Re: The Absolute Best Authentications Of The Protocols Of Zion
Here's an email I got from Harrell Rhome about the protocols.
We must be the most deceived population of all times, yet when the information-age possibilities are considered, we should be the best informed. But we are not, and are most often our own worst enemy -- the willingly deceived Euro-American. We accept, and proclaim from our pulpits and schools, the most idiotic drivel about the modern history of the world. If you do not see at least some of the roles certain conspiracy plans play in world history, then you are among the most deceived of all, so do not bother to read further! Here is a short item of interest, pointing to a program, plan, plot, cabal, or whatever you choose to call it, that has been operating for countless centuries. The most agreeable name is Zionism, but because the main participants (but not all!) were/are of the Turko-Mongol-Khazarian Central Asian Judaized tribe who began entering Europe in the late tenth century, the most accurate moniker could just as well be Khazarian Zionism. They are not Semites and their forebears never set foot in Palestine; nor did they originally speak Hebrew! The plans for their eventual success are partially revealed in several old documents. One of the most interesting appears below. This 1489/1492 piece seems based on ‚Äúdisaster contingency plans and protocols already in place long before the letter writers posed their questions. And, just in case you don't know, the plans are succeeding! Not 500 years ago, but now.
In a Radio Roma broadcast, 20 April 1943, the eminent poet, philosopher and scholar Ezra Pound said:
If or when one mentions the Protocols alleged to be of the Elders of Zion, one is frequently met with the reply: Oh, but they are a forgery. Certainly they are a forgery, and that is the one proof we have of their authenticity. The Jews have worked with forged documents for the past 24 hundred years, namely ever since they have had any documents whatsoever. And no one can qualify as a historian of this half century without having examined the Protocols. What we know for certain is that they were published two decades ago. That Lord Sydenham wrote a preface to them. That their content has been traced to another sketch said to have appeared in the eighteen forties. The interest in them does not lie in [the] question of their having been, or not been concocted by a legislative assembly of Rabbis, democratically elected, or secretly chosen by the Mysterious Order of Seven Branched Antlers or the Bowling Society of Milwaukee.
Their interest lies in the type of mind, or the state of mind of their authors.
What is interesting, perhaps most, to the historian is their definite campaign against history altogether, their declared intention to blot out the classics, to blot out the record, and to dazzle men with talk of tomorrow.
While the Jews and their court historians love to rant on and on about The Protocols being a forgery they never, ever refer to the preceding information or the distinct implication that The Protocols, as they were manifested in the late 19th century are but an overview, a portion of conspiracy plans that have been afoot for centuries. Read The Protocols again. Every point is either in full process or has already happened!¬ Will the self-deceived ones ever wake up? If this were to happen, truly cataclysmic events might occur. The dark forces know this well, and that is why they fear the Protocols so much, and never cease in their mission to deter their circulation. Many Internet sites have them. Print them out. Pass them on. You never know where they might end up. Stay clearly sighted on an informational ministry. Spread the word.
Khazarian Zionism and the dark forces now ride the ascendant wave, and the warriors of truth and light are few and far between.¬ This will change, but we are in a very low phase of the cosmic cycle, when the thugs seem to have their way.
\"Permit me to issue and control the money of a nation, and I care not who makes its laws.\"
-Mayer Amschel Rothschild (1743-1812)