Club Conspiracy Forums

Club Conspiracy Forums (http://www.clubconspiracy.com/forum/index.php)
-   What is really going on? (http://www.clubconspiracy.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=24)
-   -   HIGHER INDOCTRINATION: Universities and Corporate control by David Livingstone (http://www.clubconspiracy.com/forum/showthread.php?t=345)

Draken 03-09-2005 02:24 AM

HIGHER INDOCTRINATION: Universities and Corporate control by David Livingstone
 
Introduction

Universities are viewed as institutions independent of the concerns of the rest of society, where free inquiry, for the sake of knowledge itself, is encouraged. However, an examination of the developments that took place in the North American university system over the last century or so, will reveal a situation significantly different from the one that has been presumed to exist. A dramatic restructuring had been undertaken, between 1894 to 1929, that permanently placed policy making decisions over education in the hands of an industrial minority. Unbeknownst to the public at large, their very positions of power placed them in a direct conflict of interest with the generally accepted aims of higher education.

Although Marx’s solution for the ills of capitalism have turned out to be a political disaster, his critique of capitalism, nevertheless, was quite apt. Our understanding of capitalism is a society that practices a policy of free-enterprise. In actuality, the situation is closer to what Marx had described. He defined a capitalist state as one in which the “owners of the means of production”, that is, the industrial class, or the major corporations, manipulate the industry, the government, the media, and the educational system, towards their own personal ends, and at the expense of the masses, or who he would have called the “proletariat”.

Marx predicted that, in the advanced stages of capitalism, universities would become “factories of mental production”. What he meant was, that universities would become tools of the state-apparatus, guided by commercial interests, to first, coordinate necessary research projects, and second, to exercise control over the population, through the formulation of a national ideology designed to foster adherence and dedication to the capitalist agenda.

Read the rest of the article <a href="http://www.captiveminds.org/edu/education.htm">HERE</a>
I would very much like to read what all you students of "higher indoctrination" think about this article!

this 03-09-2005 01:44 PM

Re: HIGHER INDOCTRINATION: Universities and Corporate control by David Livingstone
 
Yes it's almost a truism that the more schooling a person has, the stupider they get.

The amount of learning about the universe a person can pursue it limitless so in a university situation the field of study is necessarily narrow, and narrower the further you go. Condoleezza went far in skool but those who know her field of study have found she really didn't know much.

It has been said that Economics is an example of a discipline that has very little academic rigour and is more or less a faith. I suspect that the same forces that made it that way also took over the pharmaceutical thought operation a century ago as well.

Specialization out of relevance is what happens. It's commonplace for advanced adademics and scientists to have no idea of the world around them, especially the political dimension of their specialty.

get_real 03-09-2005 01:57 PM

Re: HIGHER INDOCTRINATION: Universities and Corporate control by David Livingstone
 
Quote:

this wrote:
Yes it's almost a truism that the more schooling a person has, the stupider they get.

The amount of learning about the universe a person can pursue it limitless so in a university situation the field of study is necessarily narrow, and narrower the further you go. Condoleezza went far in skool but those who know her field of study have found she really didn't know much.

It has been said that Economics is an example of a discipline that has very little academic rigour and is more or less a faith. I suspect that the same forces that made it that way also took over the pharmaceutical thought operation a century ago as well.

Specialization out of relevance is what happens. It's commonplace for advanced adademics and scientists to have no idea of the world around them, especially the political dimension of their specialty.
Yes, I've also noticed that the Condoleezza-type use that beautiful extended vocabulary to say absolutely nothing. Too much fluff words when addressing all peoples. No answers, just fluff.

marypopinz 03-09-2005 02:05 PM

Re: HIGHER INDOCTRINATION: Universities and Corporate control by David Livingstone
 
Uniherdity. When the campus media is known to reflect the lamestream media - gagged - you know the education is fcuked oops biased to a greater agenda.

They are training people's individual trains of thoughts towards what ends? Personal fullfillment or fitting the societal mold?

If free speech is not valued, I doubt free thought is recommended. I could be mistaken - I never attended uni - always chose private trade schools. My minimal education has served me very well. Mind you, i love to read.



You said it, get_real. they talk the fluff and its all just big words with not much meaning as these words make up half truths and half lies.

They learn political speak. Well these kids have got to learn to be P.C. somewhere and the folks ain't home to teach em. That's the government's responsibility. Train the globbies....

nohope187 03-09-2005 02:05 PM

Re: HIGHER INDOCTRINATION: Universities and Corporate control by David Livingstone
 
Outcome based education has been around for awhile. Hell, I think its been around back when I was in school and I graduated back in '96. :-?

get_real 03-09-2005 02:07 PM

Re: HIGHER INDOCTRINATION: Universities and Corporate control by David Livingstone
 
Unifarsity

marypopinz 03-09-2005 02:09 PM

Re: HIGHER INDOCTRINATION: Universities and Corporate control by David Livingstone
 
Excellant!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
LOLOLOLO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Draken 04-02-2005 04:25 AM

The Techniques of Communism: INVADING EDUCATION
 
<a href="http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/educatio.htm">The Techniques of Communism:
INVADING EDUCATION</a>

CHAPTER X: 208-248 (1954)

by Louis F. Budenz



IN UNDERMINING a nation such as the United States, the infiltration of the educational process is of prime importance. The Communists have accordingly made the invasion of schools and colleges one of the major considerations in their psychological warfare designed to control the American mind. By such "cultural" work, the Soviet fifth column obtains an influence, directly or indirectly, over at least a portion of American youth. Some of the young men entering our armed forces, and some of the young women who must support them, are brought within the orbit of pro-Communist thinking, to the detriment of our national security. Future community leaders are also affected. Many by-products beneficial to the conspiracy arise from this infiltration, since concealed Communists in education or their friends become sponsors of Communist fronts, aid in financing Communist causes, and sometimes play a part in influencing the attitudes of certain scientists, specific church circles, and government agencies.

As early as 1924, in lectures delivered at the Sverdlov University in Moscow, Stalin specified "cultural and educational organizations" as valuable allies in the Communist battle for world dictatorship. These Stalin lectures are now the famous Foundations of Leninism, published and studied widely by the Communists. It was in 1933, however, that extensive infiltration began in the schools and colleges of this country-encouraged by American recognition of Soviet Russia, and stimulated by the Open Letter to the Party. The Trojan horse policy of the People's Front, which had been initiated at the Seventh World Congress of the Communist International in 1935, gave added impetus to this activity. By May, 1937, the conspiracy considered that enough progress had been made in the schools and colleges to justify a special article of directives in that month's issue of The Communist, then the official theoretical organ of the Party. This article, "The Schools and the People's Front," laid it down as a necessity that "Marxist-Leninist analysis must be injected into every class." In order that this might be accomplished successfully, "the Party must take careful steps to see that all teacher comrades are given thorough education in the teachings of Marxism-Leninism." It was stressed that "Communist teachers are faced with a tremendous social responsibility." They must affect the children's thinking, and they must mobilize other teachers. But all of this was to be done from the work in the classroom to the agitation among other teachers -- "without exposing themselves." (Italics mine./Author)

This is the instruction which runs through all directives to the infiltrators of our schools and colleges: they must exercise their Communist influence "without exposing themselves." In this very article of May, 1937, an added precaution is given "Only when teachers have really mastered Marxism-Leninism will they be able to inject it into their teaching at the least risk of exposure."

The article by John Williamson in the November, 1950, issue of Political Affairs, dealing with general infiltration but referring specifically to trade union work, makes much of the same necessity. The Red infiltrators are there counseled to perform their task in such a way as not to be "exposed" and dislodged from their positions.

This method must be thoroughly understood. If it is not constantly kept in mind, the Red techniques of entering education and influencing its course will be completely missed. Those who contend that Communists should be permitted to teach in our schools "as long as they do not teach Communism openly in the classroom" have not acquainted themselves with the ABC of Red infiltration. And yet, the late Senator Robert A. Taft of Ohio, who represented a considerable section of conservative opinion, has made this grave error.

In the classroom, the Communist teacher or professor very rarely, if ever, teaches Marxism-Leninism openly. There are hundreds of indirect ways of reaching the same end. Books by Howard Fast, the author who has refused to state whether or not he would fight against Communists if drafted, are proposed as suggested or recommended readings. The works and statements of many other "authorities" who invariably take a pro-Soviet position, such as Professor Frederick L. Schuman of Williams College, can be freely used. The Red instructor has many other "non-Communist" sources to draw on-those leading figures in public life who always follow the Communist line and whom Stalin has designated as the "reserves" the conspiracy should call upon. An entire syllabus which would inevitably lead a student either to embrace Marxism-Leninism or to be sympathetic to the Communist line, can be drawn up without one notably or openly Stalinite reference in it.

Building on that foundation, the Communist teacher or professor notes the pupil or student most susceptible to pro-Red ideas. This student is cultivated privately, with a view to drawing him toward the conspiracy. In like. manner, colleagues on the faculty who indicate sympathy for pro-Communist ideas are influenced by personal association to join the Communist Party. The influence of the teacher who is committed to Marxism-Leninism goes far beyond these contact~into parent-teachers associations (often working behind the scenes with Communists in those groups), in the preparation of books, the presentation of lectures, the voicing of opinions, the raising of finances for the conspiracy.

Anyone who doubts the widespread character of Communist infiltration into education needs only to consult the Congressional investigations over the years. Specifically, the report of the House Committee on Un-American Activities of April 1, 1951, is most helpful. Entitled The Communist "Peace" Offensive: The Attempt to Disarm, and Defeat America, it cites scores of educators who have aided the Kremlin's peace partisans. Many of these have been sponsors or members of Communist fronts on a great number of occasions. Robert Morss Lovett, long with the University of Chicago and former American Governor of the Virgin Islands, is there cited as being a member of at least eighty-five Communist fronts. Dr. Harry F. Ward, Professor Emeritus of Christian Ethics at Union Theological Seminary, is reported to be a member of sixty Communist fronts. The late Dr. Walter Rautenstrauch, well-known professor of engineering at Columbia University, is reported to be affiliated with fifty Communist fronts. Dr. Henry Pratt Fairchild of New York University has been associated with forty of such organizations; Colston E. Warne of Amherst and Frederick L. Schuman of Williams College, with thirty, and that is the record also of Dr. Robert S. Lynd of Columbia.

Each student should examine this report carefully, since it gives an indication of the scale on which the peace partisans (so valuable to the Kremlin) have penetrated our educational institutions. Dr. J. B. Matthews, after careful examination of the records, declares that since 1935 "the Communist Party has enlisted the support of at least thirty-five hundred professors -- many of them as dues paying members, many others as fellow travelers, some as out-and-out espionage agents, some as adherents of the Party line in varying degrees, and some as the unwitting dupes of subversion." (American Mercury, May, 1953, "Communism and the Colleges," by J. B. Matthews.)

Read the rest of the article <a href="http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/educatio.htm">HERE</a>.

this 04-02-2005 12:25 PM

Re: The Techniques of Communism: INVADING EDUCATION
 
here's a good speech on Gramscian infiltration of the US including education:

waysandmeans.house.gov/hearings.asp?formmode=view&id=954

rushdoony 04-02-2005 01:53 PM

Re: HIGHER INDOCTRINATION: Universities and Corporate control by David Livingstone
 
It is illegal to attend or work for
state/public university because
ALL TAXATION IS THEFT, so these people
are accepting the benefits of stolen money,
money that has been stolen ( taxed )
from hardworking, laissez-faire employed
fathers. It is illegal because the
states' law of theft ( taxation )
is in itself "illegal".
A moral, righteous person would refuse
to, and not want to, participate in
Statist/Theftist schooling/anti-education.

Spiritually, this evil funding to do "good"
tripwires a spiritual law
of bad karma or more correctly,
God curses the education so that
people are taught lies, and
the truth is withheld from them
in every subject area.

Theftist/Statist education-initials
after a persons name should be renounced.
Once the initials are renounced the person
should be forgiven of their education crimes.
Then they can start real learning from
non-State sources. Whenever you see
Theftist/Statist university degree initials
translate them in your mind to read
"I.D.I.O.T." and T.H.I.E.F.
( I'm only referring to the Statist/Theftist portion
of a persons education here, not what a person
has learned on their own from
non-stolen-education sources).

If you are the CEO of a company,
only hire people who do not have a
Statist/Theftist
"degree" and those who have renounced their
Statist/Theftist degree. Refuse to hire the others. Also, initiate some sort of
apprenticeship program within your organization
for young people to learn from the older
experienced people.

Also Statist/Theftist public university
paycheck collectors/professors and student
graduates should not be allowed to write
for "libertarian/free-market publications
and websites until they have quit or renounced
their "degree" of a stolen/socialist
education. These people, ipso facto,
have established a rule that one can
be an instigator of socialism (theftism)
and write against it too. That is called doublethink or being doubleminded.

Signed, Rushdoony, S.E.P. ( Self-Educated Person )

* P.S. - I am embarrassed and ashamed to admit that I attended Statist/Theftist/Liar
public university
for two years. Please forgive me everyone for
being a thief and a learner of Statist lies
for two whole years.
I quit so I could start learning for real
and spending my own money to do so.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:45 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.12
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.