Go Back   Club Conspiracy Forums > General Conspiracy Discussion > New World Order > New World Order operatives
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 05-19-2009, 04:24 AM
aussietinfoilhat aussietinfoilhat is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 30
Default Re: BANNED


Your original post listed 'tolerance', I was about to comment that one should NEVER tolerate the infringement of humans inaliable rights to freedom of belief and expression, and freedom of expression is no excuse for religious vilification.

Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 05-19-2009, 01:20 PM
Darth Cacodaemon Darth Cacodaemon is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 179
Default Re: BANNED

Quote:
Originally Posted by Shadow View Post
roscoe,

That poster is a bigger idiot than our very own BlueIdiot here.
Shadow, be nice to BlueAngel. She is a very sick woman, and suffers from D.I.D and also Schizophrenia.
She can't help it that her severe mental illness causes her to be delusional and hallucinate.
Best we can do is to urge her to go for mental health help and get on some anti-psychotic medicines. I fear that if she does not, she will continue her slide into a state of insane dementia.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 05-19-2009, 01:26 PM
Darth Cacodaemon Darth Cacodaemon is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 179
Default Re: BANNED

Quote:
Originally Posted by aussietinfoilhat View Post
Your original post listed 'tolerance', I was about to comment that one should NEVER tolerate the infringement of humans inaliable rights to freedom of belief and expression, and freedom of expression is no excuse for religious vilification.
Sure it is, and I will do it now :JESUS SUCKS & YHWH IS A HOMO
I hope I didn't leave anyone out..Oh yeah:

BUDDHA BLOWS DONKEYS, ALLAH IS MORON, CONFUCIUS WAS A RETARD.
I realize this isn't "politically correct", but then I don't give a damn. All the Allah freaks, Jesus jumpers, Yhwh fruits, Confucius crackpots can go blow a donkey if they don't like it.

HA HA HA MORONS!!

Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 05-19-2009, 06:03 PM
BlueAngel BlueAngel is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 10,799
Default Re: BANNED

Quote:
Originally Posted by aussietinfoilhat View Post
Your original post listed 'tolerance', I was about to comment that one should NEVER tolerate the infringement of humans inaliable rights to freedom of belief and expression, and freedom of expression is no excuse for religious vilification.
You're right.

Freedom of Expression is not an excuse for any type of vilification, but, unfortunately, we have to tolerate such or lose our freedoms.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 05-20-2009, 09:11 AM
Darth Cacodaemon Darth Cacodaemon is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 179
Default Re: BANNED

Quote:
Originally Posted by BlueAngel View Post
You're right.

Freedom of Expression is not an excuse for any type of vilification, but, unfortunately, we have to tolerate such or lose our freedoms.
I agree. But why not vilify?
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 05-26-2009, 12:37 AM
aussietinfoilhat aussietinfoilhat is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 30
Default Re: BANNED

Quote:
Originally Posted by BlueAngel View Post
You're right.

Freedom of Expression is not an excuse for any type of vilification, but, unfortunately, we have to tolerate such or lose our freedoms.
There is a drastic difference between tolerating and disregarding. The above post, as colourful as it was, was disregarded and not read entirely by me, and I disregarded that users opinion based on the fact they can't show respect enough to others to deserve the respect of others reading their words.

To tolerate it means to let it go on without any detriment, the detriment in this scenario is being ignored and considered immature.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 05-26-2009, 12:43 AM
BlueAngel BlueAngel is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 10,799
Default Re: BANNED

Quote:
Originally Posted by aussietinfoilhat View Post
There is a drastic difference between tolerating and disregarding. The above post, as colourful as it was, was disregarded and not read entirely by me, and I disregarded that users opinion based on the fact they can't show respect enough to others to deserve the respect of others reading their words.

To tolerate it means to let it go on without any detriment, the detriment in this scenario is being ignored and considered immature.
Sorry, but there isn't a drastic difference between tolerating and disregarding.

Minimal, at best.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 05-26-2009, 12:45 AM
aussietinfoilhat aussietinfoilhat is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 30
Default Re: BANNED

I disagree. So does the dictionary.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 05-26-2009, 12:55 AM
BlueAngel BlueAngel is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 10,799
Default Re: BANNED

Quote:
Originally Posted by aussietinfoilhat View Post
I disagree. So does the dictionary.
The operative word would be "drastic" and if you look that one up in the dictionary there would be no disagreement as to your original post that "tolerance" and "disregarding" are "DRASTIC" differences.

Tolerance and disregarding are not DRASTIC differences.

Last edited by BlueAngel : 05-26-2009 at 01:03 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 05-26-2009, 01:05 AM
aussietinfoilhat aussietinfoilhat is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 30
Default Re: BANNED

The end result is drastic in difference. One puts losers in their place by shunning them until they learn to not act like socially retarded maggots, the other allows them to carry on behaving inappropriately.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Has TB Been Banned? freddy Opinions 3 03-09-2009 10:24 PM
Banned Mastercard commercial Lounge 0 08-27-2006 05:14 PM
Banned from DU! Minuteman General Conspiracy Discussion 0 03-17-2006 04:32 PM
US government is banned from Wikipedia for altering facts SeC Opinions 0 02-01-2006 04:32 PM
Has anyone else been banned from a major board for posting too many conspiracy threads? Thumper General Conspiracy Discussion 6 09-07-2005 06:24 PM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:59 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.12
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.