PDA

View Full Version : Iraq was L'Aquila earthquake's target


cherry
04-16-2009, 07:30 PM
Iraq was L'Aquila earthquake's target

Japan's Conspiracy (3) P1 (http://park.geocities.jp/jpcdebate/0103/p031.html#page205)

This is the clear evidence that most earthquakes nowadays are artificial earthquakes.

Algebra
12-20-2009, 03:30 PM
I dont buy in to the whole artificial earthquake theory. How is it possible? The amount of force needed to create an artificial earthquake would be immense. Lets say you shift the techtonic plates using explosions of some kind. The blast would have to be so big that it would appear as an earth quake its self on seismographs.

This isnt a subject im hot on so if you have any further suggestions please enlighten me. ;)

cherry
01-19-2010, 09:00 AM
I dont buy in to the whole artificial earthquake theory. How is it possible? The amount of force needed to create an artificial earthquake would be immense. Lets say you shift the techtonic plates using explosions of some kind. The blast would have to be so big that it would appear as an earth quake its self on seismographs.

This isnt a subject im hot on so if you have any further suggestions please enlighten me. ;)

I am making a story. Please wait for some time. I need more time.

socrateeze
01-19-2010, 09:04 AM
I dont buy in to the whole artificial earthquake theory. How is it possible? The amount of force needed to create an artificial earthquake would be immense. Lets say you shift the techtonic plates using explosions of some kind. The blast would have to be so big that it would appear as an earth quake its self on seismographs.

This isnt a subject im hot on so if you have any further suggestions please enlighten me. ;)

Scalar weapons, HAARP, Magnetism...take your pick. The governments technology is 50-60 years ahead of what we are actually aware of. Here are a couple of sites to check out.

Project Camelot | Welcome (http://www.projectcamelot.org/)

Jeff Rense Program (http://www.rense.com)

http://www.whatreallyhappened.com

cherry
01-29-2010, 11:40 AM
I dont buy in to the whole artificial earthquake theory. How is it possible? The amount of force needed to create an artificial earthquake would be immense. Lets say you shift the techtonic plates using explosions of some kind. The blast would have to be so big that it would appear as an earth quake its self on seismographs.

This isnt a subject im hot on so if you have any further suggestions please enlighten me. ;)

Haiti Earthquake was another artificial earthquake.

It was another Pearl Harbor attack.

Japan's Conspiracy (3) P7 (http://park.geocities.jp/jpcdebate/0103/p037.html#page262)

cherry
02-11-2010, 11:03 PM
Mt. Pinatubo Eruption was Retaliation against US

Japan's Conspiracy (3) P7 (http://park.geocities.jp/jpcdebate/0103/p037.html#page256)

In June 1991, the second largest volcanic eruption of the twentieth century* took place on the island of Luzon in the Philippines, a mere 90 kilometers (55 miles) northwest of the capital city Manila. Up to 800 people were killed and 100,000 became homeless following the Mount Pinatubo eruption, which climaxed with nine hours of eruption on June 15, 1991. On June 15, millions of tons of sulfur dioxide were discharged into the atmosphere, resulting in a decrease in the temperature worldwide over the next few years.

jane doe
02-12-2010, 06:10 PM
Haiti Earthquake was another artificial earthquake.

It was another Pearl Harbor attack.

Japan's Conspiracy (3) P7 (http://park.geocities.jp/jpcdebate/0103/p037.html#page262)

Did someone burrow a hole under the ocean's core and detonate a nuclear bomb? How else would this be possible? Aren't there reported sightings of light flashing before EQ's?

cherry
02-20-2010, 09:26 AM
It is not a nuclear bomb. But I believe that there are secret tunnels around the volcano.