Go Back   Club Conspiracy Forums > General Conspiracy Discussion > Alternate History
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-19-2006, 09:50 PM
rushdoony rushdoony is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 556
Default Moon Landing Hoax


http://www.moonmovie.com/moonmovie/intro.html

You need speakers to listen to the conversation.

Select "Replay Intro" to view again.
Neil Armstrong won't swear that
he walked on the moon.

__________________
“...I realized I had to gain more knowledge to protect against evil and to protect myself from not becoming evil myself. This is our major goal in life...\" Terry Lee
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-21-2006, 07:08 PM
Yeoshua's Avatar
Yeoshua Yeoshua is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 212
Default Re: Moon Landing Hoax

FFS! this is a piss take......you need to read the British comic "Viz".......

Jesus - Irony is really lost on our American brethren isn't it?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-22-2006, 02:26 PM
Ozzy_dopster Ozzy_dopster is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 161
Default Re: Moon Landing Hoax

Quit having us on and tell us, mate, what's on the dark side of the moon? You had to get that one right to get out, no?
__________________
\"Oops\" = A. Hitler upon hearing that the allied troops landed at Normandy instead of Pas-De-Calais as expected.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-22-2006, 06:09 PM
rushdoony rushdoony is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 556
Default Re: Moon Landing Hoax

http://216.26.168.193/moonmovie/default.asp?ID=8

or go to www.moonmovie.com and click on FAQs

Frequently Asked Questions:



Q: How could such a secret be kept from the world with so many people involved? (Didn't NASA have tens of thousands of people working on the Apollo project?)

A: This is the same logical question I asked before I did any research. Yet after having done eight years of investigation, I discovered that, in fact, very few people were involved in the actual faking. NASA, indeed, did have tens of thousands of people working constructing the nuts and bolts of the project. One team worked on the spacecraft hatch, another on the astronaut's boot, yet none of them saw an overview of the entire project, only those at the very top of the bureaucratic pyramid. All of those NASA guys at the computer consoles that you saw prior to the launch were receiving the exact same information as their colleagues sitting beside them, which was fed to all of them by a simulation computer program. If you look at the footage ten seconds prior to launch, they are all kicked back watching television, just like the rest of us. Apollo astronauts from later or previous missions were the ones at the real consoles. We know from the newly discovered behind-the-scenes footage that each crew was on the rocket during the launch. They went up in front of witnesses, splashed down in front of witnesses, yet the evidence recently uncovered proves that they never left Earth orbit. Apollo 11 was supposed to be the greatest event in human history, yet there were only three (government employee) witnesses and, for the first time ever, no independent press coverage of such an historical event.

With Cold War tensions running high, those who knew the truth went along with the deception to fool the Soviets that we had technological superiority.

In 1957 Time Magazine had on its cover "The Smartest Man in America" (the latest winner of the most popular TV trivia game show at that time.) It was later uncovered that the contestant received the answers in advance from the show's producers because he was widely loved by the viewers. In fact, one hundred twenty contestants and staff initially swore on the Bible during a grand jury investigation that the television show was not rigged. Most later recanted, and it is now known they all lied. If all these people were willing to lie for a little money, how much more for alleged national security? The fact is, Time Magazine was wrong. The best way to fool the world was to fool the media.

Q: What about all of the people refuting your accusations point-by-point?

A: Given the pride associated with this alleged accomplishment, it is natural that many people seek to refute our claims. It is not difficult to make up a plausible-sounding argument to refute almost any claim. However, we have yet to see any such argument that does not fail under critical examination.

"The likelihood of one individual being right increases in direct proportion to the intensity to which others are trying to prove him wrong."
- - Harry Segall

Q: What about the moon rocks?

A: NASA chief scientist James Garvin recently appeared on C-SPAN (4-17-2005.) A viewer called in for the live, audience response, program. He stated that his father worked for the Defense Department and told him that we never went to the moon, that the technology didn't exist back then, and that Apollo was a Hollywood-type production. The caller asked NASA chief scientist Garvin what proof he had that the Apollo moon missions were real. Garvin said the proof is in the statements made by the astronauts, and also in the moon rocks.

While it is possible that the moon rocks were manufactured (NASA has the best ceramics labs on the planet), in reality these rocks are probably just meteorites that were retrieved on Earth. Von Braun, the director of the program, visited Antarctica a few months before the missions to retrieve these meteorites. (By the way, it is a federal crime for a civilian to be in possession of an Apollo moon rock, so how can there truly be independent verification?)

Q: Can't you see the artifacts left from the alleged moon missions through a powerful telescope?

A: No. This is folklore. No Earth-based telescope is powerful enough to see manmade materials on the lunar surface. The newly released photos of the moon taken by the Hubble telescope cannot discern any objects on the moon's surface that are smaller than a football field in length.

Japan, however, sent a probe to the moon several years ago that did have this capability. Unfortunately, as soon as it entered lunar orbit all five of its cameras simultaneously malfunctioned. Further disappointment is in the fact that the most recent European lunar probe cannot see the moon's surface in enough detail to answer this persistent question.

Q: Wouldn't the Russians find out and then tell the world?

A: This is another, very logical, yet superficial question. After thinking about it for some time, I believe that one of the major reasons for faking the moon missions was to fool the Soviets about US strategic and space capability during the height of the Cold War (like a bluff in poker.) In addition, the Soviets did not have the capability to track deep spacecraft until late in 1972, immediately after which, the last three Apollo missions were abruptly cancelled.

Even if the Russians did suspect the landings were not authentic, the act of calling us liars of this magnitude at the height of the Cold War could have instigated a war, and perhaps they thought it better not to chance that.

Q: Why hasn't someone come forward?

A: Who would listen, and who would believe them? This illusion is so pridefully ingrained in everyone’s mind that it isn’t even questioned. Furthermore, would you want to be the one to ruin the international reputation of America? (Plus the likely blackmail, bribes, and death threats . . . to family members as well.) In addition, one astronaut coming forward to clear his own conscious is an inadvertent condemnation of all of the other astronauts as well. It is one thing to ruin your own life and reputation, yet what about others who are not willing to do so? All of them have built fame and wealth on their celebrity of having supposedly walked on the moon.

Q: What about laser reflectors on the moon (allegedly left by Apollo) that scientists bounce light beams off of?

A: The Russians have successfully placed such reflectors on the surface of the moon, yet they have never claimed to have put a man on the moon. The reflectors were dropped there by unmanned probes. It should also be noted that the moon's surface will naturally reflect signals; communications were carried out as early as the 1950s by bouncing signals off of the moon.

Q: How could the scientists of the world be fooled?

A: When scientists fail to require independent duplication of such an outlandish claim after over 30 years have passed, science is degraded to the status of being just another religion. They claim to have gone 240,000 miles in 1969. However, since 1972 no one has gone more than 400 miles from the Earth. This is a case of the scientists of the world not doing their jobs and otherwise being caught asleep at the wheel.

The leading scientists today who say that the Van Allen Radiation Belt is not lethal (who were generally in preschool at the time of the first alleged moon landing) do so by the following deduction: "The Apollo astronauts went through the radiation belt on their way to the moon and survived, so it must not be lethal." They are, of course, assuming that the missions were authentic, when, in fact, they were not. The leading scientists are wrong. Has this ever historically happened?

Q: If the evidence you have is so compelling, what hasn't CNN picked it up?

A: In reality, news media organizations are in the entertainment business. They figure that confronting such an emotional issue is not likely to boost their ratings. Since only a small percentage of those in the U.S. believe the landings were not authentic, most news media organizations don't want to risk offending their viewers.

Q: What about Apollo 13?

A: The fact is, none of the Apollo missions ever left earth orbit. After interest petered out following Apollo 12 (the second trip), an element of "jeopardy" was introduced to draw attention back to the alleged drama of the missions.

This makes Apollo 13 the most deplorable of all the missions. The nation held midnight prayer vigils for the astronaut's safe return, all the while they casually coasted around the earth in a completely sound orbiting vehicle.

Q: If A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Moon is such Earth-shattering evidence, why are you selling it instead of offering it for free?

A: The film is Earth-shattering evidence, indeed. The fact is that investors put up five hundred thousand dollars to produce the film, and they would like to recoup a little of it. This is simply the concept of exchange; when someone does work to provide you with something of value, you compensate them when you receive benefit from that work.

Thirty bucks for a half a million dollar film is not bad, if you ask me.
(The lie cost every citizen $800--the truth... $30.)

Q: What are the running times for each of the DVD's?

A: A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Moon is 47 minutes in length. Astronauts Gone Wild is 53 minutes long. Apollo 11 Post-Flight Press Conference is 1hour, 23 minutes long. Apollo 11 Monkey Business is 1 hour, 48 minutes long.



- Bart Sibrel -
__________________
“...I realized I had to gain more knowledge to protect against evil and to protect myself from not becoming evil myself. This is our major goal in life...\" Terry Lee
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-29-2006, 09:28 PM
madthumbs madthumbs is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 92
Default Re: Moon Landing Hoax

The truth about the Moon landing 00:34 - June 28, 2005

Astronauts Gone Wild 53 min 15 sec - Mar 21, 2006

Did we really land Men on the Moon? 51 min 16 sec - Mar 21, 2006

A Funny Thing Happened On The Way To The Moon 46 min 56 sec - Mar 15, 2006

Google vids available as avi, ipod, psp, flv. Youtube are flv.

Check faqs if you have any problems.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-30-2006, 08:08 AM
madthumbs madthumbs is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 92
Default Re: Moon Landing Hoax

What Happened on the Moon
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-07-2006, 05:40 AM
howzdababies howzdababies is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 5
Default Re: Moon Landing Hoax

the clangers were the first life form on the moon, then walice and gromit (a grand day out) finaly me i live there now i am curently plaing to ust the moon as an endless suply of chease to sell on the black market. so there mr. poo!
:lol: :-D 8-)
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 07-21-2006, 05:35 AM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Moon Landing Hoax

seriously mr how are the babies, it is this kind of repulsive behaviour that ruins forums like this for everyone else. honestly, stop posting and get yourself a life, this is a place of refuge for intelligent and enlightened souls, and we do not appreciate your silliness. go away, and leave us in peace.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 07-21-2006, 05:36 AM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Moon Landing Hoax

mr mongo, why dont you take your own advice and leave yourself?
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 07-21-2006, 11:17 AM
Bouncer Bouncer is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 765
Default Re: Moon Landing Hoax

No please, take my advice: I'm not using it.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The Great "HIV" Hoax rushdoony Social Engineering 76 05-05-2010 06:23 AM
The Hard Landing For Housing is Already Here SeC Opinions 0 09-25-2006 10:48 AM
Fake Apollo Landing Sites rushdoony General Conspiracy Discussion 21 12-30-2005 06:30 PM
Moon Hoax igwt General Conspiracy Discussion 0 11-07-2005 05:56 AM
Moon Landing Conspiracy rushdoony New World Order operatives 25 02-13-2005 02:19 PM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:05 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.12
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.