[horatio13]

Originally Posted by roof_top_eagle

Christianity has a good backing scientifically. You bring up Scientology, that is as whacked as Jehovah's witness and Mormonism. Both thought up by a person as their own form a Christianity because they didn't like what was being taught. It was created by a guy named Hubbard in 1952. You can't call it a religion because it was created by man. Check wikipedia Scientology - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia and the definition of religion is "1.a set of beliefs concerning the cause, nature, and purpose of the universe, esp. when considered as the creation of a superhuman agency or agencies, usually involving devotional and ritual observances, and often containing a moral code governing the conduct of human affairs." unless Hubbard was superhuman?

Dumbest thing i've heard in a while.

Scientology was indeed created by man, but so was Christianity. Go back to bible school. EACH AND EVERY religion was created by man.

And scientific backing? WTF? There is NO scientific backing for ANYTHING in Christianity. Please try and prove that. Christianity is the opposite of science.