Re: The Militarization Of America & The Posse Comitatus Act
How Can The U.S Morally & Legally “False Flag” Itself ??? - :-o :-o :-o
How Can The U.S Morally & Legally “False Flag” Itself ???
I don’t know the answer to this question, but perhaps w/ enough, reliable, researched, & corroborated information we can find out,…
By which mechanisms (whether legal or secret) can any U.S. high government official order a “False Flag” attack against its own citizens & infrastructure in order to mock, & thus fake, a foreign attack against the U.S. by an enemy outside of our borders & presumably from another country – & then use it as a justification for War? How can this be possible? And if so, who has the power to approve & order the execution of such an aggressive military exercise? And how, can this power be “eternally” removed, by the citizenry of the United States of America, & so that it never happens again?
A Blueprint For A “New Pearl Harbor” – 1998 – “A Catastrophic & Transformative Event” that can be used to “undermine” America’s fundamental sense of security – By design as of 1998.
Excerpt Transcript – From the first half of the Video.
Phillip Zelikow in his capacity as the Staff Director for the Kane/Hamilton 911 Commission, that delivered its report in July, of 2004, is a very important figure, & he is one of the key operatives in the cover-up of the 911 terrorist attacks.
The guy is clearly an academic closely related to the Bush administration, close friend of Condoleezza Rice, & he had written about the so called “ Catastrophic Terrorism”, before 911. And yeah, he was in the perfect position to see how much hate could be made out of this event. He had already talked about “Catastrophic Terrorism” & in a sense knew how it could be used. He was certainly the perfect choice for helping to write the report, because this is a guy that could see how to manipulate it, in terms of peoples civil liberties, & getting a war going, & so on, & so, …he is the perfect guy.
“Foreign Affairs” the magazine for the “Council On Foreign Relations” (CFR), in its November, December, 1998 edition, published an article entitled “Catastrophic Terrorism – Imagining The Transformative Event”. The “Pearl Harbor” like event occurred just 3 years later. Philip Zelikow was 1 of the authors.
“…if the 1993 bombing of the WTC had succeeded, “the resulting horror and chaos would have exceeded our ability to describe it. Such an act of “Catastrophic Terrorism” would be a watershed event in American history. It could involve loss of life and property unprecedented in peacetime and undermine America’s fundamental sense of security… Like Pearl Harbor, the event would divide our past and future (thus break) into a before and an after. The United States might respond with ”Draconian Measures” scaling back civil liberties, allowing wider surveillance of citizens, detention of suspects and use of deadly force. More violence would follow, either future terrorist attacks or US counterattacks. Belatedly, Americans would judge their leaders negligent for not addressing terrorism more urgently.” Philip Zelikow, CATASTROPHIC TERRORISM: Imagining the Transformative Event – 1998.
“He was certainly the perfect choice for helping to write the report…”
Philip Zelikow, who is the head of the 911 Commission, has an interesting background. His “thesis” in college was on “Creating Public Myths”. And as many of us know, 911 was the “Ultimate Public Myth”.
““Contemporary History” is defined functionally by those critical people and events that go into forming the public’s presumptions about its immediate past… akin to “public myth” without all the negative implication.”
“Such presumptions are beliefs thought to be true (although not necessarily known to be true with certainty), and shared in common within the relevant political community.” – Philip Zelikow
Prior to his appointment to head the 911 Commission, Philip Zelikow was the executive director of the Aspen strategy group (Markle Task Force on National Security) whose members include Cheney, Rice and Wolfowitz.
My starting point is of course that these attacks were not the work of any group of Arab or Muslim fanatics, but were rather a “deliberate war provocation” orchestrated by the US Intelligence Community & the security bureaucracy. But let’s focus on Zelikow as an individual.
When Philip Zelikow was then appointed, to be the Staff Director, doing the substantive work of the Kane/Hamilton Commission, he suffered from a crippling conflict of interest. Because he has such close personal ties to Ms. Rice, who of course on her capacity as the head of the “National Security Council”, was 1 of the main people that he was going to “investigate”. Governor Kane of New Jersey, the former Congressman Lee Hamilton from Indiana, put in ceremonial appearances, did some public speeches on the subject, but the main work was done by a “Staff”, that was directed by Philip Zelikow.
Catastrophic Terrorism – by Philip Zelikow et alia Nov.-Dec. 1998
“Zelikow is not interested in discovering what’s going on.
As a reward for the job he did w/ the report, they put him on the President’s Foreign Intelligence Advisory Board / PFIAB, which is a group you don’t hear about very much. But is a very key link between what you might call the “White House” & the “Ruling Establishment of the United States”.
He is an example of the kind of “invisible government operative” who is part of the cover-up that will attempt to make sure that the “truth” about the “911 Terrorist Attacks” is never known, all the while eagerly calling for military action against Iraq, Iran, Afghanistan, & other Arabs & Muslim States.”
References: :-o :-o :-o
Zelikow - 911 Commission Cover-Up – P1 - yT Video
Zelikow - 911 Commission Cover-Up – P2 - yT Video
Death, Lies & Videotape - yT Video
Thank God for "Freedom Of Speech"... An “Informed Citizen” makes a good “Patriot.”
Freedom is to understand, & to be unbounded by that Freedom -
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.