Are the Masons evil?

[BlueAngel]

Albert Pike explained in Morals & Dogma how the true nature of Freemasonry is kept a secret from Masons of lower degrees:

"The Blue Degrees are but the outer court or portico of the Temple. Part of the symbols are displayed there to the Initiate, but he is intentionally misled by false interpretations. It is not intended that he shall understand them; but it is intended that he shall imagine he understands them. Their true explication is reserved for the Adepts, the Princes of Masonry. The whole body of the Royal and Sacerdotal Art was hidden so carefully, centuries since, in the High Degrees, as that it is even yet impossible to solve many of the enigmas which they contain. It is well enough for the mass of those called Masons, to imagine that all is contained in the Blue Degrees; and whoso attempts to undeceive them will labor in vain, and without any true reward violate his obligations as an Adept. Masonry is the veritable Sphinx, buried to the head in the sands heaped round it by the ages. " 3

------------------------------------------------------------

WW3 - Morals and Dogma by Albert Pike

Excerpts:

The initiates are intentionally mislead by false interpretations...

It is intended that he (the initiates) shall IMAGINE he (the initiates) understands them...

Talk about mind control (deception).

[KSigMason]

Does anyone not get that Morals and Dogma has nothing to do with actual ritual of the Scottish Rite degrees? Its a supplement to them. His own personal thoughts.

Well this May I plan on joining the Scottish Rite, so first hand I'll experience this 'evil of Pike'.

[BlueAngel]

Originally Posted by KSigMason

Does anyone not get that Morals and Dogma has nothing to do with actual ritual of the Scottish Rite degrees? Its a supplement to them. His own personal thoughts.

Well this May I plan on joining the Scottish Rite, so first hand I'll experience this 'evil of Pike'.

We get it, but you don't.

Why?

Because you've been deceived.

WW3 - Morals and Dogma by Albert Pike

Excerpt:

While a prolific writer, Albert Pike is best known for his major work Morals and Dogma of the Ancient and Accepted Scottish Rite of Masonry. Published in 1871 (no ISBN), this massive volume consists of 861 pages and 32 Chapters, covering each of the 32 Degrees of Freemasonry.

[BlueAngel]

WW3 - Morals and Dogma by Albert Pike

Excerpt:

After Mazzini's death on March 11, 1872, Pike appointed Adriano Lemmi (1822-1896, 33rd degree Mason), a banker from Florence, Italy, to run their subversive activities in Europe. Lemmi was a supporter of patriot and revolutionary Giuseppe Garibaldi, and may have been active in the Luciferian Society founded by Pike. Lemmi, in turn, was succeeded by Lenin and Trotsky, then by Stalin. The revolutionary activities of all these men were financed by British, French, German, and American international bankers; all of them dominated by the House of Rothschild.

Between 1859 and 1871, Pike worked out a military blueprint for three world wars and various revolutions throughout the world which he considered would forward the conspiracy to its final stage in the 20th Century.

[KSigMason]

Maybe next you'll pull "evidence" for FreemasonryWatch.

[BlueAngel]

Originally Posted by KSigMason

Maybe next you'll pull "evidence" for FreemasonryWatch.

Maybe I will.

[stompk]

Originally Posted by KSigMason

Maybe next you'll pull "evidence" for FreemasonryWatch.

Why is it, that someone who is anti Mason, is never credible, according to acting Freekmasons?

[BlueAngel]

Originally Posted by stompk

Why is it, that someone who is anti Mason, is never credible, according to acting Freekmasons?

Obviosuly, you don't know the answer, so allow me, please.

Why would think that someone who is a Freemason would side with someone who is anti-Freemason?

It's like asking a Democrat to side with a Republican.

[galexander]

Originally Posted by BlueAngel

WW3 - Morals and Dogma by Albert Pike

Excerpt:

After Mazzini's death on March 11, 1872, Pike appointed Adriano Lemmi (1822-1896, 33rd degree Mason), a banker from Florence, Italy, to run their subversive activities in Europe. Lemmi was a supporter of patriot and revolutionary Giuseppe Garibaldi, and may have been active in the Luciferian Society founded by Pike. Lemmi, in turn, was succeeded by Lenin and Trotsky, then by Stalin. The revolutionary activities of all these men were financed by British, French, German, and American international bankers; all of them dominated by the House of Rothschild.

Between 1859 and 1871, Pike worked out a military blueprint for three world wars and various revolutions throughout the world which he considered would forward the conspiracy to its final stage in the 20th Century.

Sorry to butt in here BlueAngel but are you suggesting that Lenin was a Freemason?

I heard he was not and attempted to remove the Masons from Revolutionary Russia. Lenin described Freemasonry as a middle-class confidence trick.

I distrust any organisation (as everyone else should as well) that cannot openly state its aims and beliefs in public.

The best the Masons can ever say is.......oh its a charity.........or oh its a fraternity, brotherly love etc, etc.......

Well if that is all it is then why all the oaths of secrecy, the degrees and the ritual?

[KSigMason]

Originally Posted by stompk

Why is it, that someone who is anti Mason, is never credible, according to acting Freekmasons?

Well, the most obvious reason would be your name uncivil behavior (name calling), but another would be you are considered not credible as you pull from 2nd hand sources and usually post allegations that are based on lies or hoaxes.