Originally Posted by galexander
I would like to make the following points:
1. I never claimed to be an expert on Neuro-Linguistic Programming.
2. Why should I be obliged to explain to all what NLP is when it can be found easily enough on the internet?
3. I would like to remind you this thread is NOT on the subject of NLP but on FREE ENERGY.
Points are noted.
However, since YOU are the MEMBER of CC who, on this thread, accused Jane Doe of using NLP, you are RESPONSIBLE for explaining why you are under the impression that Jane Doe's repetition of the words, "in deed," suggested to YOU that she was using NLP; what NLP is and why you believe that NLP is not a GOOD thing.
I would like to remind you that YOU are the person who interjected the subject of NLP in this thread.
Therefore, I suggest you remind yourself that NLP isn't what this thread is about and that you should refrain, in the future, from commenting about another subject matter on a thread which does not include that matter, if you do not desire a discussion about that subject matter to ensue.