FACT: The Nazi Party is a puppet of the Elders of Zion and is still active in Guatemala.
Wrong. The Nazis were the greatest enemy the Elders of Zion had encountered since the French revolution and they were destroyed precisely for that reason.
Wrong. The Nazis were the greatest enemy the Elders of Zion had encountered since the French revolution and they were destroyed precisely for that reason.
Both comments represent an OPINION.
Therefore, neither can be considered as right or wrong.
Last edited by BlueAngel : 11-16-2009 at 08:18 PM.
Therefore, neither can be considered as right or wrong.
Wrong again. It's not a matter of opinion but a matter of historical accuracy. Either the Nazis were wilful puppets of the oligarchy or they were the greatest enemies the oligarchy has ever had. They can't have been both. In fact, both viewpoints are diametrically opposed.
Anyway, just check out era Nazi authors like Anton Zischka or Giselher Wirsing. At times, I felt I was reading a 21st century anti-NWO work when I was reading their work (that was surprisingly objective with regards to Jews), especially with respect to American imperialism. Nevertheless, this sort of literature is typical for Nazi Germany and it makes no sense they would publish material that explosive if they were just pawns of the oligarchy themselves.
Last edited by Out of the Box : 11-17-2009 at 01:53 AM.
Wrong again. It's not a matter of opinion but a matter of historical accuracy. Either the Nazis were wilful puppets of the oligarchy or they were the greatest enemies the oligarchy has ever had. They can't have been both. In fact, both viewpoints are diametrically opposed.
Anyway, just check out era Nazi authors like Anton Zischka or Giselher Wirsing. At times, I felt I was reading a 21st century anti-NWO work when I was reading their work (that was surprisingly objective with regards to Jews), especially with respect to American imperialism. Nevertheless, this sort of literature is typical for Nazi Germany and it makes no sense they would publish material that explosive if they were just pawns of the oligarchy themselves.
Wrong.
Just as your comment and the OP's comment are opinions, this also applies to the authors you have mentioned.
Just because you believe what they wrote in published books, doesn't make it fact.
Last edited by BlueAngel : 11-17-2009 at 10:32 PM.
Just as your comment and the OP's comment are opinions, this also applies to the authors you have mentioned.
Again = EITHER the Nazis were ENEMIES of the NWO or they were PART of the NWO. There is NO WAY both can be right, so it's not a matter of opinion but a matter of fact.
Logic really doesn't seem to be your cup of tea, I guess, but I wouldn't expect more from a Christian
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlueAngel
Just because you believe what they wrote in published books, doesn't make it fact.
It's not a matter of whether or not what was in those books is true. It's about the fact that they exposed the New World Order in a way reminiscent of Noam Chomsky, Alex Jones, Kevin MacDonald, David Duke and many other authors today. And unlike Alex Jones, their case was actually pretty strong.
Anyway, people can figure this out for themselves. Try finding some era Nazi books on British or American imperialism in a language you can read and you'll know what I'm talking about.
Again = EITHER the Nazis were ENEMIES of the NWO or they were PART of the NWO. There is NO WAY both can be right, so it's not a matter of opinion but a matter of fact.
I didn't say that both can be right.
I said that each is of their own opinion which makes neither right and/or wrong.
Obviously you have a reading comprehension problem.
It is not a matter of fact, as you say, but a matter of differing opinions.
This realism seems to escape you.
Logic really doesn't seem to be your cup of tea, I guess, but I wouldn't expect more from a Christian
Logic is my cup of tea and I have demonstrated such.
You, on the other hand, have demonstrated an inability to comprehend the written word.
That's why your rebuttal is lame.
So, you refer to me as a Christian because you have deemed in your own mind that a Christian is incapable of logical thinking.
This is all you've got?
Referring to me a a Christian, because, according to you, Christians are incapable of logical thinking.
I'm not a Christian, so, obviously, I am capable of logical thinking.
Thanks for proving my point.
It's not a matter of whether or not what was in those books is true. It's about the fact that they exposed the New World Order in a way reminiscent of Noam Chomsky, Alex Jones, Kevin MacDonald, David Duke and many other authors today. And unlike Alex Jones, their case was actually pretty strong.
It is a matter of whether or not what was in those books is true.
Again, logic seems to elude you.
You must be a Christian.
Anyway, people can figure this out for themselves. Try finding some era Nazi books on British or American imperialism in a language you can read and you'll know what I'm talking about.
Inside the box.
Last edited by BlueAngel : 11-18-2009 at 02:24 AM.
I didn't say that both can be right. I said each is of their own opinion which makes neither right and/or wrong.
If we can't both be right, that must mean either one of us must be wrong, capice?
When "conspiracy theorists" like yourself use logic this flawed, who needs "debunkers"?
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlueAngel
Logic is my cup of tea and I have demonstrated such.
Then why do you fail to apply the most basic forms of logic?
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlueAngel
So, do you think by inferring that I am a Christian, you have criticized me?
In the eye of rational people, yes. Christianity is a childishly primitive Jewish religion that is logically flawed in so many ways...
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlueAngel
Quote:
It's not a matter of whether or not what was in those books is true. It's about the fact that they exposed the New World Order in a way reminiscent of Noam Chomsky, Alex Jones, Kevin MacDonald, David Duke and many other authors today. And unlike Alex Jones, their case was actually pretty strong.
Anyway, people can figure this out for themselves. Try finding some era Nazi books on British or American imperialism in a language you can read and you'll know what I'm talking about.
Inside the box.
No it's not. It's called "RATIONALITY". You should try memorising that word and applying it.
Obviously, two differing opinions does not mean that one is right and one is wrong.
Do you not understand the definition of the word OPINION?
Obviously not.
Let me explain.
One person has one opinion and another person has a differing opinion.
This means that neither one can be proven to be right and/or wrong.
THEY ARE OPINIONS!!!
This is only true in case of moral issues or other issues that are mostly a case of preference or feeling. When you discuss historical facts (like in this case), two conflicting views imply that at least one is WRONG.
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlueAngel
When conspiracy theorists like yourself are so illogical who needs debunkers?
I'm applying pure mathematical logic. As a programmer, that's my job.
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlueAngel
You believe your opinions to be fact.
Breaking news.
Your opinions aren't fact.
With regards to historical events, I rely on evidence only. That makes my views factual. Other people may disagree with that, which makes discussion on the facts useful.
With regards to political views and religious views, it is of course a matter of personal opinion. That's a totally different playing field, though. I notice you're unable to keep those two apart.
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlueAngel
Your stance was that I was a Christian and, therefore, incapable of logical thinking.
Christianity has nothing to do with this topic.
Why did you feel it necessary to drag it in?
Most people I encounter showing as little understanding of basic logics as you've shown recently are either fundamentalist Christians and radical liberals.
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlueAngel
I suggest you try memorizing the words "RATIONAL and practice CRITICAL THINKING."
Critical thinking is the very foundation of my personal views, both with regards to historical facts and personal ideology.
10-19-2009, 03:59 AM
Re: Mammon-Ra: God of the Jews..(Money.)
Linear Mode
