Re: Nex's Game
How is this applicable to (I'm getting a little tired of typing this) "consensual sex between sexually matured human beings"?
Do you have knowledge of the prostitution, pedophile, pornography, mind control, sex rings run by the Mafia, but owned and operated by the CIA that use children to serve the "sexual deviant behavior" of many within politics and military.
And, hell, the movers and shakers who attend Bohemian Grove?
The elitists who like little children and program personalities as such so that no matter their age, they can call up an alter who lives in Never Never Land where children never grow up!!!
This is from the following article that TB posted:
Rind brought unfavorable publicity to the American Psychological Association in 1999 when the organization published in its official peer-reviewed journal, APA Bulletin, a report disputing the harmfulness of child molestation. Titled "A Meta-Analytic Examination of Assumed Properties of Child Sexual Abuse Using College Samples," the report by Rind and others claimed child sexual abuse could be harmless and beneficial.
"a report disputing the harmfulness of child molestation."
The mainstreaming of "adult-child" or "intergenerational" sex, as it is euphemistically called by its supporters, is the next big "sexual liberation" movement on its way, says David Kupelian, WND's managing editor and author of the "The Marketing of Evil."
"intergeneration sex" -- They have no problem having sex with children, their own children or relatives. Nothing wrong with it. A natural act. Age doesn't matter. Is what they believe. If people didn't have so many sexual inhibitions, the world would be a much better place, they say!!
"Many people seem to think having sex with children is a good thing," says Kupelian, noting "a reported 100,000 websites now offer illegal child pornography, and worldwide child porn generates a reported three billion dollars in revenues every year."
"Three BILLION dollars in porn revenue every year. 100,000 websites offer illegal child pornography. If they cared, it would not be allowed. They like the money it generates and they protect those who are the middlemen and bring in the black ops money for them and the CHILDREN into the industry.
In his book, which has been met with rave reviews, Kupelian rips the veil off the modern pedophile movement, which is firmly rooted in the controversial sex research of Indiana University's Alfred Kinsey.
"The revolutionary Kinsey Reports, as they came to be known, rocked the nation’s beliefs about itself," said Kupelian. "But perhaps most shocking of all were his 'findings' on childhood sexuality. The Kinsey Reports came to the stunning conclusion that children are sexual from birth, and that youngsters as young as a few months of age have the capacity for a pleasurable and healthy sexual life.
See your point here, NOHOPE. And, like I said, you have to try it in order to achieve results and report them. Fucking perverts.
For instance, Kupelian says, "'Table 34' on page 180 of Kinsey’s 'Sexual Behavior in the Human Male' purports to be a scientific record of 'multiple orgasm in pre-adolescent males' – which is based on the criminal sexual molestation of children, including infants and toddlers, for the purposes of obtaining 'data' for his research.
You have to do the "scientific" research hands on. Where did he get the toddlers and infants? From the government's stockpile of children incarcerated in their rings. Stolen from the streets and their homes.
"It's amazing that, to this day, Kinsey, who is now known to have been a full-bore sexual psychopath, is still glorified as a scientific pioneer and cultural hero," added Kupelian, noting that a feature film, "Kinsey," starring Liam Neeson, was released last November, and currently a musical about Kinsey, titled "Dr. Sex," is playing on Broadway.
The last paragraph says it all about tb's reference to Hollywood.
It's applicable because this is what the subject topic addresses.
Your question is what is not applicable.
Provide proof that on direct quote form from Rind stating that he agreed with, supported, sex between non sexually matured individuals.
You're logic is faulty, and argument fundementally flawed unless you can prove that he advocates such with direct evidence.