View Single Post
  #9  
Old 11-05-2009, 04:10 PM
Out of the Box Out of the Box is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 518
Default Re: 9/11 Imcriminating evidence

Quote:
Originally Posted by EireEngineer View Post
I was talking about NY but nice try.
I don't see what an Intercontinental ballistic missile has to do with NYC. There is clear footage of the entry of planes in both towards that leaves no discussion about whether or not a plane actually flew into the WTC, whether there was something weird attached to it, whether it was a different size plane or whether it was an Intercontinental ballistic missile. In the case of the pentagon, however, it might have been a missile that hit the pentagon. Testimonies are confusing, the video footage is either censored or unclear and the point of impact just didn't look right. The reason for this could have been that they wanted to make sure not to hit an important part of the Pentagon (the part they hit was under construction and therefore contained little important items or people). This, in turn, would support the claim that 9/11 was an inside job.
Reply With Quote