View Single Post
Old 01-12-2005, 07:05 PM
marypopinz marypopinz is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 710
Default Re: I agree Henry, bar 1 point...

I went to henry's site and found this feedback that explained things much better than what I could have said.

I am confused by a society who will blindly stand by and watch life as a spectator sport.

Confused is the only word I can think of and I'm hardly ever lost for words.

Ever watch the new and improved "Simpson's" called "Family Guy"? By watching the opening segment of the show, you would think it were peaches and creme.

Watch a witty espisode, it is funny as shit and sicker than fuck - watch a show and catch the references to children having sex and pedophilia. "Southpark" is not so subtley broadcasting this fucked up message too. And people think this is good way to raise children?

How blind and careless can parents be? How far will this go until the parents get a fucking clue and start rebelling, any way they can? How long?

Shall we all fight about religion, in the meantime? Or maybe we should have a bitch fest regarding global politics and corruption of said world?

Oh, I know... let's all just close our eyes and pretend this nightmare called reality isn't going to effect our world.

Let's all just sleep, shall we?

How angry am I to realize that I am not the only little person to figure out the nature of their sick agenda?

Mary XXX

" January 09, 2005

marriage I agree with 'Mary xxx's comment, " Homosexuality is merely a stepping stone. My two cents. " [Below, Mary says acceptance of pedophilia is the real goal.]

Here's why..

First, is simple analysis using the tools of socio-cultural anthropology. Gays and lesbians can never procreate. Every gay I've ever known had the experience of repeated sexual encounters with a male adult before or during puberty---whether it was a father, an uncle, a priest, teacher, or stranger. (I don't know about lesbians, they've never confided in me. On the evidence, though, lesbians seem to have also been sexually abused by a man early on).

Through the anthropological lens, homosexuals can only generate new homosexuals through childhood trauma or childhood indoctrination. People do not suddenly turn gay once they've reached adulthood.

There is an old Jesuit expression, "give us a child till they're six, and they're ours for life".

If Kinsey had been a real and objective scientist, his research would have shown this. Instead, he skewed his 'research' by interviewing mostly prisoners, pedophiles, and prostitutes. He deliberately concealed this fact, and presented the material as if his test subjects were drawn from a cross section of the broad population.

Kinsey was funded by non other than the Rockefeller Foundation. Anyone has to at least consider that his success may have come from having the kind of support from behind the scenes that was in a position to also fund the national media campaign supporting his findings. (Favorable press, Time Magazine, for instance.)

This is fairly logical, obvious stuff. But I suggest a deeper reason why 'homosexuality is merely a stepping stone'.

The use of pedophilia by satanists is essential to generating more of their kind, also. Satanists know that they must 'corrupt innocence' as soon as possible in people's lives. They use a technique of inducing severe traumas in inductees, in order to shatter their identities. By instilling guilt and the ultimate feelings of helplessness and hopelessness, they leave inducted children knowing no choice but to submit to the cult, and to embrace the satanic philosophy.

A meaningful question to ask, is 'Why did Fox(Hollywood) decide to produce a movie to canonize Kinsey, now?"
Homosexuality is already legal and 'mainstreamed'. What other focus of Kinsey's legacy do they seek to promote?


I just recently came across your site and enjoy reading your articles. It is sad to see a society that has allowed itself to become seduced. It's seduction is in subtle ways that it allows male bashing and ultra feminism to run rampant. I have begun to see it more and more on television and commercials.

Thank-you having the guts and courage to point out truths and observations. It is nice to see someone taking a stand on what alot of folks take for granted. Marriage is a great institution and can work great if folks would only take time to read the instruction manual written by the most knowledgiable author in the universe, those being the Bible and God. Thanks again and keep up the good work.


Hello Henry, thank you for your fascinating article on "Why Men are Losing Interest in Women" (Ravages of Feminism). You don't say if you are a Christian,or Orthodox Jew, but this is a popular stance in both conservative wings. Ironically, I googled up your article by typing, "women attracted to controlling men". I thought there was something wrong with me that I married a somewhat dominant man, and in the past was attracted to other men even more "controlling" than he. The Women's movement had me convinced that I am weak in wanting to be "taken care of".

I have not ever desired a career, although I have a college degree and always thought I would have to work. I have been blessed to be a stay at home mom for the most part; when I do get a part time job, it never brings me satisfaction nor fullfillment. I enjoy being, as my college friends chided "a kept woman" Anyway thanks again for the good article.


It's [Reserve Sex for Marriage] an easy message from a married guy to married guys who can get it whenever they want, or older guys who don't want it very often and often can't get it up when they do, but just try telling it to an unmarried teen or 20's guy who is walking around with a hard-on most of the time in this sex-crazed world. Feggeddaboutit!!


I am pleased to hear what you are saying and have said in past articles. I have a 15 y.o son, and I am a single mother who is praying that her son does not fall into the many traps set before him by contemporary society. ...

I, too, was a victim of confusion and hurt while grown up, and have yet to find a satisfying mate such as you now have. As I am now approaching 50, I look back and am saddened by the prospect that young people today are "set up" for defeat in this area, just as I was. I am happy to know that with YHWH, all things are possible, and believe for supernatural protection for me and my son on a daily basis, as there are many, many wolves circling, everywhere you go.

I don't even go to a church as the last three "christian" men I dated were worse than the "secular" ones. One was even a pastor, if you can believe that.
Thank you for writing the articles, as I will have my son read it. It is a good thing for my son to "hear it from a guy"!

Keep writing, it encourages me.

Henry - my blood pressure after reading your article must be 240/180 - you absolutely make my blood BOIL. You would like to keep all females virginal until "deflowered" by the groom - that is AFTER being walked down the aisle in virginal white and given away like a piece of chattel by her father. May I ask you WHY?????What the devil is YOUR problem with women anyway - I have read quite a few of your articles and each time I become so aggravated I promise myself I will never read another one - but stupidity keeps me coming back for more.

HOWEVER - this one Henry is over the top......I am 10 years your senior and probably look 10 years your junior thanks to a lifetime of good genes and taking care of myself. I have been engaged and married several times and have had many lovers and would not take back ONE nanosecond of my wonderful life. I also have a fine son who is a professional and happily married from one of these marriages.

So, Mr PhD Henry (what the devil is your PhD in anyway) - my life is just AOK - despite having "come of age" in one of the most repressive of eras known to females - the '50's - I can recall being the "odd one out" on numerous occasions because I always questioned the double standard - like why buy the cow when you can get the milk etc. Henry, I leave you with:



Dear Henry,

I completely agree with your article, bar one most relavent point. No need to sugar-coat the truth is my belief.

You know the rest...
[size=medium]Freelance brain owner[/size] R U Darwin\'s monkey?[size=medium] HumanKIND = God\'s creation[/size]
Reply With Quote