View Full Version : Global Warming = Weather Warfare

11-23-2008, 07:06 AM
Global warming and weather warfare are one in the same. Let me reveal my theory.

Weather modification started in 1947

Weather modification is the effort of man to change naturally occurring weather, for the benefit of someone. The best-known kind of weather modification is cloud seeding, with the goal of producing rain or snow, suppressing hail (which can ruin crops), or weakening hurricanes...

...In November 1946, Dr. Bernard Vonnegut discovered that microscopic crystals of silver iodide (AgI) nucleate water vapor to form ice crystals....

...At the time of his discovery, Dr. Vonnegut worked in the research laboratory of Dr. Irving Langmuir at General Electric Company in Schenectady, New York...

...Their initial work on cloud seeding was funded by the Company, not the U.S. Government. General Electric rented an airplane and released dry ice into clouds on four days during November and December 1946. The last day of seeding coincided with the "heaviest snowfall of the winter" in the Schenectady, New York area, which made the Company management concerned about the possibility of cloud seeding experiments causing harmful weather....

...Just two months later, the U.S. Army Signal Corps began a contract with General Electric for cloud modification experiments. Part of this contract stated:
... the entire flight program shall be conducted by the government, using exclusively government personnel and equipment, and shall be under the exclusive direction and control of such government personnel...

...Dr. Vonnegut, appearing in 1952 before a U.S. Senate committee that was considering legislation on weather modification, said:

Theory has predicted and experiments are confirming the fact that a few pounds of silver iodide released into the atmosphere in the form of fine particles can exercise a profound influence over the weather hundreds of miles away from the point of release. Clearly no private individual or group can be permitted to carry on operations over thousands or hundreds of thousands of square miles.

The potentialities, both for good and bad, which attend silver-iodide seeding are so large that the development and use of this technique must be placed in the hands of the Federal Government.
(Havens, Jiusto, Vonnegut, 1978, p. 53)
Despite Dr. Vonnegut's clear insight into the nature of the problem, the U.S. Congress never passed a statute regulating weather modification...

History and Problems in Weather Modification (http://www.rbs2.com/w2.htm)

I urge everyone to take the above website very seriously. Mankind, people all over the world, are already suffering the effect of this practice. But it is going to get much worse in the very near future. "They" have figured it out, you know.

If you spray a chemical that is harmful on the people, and silver iodide is very harmful.

Under the guidelines of the Clean Water Act by the EPA, silver iodide is considered a hazardous substance, a priority pollutant, and as a toxic pollutant.(10) Some industries have learned this all too well.

Obviously the cloud-after-cloud, year-after-year use of cloud seeding could lead to an insidious, cumulative effect. Especially when the same area is repeatedly seeded. If the toxicity manifests in pollution and illnesses, the effects may not be reversible. At this point, the PGCD monitoring of silver iodide toxicity is so small as to be nonexistent and flawed. C.E. Williams states, “water samples taken after rain from seeded clouds have revealed no silver iodide.”(11) This is misleading.

Is Cloud Seeding Harmful (http://www.ranches.org/cloudSeedingHarmful.htm)

11-23-2008, 07:21 AM
...If you spray this poisonous substance on the people, and by up pharmacutical stocks, and invest heavily in the health industry, you serve two purposes.

You get rid of the "useless eaters", which are the weak, the "unproductive"

But by making em sick slowly and over a period of time (i.e. cancer, alzheimers, heart disease, lung disease), you know, all the slooow killers, which cost a fortune and take up all of their savings and assets through the hospitals.

Then, give them cards, that they can "borrow" money till the get back on their feet. Run up the value of their homes, so they think all is well and flush, and get them to fall in love with material items, and rely less on each other.

Then at the peak of all this fortune and fame, take it all away from them, and give it back to them only if they accept a mark.

That mark will be a 3D, that will probably look like a logo, but will be a VISA brand. Literally. Many will accept it readily. Many will not, but will get it anyway because they are hungry, broke and cold.

But some, will never get it.

11-23-2008, 08:46 AM
So, the real spraying began around 1997. Chemtrails they call it.

3) Anthropogenic influences on meteorological and climatological conditions are far reaching and
significant. Economic development should be framed with an awareness of how each activity alters environmental processes and atmospheric conditions. Much is known about the physical processes involved in many aspects of inadvertent weather modification, but important questions remain. Continuing research and monitoring related to inadvertent weather modification is required, and the breadth of these studies must be extended to include new knowledge on natural feedbacks and societal ramifications, which will lead to policy decisions that reduce the chance of severe impacts.

© 1998 American Meteorological Society

Planned and Inadvertent Weather Modification Adopted by AMS Council 2 October 1998 (http://www.ametsoc.org/policy/wxmod98.html)

The above is from an article called "Planned and Inadvertent Weather Modification"

11-29-2008, 08:29 AM
How is it that the CONTROLLERS escape all of the aforementioned illnesses that CHEMTRAILS are said to cause?

I've only asked this question about 100 times of people who post that CHEMTRAILS make us sick and I have yet to receive an answer.

"We really have not heard much from the air traffic controllers union since Ronald Reagan fired 11,000 of them in 1981."
Opinion: RON HART: (Dis)union: Kicking the can down the road | year, love, affair : TheDestinLog.com (http://www.thedestinlog.com/opinion/year_7172___article.html/love_affair.html)

People are getting sick, they just don't know the real reason.

11-30-2008, 07:09 AM
The National Aeronautics and Space Administration, which has a mandate to enhance the safety of air travel, has been suppressing huge quantities of data that apparently show the risks for civilian aircraft are much higher than commonly estimated. The agency’s lame excuses for refusing to release the information must make any traveler wonder how bad the implications might be.
One person familiar with the results told The A.P. that that pilots reported at least twice as many bird strikes, near midair collisions and runway incursions as other government monitoring systems show.


NASA’s Hidden Air Safety Survey
New York Times - Oct 25, 2007
... air traffic controllers, flight attendants and mechanics, were scrapped.

nasa suppresses flight data - Google News Archive Search (http://news.google.com/archivesearch?hl=en&rlz=1B2GGFB_enUS223&resnum=0&um=1&ie=UTF-8&tab=wn&q=nasa+suppresses+flight+data&sa=N&sugg=d&as_ldate=2003&as_hdate=2008&lnav=d0&ldrange=1985,2002)

Why are there twice as many mishaps? Twice as many AC are flying.

12-01-2008, 02:36 AM

nasa suppresses flight data - Google News Archive Search (http://news.google.com/archivesearch?hl=en&rlz=1B2GGFB_enUS223&resnum=0&um=1&ie=UTF-8&tab=wn&q=nasa+suppresses+flight+data&sa=N&sugg=d&as_ldate=2003&as_hdate=2008&lnav=d0&ldrange=1985,2002)

Why are there twice as many mishaps? Twice as many AC are flying.

What does that have to do with chemtrails? Your second link leads to a Google search page, your first to a link targeting NASA for withholding data about civilian air accidents.

it makes a stunning case for airflight security, though.