View Full Version : THE THIRD TRUTH -=- The Book They Will Kill To Keep Out Of Your Hands
06-03-2009, 11:38 PM
THE THIRD TRUTH by Dimitri Khalezov (Book) in Mystery & Crime (http://www.lulu.com/content/7233385)
The book is now on sale! It has caused controversy after only TWO MINUTES on Lulu.com, before we have even done the proper print runs at physical printers for the bookshops! This one is HOT by any standard.
Price is USD $51.74, unfortunately due to the retail sales deals we can't sell it for less than that ourselves at present. If we could it would be substantially cheaper so blame the bookshops dudes.
Anyway, even at 52 bucks- this is a no brainer to buy. It has hundreds of pages of detailed factual information, it even has passport pictures, legal documents- you name it. And the author is not shy- his full contact details are on the last page so you can definitely have it out with him in person once you've read his book if you violently disagree with him.
Dimitri has risked his life to make this book, so have I for that matter, but Dimitri is being hassled right up to this hour and time...
This is an important book for anyone interested in any aspect of the War on Terror!
06-07-2009, 12:25 PM
YouTube - THE THIRD TRUTH ABOUT 9/11
06-17-2009, 03:38 AM
Hi to everyone.
My name is Dimitri Khalezov - I am an actual author of this book. Hopefully, "they" will really kill neither the book, nor you for its possession and will leave you in peace reading it... Anyway, I did my best to write this book. It took from me almost two years to complete it. Just in case if anyone is curious, here is some information in regard to this book available on these web sites:
Third Truth about 9/11. (http://www.3truth911.com)
These web sites contain description of the book, along with quite a few chapters of the book offered for free, plus a lot of additional explanations, supported by some rare contemporary 9/11 videos, some of them seditious enough as being totally prohibited and not available anywhere in the Internet, except these web sites. Videos could be played on-line or saved to your computer for future use. You can also find my personal contact info on either of these web sites.
Everyone is welcome to visit these sites and to buy the book which is available from today in Australian books shops, as well as on-line here:
THE THIRD TRUTH by Dimitri Khalezov (Book) in Mystery & Crime (http://www.lulu.com/content/7233385)
06-17-2009, 10:22 PM
To answer the above posting - didn't you see that I was simply quoting the name of topic which mentioned the words: "Re: THE THIRD TRUTH -=- The Book They Will Kill To Keep Out Of Your Hands " - while my own words in reply were just a joke that "hopefully they won't kill you"? Are you that much deprived of any sense of humour that you can't distinguish a simple joke moreover directly related to the quote within the same post?
I can't answer what is an "actual author" as opposed to "author". I think this question has no sense and was designed exclusively to consume space on the forum as well as precious time of its visitors.
Just be honest - if you don't like to read information on web sites mentioned above - say it honestly: "I AM NOT INTERESTED IN READING IT". But if you are not interested in reading it you automatically lose your right to comment on it. If you want to comment - read it first. I think it is quite fair rules of discussion. Isn't it?
06-18-2009, 06:00 AM
Hey, mate, I did not mean to offend you, I meant only to defend me. I guess it is clear.
In any case - you should go and read the info on the web sites mentioned above. It definitely worth reading in any case. Whether you accept it or not it is another story, but just oblige me to at least read it first. You might change your opinion after reading it carefully, instead of jumping to conclusions without even seeing the thing you criticise.
06-18-2009, 11:39 AM
So, you ask who was the chief organizer of 911?
Actually, I have already mentioned it on my web site that I don't want to reveal it online, otherwise, people will have less insentive to buy my book (and I don't have any income, except from the book, unfortunately, so it is just a matter of my survival). But it is OK to me - I will make an exception to this rule if you really want to know it, but don't want to buy the book...
His name was Mike Harari - a former Deputy Chief of the Mossad, a former friend of President Bush Senior, and a former deputy of General Noriega - the Dictator of Panama.
06-19-2009, 09:32 AM
So, how is it that you know all about 911; the chief organizer, etc.?
Well... it is very long time to explain it here. If you buy the book you can find it there. In short I could say that I knew the chief 9/11 organizer personally and, moreover, because of my being a former officer of the Soviet nuclear intelligence I used to be a kind of his consultant in regard to the WTC demolition (prior to the 9/11, not after the 9/11). That is why I know quite a lot of details of the 9/11 project and of those who stood behind it.
06-20-2009, 12:09 PM
Credible or incredible - it is up to you. If you don't want to buy the book - it is up to you too. Anyhow, I seem to be the only person on this Planet who was able to provide satisfactorily explanation in regard to the WTC-1, 2 and 7 pulverizations, plus satisfactorily explanation in regard to the Pentagon attack, anthrax letters, doomsday plane, true nature of 9/11 cover-up, and the rest of strange things. My explanation has no flaws and I can answer any and every question about 9/11 which no "conspiracy theorist" could answer. Of course, even this might seem "incredible" to many people who got used to chew various conspiracy theories for the last 8 years and seem to be happy with this kind of pastime, but it does not change anything in principle - I know the entire truth about 9/11 whether you like it or not.
To answer the second part of your questions. You know, in my book it occupies two chapters, moreover, it has logical connections to few more chapters, but you want me to fit my answer into one post, which is near impossible. Anyway, I will try to please you by answering:
1) Yes I know the Chief Organizer personally. Also before the 9/11. Moreover, I was so close to him that he did invite no one else, but me alone to his early breakfast on 12 of September 2001 (in Bangkok, while in the US it was still 11 of September) and there he shared a bottle of collection wine with me to celebrate the event.
2) No, I was not involved in any planning of the 9/11, nor "privy" to any of such information prior to the 9/11. However, I knew perfectly well about the WTC thermo-nuclear demolition scheme because of my being a former officer of the Soviet nuclear intelligence. I knew it very long time ago - I guess from 1984, while the actual WTC thermo-nuclear demolition scheme existed from the beginning of 70s. That is why I used to discuss this kind of things with that guy prior to the 9/11, but without being involved into any planning to demolish the WTC in reality.
3) No, I did not know in advance that the 9/11 was going to happen. It was a total surprise to me. However, it did not took me long to realize who did it and how he did it.
4) No, the Towers were not scheduled for demolition on the 9/11. The 9/11 was much more complicated thing than might appear. The true 9/11 culprits did not want to press the red buttons by themselves. They didn't want to be that much criminals. They wanted to orchestrate the 9/11 events in such a manner that to provoke the US officials into pressing the red buttons, so that the final guilt would rest with the US officials, rather than with the 9/11 culprits, who were provocateurs only.
5) No, I was not a consultant on an actual 9/11 matter, since I was not involved in it at all. But I was a kind of consultant in regard to the actual WTC nuclear demolition idea - in a part I knew about it. But that time it did not seem to me that these guys would make such a use of it as they did on the 9/11. But as I have said, it is very difficult to answer it in one post. In the book it is explained in exact detail. Here it is absolutely out of context and might sound strange and incredible, but in the book it sounds very logical and very understandable.
06-20-2009, 10:49 PM
To continue answering your questions.
Yes, it was only me who was invited and no one else, but it is not the main point of my story at all. The main point is that I know why the WTC was pulverized during its collapse and I could explain this process in precise detail, as well as I could explain in precise details any other 9/11 event including all seeming "inconsistencies" which no one could satisfactorily explain so far.
Just for your reference. Technical details of the WTC demolition, including videos, are explained here: Nuclear demolition is another kind of controlled demolition. (http://www.nuclear-demolition.com) and more in detail here: Wikipedia: controlled demolition through nuclear demolition (http://www.nuclear-demolition-wikipedia.com) Both web sites are relatively small and you could finish reading them in only 1 hour. Technical + conspiratorial details of the WTC demolition are explained here: Introductory page: 3rd Truth about 9/11 book by D. Khalezov. (http://www.911books.net) - also including genuine videos that confirm all "conspiratorial" claims of mine, along with technical claims. This web site is not so big too - you can finish with it probably in 40 minutes or so. The rest of details (including the Pentagon attack) is explained on this web site: Third Truth about 9/11 (http://www.3truth911.com) This one is huge, but still it worth reading just to reduce number of questions addressed to me, because the most of these questions is answered there.
To continue answering your questions:
How did I react? Honestly - I did not give a shit. Being a Russian, I didn't fancy America that much as you could imagine. I was surprised, of course, that someone has dared to go that far, but nothing more than that. To be honest, I could tell you that a bigger half of Arab and Pakistani communities in Bangkok, not to say Russian, Serbian, Iranian and some other were plainly celebrating the 9/11 because it was love from the first sight. The 9/11 was ugly judging from the point of view of Americans themselves and that from their obeident allies, but when it comes to the rest of bipeds the 9/11 seemed a bit beautiful performance.
About "spilling beans". I don't think that expression was applicable. The 9/11 was kept secret from me before the 9/11, of course, but it was no reason to keep it secret from me after the job was done. As I have told you, the 9/11 was in its major part done by the US officials provoked into it. So, it was the US officials who pressed the 3 red buttons to set off the three 150 kiloton nukes in the middle of New York City. It was the US officials who dubbed the WTC demolition grounds "ground zero". It was the US officials who sent simpletons to their certain death - to clean the "ground zero" amidst streams of highly radioactive vapours without wearing full hazmat suits. It was the US officials who ordered to shoot down tow passengers planes amidst panic. And it was the US officials who attempted to cover it all up in the most awkward manner. So the real 9/11 culprits they were nothing more than provocateurs only, while near all guilt for mass murder and for cover up belonged to the US officials. So, if the real culprits would "spill beans" or not, it does not change anything in principle - the US officials knew perfectly well who did the 9/11 and they even know WHY they were punished in such a manner. But they can not do anything against the real culprits, because it was them - the US officials, who did the most of actual crimes related to the 9/11. So, there is nothing to complain. What about my book - because I knew why the WTC was demolished and how it was demolished, I did not need anyone to "spill beans" because I knew it anyways, so I would be able to write this book even without that early breakfast on the 12 of September. As I have told you I knew about the WTC nuclear demolition scheme from 1984 or so. Once I saw how the WTC did collapsed I won't take for me long to understand why it happened, due to such a knowledge. However, to find out the rest of details that lead to creation of my book, was not that easy. It took for me more than two years, to find out, to sort out and to compile all necessary information - sufficient to write over 400 pages A4 of the book. Again - it had absolutely nothing to do with any "spilling of beans".
What the chief organizer thinks about me now? I think he does not give a shit, neither do I. As I have told you the Americans can not even bring him to the court, because he did not do much in reality. All he did is this: he rented offices in necessary floors of the WTC Twins and made explosions to imitate plane impacts and holes, plus he arranged cameramen to film the "planes", plus he arranged missile with broken detonators to be fired to the Pentagon. Nothing more than that. The US officials did the rest. They shoot down two planes, they brought remains of one plane to the Pentagon site, they demolished Twins (with human beings still inside and around), moreover, they demolished the WTC-7, they sent unprotected workers to clean "ground zero", they sent anthrax letters implying that they were sent by Saddam Hussein emissaries etc. etc. etc. Just compare amount of guilt of the real 9/11 organizers and that of the US officials. So, the real 9/11 organizer does not give a shit really. Because all high-ranking US officials know who did it anyway and my book would not add to their knowledge. It could only add to knowledge of general public.
About you doubt that I know the entire 9/11 truth, of course, I do not know the entire truth in precise details (such as, for example, exact details of the plane "hijackings" or names of low-ranking Freemasons involved in setup, or exact details of how exactly they pressed the red buttons and who exactly convinced them to do so and on which minute and second of the day). But I know the 9/11 setup and following events in a general sense - good enough to claim near encyclopedic knowledge on the subject.
Whether you doubt my claims or not - it is your undeniable right. I would admit - if I were you, for example after chewing on various conspiracy theories for 8 years I eventually encounter such claims I might treat them with doubt too. However, I would not hesitate to go to the web sties offered for free and to read information mentioned there - in order to have my own opinion on the subject. At least I would not express my doubts without reading all related technical stuff first.
About your last sentence - in the Soviet Union there was no "thermo-nuclear intelligence". In the Soviet Union was a "nuclear intelligence" (unofficial term) aka "Special Control Service" (official term). Being an officer of such an organization, of course, doesn't make you an expert on the 9/11. However, it makes you a kind of expert firstly in nuclear weapons, secondly, in nuclear terrorism, thirdly - in actual thermo-nuclear demolition of the World Trade Center. But being personally acquainted with the chief 9/11 organizer could elevate your abilities in this case to be an expert on the entire 9/11 project.
If it impresses you much, or not much - sorry, it is not my problem. It is yours. I could only feel pity that you don't want to spend your precious time to read the web sites I mentioned. Please, read at least those about nuclear demolition of the WTC and that related to the Wikipedia article on this subject. I hope you will understand, at last, why the WTC was pulverized and why its demolition grounds are called by strange nuclear name "ground zero".
06-21-2009, 02:45 AM
Buy the book.
Dimitri is penniless, needs money- and you're trying to rip him off. It's bad enough his life and livelihood are in permanent danger.
Journalist organisations, for example let's say FOX NEWS, pay fortunes all the time to secure the rights to even trivial stories. Faced with the same practice as journalists, which is standard and indeed professional practice, you refuse to buy a book.
Gee you really must be SO fascinated in the subject. As for your rubbish about giving information away for free- you don't have any information of any worth in the first place. Dimitri does. And if there is some sort of insane implication that in a world that uses money you yourself don't work for reward... Really? Your life just runs on self-satisfaction, instead of cash? Interesting. You should let Obama how to do that, he could use the help.
07-01-2009, 11:10 PM
I should warn you guys here. This guy came to my forum pimping this book. We are not a conspiracy site and it was panned, made fun of and flamed and then banned.
The publisher is now suing me for defamation. I didn't even post in the thread, I am merely the site admin. Nor did the bastard use any site reporting tools to report he matter to the administrators. (it is clearly available on all posts) he just set the lawyers upon me.
So be warned. The book is not only full of #. It is backed by some real mean a$$holes.
Pardon my language.
04-30-2010, 06:46 PM
you can see it a mile away. this is just another properganda tool for the 9/11 attack. distorting the truth. and out right lies of why it happend.
the same kind of properganda used in north korea durin the war. oh.. i was alive to see that while most of you were maybe born after 1965..
anyway people are tired of hearing about this inside job junk and are geting
on with there lives. no one is intristed any more. and most dont believe it..
save your money
08-24-2010, 11:38 PM
Please e-mail me. Same username firstname.lastname@example.org I have some info and a couple questions for you. Just got done reading free version of your book for the second time. Nice! Regards, izzy
12-29-2010, 12:24 PM
Interesting, Thanks for posting. Have to go look for the book now. Take care.
06-04-2011, 10:02 AM
There are two possibilities for the appearance of this book. One would be that Mr. Khalezov’s account is a liability to some factors, and therefore a method of debunking his work will begin. It would be naive to believe otherwise.
The second possibility is Mr. Khalezov’s account to have been orchestrated by the same perpetrators of 9/11 to calm down the American people, as the current President did with announcing the “extermination” of Laden, regardless if this actually happened or not.
Under whatever possibility Mr. Khalezov’s account belongs to, I believe that an apology should be given by this gentleman for saying, “How did I react? Honestly - I did not give a shit. Being a Russian, I didn't fancy America that much as you could imagine.”
When people are innocently murdered for the sake of money and power, no whistleblower, no investigator, no reporter, no commentator, no writer, no author, no poet, should forget the innocent.
Nearly 3,000 souls were lost; regardless if they were Chinese, Mongolian, American, British, Russian, Italian, Zimbabwean, they were innocent people. They should be respected, and I believe Mr. Khalezov believes they should be respected; if he did not, he would not be investigating 9/11.
So, he owes these people an apology for saying he did “not give a shit” because he is Russian and these innocent victims were from all around the world, not only America. He can “not give a shit” about American policy; it is well known that the American government is sinister. It would be naďve to think otherwise.
I will end with a quote from J. Hendrix: “When the power of love overcomes the love of power, the world will know peace.”
vBulletin® v3.6.12, Copyright ©2000-2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.