Go Back   Club Conspiracy Forums > General Conspiracy Discussion > New World Order > New World Order operatives
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 05-20-2009, 09:11 AM
Darth Cacodaemon Darth Cacodaemon is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 179
Default Re: BANNED


Quote:
Originally Posted by BlueAngel View Post
You're right.

Freedom of Expression is not an excuse for any type of vilification, but, unfortunately, we have to tolerate such or lose our freedoms.
I agree. But why not vilify?

Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 05-26-2009, 12:37 AM
aussietinfoilhat aussietinfoilhat is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 30
Default Re: BANNED

Quote:
Originally Posted by BlueAngel View Post
You're right.

Freedom of Expression is not an excuse for any type of vilification, but, unfortunately, we have to tolerate such or lose our freedoms.
There is a drastic difference between tolerating and disregarding. The above post, as colourful as it was, was disregarded and not read entirely by me, and I disregarded that users opinion based on the fact they can't show respect enough to others to deserve the respect of others reading their words.

To tolerate it means to let it go on without any detriment, the detriment in this scenario is being ignored and considered immature.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 05-26-2009, 12:45 AM
aussietinfoilhat aussietinfoilhat is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 30
Default Re: BANNED

I disagree. So does the dictionary.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 05-26-2009, 01:05 AM
aussietinfoilhat aussietinfoilhat is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 30
Default Re: BANNED

The end result is drastic in difference. One puts losers in their place by shunning them until they learn to not act like socially retarded maggots, the other allows them to carry on behaving inappropriately.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 05-26-2009, 01:12 AM
aussietinfoilhat aussietinfoilhat is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 30
Default Re: BANNED

I'll take that as a sign of partial enlightenment.

However, I have to comment--and I mean no disrespect in this--I've noticed you can't help but have the last word on any thread you post on, even when that last word is, as above, irelevant and uneccesary. Is there some reason for this that I, as a new poster, should be aware of?

At first I thought you were just a troll, but this seems to be more on a pathological level, where you have a need to consume the proverbial 'other', and on consumption the cycle continues.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 05-26-2009, 01:27 AM
aussietinfoilhat aussietinfoilhat is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 30
Default Re: BANNED

Thank you for clarifying. However as you said, you don't post irrelevant or uneccesary material, but I thought 'whatever' to be a redundant post and seemed to be a neccesary 'last word' type thing. My apologies if I read that wrong.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Banned Mastercard commercial Lounge 0 08-27-2006 05:14 PM
Banned from DU! Minuteman General Conspiracy Discussion 0 03-17-2006 04:32 PM
US government is banned from Wikipedia for altering facts SeC Opinions 0 02-01-2006 04:32 PM
Has TB Been Banned? freddy Opinions 2 12-11-2005 01:43 AM
Has anyone else been banned from a major board for posting too many conspiracy threads? Thumper General Conspiracy Discussion 6 09-07-2005 06:24 PM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:45 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.12
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.