THERE IS NO EVIDENCE! - Page 8

Out of the Box · #71 11-12-2009, 09:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by EireEngineer

I might have looked at it if you were not so insulting in your post.

Insulting? I don't see where he's insulting anyone....

Now, I'm personally not convinced that references to prior knowledge of 9/11 would be hidden in Hollywood films (the evidence is quite poor and why would anyone do such a thing, really?), but you could at least TRY to give an argument rather than just ignore the whole film just because you're supposebly offended....

revolution60 · #72 11-12-2009, 09:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by EireEngineer

I might have looked at it if you were not so insulting in your post.

what's insulting, is you WONT look and open your mind a bit more!

i did not address that post specificly to anyone in particular

i'm merely stating that if you at least have the courage to watch all of them, and then come to a sane conclusion, keeping in mind the actual odds of these occurrences actually happening by "pure coincidence"

please people...wake up seriously...

EireEngineer · #73 11-12-2009, 10:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by revolution60

what's insulting, is you WONT look and open your mind a bit more!

i did not address that post specificly to anyone in particular

i'm merely stating that if you at least have the courage to watch all of them, and then come to a sane conclusion, keeping in mind the actual odds of these occurrences actually happening by "pure coincidence"

please people...wake up seriously...

Nobody is asserting that anything that happened on 9/11 was pure coincidence, but we are debating the finer points of causation. Perhaps you need some coffee?

Out of the Box · #74 11-12-2009, 11:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by EireEngineer

Nobody is asserting that anything that happened on 9/11 was pure coincidence, but we are debating the finer points of causation.

Anyone who's done the research is aware of the fact that 9/11 was an inside job. It just makes no sense that various Hollywood films hinted at it several years before and the evidence for this is pathetic. IMO, it is these sort of claims that make honest and genuine skeptics (not the self-righteous "debunker" kind who don't listen to reason at all) shun the 9/11 truth movement. I wonder who first started making such claims....

EireEngineer · #75 11-12-2009, 12:30 PM

Its the conspiracy man....

Out of the Box · #76 11-12-2009, 12:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by EireEngineer

Its the conspiracy man....

What conspirators would throw hint after hint at the public via a mass medium like film? I have no doubts about 9/11 being an inside job, but this whole "Hollywood sent us hidden messages" crap simply makes no sense.

BlueAngel · #77 11-12-2009, 10:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by EireEngineer

Nobody is asserting that anything that happened on 9/11 was pure coincidence, but we are debating the finer points of causation. Perhaps you need some coffee?

I'm certain there are many people who assert that some of what happened on September 11, 2001 was pure coincidence.

Therefore, your statement that NOBODY is asserting that anything that happened on 9/11 was pure coincidence is inappropriate.

It would be more accurate if you indicated that "YOU" were not asserting that anything that happend on 911 was pure coincidence.

To summarize.

You should speak for yourself and not everyone else.

albie · #78 11-13-2009, 03:41 AM

>>please people...wake up seriously...

Please people...believe all manner of bs...seriously, my mommy made me wear a woman's fedora for three years. It had a FLOWER on it! We must end this tyranny.

Out of the Box · #79 11-13-2009, 03:59 AM

* yawn *

EireEngineer · #80 11-13-2009, 08:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BlueAngel

I'm certain there are many people who assert that some of what happened on September 11, 2001 was pure coincidence.

Therefore, your statement that NOBODY is asserting that anything that happened on 9/11 was pure coincidence is inappropriate.

It would be more accurate if you indicated that "YOU" were not asserting that anything that happend on 911 was pure coincidence.

To summarize.

You should speak for yourself and not everyone else.

OK, how about "Nobody here in this conversation between Outofthebox and Myself is saying that it is pure coincidence"? Would that make you happy, Ms Minge?