Aliens would find us boring.

[BlueAngel]

Originally Posted by upagainstit

Commenting on your question at the bottom.

People may not be that unaware - they are mostly in different states.
Most people - may not fight it.(?)
Most people - may not have a hard time with it.
IMO

Found this site - that has - maybe all - of Ralph Waldo Emersons' - essays -
Site Map: Emerson Texts
pretty-well, all of his writings, are - what I see - as like-minded - from within.
Where he writes from.
However: he gives the impression that he is "over-ridden",
more than I am of mind to be.

Yes.

People are in different states of mind all the time.

That's normal.

However, you are stating that the "I" within the "me" of you is not one.

That is a totally different scenario.

That would indicate that you are not of one entity which is not the same as being in a different state of mind.

Tell us about it.

How and why did you separate/split?

[BlueAngel]

My assessment is that you are not of one entity.

Tell us about it.

How many of you are there and why?

I think the WHY is the most important question.

What caused you to separate?

[upagainstit]

Originally Posted by BlueAngel

Trust me, I don't need you to tell me to feel free to comment about anything and asking you for more clarity is futile.

Sounds to me as if you have an identity crisis going on.

Do you realize that "I" and "Me" are one in the same?

Obviously not.

They can't be separated, pal.

And, if they are, that means you are not one.

1) No identity crisis going on - directly - as far as I go. Not now, anyway.

2) No secret that - I and me - "would" be - one and the same.

3) You, do not see them, as separatable.

4) Correct, I am not "one".
Meaning: I am not "together" - as "one" - in myself.

[upagainstit]

Originally Posted by BlueAngel

If you are not the "I" in "me" than who are you?

Three?

I - am - the I - of "me".

[BlueAngel]

Originally Posted by upagainstit

1) No identity crisis going on - directly - as far as I go. Not now, anyway.

2) No secret that - I and me - "would" be - one and the same.

3) You, do not see them, as separatable.

4) Correct, I am not "one".
Meaning: I am not "together" - as "one" - in myself.

Correct.

"I" and "me" are one in the same and I would not see them as separate.

You do because you are not one in the same.

Yes.

I am correct.

You are not one; together.

Now.

Let's go from there.

Why are you more than one?

What happened?

[upagainstit]

Originally Posted by BlueAngel

Yes.

People are in different states of mind all the time.

That's normal.

Not what I was referring to.

However, you are stating that the "I" within the "me" of you is not one.

That is a totally different scenario.

That would indicate that you are not of one entity which is not the same as being in a different state of mind.

Tell us about it.

How and why did you separate/split?

I would not be - within me.
I would be me.
Me is not I.

That's right - I and me - are not - one and the same - in being.

I don't have anything to do with it - being so - with me - like this.
It's been done to me.
I - not me - is winning out. In the long run.

ps: you (BA) - and I - are not - in the same way. We are different.

[upagainstit]

Originally Posted by BlueAngel

My assessment is that you are not of one entity.

Tell us about it.

How many of you are there and why?

I think the WHY is the most important question.

What caused you to separate?

Your assessment is correct. I am not "one" in myself.

There is only - one - I. However - I am dubbed over.
More so - in past - than the present.

As far as I know, the reason for it, would be,
above and beyond us in being
wants to be there - instead of "ones self".
Wants to be in control - instead of - oneself.
Doesn't want to be - oneself - instead of our self, though.

[BlueAngel]

Originally Posted by upagainstit

I would not be - within me.
I would be me.
Me is not I.

That's right - I and me - are not - one and the same - in being.

I don't have anything to do with it - being so - with me - like this.
It's been done to me.
I - not me - is winning out. In the long run.

ps: you (BA) - and I - are not - in the same way. We are different.

Really?

You and I are not in the same way.

We are different.

GOSH.

I never would have thunk it.

Thanks for enlightening me.

[BlueAngel]

Originally Posted by upagainstit

Your assessment is correct. I am not "one" in myself.

There is only - one - I. However - I am dubbed over.
More so - in past - than the present.

As far as I know, the reason for it, would be,
above and beyond us in being
wants to be there - instead of "ones self".
Wants to be in control - instead of - oneself.
Doesn't want to be - oneself - instead of our self, though.

From what I gather, you have an ENTITY within yourself who wants to be in control of your core.

I suggest you seek psychological help.

Club Conspiracy nor myself are equipped to help you in this regard.

Good luck.

[upagainstit]

Originally Posted by BlueAngel

Correct.

"I" and "me" are one in the same and I would not see them as separate.

You do because you are not one in the same.

Yes.

I am correct.

You are not one; together.

Now.

Let's go from there.

Why are you more than one?

What happened?

I am not "really" more than one. I - would have to be - one.
I was "dubbed" over - along the lines of - a past life -
that was - already - being me - at times.
There was no - I was different of such past life - prior to, in the 1990's.
I have been - separate of - this past life - throughout this lifetime.
I am no longer - susceptible - to this past life - up front - anymore.

The reason for this - dubbing over - is so that - outside interests -
can over-ride me - in being.

These outside interests - want to - be what's there -
to do with - oneself being - instead of - oneself.
So that "they?" have control - instead of oneself.

Unknown what actually happened - that has led up to this.

I suspect - where ever we are from, historically - got vanquished.