View Single Post
  #7  
Old 09-15-2007, 04:08 PM
BlueAngel BlueAngel is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 10,799
Default Re: THERE IS NO EVIDENCE!

Quote:
George_Bush wrote:
Quote:
BlueAngel wrote:
Unless there are individuals who attest to their involvement in OPERATION 911, everything else is considered here-say and a conspiracy theory.
False-premise and unsubstantiated assertion -- your approach would not stand up in a court of law.

Quote:
BlueAngel wrote:
The same as JFK.
False-premise and unsubstantiated assertion -- your approach would not stand up in a court of law.

Quote:
BlueAngel wrote:
All that we saw with our naked eye; all that occurred that is illogical and defies the laws of nature and realm of possibilities that brings us to the conclusion that 911 was an inside job, will always and forever remain a conspiracy.

The same as JFK.
Again, False-premise and unsubstantiated assertion -- your approach would not stand up in a court of law and is in itself a logical contradiction.

Quote:
BlueAngel wrote:
True as it may be, but here-say.
You mean "HEARSAY"?

Quote:
BlueAngel wrote:
Unless there is convincing and compelling witness testimony.
There is convincing and compelling witness testimony. There are multiple credible witnesses. Their testimony is compelling. And their testimony is convincing because it matches. This is called "Having a case." This has moved beyond theory into the realm of testimony, and demonstrative evidentiary proof.
Yes, I mean hearsay.

I understand that you have debunked my false premise and unsubstantiated assertion and that this most serious matter of National Security has moved from beyond theory into the realm of testimony and can now be referred to as "having a case."

If this is the current status, I would not be in any courthouse, nor has it ever been my desire to hold the government harmless, attempting to discredit any credible witness who could supply evidence and compelling testimony as to 911 being an inside job.

To the contrary.
Reply With Quote