Club Conspiracy Forums

Club Conspiracy Forums (http://www.clubconspiracy.com/forum/index.php)
-   Opinions (http://www.clubconspiracy.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=29)
-   -   BLICK, the biggest Newspaper of Switzerland and its Cover Story: "Bush-Clan is behind 9/11" (http://www.clubconspiracy.com/forum/showthread.php?t=3977)

SeC 09-15-2006 12:38 PM

BLICK, the biggest Newspaper of Switzerland and its Cover Story: "Bush-Clan is behind 9/11"
 
BLICK, the biggest Newspaper of Switzerland and its Cover Story: "Bush-Clan is behind 9/11"

The rest of the article is in german, the CIA might have fast translators to decifer the message...

Jetzt sagen auch Schweizer zum 9/11: «Steckt doch der Bush-Clan dahinter?»

VON ELIE PETER
15.09.2006 | 12:03:15

ZÜRICH – 2973 Menschen starben bei den Anschlägen von 9/11. «Bin Laden» und «Al Kaida», schrie der Bush-Clan. Die Welt glaubte ihm. Inzwischen zweifeln selbst Wissenschaftler an der Bush-Version. Auch die Schweizer Uni-Dozenten Albert A. Stahel (63) und Daniele Ganser (34) stellen jetzt heisse Fragen.

«Etwas stimmt nicht», sagt Strategieexperte Stahel in der «Weltwoche» und verweist auf den «lückenhaften» offiziellen 9/11-Report der US-Regierung von 2004.

Gegenüber BLICK bestätigt der Uni-Professor die Kritik:

Osama Bin Laden kann «nicht der grosse Pate» hinter den Anschlägen sein. Er habe nicht genug Kommunikationsmittel gehabt.

Stahel bezweifelt, dass ein Passagierflugzeug ins Pentagon krachte: «Für Flug-Anfänger ist es eigentlich unmöglich, das Gebäude so genau zu treffen.»

Sieben Stunden nach den Twin Towers stürzte daneben das World Trade Center 7 ein. Die offizielle Version: Es brannte lange. Stahel: «Gar nichts ist klar.»

Noch weiter als Stahel geht Historiker Daniele Ganser, sein Kollege an der Uni Zürich. Auch die offizielle US-Version nennt er «eine Verschwörungstheorie»: «Es gibt 3 Theorien, die wir gleichberechtigt behandeln sollten»:

«Überraschungs-Theorie» Bin Laden und Al Kaida führten die Anschläge aus.

«Lass es absichtlich passieren» Teile der US-Regierung kannten die Al-Kaida-Pläne. Sie reagierten nicht, um eine Serie von Kriegen zu legitimieren.

«Führe es absichtlich selbst aus» Die Anschläge wurden vom Pentagon und/oder Geheimdiensten ausgeführt. Die Bin-Laden-Videos sind gefälscht. 3000 Menschen wurden für strategische Interessen geopfert.

Ganser: «Je mehr wir forschen, desto mehr zweifeln wir an Bushs Version.» Für ihn ist denkbar, dass die Bush-Regierung verantwortlich war. «Bush hat schon so viel gelogen! Und bereits 1962 gab es im Pentagon einen Plan, unschuldige US-Bürger für eigene Interessen zu opfern.» So weit wie Ganser geht Stahel nicht: «Ich stelle nur Fragen.»

Hier der Link zum Blick:
http://www.blick.ch/news/ausland/9-11/artikel45057?display=kommentar

Heutiges Blick-Cover:

09-15-2006 01:41 PM

Re: BLICK, the biggest Newspaper of Switzerland and its Cover Story: "Bush-Clan is behind 9/11"
 
Can you get someone to proofread this?
I'm really curious to find out what it says.

09-15-2006 01:45 PM

Re: BLICK, the biggest Newspaper of Switzerland and its Cover Story: "Bush-Clan is behind 9/11"
 
Although I haven't yet read it, I forgot I could translate it, or atleast my browser did, http://translate.google.com/translate_t

Now also Swiss say to the 9/11: “Nevertheless does Bush theclan put behind?” BY ELIE PETER 15.09.2006 | 12:03: 15 ZURICH - 2973 humans died with the notices of 9/11. “Bin Laden” and “aluminium Kaida”, the Bush clan cried. The world believed him. In the meantime even scientists doubt the Bush version. Also Swiss university University of Albert A. Stahel (63) and Daniele Ganser (34) place now hot questions. “Something is correct not”, says strategy expert Stahel in the “world week” and refers to the “incomplete” official 9/11-Report of the US Government of 2004. In relation to VIEW the university professor confirms the criticism: Osama Ben Laden cannot be “the large godfather” behind the notices. It did not have enough means of communication. Stahel doubts that a passenger airline cracked in the Pentagon: “For flight beginners it is actually impossible to meet the building so exactly.” Seven hours after the twin Towers beside it the World trade center 7 collapsed. The official version: It burned for a long time. Stahel: “Nothing at all is clear.” Still as Stahel historian Daniele Ganser, its colleague at the University of Zurich continues to go. Also it calls the official US version “a conspiracy theory”: “There are 3 theories, which we should treat equally”: “Surprise theory” Bin Laden and Al Kaida implemented the notices. “Let it intentionally happen” parts of the US Government knew the aluminum dock since plans. They did not react, in order to legitimize a series from wars to. “Lead it intentionally out” the notices by the Pentagon and/or secret services were implemented. The being shop videos are falsified. 3000 humans were sacrificed for strategic interests. Ganser: “The more we research, the we doubt more of Bush version.” For it it is conceivable that the Bush government was responsible. “Bush lied already so much! And already 1962 gave it in the Pentagon a plan to sacrifice innocent US citizens for own interests.” As far as Ganser Stahel does not go: “I place only questions.” Here the left to the view:

SeC 09-15-2006 02:13 PM

Re: BLICK, the biggest Newspaper of Switzerland and its Cover Story: "Bush-Clan is behind 9/11"
 
TRANSLATION:

Was the Bush-Clan behind 9/11?

Swiss University Lecturers ask the HOT QUESTIONS

"The More We Research, the More We Doubt It"

BLICK
BY ELIE PETER
15.09.2006

ZURICH

http://www.blick.ch/news/ausland/9-11/artikel45057?display=kommentar

2973 humans died in the events of 9/11. "Bin Laden" and "al-Queda", the Bush clan cried. The world believed him. In the meantime, even scientists doubt the Bush version. Also the Swiss University lecturers, Albert A. Stahel (63) and Daniele Ganser (34), now ask hot questions.

"Something is not right", says strategy expert, Stahel, in the "World Week", and he refers to the "incomplete" official 9/11-Report of the US Government of 2004.

In response to BLICK the university professor confirms the criticism:

Osama Ben Laden cannot be "the grand godfather" behind the events. He could not have had enough means of communication.

Stahel doubts that a passenger airline hit the Pentagon: "For flight beginners it would have been actually impossible to target the building so exactly."

Seven hours after the twin Towers collapsed, beside it, the World Trade Center 7 collapsed. The official version: It burned for a long time. Stahel: "nothing at all is clear."

Stahel goes further than historian, Daniele Ganser, his colleague at the University of Zurich. He also calls the official US version "a conspiracy theory": "There are 3 theories, which should we treat equally?":

* "Surprise theory" - Bin Laden and al-Qaeda implemented the events.

* "Let it happen intentionally" - parts of the US Government knew of al-Queda's plans. They did not react, in order to legitimize a series of wars.

* "It was intentionally played out" - the events were implemented by the Pentagon and/or secret services. The Bin Laden videos were falsified. 3000 humans were sacrificed for strategic interests.

Ganser: "The more we research, the more we doubt the Bush version." It is conceivable that the Bush government was responsible. "Bush already lied so much! And it already occured in 1962 that the Pentagon had a plan to sacrifice innocent US citizens for its own interests." Stahel does not go as far as Ganser: "I have only questions."

09-15-2006 02:38 PM

Re: BLICK, the biggest Newspaper of Switzerland and its Cover Story: "Bush-Clan is behind 9/11"
 
Your translations better than mine, how did you get yours?

SeC 09-15-2006 03:11 PM

Re: BLICK, the biggest Newspaper of Switzerland and its Cover Story: "Bush-Clan is behind 9/11"
 
I got it from here:

http://www.davidickeforum.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=35480

09-15-2006 03:32 PM

Re: BLICK, the biggest Newspaper of Switzerland and its Cover Story: "Bush-Clan is behind 9/11"
 
Sec, are you an X American?

truebeliever 09-15-2006 09:48 PM

Re: BLICK, the biggest Newspaper of Switzerland and its Cover Story: "Bush-Clan is behind 9/11"
 
So, the Globalist lackey Soros is criticising Bush and his Bolshevik 5th Columnist stooge show?

I guess the Left can step in as saviours now and the U.N can take over after the U.S economic collapse.

09-15-2006 11:06 PM

Re: BLICK, the biggest Newspaper of Switzerland and its Cover Story: "Bush-Clan is behind 9/11"
 
fell off that fucken wagon, although will get back on...

09-16-2006 01:31 AM

Re: BLICK, the biggest Newspaper of Switzerland and its Cover Story: "Bush-Clan is behind 9/11"
 
still not there, but trying to figure out what the surest path might be to re awaken my senses


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:20 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.12
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.