Go Back   Club Conspiracy Forums > General Conspiracy Discussion > Opinions
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-22-2008, 07:10 PM
stompk's Avatar
stompk stompk is offline
I work for God
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: In the valley
Posts: 542
Question The Fairness Doctrine?


Quote:
This Truman-era piece of legislation is not simply outdated — it’s also part of some congressional Democrats’ plan to control speech on the radio.

The Fairness Doctrine was enacted by the Federal Communications Commission in 1949, long before the existence of the Internet, cable TV or satellite radio. It required FCC-licensed stations to “afford reasonable opportunity for the discussion of conflicting views of public importance.” While that might indeed sound “fair” on paper, the Fairness Doctrine was used by both Republican and Democratic administrations to harass critics on the radio and TV.
The Post

Today, Nancy Pelosi was pushing the "Fairness Doctrine"

Let's talk a little bit about the word "doctrine".
"
Quote:
Doctrine (Latin: doctrina) is a code of beliefs or "a body of teachings" or "instructions", taught principles or positions, as the body of teachings in a branch of knowledge or belief system. The Greek analogy is the etymology of catechism.
Doctrine - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

In my opinion, the word "doctrine" has no belonging in politics. It is a word pertaining to belief.

So, are we supposed to do things according to "their" beliefs? Do we the public, get to vote on this??

Quote:
The Fairness Doctrine had two basic elements: It required broadcasters to devote some of their airtime to discussing controversial matters of public interest, and to air contrasting views regarding those matters. Stations were given wide latitude as to how to provide contrasting views: It could be done through news segments, public affairs shows or editorials.
Fairness Doctrine - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Um, whats wrong with raw reporting, telling the truth of the story, without injecting opinion? Just state the facts mam? Only if you give the other side equal time?

I can see it now

"Patriotic citizen holds political rally"

Contrasting view

"Antigovernment trouble maker is arrested"

What kind of authority is Pelosi after now?

Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-23-2008, 10:09 AM
justgroovy's Avatar
justgroovy justgroovy is offline
workin' for the man
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Northern Bay
Posts: 251
Send a message via AIM to justgroovy
Default Re: The Fairness Doctrine?

Quote:
Originally Posted by stompk View Post
Um, whats wrong with raw reporting, telling the truth of the story, without injecting opinion? Just state the facts mam? Only if you give the other side equal time?
I couldn't agree with you more.

Journalistic integrity has taken a permanent vacation I'm afraid.
__________________
You can't take the sky from me.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-23-2008, 06:27 PM
BlueAngel BlueAngel is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 10,799
Default Re: The Fairness Doctrine?

Quote:
Originally Posted by justgroovy View Post
I couldn't agree with you more.

Journalistic integrity has taken a permanent vacation I'm afraid.
Seriously.

I'm still seething over the fact that BROKJAW didn't even attempt to address Colin's (Powell, that is) outrageous remarks.

I mean, should we all be getting DUCT TAPE for our windows or something?
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:55 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.12
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.