PDA

View Full Version : Naomi Klein: The New Trough


NotThe1
11-14-2008, 11:00 PM
Naomi Klein: The New Trough

The Wall Street bailout looks a lot like Iraq - a "free-fraud zone" where private contractors cash in on the mess they helped createOn October 13th, when the U.S. Treasury Department announced the team of "seasoned financial veterans" that will be handling the $700 billion bailout of Wall Street, one name jumped out: Reuben Jeffery III, who was initially tapped to serve as chief investment officer for the massive new program.On the surface, Jeffery looks like a classic Bush appointment. Like Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson, he's an alum of Goldman Sachs, having worked on Wall Street for 18 years.
The Movement: Naomi Klein: The New Trough (http://thelastmovement.blogspot.com/2008/11/naomi-klein-new-trough.html)

BlueAngel
11-14-2008, 11:13 PM
Naomi Klein: The New Trough

The Wall Street bailout looks a lot like Iraq - a "free-fraud zone" where private contractors cash in on the mess they helped createOn October 13th, when the U.S. Treasury Department announced the team of "seasoned financial veterans" that will be handling the $700 billion bailout of Wall Street, one name jumped out: Reuben Jeffery III, who was initially tapped to serve as chief investment officer for the massive new program.On the surface, Jeffery looks like a classic Bush appointment. Like Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson, he's an alum of Goldman Sachs, having worked on Wall Street for 18 years.
The Movement: Naomi Klein: The New Trough (http://thelastmovement.blogspot.com/2008/11/naomi-klein-new-trough.html)

Yeah, well, thanks for the info.

How shall the American citizens proceed against this tyranny?

NotThe1
11-15-2008, 03:32 PM
Yeah, well, thanks for the info.

How shall the American citizens proceed against this tyranny?
Remove them from office and not with voting!

BlueAngel
11-16-2008, 11:26 PM
Remove them from office and not with voting!

Voting doesn't remove anyone from office.

It places them in office, just as they WANT you to believe.

So, how do you suggeset WE remove them from office since you don't appear to include yourself as a part of the answer to the problem?