Go Back   Club Conspiracy Forums > General Conspiracy Discussion > General Conspiracy Discussion
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-12-2007, 11:52 PM
CB_Brooklyn CB_Brooklyn is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 26
Default US District Court Unseals Second 9/11 'Inside Job' Case


US District Court Unseals Second 9/11 ‘Inside Job’ Case

Developments regarding Dr Judy Wood, a former Professor of Mechanical Engineering from Clemson University, and Dr Morgan Reynolds, the former Chief Economist of the US Department of Labor. Both Wood and Reynolds are represented by mainstream attorney Jerry Leaphart.


Those following developments in 9/11 “inside job” legal proceedings are aware that the US District Court in Southern New York unsealed a complaint filed by Dr Morgan Reynolds against private contractors hired by the government. This lawsuit alleges that the contractors supplied bogus analyses for the NIST Report of an aluminum airplane with a plastic nosecone gliding through a steel and concrete building . Information pertaining to this lawsuit, including a PDF of the unsealed complaint, can be found on Reynolds website:
http://nomoregames.net/index.php?page=911&subpage1=federal_case


More recently however, September 12, 2007 to be exact, the Southern New York District Court unsealed a second “inside job” case. This second complaint was filed by Dr Judy Wood against the same private contractors, alleging the World Trade Center was destroyed by Directed Energy Weapons (DEW), and not airplane strikes, jet fuel fires, or gravity. Wood’s unsealed complaint is available here (in the Qui Tam section): http://drjudywood.com/articles/NIST/Qui_Tam_Wood.html

Dr James Fetzer, the founder of Scholars for 9/11 Truth, interviewed Dr Wood and Mr Leaphart on his October 11th Dynamic Duo radio show to discuss the new unsealed complaint. An MP3 of this broadcast is downloadable at this link: http://tinyurl.com/3dmpqo

Dr Fetzer also submitted a press release for this wonderful news. Read it and learn that NIST admitted to Dr Wood (in writing) that they did not analyze the “collapse” of the towers!
http://www.opednews.com/articles/opedne_jim_fetz_071011_9_2f11_scholar_files__22.ht m


One of the Defendants, Applied Research Associates (ARA), is a manufacturer of directed energy weapons :
http://drjudywood.com/articles/ARA/ARA.html

ARA is also a Silver Level Founding Sponsor of the Directed Energy Professional Society (DEPS). Founded in 1999, DEPS put out their first newsletter one year before 9/11, containing the following excerpt:

"Lasers in space, lasers in the stratosphere, lasers
on and over the battlefield - we're at the
beginning of an evolutionary new wave of
weaponry."

http://www.deps.org/DEPSpages/graphics/wavefront2.pdf



Dr Wood has also discovered that the "Capabilities - National Defense and Aerospace" section of ARA's website contains an image depicting a simulation with the following characteristics:

1. A building (in the foreground) having damage similar to that of WTC 6 and the Murrah Building in OK City.

2. A building (behind the red building) with the same cosmetic design as WTC 3.

3. A building (in the background) turning to dust similar to the Twin Towers.

Here's the image:



See pages 3 and 4 of Dr Wood’s Appeal to NIST for information regarding that photo:
http://drjudywood.com/articles/NIST/NIST_WoodAppeal.html

Here are pages 3 and 4:






Those skeptical of the directed energy weapon theory often ask how such a weapon could eject steel beams horizontally from the towers, as seem in some of the videos and photographs. Dr Wood says the DEW didn’t destroy the towers itself, but instead activated chemical clouds that were released from within the buildings; much like how light activates photographic film. Dr Wood has discovered photographic evidence of these chemical clouds coming from the towers, as well as WTC 7:
http://drjudywood.com/articles/dirt/dirt5.html
http://drjudywood.com/articles/dirt/WTC7.html




The Evidence for Directed Energy Weapons is Very Strong!


**Let's take this Vertical Cut on WTC 4 as an example.
The building material on the other side of the cut is "missing".
Where'd it go?



**Has anyone noticed... the WTC 4 cut is in the same path as the South Tower's north wall?
The South Tower is also "missing".



**How about these Cylindrical Holes in WTC 5 and WTC 6?
What, if not a beam weapon, could make these?



**How about this video of the Steel Core Turning to Dust and trickling down?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jVRh4U2BlhQ


**What type of weapon could destroy car engine blocks, yet leave unexploded gas tanks?



**This police car looks too weird.



**These cleanup workers certainly look puzzled.
What happened here?



**About 20 minutes before the South Tower is destroyed, the FAA orders all aircraft to land.
Two minutes after the North Tower is destroyed, the FAA allows military craft back up.
Why?




One must wonder... where did the towers go?


Look at these two comparisons. What happened?





Drs Wood and Reynolds have filed legal challenges, which provides an excellent opportunity for a new investigation.
They deserve our full support.

Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
U.S. District Court Unseals 9/11 "Inside Job" Case CB_Brooklyn General Conspiracy Discussion 15 08-30-2007 07:05 AM
the case of johnny gosch General Conspiracy Discussion 5 09-13-2006 02:09 PM
Fury as 75 academics claim 9/11 was 'inside job' SeC Opinions 4 09-06-2006 12:17 PM
Case for Christ Stranger Opinions 2 09-03-2006 09:40 PM
Just another case of combat fatigue? freeman What is really going on? 1 08-15-2005 08:39 AM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:54 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.12
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.