Go Back   Club Conspiracy Forums > General Conspiracy Discussion > General Conspiracy Discussion
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #1  
Old 05-25-2006, 11:29 AM
HothSnake HothSnake is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 24
Default America: still a British colony.


http://www.givemeliberty.50megs.com
“The Constitution is swollen with dangerous doctrine; doctrine that will be taken advantage of by the Federalists, a faction of monarchy men, military men, aristocrats and drones whose noise, impudence and zeal exceeds all belief."Richard Henry Lee, letter to George Mason, 1 October 1787

There existed a strong element within this country that maintained ties to the Crown before and after the war. These monarchy men, known as the Federalists, worked for the Crown and sought to undermine the fledgling Republic from its beginning. The Anti-Federalists (Patrick Henry was a prominent one of these) sounded the warning about the dubious actions of the Federalists; their public debates centered on the centralization of government under a Federal Constitution, the powers of the Executive branch in a consolidated and Federally Constituted government, and later, upon monetary issues. Of course, the Federalists were for a Federal consolidated government, a national central bank, and a strong Presidential office. Though the Anti-Federalists are generally ignored by our history books, it is because of them that we have a Bill of Rights. Because of their strong dissent against Federalism, the Bill of Rights was adopted into the Federalist's Constitution in order to get it ratified by all of the then thirteen States. A huge victory for freedom lovers at the time, but this victory would not last for long, as you will see. Patrick Henry was asked by his home State of Virginia to represent them at the Constitutional Convention of 1787. He refused this service stating, "I smell a rat!"

"Unlike Henry, we have bought the lie that government made us rich, and that government can keep us that way. We have accepted the farce that an armed and independent people means nothing in the face of great dangers in far away lands. Indeed, these are the same lies spouted in Henry’s time. As Patrick Henry knew, Federalists, the ideological great-grandfathers of our own tax-happy centralizers, built everything on fear. Fear of economic decay, fear of foreign enemies, and fear of disunity. For a civilized and free people, the answers to such fears could no more be found in the hands of government in 1788 as today. Indeed, for Henry, it is those hands that are the only true threat to liberty." ~ Ryan McMaken

You may be very surprised at what you were never taught at government school. For instance, the Avalon Project at Yale Law School has documented significant sections of American history, through the various contracts and treaties that we have signed with foreign governments. I suggest that you check some of this material out at their website linked above, because I believe that what you will learn will be quite shocking.

For instance, I would wager that you did not know that the colonies were barrowing money from King George III before, during, and after the Revolutionary War (1775-1783) to the tune of 18 million of liveres, as indicated by the Contract of 1782. What is the King of England doing financing both sides of this war!? Also, according to the Treaty of Paris (the treaty that ended the war), article IV; all debts were to be repaid to their creditors (King) and article V, which returned all confiscated land to real British subjects. This treaty also provided for the use of the Mississippi River by England. Kind of a one sided treaty, huh? Note that the American signers of this treaty carried the title "Esqr." (Esquire a.k.a. attorney, lawyer), which legally denotes them as officers of the King's courts, thus making both parties the same party and thus only one creditor and recipient of confiscated lands (the Crown). When you only have one party to a contract, its not really a contract. Also, according to the Treaty of Amity, Commerce, and Navigation (1794), the King kept troops quartered in the U.S. well after the war. It would seem that the Revolutionary War was nothing but a ruse with the goal of placing the American colonies in considerable debt to the Crown. It is the exact same premise used by credit card companies that make considerable profits off of debt slavery. Control the monetary policies of a country, and you control that country. Like all wars over the past four hundred years, the Revolutionary War was fought for monetary reasons.

It is interesting to note that the due date on the loans discussed under the Contract of 1782 was January 1, 1788. Was the scramble for a Constitutional Convention of 1787 an attempt at reorganization for bankruptcy? Note that Article Six, Section One keeps the loans from the King current. It states; "All Debts contracted and Engagements entered into, before the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be as valid against the United States under this Constitution, as under the Confederation." It would appear that the Constitution was a contract securing the King's ransom and providing for control of his debtors (note that the Crown of England was sworn in fealty to the Pope under the Charter of 1213, making the "Crown" the legal arm of the Vatican when this charter was breeched by the Magna Carta of 1215).

It would appear that the creditors ("Arch-Treasurer and Prince Elector of the Holy Roman Empire and of the United States of America," i.e., King George III, according to the Paris Peace Treaty of 1783) of the newly reorganized "United States" wanted the interest on the loans that they had given the colonists (Contract of 1782), so Alexander Hamilton (Federalist extraordinaire) came up with an ingenious plan for taxing alcohol. The people resisted and George Washington sent the militia out to collect this tax, an event known by historians as the Whiskey Rebellion. And collect this tax he did.

According to Article One, Clause 15, the militia is responsible for executing the laws of the land. Also, notice Clause 16, which states that it is Congress that has the power to arm and organize the militia. Make no bones about it folks! The militia (police, IRS, etc.) are not here for our protection. The Constitution never provided for our protection, but for the collection of our substance and the maintenance of plantation America for her creditors.

One only has to look at the actions of a certain "Esqr." Alexander Hamilton in the creation of the United States (central) Bank of 1791, in order to witness the fruit born of the Federalists. This, of course, was a private bank, of which 18,000 of the 25,000 shares were owned by England. This bank led to so much economic turmoil and rampant corruption that its charter was not renewed in 1811, leading to the War of 1812. Soon, the second BUS was chartered just after the war, until it was put down by Andrew Jackson, who exclaimed: "You are a den of vipers and thieves. I intend to rout you out, by the Eternal God, I will rout you out!" In 1913, England cemented its control over our monetary system with the creation of the Federal Reserve System, culminating in the second reorganization for bankruptcy under FDR.

The fact of the matter is that the King of England allowed the colonists of America to falsely believe that they were free, just as he did with the British people under the Magna Carta of 1215 and the Declaration of Rights of 1689. It's the same old game, but we are too ignorant about our history to figure it out.

Things got so bad with so called "Esquires" and "Attorneys" (agents of the Crown) running the country that a new amendment was suggested to the Constitution. In 1810 the original Thirteenth Amendment was proposed, which would have effectively removed the king’s power of reclaiming his land from the American people, by removing the possibility of lawyers/esquires running and obtaining office in the United States government. Strangely, this Amendment, though ratified in 1819, seems to have dissappeared until fifty years later when it was replaced by what we currently call the Thirteenth Amendment, which has nothing to do with the original. How could such a fraud be perpetrated upon our history books? Well, the evidence is overwhelming that such an Amendment did exist and was ratified long before the Civil War and can be seen in many of the official documents from the era. If you don't believe me, then here is just one: Journal of the Senate (1810). Here are a bunch more.

"If any citizen of the United States shall accept, claim, receive, or retain any title of nobility or honour, or shall without the consent of Congress, accept and retain any present, pension, office, or emolument of any kind whatever, from any emperor, king, prince, or foreign power, such person shall cease to be a citizen of the United States, and shall be incapable of holding any office of trust or profit under them, or either of them."-- Original 13th Amendment ratified in 1819. [Journal of the Senate]


You see, Attorneys (Attornies), Lawyers, Esquires swore an oath to the "Crown Templar Bar", i.e., they are the legal arm of the King and the Vatican. It is the equivalent of today's American Bar Association, which is a franchise of the Lawyer's Guild of Great Britain. Not much has changed today, where these franchised members of elite clubs with their secret oathes, are placed in control of nearly every office in the land, and hold a total monopoly on the legal system of this country.

As you are coming to learn, the U.S., and the entire world for that matter, is still under Roman Law, which is Babylonian Talmudic Law, Justinian Codes and Hammurabi's Code, known today in the U.S. as the Uniform Commercial Code. We are members of the ardu (slave) class, i.e., tenants, "subjects", or "citizens" (notice that the use of the word "citizen" changed under the 14th Amendment, the Amendment that placed us all under the Code by granting us privileges from a contracting party instead of Rights derived of God) of Rome. This whole system of charters, contracts, deeds, conveyances, bonds, feuds and corporations is Babylonian Code, which is essentially a secret law administered within conquered nations for the benefit of the conquering force that allows them to extract tribute. Just take a look at the words used in the contracts and charters that are mentioned above and then notice their definitions. It is an ingenious system of thievery by equity (chancery) contracts. It was used extensively by the Roman Empire for controlling her conquered subjects, and has been the supreme law of the land (not the Constitutional Bill of Rights) since the Civil War under Abraham Lincoln, who abolished Congress as a lawful Constitutional entity and established Martial (Justinian Code) Law. Today, Congress as well as our Judicial branch operate under the auspices of the Executive branch. This is why the flag of the Executive branch flies in our Courts of law (gold fringed flag.) Our Government as it is portrayed today, is nothing more than a hoax. We are taxed without representation, and subject to military subjugation.

First, there is novation, [taken from Roman Justinian Code] from the Latin, novatio. This concept did not exist in American law before Lincoln's War Against the States. Novation is the extinguishment of a prior debt by a new debt obligation. Today, this is done by a birth certificate when a baby's foot is placed thereon - before it touches the land. The certificate is then recorded at a County Recorder, sent to the Secretary of State in the State where the baby is born, exported to the Department of Commerce, and Bereau of Census and the process of converting a man's life , labor, and property to an asset of theUnited States government is in place. (Ever wonder how the government can be so deeply in debt and still remain solvent? You're the collateral!) Novation is not complete until the child -- as adult -- voluntarily assents to being a debtor, by submitting an application for a benefit, priviledge, immunity, or opportunity from any branch of martial law agency. It does not matter whether it's The Department of Motor Vehicles or, The Social Security Administration, the effect is the same. Novation converts a baby's life, liberty, labor, and property, to an asset of the United States, a Federal Corporation, and converts flesh and blood man or woman, created under substantive Law by God, to a persona, {15} i.e., a fiction. One is now living collateral for the debts of the United States corporation, who has entered into commerce for some benefit, priviledge, etc., from an imperial power, regulated by military law that benfits bondholders of the debt of the corporation.-- Alan Russel

There are some whom will undoubtedly ask why Lincoln did not import the civil law of Rome. The answer is, the idea of Roman civil (common) law is bogus because Rome was always under the god Mars, i.e., Martial law (Temple) and was always a military state in which the Roman Legions were used to expand and maintain control of Rome's insatiable commercial appetite on behalf of the Crown Temple God (Emperor, Mars,etc.). Haven't you ever wondered why you need a lawyer in order to have justice? Why can't the law be made accessible and understandable to the common man? This is because we live under Roman Justinian Code, a legal system that is often kept a secret from the public. We all have selected sections of the Constitution of the U.S. drilled into our skulls from the time we start Government school, but we never learn about the commercial Codes that actually rule and control our lives.

See definitions of Esquire and Attorney.

__________________
\"If one understands that socialism is not a share-the-wealth program, but is in reality a method to consolidate and control the wealth, then the seeming paradox of super-rich men promoting socialism becomes no paradox at all. Instead, it becomes logic...
Reply With Quote
 


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Was Hitler a "British" Agent? Insider Alternate History 26 07-28-2008 04:02 AM
United States Still A British Colony ??? Jimbo New World Order operatives 12 10-27-2007 08:55 PM
British Drivers - Another bone Yeoshua General Conspiracy Discussion 16 02-12-2007 06:32 PM
British Isreal World Federation redrat11 Share the knowledge 0 11-20-2005 02:35 AM
where does the idea of 'British Israelism' come from? Thumper General Conspiracy Discussion 1 10-18-2005 04:01 AM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:58 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.12
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.