Quote from the Weber Hadd article:
The attack [on USS Liberty], which was a war crime, has been a matter of controversy ever since. Survivors and many key government officials including Secretary of State Dean Rusk, former JCS Chairman Admiral Thomas Moorer, and nearly every senior American intelligence professional say it was no accident. Israel and its supporters insist it was a "tragic case of misidentification" and charge that the survivors are either lying or too emotionally involved to see the truth.”
Really? That's interesting. Let's see if that argument can be used to refute the Holohoax survivors' claims:
the Holocaust survivors are either lying or too emotionally involved to see the truth.
Wow. You most certainly can.
So in the USS Liberty case we are to believe that the survivors of Jewish war crimes - an attack they're not even denying - are "either lying or too emotionally involved to see the truth" but in the case of THEIR OWN "survivors" of Nazi "war crimes" - of which there is NO EVIDENCE - we're NOT to apply the same argument, because apparently Jewish "survivors" can't be questioned, lest we "blaspheme the Holocaust", "hurt their feelings", "disregard their experiences" or "incite hatred".
We're to believe Jewish "survivors" simply don't lie.