what kind of political stance do you think Dr. Makow has?

[Thumper]

Conversative? Liberal? Green party?







I suspect libertarian. :-o

I believe he may have once been a conservative;
I don't believe he is a libertarian;
Can't imagine him of the Green Party!

What does that leave?

I've never heard of the CONVERSATIVE party!!

:lol:

[rushdoony]

Well, I know the answer.
Ask Henry Makow.
Also make sure you ask him on each
of the 10,001 political issues,
what his stance is. It could
be "conservative", "liberal"
"here", "there", for "freedom",
for "coercion"
depending on the issue.
You would have to go through each issue separately with him.

[Insider]

I don't care.

"I don't care."

Really? I do!

[Conformist]

Thumper wrote:
Conversative? Liberal? Green party?

Jewish.

http://www.conspiracypenpal.com/columns/never.htm

[Ozziecynic]

:-? Insider:

Ozzie-me-lad, you need to take a headlong dive off Ayers Rock. Gouday.

Why? Because i ask one of the most reasonable requests that one can make on a Public forum which has absolutely no openess or frankness and no Moderators to ensure quality over quantity like other forums manage to do successfully!.

I would like to ask the question because i simply dont believe many of you are genuine and are infact probly just as much in on this charade as those you claim to oppose or the order they uphold! The fact that you think my request is too much for many of you and the fact you want me to know nothing about yourselfs only helps to heighten my suspicions.

As i have in many of my 200 odd posts here, been more than open about many aspects of my personal life to the point of not being too foolishly loose with my identity shows that I am more honest and open than the likes of yourself!.

If anyone needs to take dive off a high place into an abyss for Kookyness then surely that must be everyone who has ever posted on cc yourself included and ofcause Sir Henry Himself!.If you want to get into a debate about who is more kooky than kooky then you are preaching to the converted anyway! :roll:

Good LUCK in your battle for sanity on cc!. :lol: :roll:

[Shannow]

Ozziecynic wrote:
If you want to get into a debate about who is more kooky than kooky

Rob Zombie has a really cool track to go with that.

Ozziecynic wrote:
:-? Insider:

Why? Because i ask one of the most reasonable requests that one can make on a Public forum which has absolutely no openess or frankness and no Moderators to ensure quality over quantity like other forums manage to do successfully!.

I would like to ask the question because i simply dont believe many of you are genuine and are infact probly just as much in on this charade as those you claim to oppose or the order they uphold! The fact that you think my request is too much for many of you and the fact you want me to know nothing about yourselfs only helps to heighten my suspicions.

As i have in many of my 200 odd posts here, been more than open about many aspects of my personal life to the point of not being too foolishly loose with my identity shows that I am more honest and open than the likes of yourself!.

If anyone needs to take dive off a high place into an abyss for Kookyness then surely that must be everyone who has ever posted on cc yourself included and ofcause Sir Henry Himself!.If you want to get into a debate about who is more kooky than kooky then you are preaching to the converted anyway! :roll:

Good LUCK in your battle for sanity on cc!. :lol: :roll:

I think we do a good job of policing ourselves and I don't understand why you feel that responsibility should rest in the hands of another unless you are insecure within yourself.

Or, do you prefer censorship, police state and big brother?

If you can't stand the heat, get out of the kitchen.

On the otherhand, there is one NUTJOB on this board who should be banned, but it's quite amuzing watching him cut off his nose to spite his face.