View Single Post
Old 09-17-2006, 08:59 PM
truebeliever truebeliever is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,768
Default Re: George Soros Slams Terror 'War,' Compares White House to Nazis

George Soros Blames Jews for Anti-Semitism

Do we have to listen when the billionaire speaks?

George Soros Addresses a Jewish Audience
SEC...Soros is your classic "Hofjude(n), Hoffaktor" or "Court Jew". He could'nt give a damn about ordinary Jews and will say whatever required when it suits the Globalist agenda.

Soros copped a mouthful from Mahattir Mahummed (Malaysian P.M) and did'nt have much to say about the oppression of Palestinians before then though he gives a few shekels Noam Chomsky's way when needed.

In fact...Mahattir said something like "when billionair jews come calling i get worried". He had just thrown Soros out of Malaysia and accused him of massive currency manipulation.

Soros is like a J.P agent of Rothschild. Soros probably owns little if anything of his vast empire. He is a simple "cut out" of the U.K Banking Elite.

He has been busy spreading "democracy" in Russia's southern states. The "Orange Revoloution" they called it where "spontaneous" demonstrations erupted and the oppressed masses of Ukraine and elswhere voiced their outrage of alledged voting manipulations of the heavy communist (read nationalist) leaning party. Soros poured MILLIONS into it with a second to none western intelligence run youth led revoloution. It was staged from start to finish with HEAVY involvement of most western media who openly supported the Soros agenda.

Soros, like the Jewish Oligarchy in Russia, is an endangered species who would do well to follow the rest of the Bolshevik filth who have been run out of Russia and now call Israel home.

Just to reiterate...

Bush and the "neo-cons" are "neo-bolsheviks".

What Is A Neo-conservative?

The exact opposite of a conservative. Neo-conservatives are the Bolsheviks of the Right. Like the Bolsheviks, they appear in restrained groups driven by a simple idology. They seek practical ways to acheive real power in order to make revoloutionary changes. These "practical ways" usually involve creating a misunderstanding over the "revoloutionary changes" to follow.

The first step in the advancement of a Bolshevik movement is the establishement of intellectual respectability. This was acheived by hiring bevies of academic consultants to lay out a marginal idea - that the West could revert to the rough capitalism of the 19th century - as if it were not only an historic nescessity but a natural inevitability. Their determinism literally mimmicked the Marxists. What a few years before had been marginal nonsense was now driven home as received wisdom by right wing newspaper columnists.

The second stage involved a series of coups d'etat within established conservative parties, beginning with those of Britian, the United States and Canada. The movement was then able to enter elections disguised as conservative renewal. They won power with the support of an electorate which would be among the first to suffer from their policies - the middle and lower middle classes.

The third step again mimmicked the Bolsheviks. This was the key to destabilising the opposition - including the now confused and captive conservatives - in order to win re-election. They redefined the political spectrum so that their marginal ideas occupied all of the territory from the extreme right to the center. This left many conservatives redefined as dangerous Liberals (the Wets, moderate Republicans and radical Tories). The Liberals suddenly resembled socialists and the socialists, communists. In other words, the great mainstream which had presided over the remarkable rise of the West was squeezed over to the marginal edge of public debate.

Since the essential characteristics of Neo-Conservatism are revoloutionary, it was perfectly natural for them to begin by disguising their actions behind reassuring phrases. What they believe is that wholesale change in structures is the only way to change society. Continuity, careful progress and memory are their enemy. However, to admit this in the early stages of holding power is to risk losing it. Eventually they felt free to turn on those who rejected their ideas of change and tar them as cowards.

With hindsite it can be seen that the movement was and remains a paradoxiacal mixture of silly abstract ideology andcrude self interest. The Neo-conservative recipe for public action seemed to have been drawn directly from that of Mussolini, which turned on praise of free enterprise, insistence on the need to reduce beauracracy, suggestions that unemployment relief was part of the economic problem, sotto voce hints that social inequalities should be increased not removed, and an aggressive foreign policy.

By the early 1990's they had so successfully redrawn the intellectual map that whenever Liberals returned to power they spent their time mouthing Neo-conservative formulae. At the same time, a growing number of political parties appeared who were openly corporatist or Mussolinian. Thanks to the respectability given their ideology by the Neo-conservatives they could present themselves as moderate conservative reformers. They began to make serious political inroads in Canada, the United States, Germany and, of course, Italy. There, three parties drawn from the Mussolini mould triumphed in the 1994 general elction. No Neo-conservative movements elswhere in the West expressed dispair or concern.

All of this explained why the Neo-conservatives treat cynicism as a sign of wisdom. It is not unreasonable to place them amongst the last true MArxists, since they believe in the inevitability of class warfare, which they are certain they can win by provoking it while they are in power.

John Raulston Saul. The Doubters Companion: A Dictionary Of Aggressive Common Sense. p.220

Though a rabid Secular Humanist, I cannot recommend Sauls books enough.


"The Unconscious Civilization".

"Voltairs Bastards".
They are "5th Columnists" who are to DESTROY the so called Christian Conservative Right and ENERGISE the Left.

The neo-cons (FULL of internationalists types like Armitage, Wolfowitz, Brizinsky, Powel etc...anyone notice this?) are to destroy the U.S economy and usher in a reinvigorated so called "Left Wing" who will dismantle NOT ONE IOTA of the totalitarian apparatus put in by Bush. But they'll blame that nasty right wing for it.
[size=medium]\"The Office\" is the greatest comedy...ever. [/size]
Reply With Quote