View Full Version : This just in

07-25-2005, 07:04 AM
just heard, it appears that the photo of the suspected suicide bombers has been created in photoshop type software, but cannot yet confirm if you look at the picture it has a few problems, it shows one of the persons arm being on the other side of a rail that can not be so, in another part it shows a bar of some sort going into one guys head, it was evidently done by the same people who doctored the moon landings?
If anyone has a good picture that they have released of the four men in the subway, please put it in this post.

07-25-2005, 09:03 AM
It could be that the photos are digitally enhanced making certain "outline crop highlights".

I dont see anything suspicious about the pic I saw.. where is the link to the ones your refering to ?

PS. it was evidently done by the same people who doctored the moon landings?

heh..I can't see some 78 year old bunch of geriatrics doing photo doctoring in some secret lab .. gesh..my brother can do a better job with the software out there now a days. If you can "see" problems .. then there not done professionally..think about it m8.


07-25-2005, 09:35 AM
I heard about it on the powerhour today.

07-25-2005, 09:46 AM
just heard, it appears that the photo of the suspected suicide bombers.....

Man..you just hear something..no research on your own ? and post a thread on it ?

then want US to research it for you ?

get to googleing m8.


07-25-2005, 10:05 AM
I did say ,but cannot yet confirm, it was a heads up, although I know a photo is out there because I've seen it, but now when I look for it, I can't find it, thats I why I didn't have a link to it.
Since when are post required to show that they are rock solid, and not just an arrow thats looking for a target?

07-25-2005, 10:26 AM
Since when are post required to show that they are rock solid, and not just an arrow thats looking for a target?

Nothing is required m8..just kinda helps..and not to be rock solid, just a base that I can work off of. an arrow looking for a target ? You havent even suggested a bow yet..much less a targeteer.

Sorry..I kinda thought that your "this just in" and you "just heard" and you just saw would kinda like..you know..mebbe point us in some direction ..

Not to say your wrong or anything..but could you mebbe help me out a little ?

( not like I claimed to be able to buy forskin DNA or anything .. without giving the link for it...um..cough..cough.. ) :)

Peace D.

07-25-2005, 08:42 PM
I almost agreed with draken on this one.

I think it's just "white out". BUT...the bottom photo is the clincher.

Alex Jones does note that the photo's "may" have been doctored.

Originally picked up on by citizens for legitimate Government, we now have further evidence to suggest that the above photo has been doctored.

CLG reported: "At first, (almost) everything looks fine, but look closer... look at the guy with the white hat... check out his left arm (HIS left arm).... the lower of the rails of the railing is IN FRONT of his left arm... where of course it shouldn't be! I'm NO image specialist, but this sure looks ridiculous. I'd say itīs a fake."

The CLG has also inspected this image. "The white-hatted man was apparently superimposed onto the photo. Not only is his arm 'behind' a railing that is supposedly several feet behind HIM, but also, upon magnification in Photoshop, part of the bar actually goes into his head. This was 'touched-up,' but pixels of his head mix unmistakably with pixels from the railing." --Michael Rectenwald.



Here is an enhancement of the picture. You can clearly see that the railing appears IN FRONT of the supposed bomber's left arm. Not only this but there also seems to be a railing running through the man's head.


07-25-2005, 08:45 PM
We must be wary.

"Alot" of info - disinfo - dis/dis info - dis/dis/dis info.

"I do not bring peace but a sword!"

The Christ

A "sword" is a metaphor for the ability to "cut through" and "discriminate".

I belive Christ also meant it as a litteral weapon.

click, clack...

07-25-2005, 08:54 PM
so, make a guess how many sheeple fell for it- the doctored picture. :-P

07-25-2005, 09:16 PM
I dunno.

But i think our Master Alex was wary by the tone of the article.

I dont know enough about the subject but I'd "hazzard" a guess it was faked.

Who's to say it has to be "perfect".

The op was such a fuck up that they can barely hold it together.

"They" cannot control everyone and everything.

Hundreds of people in the various Intelligence Services know this is a "joke". Trust me.

What scares me is how far they'll take it.

As Alex says..."they dont have enough scum to go along with them."

They are getting desperate. They will strike again soon.

Probably in Oz.

Steve Irwin has been alerted and a line of SAS Crocs have been deployed to hunt down the snivelling dogs.

[Please hum "Ride Of The Valkyres" (Apocalypse Now) while I attempt some humour to alleviate the depressing subject matter]

Irwin Combined Arms Attack (Blitzkreig)

"Croc" on point

[Croc] "Steve! Must you ALWAYS get this close on patrol? The nights are lonely indeed!"

[Croc]"Jump on my back one more time Irwin!"

[Steve] "Which way to the Globalists boy?"...(Skippy - Flipper piss take.)

07-25-2005, 09:21 PM
nothin' showed up.

07-25-2005, 09:23 PM
Was editing...

07-25-2005, 09:28 PM

07-25-2005, 09:35 PM
no, there still ain't nothin' there. :-P

07-26-2005, 10:16 AM
If he were truely edited into the frame, then he would have been either completely in front of or completely behind the bars. To insert him half way between the bars would require them to break the image apart into layers and then intentionally lay him BETWEEN the layers for the first and third bars. The second bar shows nothing irregular

In order for this to be a doctored image through superimposing the rear man onto the image, they would have had to intentionally created a bad edit, because those overlaying bars are so bad they would have to have been INTENTIONALLY left there.

Not only that, but anyone can see the bars are not straight. They have a slight bend to them at the persons body.

I mark this one up to poor photo quality... or simply out-right stupid photo manipulators. I'd side with the former.