who threatens the American Homeland. The fact that bin Laden is a US sponsored intelligence asset, created and sustained by the CIA, is never mentioned.
<B>The Obama campaign galvanizes public support for the "Global War on Terrorism" (GWOT). In the words of Obama's running mate, Joe Biden:
"The fact of the matter is, al-Qaida and the Taliban - the people who have actually attacked us on 9/11 [note: exactly the same wording as in the Obama speech] -- they've regrouped in the mountains between Afghanistan and Pakistan and are plotting new attacks. And the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff has echoed Barack's call for more troops and John McCain was wrong and Barack Obama was right." (Joe Biden, Democratic Convention, Denver, August 27, 2008, emphasis added)
</B>
In contrast to Iraq, the war on Afghanistan is portrayed by the Obama-Biden campaign as a "Just War", a war of retribution initiated in October 2001 in response to the 9/11 attacks.
This concept of the "Just War" in relation to Afghanistan has been echoed by several prominent Liberal and "Progressive" intellectuals: The war on Iraq, on the other hand, is seen as an "illegal war". In October 2001, the attack on Afghanistan was supported by numerous civil society organizations on humanitarian grounds.
It is by no means coincidental that the prominent "Leftist" scholars and intellectuals, who failed to address the use of the 9/11 attacks as a pretext to wage war, have expressed their support for Barack Obama. The Nation Magazine and Progressive Democrats for America (http://pdamerica.org/) are indelibly behind the Obama-Biden ticket.
The Obama-Biden campaign has endorsed the 9/11 cover-up. Without a shred of evidence, Afghanistan, a nation of 34 million people (the size of Canada), is portrayed as the State sponsor of the 9/11 attacks. This basic premise is accepted by the Democrats.
Obama indelibly upholds 9/11 as an act of war and aggression directed against America, thereby justifying a war of retribution directed against "Islamic terrorists" and their state sponsors.

The "Global War on Terrorism" (GWOT) is the product of a carefully designed military-intelligence agenda, which determines the thrust of US foreign policy.

GWOT is endorsed by both Republicans and Democrats. US intelligence overrides party politics. GWOT is part of the presidential campaign platform of both political parties. Its validity is not questioned, nor are its consequences. The fact that it is predicated on a "Big Lie" is not an issue.
Spiraling Defense Spending
Both Barack Obama and John McCain have signaled that they will increase overall defense spending, while also revamping the system of Pentagon procurement with a view to reducing cost overruns. (See Bloomberg, June 30, 2008 (http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=adXiGrYSU5PA&refer=home) See also Reuters, August 29, 2008 (http://uk.reuters.com/article/topNews/idUKMOL95454020080829)).
For FY 2009, the US Defense Department is asking for a $515 billion defense budget plus a separate $70 billion "to cover war costs into the early months of a new administration... Those amounts combined would represent the highest level of military spending since the end of World War II (adjusted for inflation)." (csmonitor.com February 06, 2008) (http://www.csmonitor.com/2008/0206/p02s02-usmi.html)

<B>Obama's message is crystal clear. He endorses the Bush administration's proposed surge in military spending. He wants to spend more money on weapons and troops. Going after bin Laden and the "Global War on Terrorism" constitute his main justification for increased defense spending:
"[M]ore resources and more troops to finish the fight against the terrorists who actually attacked us on 9/11..."
</B>
<B>But at the same time, Obama promises more resources for education and health.
"Now is the time to finally meet our moral obligation to provide every child a world-class education, ... I’ll invest in early childhood education. I’ll recruit an army of new teachers, and pay them higher salaries and give them more support. ...
</B>
Now is the time to finally keep the promise of affordable, accessible health care for every single American.... (The American Promise, August 28, 2008, Democratic Convention. Denver (http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=9988), emphasis added)
http://www.globalresearch.ca/articlePictures/DiscFY2004Pie.gif

Will there be a shift in spending priorities?

Under the Bush administration, Defense was favored in relation to all other expenditure categories. (See Chart above for FY 2004). Will an Obama administration change the structure of Federal government expenditure?

Will he reduce the absolute size of defense spending which constitutes approximately 47 percent of global defense spending (all countries combined)? The US NATO combined control 70% of global defense spending. (See Chart below)

http://www.globalresearch.ca/articlePictures/military_spending_pie_chart.gif
Guns versus Butter

Visibly Barack Obama does understand the Guns versus Butter dilemma.
He fails to address a fundamental macro-economic relationship, namely the issue of public investment in the war economy versus the funding, through tax dollars, of civilian social programs. More broadly, this also raises the issue of the role of the US Treasury and the US monetary system, in relentlessly financing the military industrial complex and the Middle East war at the expense of most sectors of civilian economic activity.
http://www.globalresearch.ca/articlePictures/gunsbutter.gif



More resources to war and weapons, as proposed by both Obama and McCain, favors the Big Five Defense Contractors (Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grunman, Raytheon, Boeing and General Dynamics), Dick Cheney's Halliburton, British Aerospace, not to mention Blackwater, MPRI et al, at the expense of the civilian sectors, including national, regional and local level economies.
Military Spending Creates Unemployment
Tax dollars allocated, as promised by Obama, to National Defense and Homeland Security will result in unemployment.
In contrast to World War II, the war economy in the 21st Century does not create jobs.
The costs of creating jobs in the military industrial complex are abysmally high when compared to the civilian sectors. In turn, the financial resources channeled by the US government to the DoD defense contractors dramatically reduces public expenditure in favor of all other spending categories.
Lockeed Martin together with Northrop Grumman have been involved in developing the Joint Fighter program (http://www.jsf.mil/news/). Based on initial estimates, 5400 direct jobs were created at a unit cost of $37 million per job. (See Michel Chossudovsky, War is Good for Business, Global Research, September 16, 2001 (http://www.globalresearch.ca/articles/CHO109D.html)). Similarly at Boeing's assembly plant, each job created in the Joint Strike Fighter program costs US taxpayers $66.7 million. (Seattle Post-Intelligencer, 7 September 2001).
With regard to the F22 Raptor fighter, (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/F-22_Raptor)assembled at Lockheed Martin Marietta's plant in Georgia, the F22 Raptor fighters was estimated to have a unit cost of $85 million. Three thousand (3000) direct jobs were to be created at an estimated cost of $20 million a job. (Ibid) The cost of the program once completed in 2005 was of the order of 62 billion dollars. According to 2008 company figures, roughly 2000 jobs remain tied to the production of the F22. (See Free Republic, March 2008 (http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1983939/posts)). Two Thousand Jobs created at the Lockheed-Marietta's plant in Georgia at an initial outlay of 31 million dollars per job.
Imagine how many jobs you could create with 31 million dollars invested in small and medium sized enterprises across America.
http://www.globalresearch.ca/articlePictures/F-22.jpg
These post 9/11 defense expenditures by the Bush administration trigger mass unemployment. Moreover, they are funded by downsizing America's social programs, which in turn contributes to exacerbating the levels of poverty and unemployment.
Obama's War Economy
The Obama campaign accepts the logic of a war economy which triggers unemployment and poverty at home while creating death and destruction in the Middle East war theater.
This post 9/11 direction of the US economy has lined the pockets of a handful of defense contractors corporations, while contributing very marginally to the rehabilitation of the employment of specialized scientific, technical and professional workers laid-off by the civilian economy.
Not surprisingly, the defense contractors, while favoring John McCain are also firm supporter of Barack Obama.

<B>America's largest military contractor Lockheed Martin (and business partner of Dick Cheney's Halliburton) was present at the Denver Democratic Party Convention, among a vast array of powerful corporate sponsors and lobby groups. According to a company spokesperson:
“Lockheed Martin strongly supports our nation’s political process and candidates that support in general national defense, homeland security, high technology and educational initiatives,” (quoted by Bill van Auken, Democrats convene in Denver amid police state security and a sea of corporate cash, Global Research, August 2008)
</B>
The Big Lie
The Obama lies are perhaps more subtle than those of George W. But again in substance, we are dealing with a continuum.
The "Global War on Terrorism" is an integral part of the Obama campaign. "Islamic terrorists" threaten the American way of life. Al Qaeda and its alleged State sponsors are portrayed as the main threat at home and abroad.
The corporate media applauds.
No shift in direction.

The doctrine of preemptive war directed against "Islamic terrorists" and their State sponsors remains functionally intact.

The same applies to the post 9/11 nuclear weapons doctrine as first formulated in the 2002 Nuclear Posture Review (NPR). Nuclear weapons are on the drawing board of the Pentagon, for use in the Middle East war theater. And the Democrats are fully supportive of preemptive nuclear weapons as a means to protect the American Homeland.
Under the "Global War on Terrorism", the Homeland Security apparatus, not to mention the anti-terrorist Patriot legislation, the Big Brother surveillance apparatus would, under a Barack Obama administration, remain intact.

9/11 constitutes for Obama the main justification for waging a humanitarian war in the Middle East and Central Asia. In this regard, his position does not differ from that of the Bush Administration.
Withdraw from Iraq, but remain in Afghanistan.
Bring the troops back from Iraq. Move them to Afghanistan.

<B>Confront Iran, challenge Russia:
"I will end this war in Iraq responsibly, and finish the fight against al Qaeda and the Taliban in Afghanistan. I will rebuild our military to meet future conflicts. But I will also renew the tough, direct diplomacy that can prevent Iran from obtaining nuclear weapons and curb Russian aggression. I will build new partnerships to defeat the threats of the 21st century: terrorism and nuclear proliferation; poverty and genocide; climate change and disease. And I will restore our moral standing, so that America is once again that last, best hope for all who are called to the cause of freedom, who long for lives of peace, and who yearn for a better future.
</B>
These are the policies I will pursue. And in the weeks ahead, I look forward to debating them with John McCain." (The American Promise, August 28, 2008, Democratic Convention. Denver (http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=9988), emphasis added)
"Finishing the fight against Al Qaeda and the Taliban" means extending the "Global War on Terrorism" (GWOT) into new frontiers.

Concretely, the GWOT, which is central to the Obama campaign, provides a pretext and justification for waging a war of conquest, for expanding US influence in the Middle East, Central Asia, Sub-Saharan Africa and South East Asia.
Obama-Biden and The "New Cold War"
The Obama-Biden campaign is committed to reinforcing US-NATO military presence on the Iran-Afghan border, as well as on Afghanistan's border with China's Xinjiang Uigur autonomous region as well as within Pakistan.
Afghanistan is a strategic hub in Central Asia bordering on Iran, the former Soviet Union, China and Pakistan. It is a land bridge and potential oil and gas pipeline corridor which links the Caspian sea basin to the Arabian sea. It is also part of the continued process of militarization and encirclement of the People's Republic of China.
The Obama-Biden campaign has also endorsed the "New Cold War". Russia is explicitly identified in Obama's speech as an Aggressor. Iran is identified as nuclear threat, despite ample evidence to the contrary.
<B>Joe Biden, who if elected, would take over from Dick Cheney, considers Russia, China and India as the main threat to America's National Security:
The Bush foreign policy has dug us into a very deep hole, with very few friends to help us climb out. And for the last seven years, the administration has failed to face the biggest the biggest forces shaping this century. The emergence of Russia, China and India's great powers, the spread of lethal weapons, the shortage of secure supplies of energy, food and water. The challenge of climate change and the resurgence of fundamentalism in Afghanistan and Pakistan, the real central front in the war on terror.
</B>
Ladies and gentlemen, in recent years and in recent days we once again see the consequences of the neglect, of this neglect, of Russia challenging the very freedom of a new democratic country of Georgia. Barack and I will end that neglect. We will hold Russia accountable for its action and we will help Georgia rebuild. I have been on the ground in Georgia, Iraq, Pakistan, Afghanistan, and I can tell you in no uncertain terms, this administration's policy has been an abysmal failure. America cannot afford four more years of this failure. (Democratic Party convention, August 27, 2008 (http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=9975), emphasis added)
The militarization of Afghanistan and Pakistan under the GWOT is directed against two overlapping military alliances: the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) (http://www.sectsco.org/home.asp?LanguageID=2) and the Collective Security Treaty Organization (CSTO) (http://www.dkb.gov.ru/start/index.htm).
The SCO is a military alliance between Russia and China and several Central Asian former Soviet republics including Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan and Uzbekistan. Iran has observer status in the SCO.
The Collective Security Treaty Organization (CSTO) (http://www.dkb.gov.ru/start/index.htm), which plays a key geopolitical role in relation to transport and energy corridors, operates in close liaison with the SCO. The CSTO regroups the following member states: Armenia, Belarus, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Russia, Tajikistan and Uzbekistan.
For Obama-Biden, the war on Iran is still on. The New Cold War is directed against China, Russia and its allies, namely the SCO-CSTO military alliance.
In other words, the Democrats have endorsed the New Cold War
What Prospects under an Obama Presidency?

Apart from the rhetoric of "bringing the troops home" from war torn Iraq, which may or may be carried out, what distinguishes the Democrats from the Republicans?
A more articulate, knowledgeable and charismatic President?
A more dignified and diplomatic approach to US foreign policy?

An opportunity to the US ruling elite "to present a different face to the world that could revive illusions in its democratic pretensions, not only internationally but within the United States as well." (Patrick Martin, Tensions rise in Democratic contest as Obama nears nomination, (http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=8947)Global Research, May 11, 2008)
A spurious and counterfeit "humanitarian" approach to Empire, which serves to mask the truth and gain popular support.
A less reckless Commander in Chief, who has an understanding of geopolitics and is capable of taking foreign policy decisions.

A more carefully thought out military agenda than that experienced during the Bush administration? But with no substantive shift in direction.
A means to quelling mounting dissent and opposition to the ruling corporate establishment by providing the illusion that the Democrats constitute a Real Alternative.
A means to sustaining the illusion that African-Americans can move up the social ladder in America and that their fundamental rights are being upheld.
A means to undermining real progressive movements by further embedding civil society organizations, trade unions, grass-roots organizations not to mention "Leftist" intellectuals into the realm of the Democratic Party.
A distraction from the extensive war crimes committed under successive US administrations.

A "human face" to war and globalization?

________________________________________



Joe Biden Zionist...


Joe Biden's record on US wars (http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=9994)



Biden - Warmonger, Wordmonger And Political Hit Man (http://www.rense.com/general83/biden.htm)




<DT><CENTER>Motormouth Joe Biden -
Warmonger, Wordmonger
And Political Hit Man
By Webster G. Tarpley
8-25-8</CENTER>
<DT><CENTER></CENTER><DT><CENTER><TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width=555 border=0><TBODY><TR><TD vAlign=top width="100%"><DL><DT>WASHINGTON DC -- The vice presidential candidate chosen to run with Obama is Senator Joe Biden of Delaware, a discredited, sleazy, and shopworn political hack -- and therefore an anti-climax for all the callow and feckless youth who got the word via text message at 3am in the morning. The ability of the Trilateral-Bilderberg machine which controls Obama to put up a person like Biden already reflects the further degradation of US political life over the past 9-12 months, largely as a result of Obama's own demagogic, no- issues, personality cult agitation. <DT><DT>A year ago, there was wide agreement in the US middle class that Bush and Cheney should be impeached, that the police state be rolled back, and that the Iraq war should be ended as soon as physically possible. Thanks largely to the advent of the vapid and messianic Obama, these issues have now been thoroughly deflated. Biden is himself an incurable warmonger who voted for the Iraq war and blathered ceaselessly in favor of Bush's aggressive adventure to all who would listen. Naming Biden is a brutal insult to the antiwar majority of the Democratic Party, and Obama is obviously hoping that the Iraq war issue is dead, so nobody will care. Last year, Obama promised that he would work against the mentality that produced Iraq; if anyone incarnates that mentality, it is Biden. Biden is an incurable imperialist and an eager advocate of the discredited Bush-Cheney "war on terror." He even tried to use one of the Democratic debates last year to whip up hysteria in favor of attacking Sudan over the Darfur issue, and with some success. "I went there. I sat in the borders. I went in those camps. They're going to have thousands and thousands and thousands of people die. We've got to stop talking and act," Biden postured in Manchester New Hampshire on June 3, 2007 in an apparent call for bombing Sudan, a coup in Khartoum, or an invasion. Incredibly, the crowd applauded wildly. <DT><DT>Biden remains convinced that it is up to the United States to dictate the form of government and economic system of virtually every country in the world. His specialty is blatant interference in the internal affairs of sovereign states, with left-cover of soft power issues like human rights and humanitarian concerns furnishing his favorite pretexts. Biden has learned nothing from the Iraq debacle except that Iraq was not the right victim; more appropriate victims and more effective methods will have to be found, argues Biden. The real lesson of Iraq (and Lebanon 2006) is that US-British imperialism and world domination are finished historically, but this is lost on Biden. <DT><DT>Biden is the author of the odious plan to balkanize, partition, and subdivide Iraq into three zones: a Kurdish state designed to carve up Iran, Syria and Turkey as well as Iraq; a landlocked and oil- poor Sunni desert entity; and an oil-rich Shiastan in the south that might absorb the Arabistan or Achwaz province of Iran is a later breakup scenario for Iran. Biden's plan is a continuation of the Bernard Lewis plan to break up the existing states of the Middle East in a way destined to create a mosaic of pseudo- independent, squabbling mini-states or micro-states. This approach places Biden squarely behind the Zbigniew Brzezinski "dignity" doctrine of breaking up the existing nation states of the world in favor of a crazy quilt of micro-states based on ethnic and religious parochialism and particularism; not one of these micro- states could stand up to Exxon-Mobil or JP Morgan Chase. <DT><DT>BIDEN IS MORALLY INSANE ON GEORGIA <DT><DT>Biden's ample track record as an agent provocateur against Russia goes back more than a decade to the time he mobilized his mouth to help demonize Milosevic of Serbia as part of the Albright-Holbrooke- Wesley Clark anti-Russian campaign of those years, which ended with the NATO bombing of Serbia, an act of unprecedented historical vandalism. In the past week, warmonger Biden has rushed to the side of the latest tin pot mini-Mussolini of the Brzezinski-Soros faction, the infamous war criminal and gangster Mikhail Saakashvili of Georgia. "I left the country convinced that Russia's invasion of Georgia may be the one of the most significant events to occur in Europe since the end of communism," raved Biden on his return, documenting his own moral insanity by siding with the aggressor. "The claims of Georgian atrocities that provided the pretext for Russia's invasion are rapidly being disproved by international observers, and the continuing presence of Russian forces in the country has severe implications for the broader region," added the Orwellian senator. <DT><DT>BIDEN: $1 BILLION FOR MADMAN SAAKASHVILI <DT><DT>In presenting Biden, Barky reveled in Biden's "tough message" for Russia; we are sure Putin is trembling. Biden wants to prop up the madman Saakashvili with $1 billion of the US taxpayers' money, a gesture which is every bit as obscene as the worst Bush-Cheney excesses. $1 billion would get us on the road to fully funding a program like WIC (high-protein foods for expectant mothers) or Head Start, but this thought does not occur to Biden when he is trying to provoke Russia. We can see the cruel elitism of a financier- controlled Obama regime taking place before our eyes. <DT><DT>Obama and Biden resemble each other closely, Both are insufferable windbags besotted with their own rhetorical verbiage. Biden's celebrated gaffes will provide comic relief, as long as they do not gaffe us into World War III, which is always a distinct possibility. Obama and Biden are addicted to the sound of their own voices, and this may turn out to be the fatal flaw that sinks them when the voters get sick of the endless parade of speeches. Obama and Biden are in danger of drowning in their own endless blabber. Each one has more than a touch of megalomania, which prevents them from seeing their limits. Biden's middle name is Robinette, which is close to the term for a faucet tap in French. Biden has never been able to find the tap to turn off his own mouth. <DT><DT>TWO PLAGIARISTS ON THE DEMOCRATIC TICKET <DT><DT>Obama and Biden are both plagiarists; words are their stock in trade, and even the words are fake. It emerged this spring that Obama was spouting verbatim the canned speeches of Governor Deval Patrick of Massachusetts, his fellow clone from the Trilateral stable. Biden is a picaresque paladin of plagiarism. His 1988 presidential campaign was aborted when he was found to have stolen paragraphs of a speech by the Labour Party leader, Neil Kinnock. He had also embroidered his campaign biography. Biden had also been guilty of plagiarism at the Syracuse University law school which he attended, but he had somehow talked his way out of those charges. <DT><DT>BIDEN A CREATURE OF THE WORST CREDIT CARD GOUGERS <DT><DT>Biden represents Delaware in the US Senate. Delaware is not a state, but a giant post box for Dupont, General Motors, and many of the giant corporations and Wall Street firms. The state politics of Delaware are dictated down to the most minute detail by the bankers and their corporate lackeys, since everything depends on keeping a pro-oligarchical political climate in the state. Biden personally is a tool of MBNA, a credit card issuer that was recently absorbed by the Bank of America, which presumably now also owns Biden. Biden got at least $215,000 from MBNA over the past decade. MBNA is notoriously one of the biggest predatory lenders and interest rate gougers in the entire usurious world of credit cards, and Biden's services to them are precisely in this area: Biden was a big supporter of the 2005 bankruptcy law which makes it much harder for working families to escape debt bondage and debt slavery * just what the looters at MBNA ordered. Biden has also boasted that he wrote the ban on assault weapons, a measure that is sure to cause problems among the bitter clingers of Appalachia who are concerned about gun ownership. <DT><DT>Obama has voted for the rotten compromise on FISA illegal wiretaps ordered by Bush that grants retroactive immunity to the telecoms. Biden is also an enthusiastic police state totalitarian. In 1995, after the Oklahoma City false flag bombing, Biden submitted an oppressive police state bill, in many ways a precursor of Bush's infamous Patriot Act. "I drafted a terrorism bill after the Oklahoma City bombing," boasts Biden. "And the bill John Ashcroft sent up was my bill." Biden's only regret is that he was not able to undermine political freedom as much as he wanted to. <DT><DT>Obama's drooling acolytes have argued all summer that to name Senator Clinton to the ticket would negate Barky's profile of youth, change, hope, and so forth. Clinton has been a national figure for almost twenty years, but she has been dumped in favor of Biden, who has been in the US Senate for about 36 years and is about as stale and hackneyed as a political figure could be. The difference is that Biden's track record established him as an obedient servant of the Wall Street banks that have their post box headquarters in his state; the Clintons, by contrast, represent the closest thing we have to political combination not wholly owned by Wall Street and capable of saying no to the bankers when they demand austerity and aggression, as they are assuredly doing now. Rockefeller and Soros do not want Sen. Clinton in the presidential succession under any circumstances, and this is an important positive qualification for the New York senator. <DT><DT>BEAU BIDEN, THE CORRUPT ATTORNEY GENERAL OF DELAWARE <DT><DT>Joe Biden's son is Beau Biden, the current attorney general of Delaware. Beau is involved in one of the dirtiest enemies' list operations in recent memory against Larry Sinclair, who has come forward with explosive charges of gay sex and crack cocaine use in 1999 on the part of Obama. When Sinclair came to the National Press Club in Washington on June 18 to make his case, he was arrested on a trumped-up warrant issued by Beau Biden. Sinclair is being threatened with a long jail term, essentially because he has spoken out against Obama. It was a clear bid to do a favor for Barky and get Joe Biden on the ticket in the veep slot. That has now occurred * on the basis of a police state operation against an outspoken political opponent which goes beyond Nixon or Bush- Cheney, since Obama is not yet president and may well never be. <DT><DT>The Biden announcement was thoroughly botched and bungled by Axelrod, Plouffe, and Favreau. The text message gimmick is drawn straight from the Kiev Orange revolution of 2004 and the Tiflis Roses revolution of 2003, the models for Obama's attempt to seize power. The proceedings were a carnival of gaffes and Freudian slips, all ignored by Obama's loyal brigade of media whores. According to Barky, Joe Biden would help enact "a new energy policy to freeze ourselves from our dependence on foreign oil" * a chilling prospect. <DT><DT>"BARACK AMERICA" AND OTHER FREUDIAN SLIPS <DT><DT>Barky made another revealing Freudian slip: "the next President the next Vice President * Joe Biden." Does Barky know that Biden will act as his resident in-house controller? Biden, evidently mindful that he will have to sell the radical subversive Obama as a wholesome product of the heartland, returned the gaffe by calling the presumptive nominee "Barack America" or "Barack American." Perhaps he was trying to imitate the old Subliminal Man of Saturday Night Live, but was too slow. <DT><DT>Behind Barky's Freudian slip is the fact that Biden will evidently run foreign policy for the clueless Obama in much the same way that Brzezinski ran foreign policy above and behind Carter, or that Cheney has run foreign policy above and behind Bush. Obama is so ignorant and cognitively impaired that he could hardly understand the instructions that bankers' spokesmen like Brzezinski and Soros will be shouting to him on the phone. This is where an experienced hack like Biden is needed. The media, in a transparent attempt to portray an apostolic succession for Biden, are still feeding the illusion that Biden was chosen by Caroline Kennedy. In reality, the choice was probably made by Trilateral-Bilderberg operative Jim Johnson, who was forced to retreat from his announced role as The Vetter by revelations about a sweetheart mortgage, but probably just kept going behind the scenes. <DT><DT>The Obama campaign has repeated ad nauseam its mantra that McCain is running for Bush's third term. McCain has answered that Obama is running for Jimmy Carter's second term. The reality may be that Joe Biden is running for Dick Cheney's third term as the resident controller of a lazy and shallow puppet president * Obama, the Manchurian candidate of the Trilateral Commission. <DT><DT>Webster G. Tarpley is the author of Obama: The Postmodern Coup, and Barack H. Obama: The Unauthorized Biography, both published by Progressive Press of California. </DT></DL></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE></CENTER>


<HR>
</DT>


You lost me on your butter analogy!

redrat11
09-22-2008, 09:39 AM
Obama will "crack" by mid October???
http://i30.photobucket.com/albums/c307/reddog11/obama.png


Qp0hU1THjuc

YouTube - Barack Obama Stuttering Uh Montage (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qp0hU1THjuc)
:rolleyes:


Obama is becoming Mentally Il, will probably "Crack" before November. (http://www.godlikeproductions.com/forum1/message612592/pg1)

BlueAngel
09-22-2008, 09:47 PM
Obama will "crack" by mid October???
http://i30.photobucket.com/albums/c307/reddog11/obama.png


Qp0hU1THjuc

YouTube - Barack Obama Stuttering Uh Montage (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qp0hU1THjuc)
:rolleyes:


Obama is becoming Mentally Il, will probably "Crack" before November. (http://www.godlikeproductions.com/forum1/message612592/pg1)

What bullshit!

BlueAngel
09-22-2008, 10:00 PM
What don't You understand about GUN CONTROL STUPID IDIOT???
Gun Law News - Barack Obama (http://www.gunlawnews.org/Senators/Barack-Obama.html)


Barack Obama -- GOA 2008 Presidential Candidates and the Second Amendment (http://www.gunowners.org/pres08/obama.htm)
who cares whether a utube link did'nt impart the information of disarmment of the military, but if you had as much knowledge as me in this area, you would know the State department and the NWO have been trying to disarm all guns from citizens across the world, private ownership of guns here in america has been a TOP PRIORITY for idiots like Obama.

Apparently, you don't care what type of fraud you perpetrate on this site. I'm well aware that the controllers would prefer the public be disarmed. This has nothing to do with the LIES that you post and the one I called out about the youtube video headline of Obama. Deflection. RedRat's middle name. Please inform us as to Obama's top priority being gun ownership and I respectfully request that you provide facts and not disinformation.


Nobody else on this forum even comes close to posting things about our corrupt government, take a look around moron, you have a shill posting garbage about new age/new world order religous beliefs, along with your stupid garbage, then the guy from down under trying to not be (offensive) so he wishes Obama to be president, despite monumental info I've posted about his NWO ideals, Again BA, I say to U>>>>>F..U and the horse you rode in on.:)

Sorry to burst you bubble, but you post propaganda most of the time and, as per usual, RedRat thinks he is the only poster on this site who is informative. Take a look at the thread posted today about the banking industry. VERY informative. Ozzie lives in Canada so he won't be voting.

BTW, I didn't ride in on a horse.

P.S. What's with the black? Guess you really don't want people to read what you write.

And, when is it that Makow doesn't write an article about how humanity is under attack?




Message is long!!!!!!!!

Ozziecynic
09-24-2008, 06:30 AM
Message to all americans on cc scrolling through here this organisation Think Tank - Council on Foreign Relations (http://www.cfr.org/thinktank)
pulls your strings dont be ignorant dont be naive like the common goyim mass your elections are rigged and a circus.

It aint Obama or Palin that runs anything they are merely tenured caretakers for your Ordo Novo Secularum your CFR/(SKULL&BONES) Republic.
Pointless threads like this one are hence a complete waste of space and time

BlueAngel
09-24-2008, 07:37 AM
Message to all americans on cc scrolling through here this organisation Think Tank - Council on Foreign Relations (http://www.cfr.org/thinktank)
pulls your strings dont be ignorant dont be naive like the common goyim mass your elections are rigged and a circus.

It aint Obama or Palin that runs anything they are merely tenured caretakers for your Ordo Novo Secularum your CFR/(SKULL&BONES) Republic.
Pointless threads like this one are hence a complete waste of space and time

Very good POINT made on this pointless thread.

redrat11
09-25-2008, 10:36 AM
BUMPITY:p

redrat11
09-25-2008, 10:36 AM
Bump, Bump...:(

redrat11
09-25-2008, 10:47 AM
OK, I'll try to not post on BARACK THE CON ARTIST anymore, we all know they're all scumbag elitist NWO cronies, yes, ok. I just want to add that what will happen under his administration, he is a avowed MARXIST, so, if Bush is Tyrannical, Barack will make his dictatorship seem gentle by comparison.


here read this...

Barack Obama's Stealth Socialism

INVESTOR'S BUSINESS DAILY

Posted 7/28/2008
Election '08: Before friendly audiences, Barack Obama speaks passionately about something called "economic justice." He uses the term obliquely, though, speaking in code — socialist code.


---------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------

IBD Series: The Audacity Of Socialism


---------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------

During his NAACP speech earlier this month, Sen. Obama repeated the term at least four times. "I've been working my entire adult life to help build an America where economic justice is being served," he said at the group's 99th annual convention in Cincinnati.
And as president, "we'll ensure that economic justice is served," he asserted. "That's what this election is about." Obama never spelled out the meaning of the term, but he didn't have to. His audience knew what he meant, judging from its thumping approval.
It's the rest of the public that remains in the dark, which is why we're launching this special educational series.
"Economic justice" simply means punishing the successful and redistributing their wealth by government fiat. It's a euphemism for socialism.
In the past, such rhetoric was just that — rhetoric. But Obama's positioning himself with alarming stealth to put that rhetoric into action on a scale not seen since the birth of the welfare state.
In his latest memoir he shares that he'd like to "recast" the welfare net that FDR and LBJ cast while rolling back what he derisively calls the "winner-take-all" market economy that Ronald Reagan reignited (with record gains in living standards for all).
Obama also talks about "restoring fairness to the economy," code for soaking the "rich" — a segment of society he fails to understand that includes mom-and-pop businesses filing individual tax returns.
It's clear from a close reading of his two books that he's a firm believer in class envy. He assumes the economy is a fixed pie, whereby the successful only get rich at the expense of the poor.
Following this discredited Marxist model, he believes government must step in and redistribute pieces of the pie. That requires massive transfers of wealth through government taxing and spending, a return to the entitlement days of old.
Of course, Obama is too smart to try to smuggle such hoary collectivist garbage through the front door. He's disguising the wealth transfers as "investments" — "to make America more competitive," he says, or "that give us a fighting chance," whatever that means.
Among his proposed "investments":
• "Universal," "guaranteed" health care.
• "Free" college tuition.
• "Universal national service" (a la Havana).
• "Universal 401(k)s" (in which the government would match contributions made by "low- and moderate-income families").
• "Free" job training (even for criminals).
• "Wage insurance" (to supplement dislocated union workers' old income levels).
• "Free" child care and "universal" preschool.
• More subsidized public housing.
• A fatter earned income tax credit for "working poor."
• And even a Global Poverty Act that amounts to a Marshall Plan for the Third World, first and foremost Africa.
His new New Deal also guarantees a "living wage," with a $10 minimum wage indexed to inflation; and "fair trade" and "fair labor practices," with breaks for "patriot employers" who cow-tow to unions, and sticks for "nonpatriot" companies that don't.
That's just for starters — first-term stuff.
Obama doesn't stop with socialized health care. He wants to socialize your entire human resources department — from payrolls to pensions. His social-microengineering even extends to mandating all employers provide seven paid sick days per year to salary and hourly workers alike.
You can see why Obama was ranked, hands-down, the most liberal member of the Senate by the National Journal. Some, including colleague and presidential challenger John McCain, think he's the most liberal member in Congress.
But could he really be "more left," as McCain recently remarked, than self-described socialist Sen. Bernie Sanders (for whom Obama has openly campaigned, even making a special trip to Vermont to rally voters)?
Obama's voting record, going back to his days in the Illinois statehouse, says yes. His career path — and those who guided it — leads to the same unsettling conclusion.
The seeds of his far-left ideology were planted in his formative years as a teenager in Hawaii — and they were far more radical than any biography or profile in the media has portrayed.
A careful reading of Obama's first memoir, "Dreams From My Father," reveals that his childhood mentor up to age 18 — a man he cryptically refers to as "Frank" — was none other than the late communist Frank Marshall Davis, who fled Chicago after the FBI and Congress opened investigations into his "subversive," "un-American activities."
As Obama was preparing to head off to college, he sat at Davis' feet in his Waikiki bungalow for nightly bull sessions. Davis plied his impressionable guest with liberal doses of whiskey and advice, including: Never trust the white establishment.
"They'll train you so good," he said, "you'll start believing what they tell you about equal opportunity and the American way and all that sh**."
After college, where he palled around with Marxist professors and took in socialist conferences "for inspiration," Obama followed in Davis' footsteps, becoming a "community organizer" in Chicago.
His boss there was Gerald Kellman, whose identity Obama also tries to hide in his book. Turns out Kellman's a disciple of the late Saul "The Red" Alinsky, a hard-boiled Chicago socialist who wrote the "Rules for Radicals" and agitated for social revolution in America.
The Chicago-based Woods Fund provided Kellman with his original $25,000 to hire Obama. In turn, Obama would later serve on the Woods board with terrorist Bill Ayers of the Weather Underground. Ayers was one of Obama's early political supporters.
After three years agitating with marginal success for more welfare programs in South Side Chicago, Obama decided he would need to study law to "bring about real change" — on a large scale.
While at Harvard Law School, he still found time to hone his organizing skills. For example, he spent eight days in Los Angeles taking a national training course taught by Alinsky's Industrial Areas Foundation. With his newly minted law degree, he returned to Chicago to reapply — as well as teach — Alinsky's "agitation" tactics.
(A video-streamed bio on Obama's Web site includes a photo of him teaching in a University of Chicago classroom. If you freeze the frame and look closely at the blackboard Obama is writing on, you can make out the words "Power Analysis" and "Relationships Built on Self Interest" — terms right out of Alinsky's rule book.)
Amid all this, Obama reunited with his late father's communist tribe in Kenya, the Luo, during trips to Africa.
As a Nairobi bureaucrat, Barack Hussein Obama Sr., a Harvard-educated economist, grew to challenge the ruling pro-Western government for not being socialist enough. In an eight-page scholarly paper published in 1965, he argued for eliminating private farming and nationalizing businesses "owned by Asians and Europeans."
His ideas for communist-style expropriation didn't stop there. He also proposed massive taxes on the rich to "redistribute our economic gains to the benefit of all."
"Theoretically, there is nothing that can stop the government from taxing 100% of income so long as the people get benefits from the government commensurate with their income which is taxed," Obama Sr. wrote. "I do not see why the government cannot tax those who have more and syphon some of these revenues into savings which can be utilized in investment for future development."
Taxes and "investment" . . . the fruit truly does not fall far from the vine.
(Voters might also be interested to know that Obama, the supposed straight shooter, does not once mention his father's communist leanings in an entire book dedicated to his memory.)
In Kenya's recent civil unrest, Obama privately phoned the leader of the opposition Luo tribe, Raila Odinga, to voice his support. Odinga is so committed to communism he named his oldest son after Fidel Castro.
With his African identity sewn up, Obama returned to Chicago and fell under the spell of an Afrocentric pastor. It was a natural attraction. The Rev. Jeremiah Wright preaches a Marxist version of Christianity called "black liberation theology" and has supported the communists in Cuba, Nicaragua and elsewhere.
Obama joined Wright's militant church, pledging allegiance to a system of "black values" that demonizes white "middle classness" and other mainstream pursuits.
(Obama in his first book, published in 1995, calls such values "sensible." There's no mention of them in his new book.)
With the large church behind him, Obama decided to run for political office, where he could organize for "change" more effectively. "As an elected official," he said, "I could bring church and community leaders together easier than I could as a community organizer or lawyer."
He could also exercise real, top-down power, the kind that grass-roots activists lack. Alinsky would be proud.
Throughout his career, Obama has worked closely with a network of stone-cold socialists and full-blown communists striving for "economic justice."
He's been traveling in an orbit of collectivism that runs from Nairobi to Honolulu, and on through Chicago to Washington.
Yet a recent AP poll found that only 6% of Americans would describe Obama as "liberal," let alone socialist.
Public opinion polls usually reflect media opinion, and the media by and large have portrayed Obama as a moderate "outsider" (the No. 1 term survey respondents associate him with) who will bring a "breath of fresh air" to Washington.
The few who have drilled down on his radical roots have tended to downplay or pooh-pooh them. Even skeptics have failed to connect the dots for fear of being called the dreaded "r" word.
But too much is at stake in this election to continue mincing words.
Both a historic banking crisis and 1970s-style stagflation loom over the economy. Democrats, who already control Congress, now threaten to filibuster-proof the Senate in what could be a watershed election for them — at both ends of Pennsylvania Avenue.
A perfect storm of statism is forming, and our economic freedoms are at serious risk.
Those who care less about looking politically correct than preserving the free-market individualism that's made this country great have to start calling things by their proper name to avert long-term disaster.


______________________________________________:coo l:


A few things that will happen if Obama gets elected to the Presidency (http://www.godlikeproductions.com/forum1/message608548/pg1)

redrat11
01-31-2014, 10:35 AM
This is for all the STUPID (fill in blank) Socialist/Communist who voted and or supported Obama. How does it feel now?

http://i738.photobucket.com/albums/xx25/77769/liberal_mind.gif

I am one of a handful of bloggers/posters on the web to lay out ALL HIS/HANDLERS Agenda up until I stopped a year ago or so.{ NSA } Look at how Obama has TOTALLY DESTROYED the" Health Care Industry" in America, just for starters.

Thanks to the Net, the young/old foolish wide eyed Zombie Socialist of America are now seeing the "Fruits of Obama" wither on the vine.

By the way, you ain't seen nothing yet! Last year 6+ million people lost there private health insurance because of ObamaCare, which decoded means DEATHCARE FOR AMERIKA! This year it is estimated that at least 80 to 100 million people who are getting health insurance through there employers will LOSE IT because of skyrocketing cost all due to Obama Care.Of course people like me told you this a full two years before it even became law, but Wait! The Master Plan all along along was to....to be continued.
------

http://i738.photobucket.com/albums/xx25/77769/roberts_scherer_lazarus.jpg

Chief Justice Roberts Blackmailed by Obama.

http://www.libertycaucus.net/forum/index.php?topic=113.msg755

How Roberts Was Blackmailed To Support ObamaCareMany of us have questioned what caused*Roberts* to switch his vote on ObamaCare at the last minute, as reported by CBS, and doing so,* so late that the Conservative Justices were forced to rewrite their majority opinion to be minority dissent. These facts may answer that question.*In 2000 Justice Roberts and his wife Jane adopted two children. Initially it was apparent that the adoptions were "from a Latin American country", but over time it has become apparent that the adopted children were not Latin American, but were Irish.* Why this matters will become evident.In 2005 the NY Times began investigating Roberts life as a matter of his nomination to the Supreme Court by George Bush.* The Times was shortly accused of trying to unseal the adoption papers and intending to violate* the anonymity of the adoption process... however there is more to the story.Drudge did an article in 2005http://patterico.com/2005/08/04/drudge-says-new-york-times-is-investigating-robertss-adoption-records/* * * * * * The NEW YORK TIMES is looking into the adoption records of the children of Supreme Court Nominee John G. Roberts, the DRUDGE REPORT has learned.* * * * * * The TIMES has investigative reporter Glen Justice hot on the case to investigate the status of adoption records of Judge Roberts’ two young children, Josie age 5 and Jack age 4, a top source reveals.* * * * * * Judge Roberts and his wife Jane adopted the children when they each were infants.* * * * * * Both children were adopted from Latin America.* * * * * * A TIMES insider claims the look into the adoption papers are part of the paper’s “standard background check.”* * * * * * Bill Borders, NYT senior editor, explains: “Our reporters made initial inquiries about the adoptions, as they did about many other aspects of his background. They did so with great care, understanding the sensitivity of the issue.”

http://i738.photobucket.com/albums/xx25/77769/images-7.jpg

http://i738.photobucket.com/albums/xx25/77769/John_G_Roberts_Jane_Roberts_John_Roberts_Confirmat ion_zNcgTkUknQxl.jpg

Roberts Donated Help to Gay Rights Case

In 1996, activists won a landmark anti-bias ruling with the aid of the high court nominee.

August 04, 2005|Richard A. Serrano*|*Times Staff WriterEmailShareWASHINGTON — Supreme Court nominee John G. Roberts Jr. worked behind the scenes for gay rights activists, and his legal expertise helped them persuade the Supreme Court to issue a landmark 1996 ruling protecting people from discrimination because of their sexual orientation.

-------



Nothing less than the fate of the United States rests on this decision



January 30th, 2014 by DrJohn


http://m.floppingaces.net/2014/01/30/nothing-less-than-the-fate-of-the-united-states-rests-on-this-decision/?wpmp_switcher=mobile

Obamacare is*unpopular. It’s becoming*more unpopular*with the uninsured.Scott Pruitt, Attorney General of the state of Oklahoma,*filed a lawsuit*against Kathleen Sibelius over the implementation of Obamacare.In an*article*in last month’s WSJ, he explained why:While the president’s health law is vast and extraordinarily complex, it is in one respect very simple. Subsidies are only to be made available, and tax penalties for not signing up for health insurance are only to be assessed, in states that create their own health-care exchange. The IRS, however, is attempting to enforce tax penalties in all states—including Oklahoma and the majority of the other states that have declined to create their own exchanges. Citizens and businesses in these states must use the federal exchange instead.



The "Eugenics Plan"...

http://21stcenturywire.com/2014/01/24/human-cull-how-to-decode-elite-eugenics-propaganda/

‘Human Cull’: How to Decode Elite Eugenics Propaganda

JANUARY 24, 2014*BY*21WIRE18 COMMENTS



DemoRats abandoning ship

http://hotair.com/archives/2014/01/30/abandon-ship-henry-waxman-to-retire/

redrat11
01-31-2014, 10:52 AM
Proof!


Watch: Employees in Pennsylvania Company Learn of Increased Health Costs Due to Obamacare10:43 AM, Jan 30, 2014BY*DANIEL HALPER

A local news station brings viewers inside one Pennsylvania company as the employees there learn about their new health care plans under Obamacare:

Look at the numbers," says the reporter of two employees. "Jeff and Dave used to have a $1,250 deductible. Since Obamacare went into effect, it's now jumped 60 percent to $2,000. That's nothing compared to Brian, Kristi, and Judy who have kids. they are going to pay twice that, four grand." The reporter adds that co-pays are being increased, too."I don't know how President Obama thinks he's helping us because we can't afford this, we can't afford to pay these co-pays, to pay these deductibles on what we're making," says one of the workers.Another worker adds, "They call it the affordable health plan. There's nothing affordable about it. I can't afford it."


http://youtu.be/UuA2_P-m4Sk







http://m.weeklystandard.com/blogs/watch-employees-pennsylvania-company-learn-increased-health-costs-due-obamacare_775944.html

ObamaCare a Really Big SCAM!

How the Authors of Obamacare Protected Insurance Companies

Three provisions in the law offset the crisis they might face if too few healthy people and too many sick ones enroll.



http://www.nationaljournal.com/magazine/how-the-authors-of-obamacare-protected-insurance-companies-20131110

redrat11
02-01-2014, 12:48 PM
http://www.stupid.com/assets/images/obamacare_pill_box_1.jpg


http://www.aei.org/article/health/healthcare-reform/ppaca/obamacares-mandate-meltdown/

Obamacare's 'mandate' meltdownJames C. Capretta,*Jeffrey H. Anderson*|New York PostJanuary 19, 2014

The president and his Democratic allies are finding it harder to make people buy insurance than they’d expected. Will Obamacare’s individual mandate survive?Last month, the administration announced that anyone with a canceled 2013 individual insurance plan would be exempt from the “individual-responsibility requirement” this year, and would be allowed to buy the catastrophe-only insurance previously offered to those age 30 or under.This exemption is likely only the first of many. How, for one, can the administration exempt people who had insurance last year but not exempt people who were uninsured because they couldn’t afford coverage?Obamacare’s architects were always ambivalent about the mandate. They knew compulsion was necessary to make their system work — but, fearing a backlash, opted for a fairly weak penalty for those who didn’t obey. Oops: They wound up with a mandate that still provokes resentment, yet probably won’t work.The US Supreme Court weakened the mandate even as it was saving Obamacare. The law’s authors hoped that the mandate would create the perception that insurance enrollment is now obligatory, but the high court made it clear that Congress has no authority to institute such a requirement. The justices ruled that the mandate could stand only as an optional tax, not as a fine for noncompliance.So you’re not breaking the law by not buying (overpriced) Obamacare-compliant insurance; you’re just making the legal choice to pay the tax instead.And that tax will generally be far lower than Obamacare premiums. That’s the clear conclusion of a new study by the 2017 Project, which compares premiums in the Obamacare exchanges in the 50 most populous US counties to the tax that households could pay instead.This year, that tax equals the greater of two numbers: 1) $95 per adult in a household, plus half of that amount for each child, up to $285 for an entire household, or 2) 1 percent of household income in excess of the tax-filing threshold ($10,150 for singles, and $20,300 for married couples).So, for instance, a 31-year-old single man making $30,000 in Columbus, Ohio faces a tax of $198.50, more than $2,000 less than the cheapest option in Ohio’s Obamacare exchange, even including his taxpayer-funded subsidy. For a 36-year-old San Diego woman making $40,000, the tax is $298.50, or nearly $2,400 less than the cheapest policy on the California exchange. She’s not eligible for a subsidy.Obamacare can’t work if the young and healthy don’t sign up in large numbers — yet the law creates a clear incentive for them to opt out.There’s more: The law also guarantees that you can always choose to buy during the next annual enrollment period — so if you fall seriously ill and find that Obamacare has become a better investment, you can buy it then.The Obamacare law thus made insurance a less valuable product for most people, even as it pushed up the cost of buying it.The coercion of the individual mandate was supposed to balance the equation, but it’s far too weak to do so — and it’s getting weaker each time the administration proclaims another exemption.Yes, the tax for opting out is scheduled to rise in coming years. In 2015 and 2016, the tax rate for those paying based on their household income will rise to 2.0 and 2.5 percent, respectively. But many middle-income families will still find that cheaper than buying Obamacare insurance.

------


Happy ObamaCare for everyone!


http://twitchy.com/2014/02/01/sarah-palin-finally-found-someone-excited-about-obamacare-someone-really-excited-pic/

redrat11
02-07-2014, 08:53 AM
The ObamaCare Map

http://www.forbes.com/special-report/2013/what-will-obamacare-cost-you-map.html


http://i738.photobucket.com/albums/xx25/77769/obamacare.jpg


February 5, 2014 12:00 AM
The Obamacare Security Nightmare: It Gets Worse
Malicious code may lurk in HealthCare.gov.

By Michelle Malkin


http://www.nationalreview.com/article/370358/obamacare-security-nightmare-it-gets-worse-michelle-malkin


Fraudsters on the inside, hackers on the outside. Here we are, stuck in the middle with the security nightmare called Obamacare. Can it get any worse? Yes, it can.

After the spectacular website crashes during last fall’s federal-health-insurance-exchange rollout, enrollees will soon wish the entire system had stayed down and dead. “404 Error” messages and convicted-felon Obamacare navigators may be the least of our health-care tech problems now. The latest? U.S. intelligence agencies notified the Department of Health and Human Services last week that the HealthCare.gov infrastructure could be infected with malicious code.

Who’s responsible? Washington Free Beacon national-security reporter Bill Gertz writes that U.S. officials have “warned that programmers in Belarus, a former Soviet republic closely allied with Russia, were suspected” of possible sabotage. A government tech bureaucrat in the Belarusian regime bragged last summer on Russian radio that HHS is “one of our clients” and that “we are helping Obama complete his insurance reform.”

Gulp. When an authoritarian minion from the country known as “Europe’s last dictatorship” boasts about “helping” the Obama White House, be afraid. One of our intel people spelled it out for Gertz: “The U.S. Affordable Care Act software was written in part in Belarus by software developers under state control, and that makes the software a potential target for cyber attacks.”

No kidding. The friends of Vladimir Putin are not our friends. If you’ve been paying attention, you know that Belarus and other Eastern European hacking gangs have been at the center of several recent international cybercrimes. These aren’t merely schemes to steal credit-card numbers or vandalize websites with annoying graffiti. They’re acts of espionage and sabotage — like using malware in a phishing scheme aimed at White House employees to gather military intelligence and pilfer sensitive government documents.

It’s not just the federal health-care system’s problem. Former Obamacare website contractor CGI still holds dozens of contracts with other federal agencies and state governments worth billions of dollars — and wide access to health and financial data. In my state of Colorado, for example, CGI has a $78 million contract to “modernize, host and manage” the state’s financial system. Have they checked to see whether Belarus hackers are standing by?

For their part, Obamacare officials are making their usual “don’t worry about it, the problem’s under control” noises. But we already know the problem is far out of control. Last month, GOP oversight hearings exposed persistent failures by Obamacare overseers to fix security lapses.

Former most-wanted cybercriminal Kevin Mitnick concluded in a letter to Capitol Hill: “It’s shameful the team that built the Healthcare.gov site implemented minimal, if any, security best practices to mitigate the significant risk of a system compromise.” If the latest warnings from our intel agencies are any indication, it appears that Obamacare Keystone Kops didn’t just leave out security protections, but also may have allowed foreign programmers to write in cyber-traps.

David Kennedy, head of computer-security consulting firm TrustedSec LLC and a former cybersecurity official with the National Security Agency and the U.S. Marine Corps, warned that “HealthCare.gov is not secure today” and said nothing had changed since he gave Congress that assessment two months before. Among the vulnerabilities that the Obama administration still hasn’t fixed:

TrustedSec “identified the ability to enumerate user information (first, last, email, user id, profile, etc.) through one of the sub-sites that directly integrates into the healthcare.gov website.”

“Tens of thousands of user-based data appears to be vulnerable on the specified website and has not been addressed. There are a number of other exposures that have been reported privately that continue to expose users of the healthcare.gov website.”

Another exposure identified is “the ability to perform an open redirect.” In fact, “there are multiple open redirects still vulnerable on the healthcare.gov website and supporting sub-sites.” What this means is that “an attacker can send a targeted email to an individual that has signed up for healthcare.gov or is looking to and have it appear valid and legitimate and originate from the healthcare.gov website.” These can open avenues so that victims click on links “redirecting to a malicious website that hacks the computer and takes complete control over it.”

Out: “Got Covered?” In: “Got Hacked?”

— Michelle Malkin is the author of Culture of Corruption: Obama and His Team of Tax Cheats, Crooks and Cronies (Regnery, 2010). Her e-mail address ismalkinblog@gmail.com. © 2014 Creators.com

redrat11
02-16-2014, 04:26 PM
http://i738.photobucket.com/albums/xx25/77769/obama-book.jpg


ObamaCare Enrollment Slows To Crawl, State Data Show

24 CommentsBy*JED GRAHAM,*INVESTOR'S BUSINESS DAILY*Posted*02/10/2014 06:13 PM ETRead More At

Investor's Business Daily:*http://news.investors.com/politics-obamacare/021014-689516-obamacare-enrollment-signups-stagnate-lag-2014-targets.htm#ixzz2tWwcOJCi*Follow us:*@IBDinvestors on Twitter*|*InvestorsBusinessDaily on Facebook



seven weeks of open enrollment to go, ObamaCare enrollment — and payments — have slowed to a near-crawl in some states.Minnesota's exchange enrollment goal of 67,000 seemed within reach on Jan. 4, when signups stood at 25,860.But after surging by more than 4,000 per week in the prior five weeks, signups collapsed back to November's pace of less than 700 per week.As of Feb. 1, Nevada had just 14,999 paid enrollees — vs. the state's March 31 goal of 115,000.Washington state, meanwhile, was slightly more than halfway to its goal of 340,000 signups — but only 88,071 had paid as of Feb. 1.The January data available from a handful of states raise new doubts about whether ObamaCare's downgraded first-year prospects are still too optimistic.Further, a spotty payment rate (50% in Washington and 66% in Nevada) creates a risk that the demographics of the paid exchange population may be older — and possibly sicker — than even the national signup data have signaled.Health care consultant Robert Laszewski wrote that he believes about 20% of*ObamaCare enrollees haven't paid. The administration said that exchange signups hit the 3 million mark around Jan. 23 — up from 2.2 million on Dec. 28. Laszewski figures the paid total through Feb. 1 will likely be about 2.5 million.More will be known about how pervasive these trends are when the Obama administration releases January data for all of the exchanges in coming days.Late January SlumpBut January data from New York, Colorado, Maryland and Kentucky (easily accessible via*acasignups.net) all suggest that the momentum which carried from December into January substantially faded in the second half of the month.To some extent, this isn't surprising. Those who missed the deadline for January coverage — some due to technical glitches — would have been expected to try to complete enrollment by Jan. 15 to attain coverage effective Feb. 1.But the extent of the drop-off in signups in states like Nevada,*Minnesota*and*Maryland*that have made little progress toward their goals does highlight an important question: Is demand lagging mainly because of informational hurdles — or because the subsidies and policies aren't well designed to attract broad participation?No state has provided as much detail about its enrollment through Feb. 1 as Minnesota, and the details are somewhat concerning. (The state counts people who have completed their application and chosen a payment method.)Minnesota Goes 'Platinum'Only 21% of signups were in the key 18-34 demographic vs. 35% ages 55 to 64. Minnesota officials have been taken by surprise at the share of people signing up for ObamaCare's richest "platinum" coverage, which reimburses 90% of the covered group's qualifying expenses.Fully 29% have signed up for low-deductible platinum policies — compared to a projection of 5%. Such policies would tend to be favored by people who want to guard against high medical expenses, while someone expecting minimal costs might go for a high-deductible bronze plan.Minnesota is different than other states because households earning less than 200% of the poverty level qualify for MinnesotaCare, meaning they don't go through the exchanges.Thus, the lack of participation in ObamaCare in the state is among those earning more than 200% of poverty ($23,095 for a single person).This shouldn't be unexpected. Just above that level, an individual would have to pay about 6.3% of income ($1,500) to buy a silver policy with a significant deductible. The idea of spending less up front to buy a bronze plan also has a drawback — a typical deductible of $4,000 to $5,000 before benefits kick in.Some experts have predicted a late March enrollment surge, as procrastinators decide to attain coverage to avoid going uninsured for eight months or having to pay the mandate tax penalty — 1% of income in the first year.But there are reasons to be skeptical. The precedent they cite is RomneyCare's Massachusetts rollout in 2007, but coverage there carried no deductible for up to 300% of the poverty level. Nor is it clear how aware people are of the individual mandate, which only got attention recently when the White House delayed it in December for those with canceled policies.Some policy analysts expect the Obama administration to suspend the individual mandate in 2014 for for everyone, once the March 31 deadline is passed.Read More At Investor's Business Daily:*http://news.investors.com/politics-obamacare/021014-689516-obamacare-enrollment-signups-stagnate-lag-2014-targets.htm#ixzz2tWxOB0QF*Follow us:*@IBDinvestors on Twitter*|*InvestorsBusinessDaily on Facebook

------

http://i738.photobucket.com/albums/xx25/77769/YE-Supreme-Court-Kaga_Gree_20101215110149_640_480.jpg

Obamacare Court Ruling in*Halbig*a Major Blow to Opt-Out States

by*SAM KAZMAN*on*JANUARY 15, 2014in*HEALTHCARE,*LEGAL,*REGULATION

http://www.openmarket.org/2014/01/15/obamacare-court-ruling-in-halbig-a-major-blow-to-opt-out-states/

The*court’s ruling today in*Halbig v. Sebelius*delivers a major blow to the states that chose not to participate in the Obamacare insurance exchange program. It is also a blow to the small businesses, employees and individuals who live in those states as well. In upholding this IRS regulation that is contrary to the law enacted by Congress, this decision guts the choice made by a majority of the states to stay out of the exchange program. It imposes Obamacare penalties on employers and on many individuals in those states, penalties that Congress never authorized, putting their livelihoods and the jobs of their employees at risk. Worst of all, it gives a stamp of approval to the Administration’s attempt to substitute its version of Obamacare for the law that Congress enacted.The court does all this despite its own finding that our arguments were supported by, in its words, “the plain language” of the law’s key provision regarding state-established exchanges.* And by erasing the distinction between functions carried out by states and functions carried out by the federal government on behalf of states, the ruling undercuts some basic aspects of federalism. We have appealed this decision, and will shortly move to expedite the appeal.> View more about the lawsuit at*cei.org/obamacare

redrat11
02-26-2014, 02:36 PM
http://i738.photobucket.com/albums/xx25/77769/OneBigAssMistakeAmerica.jpg


http://i738.photobucket.com/albums/xx25/77769/421.jpg

ObamaCare Embarrassment: More Lose Insurance Than Gain It

News LinksFeb 20, 2014

Good morning folks,How embarrassing is this for President Obama and Senate Democrats?* As the enrollment period for ObamaCare sputters to a close, it turns out that in many key 2014 battleground states, more people received health care cancellation notices than have actually signed up under ObamaCare (and it wasn’t really close).* Have a look:

North Carolina: 160,161 North Carolinians had*selected*an ObamaCare plan as of 2/1/14.* According to the NC department of insurance, 473,724 residents*received insurance cancellation*letters thanks to ObamaCare.
Colorado: 68,454 Coloradans had*selected*an ObamaCare plan as of 2/1/14.* According to the Colorado Division Of insurance, 335,484 residentsreceived insurance cancellation*letters thanks to ObamaCare.
Michigan: 112,013 Michiganders had*selected*an ObamaCare plan as of 2/1/14.* According to the Associated Press, 225,000 residentsreceived insurance cancellation*letters thanks to ObamaCare.
Oregon: 33,808 Oregonians hadselected*an ObamaCare plan as of 2/1/14.* According to the Associated Press, 145,000 residents*received insurance cancellation*letters thanks to ObamaCare.
Louisiana: 32,864 Louisianans had*selected*an ObamaCare plan as of 2/1/14.* According to the Louisiana Insurance Commissioner, more than 92,739*residents received insurance cancellation*letters thanks to ObamaCare.
New Hampshire: 16,863 Granite Staters had*selected*an ObamaCare plan as of 2/1/14.* According to reports, more than* 22,000 residents*received insurance cancellation*letters thanks to ObamaCare.

We’re not mathematicians, but it sure appears that in these pivotal states, 371,780 men and women signed up for ObamaCare while a whopping 1,293,947 people received notices that their health care plans were being canceled thanks to the law.* OUCH.* It begs the question, how many of the people who signed up for ObamaCare did so because their plans were canceled? In other words, how many of the 424,163 actually got coverage for the first time?“So many of the promises Democrats like Mark Udall, Gary Peters and Kay Hagan repeatedly made about ObamaCare have proven false, and now it turns out that far more families and workers had their health insurance cancelled than signed up for ObamaCare – a total embarrassment for Democrats and President Obama.* Over the last few months, Americans have learned that ObamaCare means higher costs, cancelled health care policies, and fewer hours for workers across the country. They’ve also realized that Democrats weren’t being honest about ObamaCare five years ago and they’re still not shooting straight today when talking about “fixing” the disastrous law. As a result, voters no longer trust them or their judgment.* Democrats have a credibility problem.Seize the day,Brad Dayspring@BDayspringBrook Hougesen@Brook_H

http://www.theminorityreportblog.com/2014/02/20/obamacare-embarrassment-more-lose-insurance-than-gain-it/



http://i738.photobucket.com/albums/xx25/77769/wake_up_america_imgmapzoom.jpg

redrat11
03-05-2014, 08:34 PM
Health Insurance

Obamacare enrollment ends March 31

If you haven't enrolled by the end of this month, it could be a long wait until the next enrollment period.

By*QuinStreet*Mon 2:03 PM


http://i738.photobucket.com/albums/xx25/77769/iStock_000013863469XSmall.jpg

http://money.msn.com/health-and-life-insurance/article.aspx?post=781d6728-86d6-4525-80b8-8090aef5fd83

If you've been putting off shopping for health insurance for 2014, beware that you'll miss your chance if you wait too long.Open enrollment -- the time when you can purchase*an individual or individual family health plan*for this year -- will end March 31. This open enrollment period does not apply to people who buy their health insurance through work; your employer will still hold its own open enrollment period, usually in the fall.For those seeking individual plans, if you haven't bought a health plan by end of the day on March 31, then you'll have to wait until the next open enrollment period, unless you have a special circumstance, such as losing coverage at work or having a baby, and qualify for "special enrollment."The open enrollment for*2015 health plans*is set to run from Nov. 15, 2014, through Jan. 15, 2015.


You can enroll in Medicaid or the Children's Health Insurance Program, state and federal insurance programs for low-income families, at any time during the year -- but only if your income is low enough to qualify.Although a limited open enrollment period is customary for people covered by Medicare and for employees enrolling in health plans at work, it's a new concept for the individual health insurance market.A new way of doing thingsBefore this year, you could shop for an individual health plan at any time. But starting with 2014 health plans you're limited to purchasing coverage during the open enrollment period, which began Oct. 1, 2013."We caution consumers that it may take a while to get through the enrollment process, so they should start it as soon as they can," says Cheryl Fish-Parcham, deputy director of health policy at Families USA, a health care advocacy group.Through March 31, you can buy a health plan directly from an insurance company, health insurance agent, insurance website or through the government-run marketplace in your state. If you qualify for tax credits or cost-saving subsidies to make coverage more affordable, you must enroll through the government-run marketplace to get them.Health policy experts expect a rush to buy coverage as the open enrollment deadline nears, much as there was a surge at the end of December to buy coverage to begin Jan. 1."As there is tremendous media attention on that date, we'll see a similar phenomenon in March," says Sara Collins, vice president for health care coverage and access at the Commonwealth Fund, a foundation that supports an improved health care system.A Commonwealth Fund survey conducted in December 2013 found that 59 percent of people potentially eligible for coverage who had not yet enrolled in health insurance said they were likely to try to enroll in a plan or find out if they were eligible for financial help by the end of March.What's the deal with open enrollment?It's no coincidence that an open enrollment period was introduced as part of the Affordable Care Act. Starting this year, individual health plans must cover a set of standard benefits, and insurers cannot deny coverage or charge higher premiums for people with health conditions. The Affordable Care Act also requires almost everyone to have insurance this year.


http://i738.photobucket.com/albums/xx25/77769/obama_brownshirts_tpc.jpg

A time period for enrollment was set to prevent people from waiting until they got sick to buy coverage, Collins says. Health insurers need a large pool of people -- not just those with illnesses - to buy coverage in order to spread risk and keep premiums low.If you miss the March 31 deadline to purchase coverage for 2014, you could get another chance to enroll if you have a special circumstance, known as a "qualifying life event." In most cases you have 60 days after the event to enroll.Those events include:Getting marriedHaving or adopting a childPermanently moving to a new area that offers different health plansLosing other health coverage because of job loss, divorce, loss of eligibility for Medicaid or the Children's Health Insurance Program, expiration of COBRA coverage or decertification of a health plan. (A plan is decertified if it no longer meets federal and state standards for health plans.) Losing coverage because you didn't pay the premiums does not qualify you for special enrollment.A change in your household that affects eligibility for tax credits or cost-sharing subsidies, if you're already enrolled in a marketplace plan.There will be a few plans available between March and November. Some insurers will still offer short-term and temporary health plans.This year's open enrollment period was purposely set longer to give the marketplaces, insurers and the public time to come to terms with the new rules.More from Insure.com:How to buy individual health insuranceCustomer satisfaction ratings of health insurance companiesHow to buy health insurance before March 31, 2014


------


http://i738.photobucket.com/albums/xx25/77769/51MDkFAlZuL__SS500_.jpg

What to Know About the March 31 Health Insurance Deadline

Obamacare open enrollment ends this month. Here's what you need to know if you haven't signed up.



the March 31 enrollment deadline approaches to sign up for health insurance under the Affordable Care Act, many consumers may be thinking, “another month, another Obamacare deadline.” But this date will be a defining one for consumers without affordable health insurance, as well as for the law’s critics and advocates. The March deadline will mark the end of the open enrollment period for consumers looking to purchase health insurance plans on the federal health insurance marketplace. After March 31, Americans without health care plans will have to pay theObamacare penalty. For the Obama administration, the enrollment numbers on that date will help to gauge the early impact of the president's signature health care law. Things are looking up since OctoberSome of the biggest criticism the Obama administration has faced since the law took effect has been centered on the botched rollout of healthcare.gov. The online marketplace has beenplagued with technical issues since it launched on Oct. 1, prompting outcry from both consumers and lawmakers. Users complained of outages, slow response times, error messages and system crashes. Consumers can expect a relatively smooth experience on the site now, though the administration has admitted that issues still persist. In December, the White House completed a series of fixes that allows the site to handle up to 50,000 users at once, and the system was working 90 percent of the time, according to a Health and Human Services report. Furthermore, about 4 million Americans have enrolled in health insurance plans through the federal and state exchanges since Oct. 1, the administration announced last week. This is a big jump from the approximately 106,000 Americans who enrolled in plans during the first month the online marketplace was open, signaling a turnaround from the earlier technical challenges with healthcare.gov and many of the state marketplace sites. Still a long way to goStill, the recent enrollment figures don’t come close to the 7 million Americans the White House originally projected would sign up for health care before the March 31 deadline. The Congressional Budget Office recently modified the estimation to 6 million, citing the glitches in the online marketplace.However, health care experts say there will likely be an increase in enrollment as the deadline nears, and last-minute shoppers search for plans.Another changing deadline? The enrollment deadline could be extended again for any number of reasons. The administration previously pushed back the deadline for those enrolling in coverage that would start on New Year’s Day from Dec. 15 to Dec. 23. Then, on Dec. 23, it extended the deadline another 24 hours. It has also extended deadlines for those with pre-existing conditions, as well as the employer mandate, a key provision of the law. In this case, employers with 50 to 99 employees were granted another year before they have to offer health insurance to workers. There’s a strong suspicion among Americans that the deadline may be pushed back again. In a January poll by Bankrate, about 62 percent of more than 1,000 respondents believed the March 31 deadline would be extended. Only 29 percent said they believed it would stand. Still, there’s much confusion about what the deadline actually means. Roughly 55 percent of Americans don’t know that March 31 is the cutoff date to purchase health insurance under the individual mandate provision of the law, according to the poll. Missing the deadlineDon’t be caught off guard about the consequences of missing the deadline. After March 31, consumers looking to purchase plans through the marketplace won’t be able to do so until open enrollment begins again in October. If you miss the deadline, you can purchase insurance outside of the marketplace at any time – but be aware that you won’t receive any premium subsidies(think “discounts”), and you will likely be subject to a penalty for the time you were uninsured. If you are without coverage come March 31, you may face a penalty on your 2014 tax return. The fine will be $95 per adult and $47.50 per child or 1 percent of your household income, whichever is greater. In 2015, that will increase to $325 per adult or 2 percent of income.*




http://money.usnews.com/money/blogs/my-money/2014/02/28/what-to-know-about-the-march-31-health-insurance-deadline

http://i738.photobucket.com/albums/xx25/77769/Obama_trampling_Constitution.jpg

redrat11
03-18-2014, 12:25 PM
http://i738.photobucket.com/albums/xx25/77769/obamanation_imgmap.jpg


Drudge posts photo of 'van offering free Obamacare' in Spanish as deadline looms

*March 18, 2014

Devonia SmithPolitical Transcripts ExaminerAn eye-catching photo of a traveling Obamacare ad plus an explanation byDrudge Report's creator*Matt Drudge*on hisTwitter page*was interesting enough thatDrudge*received a nod for*"Tweet of the Day,"*on Monday. Drudge explained, "Govt looking van offering free Obamacare hit Miami streets today." Drudge also quipped, "Can you throw in pair of season tickets for Heat?"

http://i738.photobucket.com/albums/xx25/77769/0ae52d31d2bed849509510ecf6c3da7b.jpg


The rear doors of the white van, striped in red and blue, were wrapped in yellow with black text in Spanish which translated in English to:You can still subscribe to ObamacareApply today!800 - 419-6318Qualify and receive callsTotally freeA busy signal was the only response to attempts to call the number advertised repeatedly for over an hour this morning. However, Drudge also posted a photo of some of the targets for the mobile Obamacare ads seated in a large room with Obamacare signs.Drudge struck a compassionate tone as he included a cryptic reference to the presidential elections of 2016 in his post. Drudge wrote, "Watched as they lined up for Obamacare this morning in Miami. Warehouse setting, sad faces. No English. Hillary'16.*pic.twitter.com/DeG6ycsAdE."Over on his*Drudge Report*page, amid a constant storyboard of articles focusing on President Obama's signature legislation, the Affordable Healthcare Act (ACA), an article written by one of his two additional editors, Joseph Curl, was included yesterday. Curl's conclusion was, that "Obamacare is already finished before it started," because although Democrats and the president sold the concept of the need for insurance reform based on "46 million uninsured," less than five million have now signed up for Obamacare as the deadline for open enrollment looms, ending March 31. (Refer to:*Drudge editor urges American revolt: 'Take to the street' for 'real change')Numerous reports have been made about the effort by the Obama administration to encourage*Latinos*to sign up for Obamacare.*According to Politico, of the large numbers of uninsured Latinos residing in California, Florida and Texas, nearly one in three Latinos is uninsured, a higher proportion than the national rate. The Obama administration has estimated approximately 10 million Latinos, who must be citizens or legal residents to get benefits, are eligible for coverage in those exchanges. It is also accepted fact that most will be eligible to receive premium subsidies as well.It was December before the Spanish language site,*CuidadoDeSalud.gov,*was even launched. Then attacks were quickly made claiming the site was riddled with translation errors and applicants still couldn't browse plan options in Spanish.Attempts to reach the Latino population have not been limited to the mobile ad which Drudge referenced. Outreach has included navigators and volunteers working in-person plus media outreach and community town halls. Still, tapping this population has proved difficult and across the board, "advocates of the law don’t expect enrollment among Spanish speakers to be high in the first year."Matt Drudge, himself, has vowed that he was not signing up for Obamacare. Drudge referred to the tax penalty as "Monopoly money," a comment which quickly drewangry responses. Among those who questioned his meaning, Ezra Klein wanted to know, "Are you going to be unisured?"

http://www.examiner.com/article/drudge-posts-photo-of-van-offering-free-obamacare-spanish-as-deadline-looms

--------


First lady Michelle Obama visits Miami to promote Affordable Care Act

http://www.miamiherald.com/2014/03/05/3975966/first-lady-michelle-obama-visits.html

LANCE DIXON




LDIXON@MIAMIHERALD.COM




First lady Michelle Obama returned to Miami for the second time in two weeks, stopping at the Jessie Trice Community Health Center Wednesday to encourage people to enroll in an insurance plan under the Affordable Care Act.With less than four weeks left to enroll by the March 31 deadline, the Obama administration’s outreach and enrollment efforts have kicked into high gear with President Barack Obama, Vice President Joe Biden and other high-profile White House officials fanning out across the country.In Miami, Michelle Obama joked that she just happened to be in the neighborhood and then spoke about getting people — especially young people and minorities — enrolled.“In the African-American community, unfortunately, one in five of us are not insured,” she said, “and the numbers are no better in the Hispanic community.’’Obama added that federally qualified health centers, such as the Jessie Trice Center, will play a key role in the future.“Because of your work,’’ she said, “we've got four million people who have signed up for healthcare, and that is a milestone.’’The first lady said that the average adult pays less than $100 a month for health insurance under the ACA.“That's a pair of gym shoes. That's less than a cell phone bill,” she said.Obama walked around speaking with four Certified Application Counselors, who sat at tables with individuals already enrolled in health plans and four others who had yet to sign up.The counselors sat with computers, sifted through paperwork and helped consumers through the enrollment process on the healthcare.gov website.Obama spoke with one counselor, Paul Salazar, who said it takes about 20 minutes to sign up one person. Obama stressed that those who have signed up should encourage others to do the same.She also spoke to Vernon Twyne, who had already enrolled in a health plan, and Terry Rutherford, who was signing up Wednesday. Both said they did not have health coverage before the ACA passed.The first lady greeted Rutherford with a hug and kiss and thanked Suzy Diogene, the counselor working with Rutherford, for “changing lives.”“No one in this country should have to go without insurance, and now you don't have to,” Obama said.The first lady also spoke to Allen Zullinger, a law student at Florida International University, who said he signed up for insurance after an automobile collision last December.“Young people, you are not invincible,” Obama said. “Mr. Allen got hit by a car; he is now insured.”With that, the first lady thanked the group for letting her “intrude” and then left.Read more here: http://www.miamiherald.com/2014/03/05/3975966/first-lady-michelle-obama-visits.html#storylink=cpy

-----


http://i738.photobucket.com/albums/xx25/77769/creditcards.jpg


Shocker: Federal government’s fiscal deterioration almost 5 times official deficit

POSTED AT 8:01 PM ON MARCH 5, 2014 BY DUSTIN SIGGINS



In Fiscal Year 2013, the official federal deficit was $680 billion. Liberals have cheered this drop while subsequently ignoring how this deficit is both larger than all of Bush’s pre-recession deficits*and*is expected to grow dramatically over the next several decades.However, the Treasury Department’s annual report on the finances of the U.S. federal government shows that not only is $680 billion an incomplete measure of the federal government’s finances, it’s off by nearly a factor of five.

From Just Facts Daily:The U.S. Treasury has just released its annual “Financial Report of the United States Government,” which provides an account of the federal government’s finances using accounting standards like those that the government*requiresof large corporations. Because the federal budget is not bound by these standards, it does not have to account for all of its fiscal obligations.For example, the Treasury report reveals that the federal government owes $6.5 trillion in retirement and health benefits to federal employees and veterans. This legal responsibility amounts to $53,000 for every*household*in the United States, but none of these liabilities are reflected in the 2013 budget deficit or national debt.….During the federal government’s 2013 fiscal year, the official federal deficit was*$680 billion, but this comprehensive accounting reveals that the federal government’s fiscal position deteriorated by $3.3 trillion or an average of $27,000 for every household in the U.S.

http://hotair.com/good-enough-for-government-work/2014/03/05/shocker-federal-governments-fiscal-deterioration-almost-5-times-official-deficit/



------

http://i738.photobucket.com/albums/xx25/77769/article-0-0EE7E8F100000578-321_634x408.jpg

http://touch.latimes.com/#section/-1/article/p2p-79247432/

Obama administration to further delay healthcare employer mandate




2015. They will have to provide coverage to 95% of full-time workers in 2016.The requirement that companies with more than 50 full-time workers provide insurance or pay a fine is designed to prevent firms from dropping health benefits once the government offers subsidies to help individuals buy coverage.The law's authors worried that firms would be tempted to stop offering coverage, shifting the cost of healthcare to the government.Under the law, large employers that do not provide insurance will be fined $2,000 per employee beyond the first 30 employees.The new regulations are almost certain to provide new fuel to Republican critics of the law, who have charged repeatedly that the administration has exceeded its authority in selectively implementing parts of the law.But administration officials said Monday that the law allows such adjustments.“The secretary has very broad authority to implement the tax law in a way that benefits tax administration, and we think the phase-in approach really is a way to administer the law better and enhance overall compliance,” a senior Treasury Department official said.

redrat11
03-18-2014, 07:53 PM
http://i738.photobucket.com/albums/xx25/77769/OBAMA_S-OCTOBER-SURPRISE-guardian-express-265x300.jpg

March 12, 2014 6:58 PM

ObamaCare's Secret Mandate Exemption

HHS quietly repeals the individual purchase rule for two more years.




ObamaCare's implementers continue to roam the battlefield and shoot their own wounded, and the latest casualty is the core of the Affordable Care Act—the individual mandate. To wit, last week the Administration quietly excused millions of people from the requirement to purchase health insurance or else pay a tax penalty.This latest political reconstruction has received zero media notice, and the Health and Human Services Department didn't think the details were worth discussing in a conference call, press materials or fact sheet. Instead, the mandate suspension was buried in an unrelated rule that was meant to preserve some health plans that don't comply with ObamaCare benefit and redistribution mandates. Our sources only noticed the change this week.


That seven-page*technical bulletin*includes a paragraph and footnote that casually mention that a rule in a separate December 2013 bulletin would be extended for two more years, until 2016. Lo and behold, it turns out this*second rule, which was supposed to last for only a year, allows Americans whose coverage was cancelled to opt out of the mandate altogether.In 2013, HHS decided that ObamaCare's wave of policy terminations qualified as a "hardship" that entitled people to a special type of coverage designed for people under age 30 or a mandate exemption. HHS originally defined and reserved hardship exemptions for the truly down and out such as battered women, the evicted and bankrupts.But amid the post-rollout political backlash, last week the agency created a new category: Now all you need to do is fill out a form attesting that your plan was cancelled and that you "believe that the plan options available in the [ObamaCare] Marketplace in your area are more expensive than your cancelled health insurance policy" or "you consider other available policies unaffordable."


This lax standard—no formula or hard test beyond a person's belief—at least ostensibly requires proof such as an insurer termination notice. But people can also qualify for hardships for the unspecified nonreason that "you experienced another hardship in obtaining health insurance," which only requires "documentation if possible." And yet another waiver is available to those who say they are merely unable to afford coverage, regardless of their prior insurance. In a word, these shifting legal benchmarks offer an exemption to everyone who conceivably wants one.Keep in mind that the White House argued at the Supreme Court that the individual mandate to buy insurance was indispensable to the law's success, and President*Obamacontinues to say he'd veto the bipartisan bills that would delay or repeal it. So why are ObamaCare liberals silently gutting their own creation now?


The answers are the implementation fiasco and politics. HHS revealed Tuesday that only 940,000 people signed up for an ObamaCare plan in February, bringing the total to about 4.2 million, well below the original 5.7 million projection. The predicted "surge" of young beneficiaries isn't materializing even as the end-of-March deadline approaches, and enrollment decelerated in February.Meanwhile, a McKinsey & Company survey reports that a mere 27% of people joining the exchanges were previously uninsured through February. The survey also found that about half of people who shopped for a plan but did not enroll said premiums were too expensive, even though 80% of this group qualify for subsidies. Some substantial share of the people ObamaCare is supposed to help say it is a bad financial value. You might even call it a hardship.


HHS is also trying to pre-empt the inevitable political blowback from the nasty 2015 tax surprise of fining the uninsured for being uninsured, which could help reopen ObamaCare if voters elect a Republican Senate this November. Keeping its mandate waiver secret for now is an attempt get past November and in the meantime sign up as many people as possible for government-subsidized health care. Our sources in the insurance industry are worried the regulatory loophole sets a mandate non-enforcement precedent, and they're probably right. The longer it is not enforced, the less likely any President will enforce it.The larger point is that there have been so many unilateral executive waivers and delays that ObamaCare must be unrecognizable to its drafters, to the extent they ever knew what the law contained.

full article

http://m.us.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052702304250204579433312607325596?mobile =y


-------

http://i738.photobucket.com/albums/xx25/77769/the_pied_piper.jpg


Young People Are Falling Into A Health Insurance Subsidy Gap

by*ELANA GORDONMarch 18, 2014*4:00 PM


Some young people seeking to buy health insurance are finding themselves falling into a subsidy gap that leaves them ineligible for financial assistance that was heavily advertised.Subsidies in the health law were designed to lower insurance costs for people who make around $11,000 to $46,000 a year.But for young people earning toward the higher end of that range, it's more complicated than that.*A new study*shows that in major cities, some young people fall in that salary range but don't actually qualify for government help to pay their insurance premiums.And as the Affordable Care Act barrels toward its March 31 enrollment deadline, insurers need people ages 18 to 34 to sign up.Brian Loughnane is 26 and was making $36,000 a year when he looked for a policy onHealthCare.gov*in December.

article continues below


http://www.npr.org/blogs/health/2014/03/18/291162837/some-young-people-won-t-get-help-for-affordable-care-act-insurance