PDA

View Full Version : Thankyou Steven Spinberg - Another Hollywood Psy Op Masterpeice!


truebeliever
07-20-2005, 05:17 AM
War of the Worlds.

Just watched it on pirated DVD from good old Thailand.

Thats right Mr Intelligence Analyst Forum Watcher! I bought it for $3 Australian...A PIRATE!

I sure as well dont pay to be brainwashed by this OBVIOUS NWO tripe.

The real giveaway is the TIMING.

How perfect! Just in case you had thought "Islamofascism" had gone away, Steven has come along just to remind you and give you a "pep" talk as the battle of Iraq sinks into quagmire.

This IS after all WHAT he has made this film for.

I would call it a mix of "Saving Private Wank" meets "Schindlers List".

Here are my reasons in NO particular order.

He has a little blonde girl in WOW who also appears in SL. In SL she is the ONLY bit in colour with the RED dress. In WOW we see the same little blonde girl dressed in Red in case you dont get the "Holocaust" connection consciously.

We see images that are EXACTLY reminiscent of the other 'W' movie...WW2. EXACTLY and I know my WW2. Trust me.

We see clothes "flutter" down like autumn leaves as the insatiable machines gobble up their human quarry. Just like those HUGE piles of clothes we see getting packed during the black & white "Holocaust" reminder doco's. The ONLY thing left from the machines to show that humans had been there, visa ve, the killing machine of Awshwitz etc...

The machines themselves have been "waiting" patiently, to ERUPT from their hidey holes. They note they could be ANYWHERE! Sound familiar?

We see a machine at the beginning run amock and Tom Cruise barely makes it home. We see images EXACTLY like we saw on 9-11 of people running down the street looking anxiously over their shoulder running in giant packs for their lives.

When inside taking it all in, his daughter say's "what are you covered in"? He is covered in a fine dust!

Speilberg you are a F-U-C-K! To so GROSSLY and OBVIOUSLY play on that particular point of 9-11...people covered in a fine white dust...makes me sick!

You use the memory of a particular event to suit your own agenda. Like your little extremist Zionist buddies do with the murder of 400,000 plus Jews of Europe.

You are SO transparent.

You have OBVIOUSLY gotton the permission from the U.S Army to use their equipment. We see alot of Abrams and even rarer XM8 Marine light tanks plus other late model equipment being used.

NO amount of money gets you this stuff unless the Pentagon has APPROVED the script...personally i think THEY WROTE IT!!!!!! How goes it Spinberg you fraud!

We see a soldier in the street...for no particular reason he and Cruis converse and we hear his mighty Brooklyn accent so reminiscent of 9-11 again.

We are to accept the troops on the street. They are the GOOD GUYS.

The music is at times straight out of Private Wank and Schindlers list.

I could go on.

I ALWAYS new it would be a PURE NWO production brimming with "chutzpah"! Spinberg has outdone himself and is the pre-eminent NWO Hollywood hack.

That we should get into our skulls that "Islamic" extremism is the NEW "Fascism" is the transparent message.

This is the push of the Israeli lobby and their extremist Zionist elements who know the jig is up.

Endless references to the "Holocaust" and the pimping off the memory of the dead and dying from it, will not cover over the war crimes and skullduggery of Israel as one of THE most subversive elements in society today.

07-20-2005, 07:52 AM
Well, geez, TB, guess I don't have to watch the movie now!!

Thanks for sparing me another end of the world, machines against people, nuclear holocaust, dust particles in the air, bleak and dark without power NWO production!!

As far as Spinberg getting his STUFF from the military. Obviously, he is not the only NWO Hollywood Production Specialist/Operative helping to advance their message/cause/agenda.

Approved by them with "covert" messages continuing until it is accepted through decades of watching their movies.

But, still, I wonder, and I wonder, who will stop the rain?

Oh, sorry, I still wonder about Mr. Cruise and his participation in many of these NWO productions such as in "Eyes Wide Shut."

I also wonder about his sexuality. I mean, anyone who has to stand up on the Oprah Winfrey show professing his love for women, in my opinion, is hiding something!!

Sorry, TOM!! Wouldn't be the first time a Hollywod Hunk wasn't what we thought he was. Afterall, you wouldn't be such a huge attraction on the "big screen" raking in billions for them.

Just MHO!!

truebeliever
07-20-2005, 08:27 AM
Oh, sorry, I still wonder about Mr. Cruise and his participation in many of these NWO productions such as in "Eyes Wide Shut."

Eyes wide shut did more damage than good for them.

I only watched it for the first time 2 weeks ago.

Better than nothing.

Classic Kubric...and he paid for it.

I also wonder about his sexuality. I mean, anyone who has to stand up on the Oprah Winfrey show professing his love for women, in my opinion, is hiding something!!

I missed it. I hear it brought new levels to the word...pathetc.

He's a manic depressive. Bipolar.

He has a big load of the... "void of complete loneliness" to run away from.

Any cult will do. Including the one called Romantic Love.

Max
07-20-2005, 08:58 AM
Great analysis TB- I've saw the movie already but didn't pick up all you did but it is an obvious propaganda piece.


You are correct about the use of military equipment- they even employed US soldiers for the flick. Here's one such link:
http://www.cnn.com/2005/US/06/28/movie.soldiers.ap/?section=cnn_latest


Another piece to note was the mob scene with the loss of the van- seems to help remind people why we need police, etc. Of course this is the same reason why street crime can top the local news.


The question that I ask on this film however is, how can the propaganda be turned around? Consider the following- if some sheep declares that the lesson to be learned from the film is that we must prepare ourselves for invasion from aliens then can you try to paint a picture that all the preparing in the world would be futile since any invaders would learn what they were up against and could be millions of years more advanced. Could it be that only by being peaceful (and not arming space, etc) that we can hope that "good aliens" would support us against invasion in the first place?

Hopefully you can see where I'm going with this--- are there any other angles that could be considered to use this film to our advantage?

truebeliever
07-20-2005, 09:18 AM
You are correct about the use of military equipment- they even employed US soldiers for the flick. Here's one such link:
http://www.cnn.com/2005/US/06/28/movie.soldiers.ap/?section=cnn_latest


I am SO angry! Trust me. Speilberg is %100 NWO in case you did'nt know.

He is OWNED and OPERATED.

By the link you gave me Speilberg has had the COMPLETE co-operation of the Pentagon and the department of Homeland security.

This movie was NO accident, it was a DELIBERATE propaganda peice.

I'm sure plenty already worked that out.

To cheer me up I had to watch a preview over at Apple Trailers...

The Dukes Of Hazard!

Memories! You dipstick!

Jessica Simpson is looking fine.

Willie Nelson is great as Grandpa. Boss Hogg is Burt Reynolds..not quite the same as the fat man Hogg!

Bo and Luke Duke are o.k but again not quite the same as they play it much more current idiot humour.

Thank God...for the early 80's...as long as you wer'nt a Guatamalan or Nicuagrian.

07-20-2005, 04:33 PM
Didn't he introduce us to "Close Encounters," Dinasours, ET, Aritifical Intelligence....???

and the list goes on and on!!

Men in black!!!

Saturnino
07-25-2005, 06:39 AM
I just watched the movie. Apart from being an obvious NWO propaganda thing, what an awful script !
The father is a complete asshole, but there is no explanation why he is as he is.
The son is totally retarded. The little girl is schizophrenic.
Cruise kills a man without any necessity in the movie. he could just have walked away. I thought the scene was gross and perverted.
The dialogues are stupid and childish. I wonder if this is on purpose...you have no human side in the story, no psychological depth, so the only thing that matters is the action.
How can Spielberg be regarded as an artist? He is just a good cameraman.

nohope187
07-25-2005, 07:33 PM
BlueAngel wrote:
I also wonder about his sexuality. I mean, anyone who has to stand up on the Oprah Winfrey show professing his love for women, in my opinion, is hiding something!!
Actually, the real reason Nicole Kidman divorced Tom is because she caught him in the act with his gay lover. That's why he was on Oprah, to do damage control. :-P

55132
07-25-2005, 08:06 PM
Tb,

great post very analytical. yes spinberg is a bilderberger and probobly a top nwo propagandist.
I am sure his career has more to do with that than anything else. he is one of lord rothc jewboy.

eyes wide shut, its interesting the way they try to spin the iluminati as just a social club for sex addicts, everything was there at least clear to the knowing eyes.

the fact that stanly kubric died of heart failure before finishing the film gives more credence to the fact that it backfired.

55132

truebeliever
07-25-2005, 08:18 PM
55132

Agreed.

nohope187
07-25-2005, 08:21 PM
truebeliever wrote:
[The Dukes Of Hazard!

Memories! You dipstick!

Jessica Simpson is looking fine.
Hell, that's the only reason I'm gonna go see that film in theaters. I see the scene where she says, "I think somethin' bounced up into ma undacarriage" over and over again.:-P

truebeliever
07-25-2005, 08:49 PM
HA ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha...

after the last 2 weeks I NEED the "Dukes A Hazzard".

Camoin Cletis!

nohope187
07-25-2005, 08:56 PM
yeehaw! :-P

truebeliever
07-26-2005, 08:31 PM
War Of The Worlds is such a specific piece of Propaganda that it deserves a little more attention.

I just watched it again.

At the expense of appearing like a "pick pocket" who only see's "pockets", it is FULL of subtle and overt propaganda which is designed to promote war and maintain the average Americans enthusiasm for conflict.

Spielberg is trying to get across to Americans that the current battle against terrorism, is EXACTLY like WW2. The Muslims are the new Nazi's. "Islamo-fascist's" to be exact. Americans must not wait like they did in the last war. The movie is basically "Saving Private Ryan" Vs "Schindlers List". It is a simplistic piece of propaganda designed to keep Americans enthusiastic for war.

Here is a more in depth analysis with pics...

Voice of Morgan Freeman:

"That our world was being watched by intelligences greater than our own. That as men busied themselves about their various concerns, they observed and studied. The way a man with a microscope might observe the creatures that swarm and multiply in a drop of water. With infinite complacency men went to and fro about the globe confident of our Empire over this world. Yet across the gulf of space, intellects vast and cool and unsympathetic regarded our planet with envious eyes. And slowly and surely drew their plans against us."

http://www.members.iinet.net.au/~falluga/PDVD_001.jpg
http://www.members.iinet.net.au/~falluga/PDVD_002.jpg
http://www.members.iinet.net.au/~falluga/PDVD_004.jpg
http://www.members.iinet.net.au/~falluga/PDVD_007.jpg
http://www.members.iinet.net.au/~falluga/PDVD_009.jpg
http://www.members.iinet.net.au/~falluga/PDVD_012.jpg
http://www.members.iinet.net.au/~falluga/PDVD_013.jpg
http://www.members.iinet.net.au/~falluga/PDVD_016.jpg

nohope187
07-26-2005, 08:38 PM
I liked the TV series better. It had more plot dialogue.

truebeliever
07-26-2005, 09:36 PM
War Of The Worlds is such a specific piece of Propaganda that it deserves a little more attention.

I just watched it again.

At the expense of appearing like a "pick pocket" who only see's "pockets", it is FULL of subtle and overt propaganda which is designed to promote war and maintain the average Americans enthusiasm for conflict.

Spielberg is trying to get across to Americans that the current battle against terrorism, is EXACTLY like WW2. The Muslims are the new Nazi's. "Islamo-fascist's" to be exact. Americans must not wait like they did in the last war. The movie is basically "Saving Private Ryan" Vs "Schindlers List". It is a simplistic piece of propaganda designed to keep Americans enthusiastic for war.

Here is a more in depth analysis with pics...

Voice of Morgan Freeman:

"That our world was being watched by intelligences greater than our own. That as men busied themselves about their various concerns, they observed and studied. The way a man with a microscope might observe the creatures that swarm and multiply in a drop of water. With infinite complacency men went to and fro about the globe confident of our Empire over this world. Yet across the gulf of space, intellects vast and cool and unsympathetic regarded our planet with envious eyes. And slowly and surely drew their plans against us."

http://www.members.iinet.net.au/~falluga/PDVD_001.jpg
http://www.members.iinet.net.au/~falluga/PDVD_002.jpg
http://www.members.iinet.net.au/~falluga/PDVD_004.jpg
http://www.members.iinet.net.au/~falluga/PDVD_007.jpg
http://www.members.iinet.net.au/~falluga/PDVD_009.jpg
http://www.members.iinet.net.au/~falluga/PDVD_012.jpg
http://www.members.iinet.net.au/~falluga/PDVD_013.jpg
http://www.members.iinet.net.au/~falluga/PDVD_016.jpg

[The opening sequence depicts life in the West. Particularly American life. Note the tall building shot from above. That is meant to remind you of the WTC. The message is..."Muslims are coldly calculating ways to end this way of life as they view the West with envious eyes." And what’s more, due to the West’s complacency they seal their own doom as they are not taking the threat seriously. The last shot of the Paris landmark has some significance.

---------------------------------------------------

http://www.members.iinet.net.au/~falluga/PDVD_029.jpg
http://www.members.iinet.net.au/~falluga/PDVD_031.jpg
http://www.members.iinet.net.au/~falluga/PDVD_037.jpg
http://www.members.iinet.net.au/~falluga/PDVD_045.jpg
http://www.members.iinet.net.au/~falluga/PDVD_053.jpg
http://www.members.iinet.net.au/~falluga/PDVD_062.jpg
http://www.members.iinet.net.au/~falluga/PDVD_067.jpg
http://www.members.iinet.net.au/~falluga/PDVD_070.jpg

The next shot is zooming into a crane on a dock. Note the skyline. The water and the skyscrapers. You are NOT to forget New York! Cruise is "working class". The ENTIRE cast is "working class". There is not a suit and tie to be seen in the ENTIRE movie! Who fights the wars? Yeh, now you're getting it. As a side note...the little girl has that gay symbol, the multi colored rainbow as her sweater. We also see "Sponge Bob and Square Pants"...gay icon cartoon. Hmmmm...I shan’t go to far with that one. A mere coincidence I'm sure. Cruise and his daughter have a meal. Cruise gets angry that the food tastes like crap. It is "Hummus"...a particular ARAB food. Again...think about these SPECIFIC little tit bits he whaks in. In the last photo we see Cruise and his daughter looking up at the lightening storm that is heralding the arrival of the Alien's. Cruise makes light of the situation and say's..."hey it's just like the 4th of July, oh say can you see..." At one stage they are watching the lightening. The girl is scared. Cruise tries to comfort her by saying..."it's all right, lightning never strikes in the same place twice..." next second, BANG, it does. Spielberg is just reminding you silly Yanks that you are required to NOT relax and remain suitably in fear!

-----------------------------------------------------------

http://www.members.iinet.net.au/~falluga/PDVD_073.jpg
http://www.members.iinet.net.au/~falluga/PDVD_076.jpg
http://www.members.iinet.net.au/~falluga/PDVD_077.jpg
http://www.members.iinet.net.au/~falluga/PDVD_081.jpg
http://www.members.iinet.net.au/~falluga/PDVD_085.jpg
http://www.members.iinet.net.au/~falluga/PDVD_097.jpg
http://www.members.iinet.net.au/~falluga/PDVD_102.jpg
http://www.members.iinet.net.au/~falluga/PDVD_106.jpg
http://www.members.iinet.net.au/~falluga/PDVD_108.jpg
http://www.members.iinet.net.au/~falluga/PDVD_120.jpg
http://www.members.iinet.net.au/~falluga/PDVD_126.jpg
http://www.members.iinet.net.au/~falluga/PDVD_136.jpg
http://www.members.iinet.net.au/~falluga/PDVD_146.jpg
http://www.members.iinet.net.au/~falluga/PDVD_148.jpg
http://www.members.iinet.net.au/~falluga/PDVD_153.jpg
http://www.members.iinet.net.au/~falluga/PDVD_158.jpg
http://www.members.iinet.net.au/~falluga/PDVD_163.jpg

The storm has passed. Cruise goes to investigate where the lightening struck. A crowd has gathered. Lotsa cops talking about "subways" with suitable "New Yawk" accents. Just in case you have somehow missed where the movie is set.

The ground begins to crack. People panic. Lots of scenes reminiscent of 9-11. A huge crack runs up the side of a Church. A Christian one I believe. The building splits in two. The "alien" smashes up through the ground from under this Church which reminds you of the church where they took the Pastor when he died in Tower 1 when Tower 2 collapsed. He coulda picked alot of buildings for this. Think it wasn't deliberate? Yeh, now you're getting it! Also note the 2 "maltese" type cross's on the front of the church. This type of cross ALWAYS appeares at the end of a "Weinstein" production - "The MAtrix" etc...also note the "mandala" - "secret of the golden flower" - "all seeing eye" inbetween those Maltese cross's.

We see deliberate shots of people taking pictures and one guy with his handy cam is focused on as the alien cuts loose with it's "lasers" and zaps him leaving us to view it through his camera lens...

The usual chaos erupts and we see people running and looking over their shoulders just like we saw on 9-11 as the dust cloud chased them down the street.

---------------------------------------------------------

http://www.members.iinet.net.au/~falluga/PDVD_172.jpg
http://www.members.iinet.net.au/~falluga/PDVD_179.jpg
http://www.members.iinet.net.au/~falluga/PDVD_182.jpg
http://www.members.iinet.net.au/~falluga/PDVD_183.jpg
http://www.members.iinet.net.au/~falluga/PDVD_184.jpg

Cruise makes it home. He is in shock. He slumps on the floor. His daughter says..."dad, what's that on you?" He's covered in fine white dust! I hope all Americans understand how Spielberg is FUCKING with you, and the memory of the trauma of that day. He is dirt! Sheer dirt! Like any Zionist scum he uses others trauma for his own ends. Others “suffering”, as propaganda for a cause that is NOT theirs. Spielberg works for others.

-----------------------------------------------------------------

http://www.members.iinet.net.au/~falluga/PDVD_187.jpg
http://www.members.iinet.net.au/~falluga/PDVD_190.jpg
http://www.members.iinet.net.au/~falluga/PDVD_193.jpg
http://www.members.iinet.net.au/~falluga/PDVD_197.jpg

They have escaped to his ex-wife's pad. All of a sudden a huge explosion rocks the house. Cruise steps outside. A large passenger plane has come down. In the context of the movie one may wonder why this was put in? It doesn't flow from anything. It just "happens". But that's because this movie is not meant to "flow". It is meant to be one traumatic reminder after another of 9-11. Perhaps specifically the aircraft that "lost" it's tail over a New York suburb just after 9-11. There is NO other reason for this scene. It is just "dumped" in front of you out of no where and then goes nowhere. It's an add. One long series of "adds" designed to sell you something. That's what "propaganda" is.

--------------------------------------------------------------------

http://www.members.iinet.net.au/~falluga/PDVD_203.jpg
http://www.members.iinet.net.au/~falluga/PDVD_206.jpg
http://www.members.iinet.net.au/~falluga/PDVD_211.jpg
http://www.members.iinet.net.au/~falluga/PDVD_212.jpg
http://www.members.iinet.net.au/~falluga/PDVD_213.jpg
http://www.members.iinet.net.au/~falluga/PDVD_215.jpg
http://www.members.iinet.net.au/~falluga/PDVD_225.jpg
http://www.members.iinet.net.au/~falluga/PDVD_229.jpg

They’ve left Cruises ex-wife's pad. They are on the side of the road while the little girl takes a pee. The son see’s the soldiers and wants to go with them to fight! Cruise forbids him! His son taunts Cruise along the lines of he hasn't the guts to fight. “I have to go!” the young teenager cries! Cruise forbids him. This scene is about setting kids against there parents. This is pathetically sick of Spielberg as he is encouraging young adolescents to go and die. As Hitler used to say…”we shall not educate the older ones but we will concentrate on the young”.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

http://www.members.iinet.net.au/~falluga/PDVD_233.jpg
http://www.members.iinet.net.au/~falluga/PDVD_239.jpg
http://www.members.iinet.net.au/~falluga/PDVD_246.jpg
http://www.members.iinet.net.au/~falluga/PDVD_257.jpg
http://www.members.iinet.net.au/~falluga/PDVD_259.jpg
http://www.members.iinet.net.au/~falluga/PDVD_266.jpg
http://www.members.iinet.net.au/~falluga/PDVD_271.jpg
http://www.members.iinet.net.au/~falluga/PDVD_274.jpg
http://www.members.iinet.net.au/~falluga/PDVD_278.jpg
http://www.members.iinet.net.au/~falluga/PDVD_281.jpg
http://www.members.iinet.net.au/~falluga/PDVD_286.jpg
http://www.members.iinet.net.au/~falluga/PDVD_291.jpg

They are on a ferry and an “alien” rises from the water looking like a suitable “all seeing eye”. It tips over the ferry and we are greeted with scenes straight out of “Titanic”…Oh the humanity! They struggle ashore. Clothes flutter down like Autumn leaves from the aliens ripping up bodies. This is straight out of a Holocaust flick.

We see long columns of refugees. These scenes are designed to take you straight back to World War 2. The “flashes” of gunfire on the horizon. The “stutter” of machine guns in the distance.

A battle is brewing and army equipment and soldiers flood to the front line. You have to have approval for the script to get equipment like this lent to you. In fact they use the real 10th Army mountain division as extras. This whole movie was written for the U.S Army as a recruiting tool. In fact the whole movie was a Pentagon production…literally.

The battle begins and Cruises young son is trying to get to the battle. Cruise is trying to stop him. He struggles with his father and says…”Dad! I have to see this!” Cruise throws him to the ground. The son pleads to his Father…”dad, please…let me go…” He wanders off to join the fight. Spielberg wants young American boys to die in Iraq. Hope your happy giving this arsehole money to brainwash your kids to war.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

http://www.members.iinet.net.au/~falluga/PDVD_297.jpg
http://www.members.iinet.net.au/~falluga/PDVD_305.jpg

Tim Robbins plays a nutter “survivalist” type. Spielberg now has a go at the “right wing conspiracy” people and Patriot movements. They are trapped in a cellar together. An “alien” all seeing eye device looks down the cellar for them. In the end Robbins loses it and Cruise has to kill him as he is a nutter. Strange how the people actually fighting the “all seeing eye” are the ones cast as the ones who need killing. Hmmmm…

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

http://www.members.iinet.net.au/~falluga/PDVD_316.jpg
http://www.members.iinet.net.au/~falluga/PDVD_325.jpg
http://www.members.iinet.net.au/~falluga/PDVD_327.jpg
http://www.members.iinet.net.au/~falluga/PDVD_329.jpg
http://www.members.iinet.net.au/~falluga/PDVD_331.jpg
http://www.members.iinet.net.au/~falluga/PDVD_332.jpg
http://www.members.iinet.net.au/~falluga/PDVD_337.jpg
http://www.members.iinet.net.au/~falluga/PDVD_340.jpg
http://www.members.iinet.net.au/~falluga/PDVD_354.jpg
http://www.members.iinet.net.au/~falluga/PDVD_361.jpg
http://www.members.iinet.net.au/~falluga/PDVD_369.jpg
http://www.members.iinet.net.au/~falluga/PDVD_373.jpg
http://www.members.iinet.net.au/~falluga/PDVD_380.jpg
http://www.members.iinet.net.au/~falluga/PDVD_388.jpg
http://www.members.iinet.net.au/~falluga/PDVD_393.jpg

The little girl loses it and Cruise runs after her and is stalked by an “alien”. We note the “all seeing eye” again. We see the little girl cornered and captured. We see her in Red. Spielberg uses this method in “Schindlers List” and carry’s the theme into this movie. Eventually Cruise frees her and they make their way back to a city. We see a “patriotic statue” in the background as Cruise realizes the “aliens” are dying for some reason.

Cruise asks for directions. The soldiers ALL have heavy “New Yawk” accents. Keeping the crowd moving along. Again…to keep the 9-11 theme popping along. A machine appears and the soldiers fight it, bringing it down. They move over to investigate the downed machine.

Much like a “tank hatch”, the machine opens up and blood gushes out. That’s what the aliens live on. We see a hand flop out. The alien has a head VERY much like a German soldiers helmet. In fact this ENTIRE scene reminded me of a “Saving Private Ryan” scene where they take out the Tiger tank and the tank commander struggles out.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

http://www.members.iinet.net.au/~falluga/PDVD_402.jpg
http://www.members.iinet.net.au/~falluga/PDVD_405.jpg
http://www.members.iinet.net.au/~falluga/PDVD_409.jpg
http://www.members.iinet.net.au/~falluga/PDVD_409.jpg
http://www.members.iinet.net.au/~falluga/PDVD_410.jpg
http://www.members.iinet.net.au/~falluga/PDVD_411.jpg
http://www.members.iinet.net.au/~falluga/PDVD_415.jpg
http://www.members.iinet.net.au/~falluga/PDVD_418.jpg
http://www.members.iinet.net.au/~falluga/PDVD_420.jpg

Cruise and his daughter make it back to his ex-wife's parents place. Mom & Pop are there…break out the “apple pie”! His daughter runs to her mother. We see her in red VERY clearly now. This is supposed to be some sought of redemptive moment for the girl in RED from “Schindlers List”. Almost like Spielberg is saying…”look, if you act NOW and kill all these Islamofasists, you will redeem the girl in the red coat from Schindlers List who you failed 60 years ago.” I kid you not! This is GOOD propaganda! Here too, we see the prodigal son return! Cruises son has returned VICTORIOUS from battle! They embrace. All is well.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

http://www.members.iinet.net.au/~falluga/PDVD_421.jpg
http://www.members.iinet.net.au/~falluga/PDVD_427.jpg
http://www.members.iinet.net.au/~falluga/PDVD_429.jpg
http://www.members.iinet.net.au/~falluga/PDVD_432.jpg

Finale! The Earth is in ruins. Just like a scene from Europe 1945. However, from the ashes a new hope arises…a small “bud” will grow again from the tree of life. The “voice over” of Morgan Freeman comes on again and explains that the aliens could not survive in OUR world and a “bug” that WE were immune too killed THEM. Considering the attention given to “bio-specific” weapons…this does not bode well for the Arabs. Perhaps I’m reaching?

Steven…"Leni" sends her regards!

truebeliever
07-26-2005, 10:03 PM
This latest of Speilbergs does not bode well for the future.

The theme is one of mass destruction and then, like a phoenix, the return of civilization from the ashes.

We are being prepared for WW3 sometime around 2011-12.

Before then more chaos including tactical nukes on Iran before the end of the year.

Only if we let them.

truebeliever
07-27-2005, 01:45 AM
Check this out!

At the intro to WOW Morgan Freeman speaks.

At this set of words...

"With infinite complacency men went to and fro about the globe confident of our Empire over this world."

This pic appears at this exact moment...out of the blue when you consider all of the previos scenes are of the U.S...

http://www.members.iinet.net.au/~falluga/PDVD_016.jpg

That is the "The Arc de Triomphe" is it not?

Looks like it, and it's out of place in the context of the previous scenes.

Whats the significance of this?

"Commissioned by Napoléon in 1806 to celebrate his victory at the battle of Austerlitz and the glory of French armies, the arch was not finished until 1836 by Louis-Phillipe and cost ten million francs. The construction was entrusted to Chalgrin, who built a model of the arch on the real site in 1810 for Napoléon's wedding to Marie-Louise, daughter of the Austrian ambassador. The Emperor did not pass through the completed, real version until his funeral procession in 1840. Forty-five years later Victor Hugo's wake took place under the arch. Today you can see the tomb of the Unknown Soldier, killed in the First World War, and his flame, lit as a memorial to all those killed in action. The Arch is a site both of memories and current events and celebrations. The lists of the dead will move you. The cars that drive around the monument will terrify you! Standing in a direct line between the Louvre and the Grande Arche de la Défense, the monument links the past with the present and offers amazing views. A truly impressive landmark, 50 metres high and 45 metres wide, Paris would not be Paris without it!"

Also this...

Arc de Triomphe de l'Etoile - 75008
The world's largest triumphal arch, 49.5 m (162 ft) in height, was conceived in 1806 by Napoleon I as a tribute to his Grande Armée and its 128 victorious battles. Designed by Jean François Thérèse Chalgrin (1739-1811), the Arc was completed in 1836 during the reign of Louis Philippe. Surmounting the hill of Chaillot at the center of a star-shaped configuration of 12 radiating avenues, it is the climax of a vista seen the length of the Champs Elysées from the smaller Arc de Triomphe du Carrousel. Since 1920 it has sheltered the tomb of France's Unknown Soldier.

Any suggestions on what level exactly Speilberg means this obvious little "inside joke"?

It means something and I am thinking along the lines of the Illuminati and the French revoloution.

Is it just a take on the "sacrifice of soldiers"?

Note the Sun setting through it's arch.

Hmmmmm...

truebeliever
07-27-2005, 01:52 AM
55132:

great post very analytical. yes spinberg is a bilderberger and probobly a top nwo propagandist.
I am sure his career has more to do with that than anything else. he is one of lord rothc jewboy

Got any good links on Spinberg and the Bilderbergers.

Spinberger is the man i love to hate.

I have had my "all seeing eye" on him ever since that crap Private Ryan.

---------------------------------------------------

Wo!

I'm having one of those peak experiences!

Looking into Spielberg and Bilderbergers...

Find this little gem...

Well, folly seemed in abundant supply at the Clinton Oct. 29 state dinner for China's latest communist leader.

"I think it's important to open up the communications," said Harvey Weinstein, co-chairman of Miramax Films. He doesn't speak Chinese -- yet, WP reported. "But I'm willing to learn," he said with a quick laugh.

An invitation to this dinner was one of the hottest of the Clinton administration, and a place on the guest list of 234 was a genuine prize. To underscore the importance of Jiang's visit, the White House invited former president Jimmy Carter, former first lady Lady Bird Johnson and five secretaries of state:

Madeleine Albright and her predecessors - Henry Kissinger, George Shultz, James Baker and Alexander Haig. Congressional leaders included House Speaker Newt Gingrich, Senate Majority Leader Trent Lott and Sen. Jesse Helms, chairman of the Foreign Relations Committee."

But the real power came from the business world, the WP reported, with no fewer than 30 presidents, chairmen or CEOs, including Michael Eisner of Disney, Steven Jobs of Apple Computer, James Wolfensohn of the World Bank and Steven Spielberg of DreamWorks.

"I'm not here as a businessman," said the overly modest Spielberg. "In a sense, I feel like I'm 'Forrest Gump' eavesdropping on a moment in history."

Spielberg feeling like a Forrest Gump? Oh, please... Not another case of the Hollywood self-infatuation spreading like a Hong Kong chicken flu? The closest "Spoofberg" got to the front lines of any war was in the Hollywood studios.

The guest list was also heavy with powerful media names:

Arthur Ochs Sulzberger Jr., publisher of the New York Times; Peter Kann, publisher of the Wall Street Journal; Katharine Graham, chairman of the executive committee of The Washington Post Co; Tom Johnson, president of CNN; CBS anchor Dan Rather; NBC anchor Tom Brokaw; and ABC correspondent Diane Sawyer.

http://www.truthinmedia.org/truthinmedia/Bulletins/tim98-1-5.html

How deep does the rabbit hole go indeed!!!!!!!

I mention Weinstein in the context of the Matrix films and the "Maltese Cross" he ALWAYS puts at the end of them...those cross's are also on the church building that the Alien wrecks!!!!

Bah!!!!

Starting to sound like one of those people in the funny house i used to look after. Too much coffee? Or not.

Saturnino
07-27-2005, 01:46 PM
The Arc du Triomphe is a symbol of the French resistance to the actions of Bush & Co., in my opinion (the complacency in the narration).

The fact that Cruise kills the survivalist is obviously a reference to the Christians who want to challenge the All Seeing Eye. In the end, who saves everybody ? Mother Gaia !!! The little girl says in the beggining of the movie that her body will eventually expell the splinter that is stuck in her hand. Same thing happens in the end. This is the main theme of the movie. New Age to the core.

55132
07-27-2005, 05:40 PM
tb,

check:

http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=17083

http://www.truthinmedia.org/truthinmedia/Bulletins/tim98-1-5.html

http://globalresearch.ca.myforums.net/viewtopic.php?t=859&start=0

there are more but check these

cheers

truebeliever
07-27-2005, 08:39 PM
The Arc du Triomphe is a symbol of the French resistance to the actions of Bush & Co., in my opinion (the complacency in the narration).

The fact that Cruise kills the survivalist is obviously a reference to the Christians who want to challenge the All Seeing Eye. In the end, who saves everybody ? Mother Gaia !!! The little girl says in the beggining of the movie that her body will eventually expell the splinter that is stuck in her hand. Same thing happens in the end. This is the main theme of the movie. New Age to the core.

Point taken, but I still dont understand if Bush is one of the East Coast Blue Blood Clan why he is going against his MAsters in Europe/U.K?

Bush is so out there that I cant believe he is anything other than a stooge designed to AT LAST get us to overthrow "throne" & "alter" by behaving like such a menace.

Look at Powel and Wolfawitz et.al...all done their job and have left Juniour while they sail off in some "Internationalist" vessals. What the hell was Powel, a blue hat man, doing in such an overtly, over the top, right wing song and dance show?

There are many levels to that movie which is why I warned I did'nt want to sound like a "pick pocket" who only see's "pockets".

I missed some obvious points that you bought up. Ta.

Thanx 55312 4 the links.

nohope187
07-28-2005, 07:33 PM
truebeliever wrote:
[
There are many levels to that movie which is why I warned I did'nt want to sound like a "pick pocket" who only see's "pockets".
Arrrrrrrrrrgh! spoken like a True pirate. :-P

truebeliever
07-28-2005, 09:36 PM
Well NOHOPE, we are a nation of convicts ya know!

I di however pay to see "Der Untergang"..."Downfall". The last days of Hitler and Berlin.

Reasonable.

I will NEVER pay for Hollywood schlock...except...

Dukes a Hazzard!

Oh miss daisy!!!!!!!

truebeliever
07-31-2005, 06:11 AM
Just realised if you pull down the pics off your site...they dont appear here.

They're up again for WOW review.

truebeliever
07-31-2005, 08:30 AM
Also, i keep saying Weinstein did Matrix. I meant Silver.

They both use those Maltese Cross's in their movies.

nohope187
07-31-2005, 09:54 AM
Hmmmm. So, I noticed. :-P

truebeliever
11-28-2005, 11:16 PM
Hollywood, Iraq and 9/11: Reinforcing the Party Line

http://www.prisonplanet.com/images/november2005/281105penhol.jpg

Moviegoers in the upcoming months will be bombarded by films about the Iraq war and 9/11. These movies will uniformly reinforce the official party line that 9/11 was carried out by 19 Arabs with box cutters and that the invasion of Iraq was a heroic act of liberation in the defense of America.

The Associated Press reports that several productions are set to hit both big and little screens, including the dramatized story of what happened on Flight 93.

The official story that passengers intercepted hijackers and crashed the plane into an empty Pennsylvanian field as the ultimate sacrifice has been thoroughly discredited by the alternative media.

Numerous credible individuals including former military and commercial pilots have come forward and stated that the plane was shot down.

However, the movie version will reinforce the "let's roll" myth, ignoring such obvious evidence of a shoot down as the fact that the debris field of Flight 93 was eight miles wide, which is impossible unless it was shot down in mid-air and then traveled for a short period, raining down debris as it descended.

Other productions will prop up the government conspiracy theory that 19 men, at least seven of which are still alive, and men who couldn't even fly puddle-jumping Cessnas conducted the biggest terror attack in history and that it was all planned from a cave in Afghanistan.

We will be subjected to tear jerking scenes where innocent people scream in terror as buildings crumble around them, without for a second stopping to ask why three steel buildings collapsed from "fire damage" for the first and only time in world history.

The criminal elements of the government that carried out 9/11 are hopeful that these re-enactments will put people to sleep and reduce skepticism of their fairy tale official version of events. We the alternative media should prepare ourselves to counter these psy-op propaganda flicks as and when they are released.

If your stomach isn't already convulsing, Newsmax is reporting that arch Neo-Con Bruce Willis is planning to produce a pro-war Iraq film that relates "the success" of liberating the Iraqi people. This is all the more vomit inducing on the day that former Iraqi Prime Minister Ayad Allawi, himself a former school bus bomber and CIA stooge, admitted that human rights in Iraq are in a worse state now than they were under Saddam.

Willis is at pains to portray Iraq as a virtual paradise and he can't understand all the negative media coverage of what is happening on the ground. Again, barf bags on standby, every Bush worshipping Neo-Con that lauds around righteously proclaiming "I visited Iraq and everything's fine and dandy" is given a carefully planned and screened 30 minute tour around the green zone, the only secure site in the country, and comes home indignantly recommending the country as a holiday resort.

The reality, as 100,000 plus Iraqis and 2,000 plus of our own troops have discovered, is somewhat different.

But Bruce's latest venture has the full support of the Pentagon because it's a recruiting poster for more American boys and girls to go and perish in a desert for the New World Order empire builders.

It is common knowledge in Hollywood that if you want access to military bases and military technology and hardware, as a movie producer you have to bend over backwards to the Pentagon and allow them majority control in scriptwriting.

Pentagon support translates into millions of dollars shaved off the film budget. In many cases, the absence of that support means the film doesn't get made. This means that movie producers are at the mercy of backroom DoD directors who can effectively re-write historical events and broadcast them to millions as accurate depictions of the real thing.

Decades old psychological studies confirm that when you're watching television the higher brain regions (like the midbrain and the neo-cortex) are shut down, and most activity shifts to the lower brain regions. These lower brain regions cannot distinguish reality from fabricated images (a task performed by the neo-cortex), so they react to television content as though it were real.

Therefore the warped fictional portrayal of a historical event becomes the only truthful depiction of that event in the mind of the viewer.

Black Hawk Down was a big favorite amongst the top brass, portraying the military in a positive light. The Pentagon shipped four Black Hawk helicopters and 35 Army Rangers to the filming location in Morocco.

Portraying war or the military in a bad light in any scene merits an immediate blacklisting from the Pentagon. If the film isn't an out and out recruiting campaign then they're not interested.

The producer of Independence Day, Dean Devlin, went to extraordinary lengths to get Pentagon support for his 1996 release. In a letter he wrote, "Just wait, there has never been any aerial footage like this before, if this doesn't make every boy in the country want to fly a fighter jet, I'll eat this script."

The Pentagon were not interested because the military were portrayed as inept in a handful of scenes in the movie. Similarly, Apocalypse Now, with its strong anti-war message was rebuffed by the DoD.



http://www.prisonplanet.com/images/november2005/281105sheen.jpg

They make prostitutes of us all because they want us to sell out to their point of view," said filmmaker Oliver Stone, who was refused military assistance for his Vietnam War-era films Platoon, Born on the Forth of July and Heaven and Earth.

"They want a certain kind of movie made," Stone said. "They don't want to deal with the down-side of war. They assist movies that don't tell the truth about combat, and they don't assist movies that seek to tell the truth about combat. Most films (about the military) are recruiting posters. They are such lies."

The state cringes when movies that actually make people think hit the big screen, and there is a growing movement within Hollywood to push the genre firmly in that direction, but they salivate when an audience can be hoodwinked into buying their crap through the medium of entertainment.

Fewer and fewer people read newspapers. Less people are watching TV news. The majority of the propaganda has shifted to television programs and movies. Watching back to back Simpsons episodes this weekend, the viewer is left with the impression that lesbian marriage is wholesome and normal and in the next instance, only a global government can save us from global warming.

We must increase our vigilance of where the propaganda is emanating from and, as in John Carpenter's They Live, shut it off right at the source.

http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/november2005/281105partyline.htm



So what does that say about Speilbergs "War Of The Worlds" where we saw a company of U.S army armoured troops who had served in Iraq "starring" and some of their high tech goodies on show?

I simply hate Speilberg. He is "schlock", pure and simple and preys on the desire of American innocence which tells me he is a "smooth operator" who knows EXACTLY what he is doing.

The pics are not up but I assure you, WOW was PURE ZIONIST propaganda and tells me Speilberg is a hard core ZIONIST through and through.

I say boycott every one of the bastards films.

BTW Stevie. I make a special point of copying your films and distributing for free. Up yours.

"Ya know, a Zionist is like a box of chocolates, you never know what you're gonna git". (Usually shit though.)

Saturnino
11-29-2005, 03:38 AM
Yes, TB, it is hard to find someone so obnoxious and evidently pro-NWO as Spielberg. What a crook. All this ET B.S... the use of children is such a sentimental, unnatural, tacky way...to make us feel good about the NWO. Jerk.

Just heard a program about the many, many occult symbols in the Indiana Jones movies. Spielberg must be extremely into Cabala.

Bondi
11-29-2005, 03:56 AM
Saturnino wrote:
Just heard a program about the many, many occult symbols in the Indiana Jones movies. Spielberg must be extremely into Cabala.

That is mainly due to the fact that Indiana Jones films are regarding the retrieval of Relgious Artifacts, the symbols of the many faiths around the world are occultism, or should I say used by occultism.

truebeliever
11-29-2005, 05:49 AM
SAT they say Speilberg and Lucas are good friends. I find that hard to believe. Lucas knows exactly whats going on and has for a long time.

BONDI, taken in context and over the range of Speilbergs films, NOTHING is by accident. The point SAT is trying to make is that Speilberg is WELL versed on occult symbolism. This doth not make a NWO minio0n extraordinair straight off, but taken as a whole...he is working DIRECTLY for the occult Globalist end of the Elite chain.

War of the Worlds was SOOOOOO directed at the MUZZIES as the enemy with untold references to "fascism" it was'nt funny. The way he portrayed the teenage sone DESPERATELY leaving his fathers arms to go and fight made me sick. In other words...ignore your parents and their pleading to not join up for the neo-con war...that is sick and if i was an American i'd thrash him in the street. I suggest that little West Coast brat don a uniform and head on over or maybe his kids should.

The footage of the machines sucking up human blood and squirting it over the country side is taken from the Talmud.

The obvious "retouching" of the little girls red coat at the end was designed to make you think of the "red coated" girl at the end of Schindlers List.

In other words..."ACT NOW! defeat the evil Islamofascists before it's too late. Send your kids off to die for the Zionists and the State of Israel. Do not fail the girl in the red coat as you did all those years ago"...cue music, national anthem...hand on heart.

Bondi
11-29-2005, 05:54 AM
truebeliever wrote:
BONDI, taken in context and over the range of Speilbergs films, NOTHING is by accident. The point SAT is trying to make is that Speilberg is WELL versed on occult symbolism. This doth not make a NWO minio0n extraordinair straight off, but taken as a whole...he is working DIRECTLY for the occult Globalist end of the Elite chain..

Was merely adding the info for those not so knowledgeable of the films.

Need to paint the whole picture to discover the scene.