Go Back   Club Conspiracy Forums > General Conspiracy Discussion > Science
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-28-2009, 02:05 PM
galexander galexander is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Bucks, UK
Posts: 405
Lightbulb The Theory of Relativity is Wrong.


These days it would appear that the Special Theory of Relativity was beyond any form of doubt however I have a theoretical proof that would strongly suggest that the theory is fundamentally flawed. Indeed the proof is so straight forward it is a wonder so many supposedly acute minds have previously overlooked it. The proof runs as follows :

If an observer with velocity v heads towards a beam of light one would have expected that the measurable velocity of the light beam would have been c + v. However according to the Special Theory of Relativity because time slows down and length decreases with velocity, the measured velocity of the beam would still be c. In other words a change in space and time for the observer slowed the new velocity of c + v back down to c again. However if the observer now heads in the opposite direction with the same velocity one would have expected that the measurable velocity of the beam without any relativistic effects, would now be c – v. But on this occasion a change in space and time for the observer would have to increase the measured velocity of light, the exact opposite of the case with c + v. But how could this be if time slows and length decreases with velocity, for the opposite to occur one would have expected that time would have needed to have speeded up and length increased? However both cannot be the case so therefore the speed of light could not remain constant when an observer’s velocity changed with respect to either magnitude or direction.

QED.


The origin of this scientific red herring lies with the famous (though some may perhaps argue infamous) Michelson-Morley experiment. It was conducted by the two Americans whom it was named after in 1887 in order to prove or disprove the existence of ‘aether’, the enigmatic substance thought to be contained in a vacuum upon which a light wave was able to move upon. The apparatus consisted of two beams of light meeting at right angles at an interferometer. If the Earth’s speed effected either of the velocities of the light beams then the interference pattern obtained would change. However it was found that the speed of the Earth about the Sun did not appear to effect the interference pattern in any way and it was upon this observation that Einstein based his Special Theory of Relativity.

However just the briefest look at the exact set-up of the apparatus used by Michelson and Morley clearly reveals that the experiment could never have worked anyway. Indeed the logic supporting it is so flawed it is a wonder that no-one appears to have ever noticed. The two light beams which meet at the interferometer first travel away from it and at equal distances are reflected back again to the same half-silvered glass it started from. However because each light beam exactly doubles back on itself each time, it is obvious what the light beam would have gained as a result of the Earth’s velocity in one direction, it would exactly lose on the way back again in the opposite direction, and vice versa. Indeed the experiment would never have proved or disproved the existence of the aether either.

Since the proof stated above clearly shows that the Special Theory of Relativity could never work, it must also be the case that a large part of the General Theory of Relativity is equally unsound since it is entirely based upon the Special Theory. As a consequence it would therefore appear that a significant part of twentieth century physics needs to be re-thought since the Theory of Relativity is intimately interwoven into it. Indeed Einstein’s theory is so well established these days that it is even included in many of the physics text books.

Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-03-2009, 03:53 AM
Out of the Box Out of the Box is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 518
Default Re: The Theory of Relativity is Wrong.

Check out EinsteinHoax.com.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-24-2009, 11:22 AM
JazzRoc JazzRoc is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: El Medano, Tenerife, Canary Isles
Posts: 104
Default Re: The Theory of Relativity is Wrong.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Out of the Box View Post
Check out EinsteinHoax.com.
That's very interesting. I'm thinking about it. Give me a year.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-31-2010, 11:44 PM
Pruner Man Pruner Man is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Kootenays BC Canada
Posts: 59
Default Re: The Theory of Relativity is Wrong.

Could the Theory be maybe relatively right?
Like not quite wrong?
sorta?}:
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-01-2010, 12:45 PM
JazzRoc JazzRoc is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: El Medano, Tenerife, Canary Isles
Posts: 104
Default Re: The Theory of Relativity is Wrong.

At the time that Einstein came along there were already big holes appearing in Newtonian physics and it is no secret that many brilliant minds were poring over them. Einstein was one of them and he made his contribution to it.

But to just sit and say so ignorantly that his contribution was not attributable to himself because others were also wondering about similar things though not able to prove it, is wacky. And the anti-Jewish undertones unspeakable.

The heart of relativity is actually not in the equation E = m c^2

The heart of it is, as I am sure most nuclear physicists know, in the space-time metric

s^2 = x^2 + y^2 + z^2 - (ct)^2
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-01-2010, 07:58 PM
Pruner Man Pruner Man is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Kootenays BC Canada
Posts: 59
Default Re: The Theory of Relativity is Wrong.

interesting vid on the concept
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-02-2010, 04:11 AM
JazzRoc JazzRoc is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: El Medano, Tenerife, Canary Isles
Posts: 104
Default Re: The Theory of Relativity is Wrong.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pruner Man View Post
I completely disagree. It's just a polemic snatching at the quantum world to spin up an imaginary friend. It's complete rubbish.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-03-2010, 10:48 AM
Pruner Man Pruner Man is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Kootenays BC Canada
Posts: 59
Default Re: The Theory of Relativity is Wrong.

Quote:
Originally Posted by JazzRoc View Post
I completely disagree. It's just a polemic snatching at the quantum world to spin up an imaginary friend. It's complete rubbish.
1 Corinthians 2:14 But the natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God: for they are foolishness unto him: neither can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 02-03-2010, 01:05 PM
JazzRoc JazzRoc is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: El Medano, Tenerife, Canary Isles
Posts: 104
Default Re: The Theory of Relativity is Wrong.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pruner Man View Post
1 Corinthians 2:14 But the natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God: for they are foolishness unto him: neither can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned
by modern atheists to be a controlling meme invented by a wild-eyed magic-mushroom-eating Essene scribe and approved later by a fifth-century convocation of priests to be a suitable aphorism to confer opprobium upon anti-religious thoughts at that time.

Such behaviour. being an attempt to overcome the natural ethos and morality evolved within primate social behaviour over the course of at least twenty million years, is of course DEEPLY, DEEPLY UNSPIRITUAL.

(Spits).
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 02-03-2010, 01:19 PM
Pruner Man Pruner Man is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Kootenays BC Canada
Posts: 59
Default Re: The Theory of Relativity is Wrong.

Quote:
Originally Posted by JazzRoc View Post
by modern atheists to be a controlling meme invented by a wild-eyed magic-mushroom-eating Essene scribe and approved later by a fifth-century convocation of priests to be a suitable aphorism to confer opprobium upon anti-religious thoughts at that time.

Such behaviour. being an attempt to overcome the natural ethos and morality evolved within primate social behaviour over the course of at least twenty million years, is of course DEEPLY, DEEPLY UNSPIRITUAL.

(Spits).
read and heed
or doubt and go without!
dumps]
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:28 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.12
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.