Go Back   Club Conspiracy Forums > General Conspiracy Discussion > Opinions
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-09-2007, 10:31 AM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default THEM


As far as the THEM poster(s) and thread is concerned, it was another attempt to align themselves with me.

Their first post stated that the coming events for this year would include information, probably public about MKULTRA/Project Monarch and/or mind control.

However, in this opening paragraph, they gave themselves away by stating that "mind control victims" are HIGHLY SUGGESTIBLE and remain that way for the rest of their lives.

This, a suggestion to ME.

They stated, we will DEFEND ourselves. This, an attempt to suggest TO ME that I should defend myself against all the negative comments being made about me by other posters.

They never once attempted to DEFEND themselves.

IGWT re-inforced this defense MODE when he stated, BA, "you CLOCKED CC again."

This, when he thought he had aligned himself with me and to further suggest that it's GREAT that I spend my time defending myself against negative comments.

If I do this, then I don't have time to write and remember my past.

To be put on the "defensive" is a tactic.

What they were also hoping for was that I would suggest that those who tormented me in the past, incarcerated me, victimized me, were the ALIENS or whatever they were, whose pictures they continued to post.

I was recounting an experience of laying on a cold, steel table with bright lights shining in my eyes.

Almost immediately, THEM posted a picture of some skeleton type person in a room with a steel table holding a flashlight.

An attempt for me to suggest that these THINGS were responsible for my abuse.

So, that is the STORY of the THEM thread and the "missing pictures."

Photoshop!

What happened to the illustration RedRat posted with a pregnant Barbie pushing a baby stroller, with scrawled lettering indicating BA was Barbie, IGWT someone else?

Did that one disappear, too.

In Peace,
BlueAngel

Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-09-2007, 12:21 PM
redrat11 redrat11 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,249
Default Re: THEM

Quote:
BlueAngel wrote:


What happened to the illustration RedRat posted with a pregnant Barbie pushing a baby stroller, with scrawled lettering indicating BA was Barbie, IGWT someone else?

Did that one disappear, too.

In Peace,
BlueAngel
That picture, I deleted from the thread in question, it was done as a 'point' to make as you all behave like children, this is true, YES!

As for 'THEM' as usual you ACCUSE everybody of being something they're not.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-09-2007, 01:32 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: THEM

Quote:
redrat11 wrote:
Quote:
BlueAngel wrote:


What happened to the illustration RedRat posted with a pregnant Barbie pushing a baby stroller, with scrawled lettering indicating BA was Barbie, IGWT someone else?

Did that one disappear, too.

In Peace,
BlueAngel
That picture, I deleted from the thread in question, it was done as a 'point' to make as you all behave like children, this is true, YES!

As for 'THEM' as usual you ACCUSE everybody of being something they're not.
But you felt it was necessary to delete it because??? it was actually meant for another purpose.

As far as who behaves like children, you can't cover your tracks. They're all over the place.

I don't accuse. I point out the obvious.

Certainly, there was some LOGICAL point to THEM being here that you can explain.

Apparently, you have some vested interest in protecting THEM.

Gee, can't imagine why.

I mean, it's certainly not OBVIOUS.

In Peace,
BlueAngel
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:42 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.12
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.