PDA

View Full Version : Dissapearing Threads


truebeliever
03-30-2008, 06:39 AM
A long time ago in a forum far, far away there was a Thread called "Whatever Happened To The Orbital Engine?"

This thread was placed by a young and bad tempered forum warrior who was constantly tempted by the dark side of the force to insult people he did'nt like online.

Despite his immaturity he posted some informative posts...one of which detailed the VERY public design and proving of a revoloutionary petrol motor in Perth, Western Australia.

One day this thread simply..."dissapeared" and the forum ADMIN refused to give an explanation.

The young internet warrior, lacking maturity and high on additive affected 2 minute noodles rampaged about the internet pissed at forum owners attitude.

Now, after much time in the swamps and deserts of the far flung planets leading an ascetic life...taming his pasions...said internet warior humbly asks the mighty Makow if he could give an honest answer on HOW and perhaps WHY "that" particular thread of all threads dissapeared?

Sincerely.

http://clubconspiracy.com/forum/f34/dissapearing-post-whatever-happened-orbital-engine-3904.html

Shadow
03-30-2008, 11:18 AM
Henry is gone. Just as most of the distasteful, racist, posters of that bygone era.

By "revolutionary" petrol engine, I must assume that you mean some sort of "perpetual" motion type device. Never fear, there are a few people of the same ilk around here.

Enjoy your noodles mate!

truebeliever
03-31-2008, 08:44 PM
The engine was a 2 stroke with a revoloutionary fuel injection system. The original was even MORE radical but Ford decided "uptooling" there factories would be too expensive.

It could go 1000km on 70 liters of fuel at 130kmh. Lower speeds and the results are even better.

Fact is there was minimal power loss with the increase in fuel saving.

An accross the board %30-%50 fuel saving with no powr loss was possible accross the board with any vehicle straight off the mark.

All pretty much standard technology.

Ford bought him out for 190 million. The patents and test cars sit in a warehouse in the U.K.

The AMAZING thing is this ALL happened over a ten year period right under the publics nose and NO ONE gave a shit. The MSM here reported the progress continually and no one bothered to ask..."whatever happened to the orbital engine?"

Shadow
04-01-2008, 02:02 PM
Welcome back!

As to your orbital engine, Wikipedia had the folowing:


The Sarich orbital engine is a type of internal combustion engine, featuring rotary rather than reciprocating motion of its internal parts. It differs from the conceptually similar Wankel engine by using a shaped rotor that rolls around the interior of the engine, rather than having a trilobular rotor that spins "in place".

The advantage is that there is no high-speed contact area with the engine walls, unlike in the Wankel where edge wear is a problem. However, the combustion chambers are divided by blades which do have contact with both the walls and the rotor, and are said to have been difficult to seal due to the perpendicular intersection with the moving impeller.

The orbital engine was invented in 1972 by Ralph Sarich, an engineer from Perth, Australia, who worked on the concept for years without ever producing a production engine. A prototype was demonstrated, running on the bench with no load

The Sarich Orbital engine has a number of fundamental, unsolved problems that have helped keep it from becoming a practical engine. Amongst these are key components that cannot be cooled and others that cannot readily be lubricated. It is very susceptible to overheating. At one press conference where Ralph Sarich presented the engine, automotive engineer Phil Irving (designer of the Vincent Motorcycle and Brabham Formula One engines) pointed out a number of technical reasons why the engine would not work (eg, excessive pressure in contact areas).

A conspiracy theory known to almost all mechanically-inclined Australians holds that the patent for the Sarich Orbital engine was exclusively licensed and then suppressed by Ford, perhaps in order to prevent a drop in oil prices, or simply to maintain the value of existing manufacturing facilities, should the highly efficient engine displace conventional piston engines.

More widely, the case is seen as a defining example of a syndrome of 'good invention, poor development' felt by many nations, with an unusually high number of good inventions becoming successful products only once they have been moved off-shore, and with economic returns on them not being returned to the nation's economy.

It needs to be noted that novel engine types are conceived in very great numbers, but overcoming the technical difficulties of producing an impressive prototype is exceedingly rare, even where investment substantially exceeds the cost of machining and assembling components. In other words, novel designs tend to be incomplete designs.


Looking at a diagram of it, I would have to agree that overheating may have truly been a problem with this design.

What you have said could also apply to a small jet engine applied to a small car.

stompk
04-03-2008, 07:05 AM
Phone spammers are losers

coolness28
04-23-2008, 10:36 PM
GAWD!

This place is depressing!

What a sell-out Henry is.

My goodness, couldn't associate with the truth and gave his site to someone by the name of Sanjay!

Who the hell is Sanjay?

Mind Control within the Music Industry, Makow.

Bruce Springsteen is a pedophile and you appear to be a woman hater same as he is!

In Peace,
Blue Angel

Change can be good.....

BlueAngel
04-30-2008, 03:27 PM
Change can be good.....

Pardon the outburst, just some left-over anger from what transpired on Club Conspiracy before the take-over and some apprehension as to where, what I consider to be ONE of the most important threads I authored while Club Conspiracy was owned by Henry Makow, had landed.

Delta
05-02-2008, 12:27 AM
Pardon the outburst, just some left-over anger from what transpired on Club Conspiracy before the take-over and some apprehension as to where, what I consider to be ONE of the most important threads I authored while Club Conspiracy was owned by Henry Makow, had landed.


The rest of us considered it to be the most boring thread you ever authored.

You baseless accusations got you banned from most of the Springsteen forums so you had to bring it here. We were all quite suprised how Henry actualy tolerated you and never banned you for life.

BlueAngel
05-02-2008, 08:21 AM
The rest of us considered it to be the most boring thread you ever authored.

You baseless accusations got you banned from most of the Springsteen forums so you had to bring it here. We were all quite suprised how Henry actualy tolerated you and never banned you for life.

Have you noticed that this forum has a new feature?

It's called "IGNORE THIS POSTER."

Click on my username and then hit the button.

Try it.

You'll like it.

I promise.

You won't have to TOLERATE me.

Good Day...

avictim
09-20-2008, 10:08 AM
Have you noticed that this forum has a new feature?

It's called "IGNORE THIS POSTER."

Click on my username and then hit the button.

Try it.

You'll like it.

I promise.

You won't have to TOLERATE me.

Good Day...


What I want to know is can I ban you from my topic altogether. Your kind of annoying BlueAngel.

BlueAngel
09-20-2008, 09:37 PM
What I want to know is can I ban you from my topic altogether. Your kind of annoying BlueAngel.

No. Sorry.

I doubt that members can be banned for being annoying.

If that were the case, there wouldn't be any members.

However, you can use the IGNORE button.

It works wonders.

That way, your thread won't disappear, but anything I post on it will not be seen by you.

BlueAngel
09-21-2008, 12:18 AM
Just wonderin', avictim, am I annoying because I've asked some very simple questions that you DON'T appear to be able to answer?

Like, why were hospitalized?

I think you should be able to answer that in about ONE sentence.

How is it that YOU know this DRUNK was able to have you chipped?

I think you should be able to answer that in about TWO sentences.

Did he send a memo to the hospital and request the same?

How do you know you were chipped?

I think you should be able to answer that in about THREE sentences.

Did the hospital people tell you upon release that they implanted you?

avictim
09-21-2008, 05:23 PM
Just wonderin', avictim, am I annoying because I've asked some very simple questions that you DON'T appear to be able to answer?

Like, why were hospitalized?

I think you should be able to answer that in about ONE sentence.

How is it that YOU know this DRUNK was able to have you chipped?

I think you should be able to answer that in about TWO sentences.

Did he send a memo to the hospital and request the same?

How do you know you were chipped?

I think you should be able to answer that in about THREE sentences.

Did the hospital people tell you upon release that they implanted you?


BlueAngel. Iíve had to tolerate an idiot for nearly 10 years, so youíre not that hard to put up with. Sorry I said youíre annoying. Anyway, as the answers to the questions youíve asked are in my initial post I donít see the point in discussing this with you any further.

BlueAngel
09-21-2008, 11:10 PM
The rest of us considered it to be the most boring thread you ever authored.

You baseless accusations got you banned from most of the Springsteen forums so you had to bring it here. We were all quite suprised how Henry actualy tolerated you and never banned you for life.

How did I miss this?

My baseless accusations got me banned from most of the Springsteen forums???

HUH????

I was a member for a short time on Springsteen's official site with SONY.

That, my dear, is the only forum and I LEFT of my own free will and how on earth would you even know if I was banned or not???

Were you there at some point?

Obviously!

One of the mind controllers?

What transpired there has been reported, documented and recorded.

It has been added to the record from the past.

I infiltrated and left.

Same as before.

You were surprised how Henry tolerated me???

HUH??

He tolerated the likes of you and COLD and a dozen just like you.

Makes one wonder what side of the fence Makow is sitting on.

As far as YOU and the OTHERS considering that the Mind Control within the Music Industry thread was one of the most boring, your opinion is not worthy.

You are off the mark in suggesting that I made PEDOPHILE accusations against Springsteen while on his SONY site, which did a disappearing act years ago, and being banned for the same.

I was under the influence of mind controllers; placed in an altered state and thus believing the LIE that he rescued me from the cult because THEY didn't want me to make the accusations that I have on this site and publicly, which will soon be the case!!

BTW, they're not accusations.

They are TRUTH!

I was banned, thank GOODNESS, and knew that I would be when I called Paddy a/k/a Patriot on BTX a Pu**y.

Why did I call him this?

Because he is and I knew I would be BANNED for doing so.

My CORE knew they were full of it and I found my OUT, but had to call a spade a spade before I performed my disappearing act!

I had been brought to a STATE of DISTRESS; however, they desired a psychotic break and didn't get it because I DON'T break!

As they know.

I do the breaking!

I survived, cause as long as I know how to love, I know I'll stay alive and I have all my life to live and I have all my love to give and I'll survive, I will survive, hey, hey!!!

Let me tell you something DELTA DAWN, what's that flower you have on, could it be a faded rose from days gone by and did I HEAR YOU SAY THAT YOU WERE LEAVING ME HERE TODAY TO TAKE ME TO THAT MANSION IN THE SKY.

IS THAT A SUICIDE SONG?

Ozziecynic
09-25-2008, 06:24 AM
Shadow:
Henry is gone. Just as most of the distasteful, racist, posters of that bygone era.


I wouldnt be so sure of that if i were you!.CC has changed little if at all.
Still the same open forum it was under the previous owner there are no mods and no extra censoring powers.
So lull yourself into that sense of false security if you wish however youll be wrong!.cc was always destined to be a bit of loony circus get use to it!.:cool:

justgroovy
09-25-2008, 10:01 AM
Shadow:


I wouldnt be so sure of that if i were you!.CC has changed little if at all.
Still the same open forum it was under the previous owner there are no mods and no extra censoring powers.
So lull yourself into that sense of false security if you wish however youll be wrong!.cc was always destined to be a bit of loony circus get use to it!.:cool:


Well I'm a mod so there's that.

What kind of extra censoring powers are you referring to? I personally like free speech even though I'm not a fan of every thing that is spoken about freely. The ignore button is useful if anyone feels like their life would be better without reading the thoughts and musings of another member.

Also, CrowdGather is putting together a set of rules/regulations/guidelines that they want enforced across their network. How they are going to effect this place I'm not sure exactly. I'll keep you updated on those when they are ready to go.

BlueAngel
09-25-2008, 12:43 PM
I can't believe Ozzie thinks CC has changed little if not at all.

I suppose he hasn't been paying attention not to know that Groovy is a moderator.

Something that was completely absent under Makow's ownership.

I guess he wasn't around when many members made their presence on this board a miserable place to be.

So, yeah, it's changed some and there are members who, I believe, post ramblings on this site in order to appear looney and, thus, make the site seems as if WE'RE all the same.

However, I'm sure most readers can discern the looney's from the sane.

There are plenty of pesky critters from back in the day who seem to have crawled back into their holes.