Aliens May Exist But Contact Would Hurt Humans; Hawkings

[superted]

WRONG!

Perhaps FA would like to explain....

[BlueAngel]

Originally Posted by superted

WRONG!

Perhaps FA would like to explain....

Sorry, but I'm not wrong, you are.

Hence, the reason you have no rebattul other than to ask FA to respond.

When I'm right, I'm right and I'm right.

[superted]

No blue I just couldn't be bothered to explain my point a second time, it's so simple yet you didn't understand so I doubt re-explaining it again would make any difference.

I await FA to respond as once he agrees I'm right and your wrong, that's it! As knowing you we could go around in circles.

[BlueAngel]

Originally Posted by superted

No blue I just couldn't be bothered to explain my point a second time, it's so simple yet you didn't understand so I doubt re-explaining it again would make any difference.

I await FA to respond as once he agrees I'm right and your wrong, that's it! As knowing you we could go around in circles.

Obviously, whatever point you're trying to make is not making a point because there is no point.

[cbluemagica]

Originally Posted by The Poet

LONDON (AFP) Aliens may exist but mankind should avoid contact with them as the consequences could be devastating, British scientist Stephen Hawking warned Sunday.
"If aliens visit us, the outcome would be much as when Columbus landed in America, which didn't turn out well for the Native Americans," said the astrophysicist in a new television series, according to British media reports.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20100425/sc_afp


So what do you think?

i think? no i know! wouldnt you like to?

[FallaciesAbound]

Originally Posted by BlueAngel

I have no clue why you are of the opinion that the chances of an "alien" society being more advanced than we are is unlikely.

Care to back up your opinion with "scientific" facts?

Didn't think so.

Because, obviously, scientific facts about aliens do not exist and netiher do any "scientific" facts exist regarding whether or not they are more advanced than we are.

Speculation is all that exists regarding ET's.

If, as you believe, an alien society had to grow up in competitive conditions just as we have, what makes you believe they did not prevail in being more advanced than we are?

P.S. Hawkings is not the best person to answer any question about ET's and neither is anyone else on Planet Earth.

Reason?

Because there isn't anyone on Planet Earth who knows anything about ET's other than what has been "scientically" speculated which does not include FACT.

Reading comprehension is not your thing is it BA? I said that the combination of being more scientifically advanced AND, I repeat, AND benevolent seems unlikely. The combination of the two. Get it now?

[superted]

"Reading comprehension is not your thing is it BA? I said that the combination of being more scientifically advanced AND, I repeat, AND benevolent seems unlikely. The combination of the two. Get it now?"

Hey Blue, I believe that is called checkmate!

[FallaciesAbound]

I think so. God, how I hate when people mis-read or misinterpret my posts. Though I do occasionally do the former. Damn dyslexia lol.

[BlueAngel]

Reading comprehension is my thing and I've proven myself to be an expert at it.

[BlueAngel]

Originally Posted by superted

No blue I just couldn't be bothered to explain my point a second time, it's so simple yet you didn't understand so I doubt re-explaining it again would make any difference.

I await FA to respond as once he agrees I'm right and your wrong, that's it! As knowing you we could go around in circles.

Please, don't even attempt to explain it again.

It made no sense the first time and, I highly doubt it will make any sense the second or third time around.

Sorry, but I couldn't care any less that FA agrees with you and not me.

I don't go around circles.

I stop the circle jerk.