Originally Posted by Out of the Box
Why seperate sections? It's not like there's so much activity on this forum that topics on conventional history are drowning in topics on revisionist history or something like that....
Further, I stick to my statement that a seperate forum for "alternate history" is just silly on a forum dedicated to conspiracies since the "conspiracy theorist"'s view of history is by default alternate to the mainstream account, whether this "conspiracy theorist" is of the David Icke kind, the Alex Jones kind, the Eric Hufschmid kind, the Texe Marrs kind or just someone who can read between the lines.
Will have to agree that the ALTERNATE HISTORY forum does seem to be somewhat redundant.
That being said, not every conspiracy theorist rejects all written history as false and adopts only alternate history as fact.