Originally Posted by BlueAngel
It wasn't a slur.
It was an observation.
You heard what I said.
But, since you asked and desire that I repeat myself, I shall honor your request.
Most people outside of the "business" do not refer to child pornography as "kiddie porn," but you do.
The following post by Gale, makes absolutely no sense:
"For example the other day I happened to be watching one of those late night TV programs on the adult film industry and the female porn actress they were interviewing reflected that in her entire career in the porn industry she had never worked with animals and children. Now you could argue that this had been a joke but at the time it came across that she was entirely serious."
What was a joke?
You thought she was joking when she said that she never worked with animals or children.
What a joke.
Or, do you mean you thought she was lying?
I don't find anything about the pornography industry to be a joke.
Maybe you should discontinue watching late night pornography.
Another glimpse into Gale's life.
The "porn" actress who was being interviewed stated that she had never "worked" with children or animals.
Worked with children or animals.
So, what now, Gale?
I sense you desire to let it be known that CIA/Mafia pornography also involved bestiality.
As if this is a secret.
I could have told you that if only you would have asked.
What I was suggesting BlueAngel was from the tenor of the joke the suggestion was that she COULD HAVE worked with animals or children even though the actress in question perhaps hadn't at the end of the day.
I mean are there adult porn stars who are dedicated to making child porn and make child porn only, or is there an overlap between the two?
You say that only people in the "business" refer to child pornography as "kiddie porn" but how are we to take your word for it anyway?
What if you got this wrong based upon a one sided perception despite of any reference to "kiddie porn" in the movies or a well researched documentary?