Keep Sundays Special, Conspiracy Theorists.

[BlueAngel]

Originally Posted by albie

I'm not going to go through all these points AGAIN. You can find the main arguments debunking ALL THESE POINTS on the internet. Go and have a look.

You will obviously NOT do this, as you don't want to spend a second debunking anything. I challenge you to do it. Spend a few hours DEBUNKING. It will open you eyes.

You have not gone through any points so if you do so now it will not be considered that you're doing it again.

I cannot search the web and find any main arguments debunking ALL THESE POINTS because you haven't provided any main arguments or any points.

Therefore, I would have no clue how to instigate a search.

Since you are the person who has stated that he has debunked all conspiracy theories regarding 911 and the government's version and has a version of his own which falls into the suspicious zone, the burden of proof falls in your lap and not mine.

I suggest that you spend a second providing the forum with information that debunks all that which you say you've debunked, because, thus far, you haven't spent a second debunking anything that you say you've debunked.

[albie]

So you are saying that you are not aware of the major points of contention within the 9/11 conspiracy world? Surely you must, being a mod on a conspiracy forum!

Take any of those points and try to debunk it. You will find debates on most of the major forums dealing with the subject.

[BlueAngel]

Originally Posted by albie

So you are saying that you are not aware of the major points of contention within the 9/11 conspiracy world? Surely you must, being a mod on a conspiracy forum!

Take any of those points and try to debunk it. You will find debates on most of the major forums dealing with the subject.

No.

That's not what I'm saying.

That's what you're saying.

I NEVER said such a thing.

I said I am unaware of any major points and/or main arguments that you say you've debunked because you haven't supplied any of the major points or main arguments that YOU say you've debunked.

Therefore, a web search cannot be instigated.

I don't visit any of the MAJOR forums and since this is a MAJOR forum, how 'bout you start a debate regarding this subject by telling us about the major points and main arguments that you say you've debunked regarding all 911 conspiracy theories and the government's version.

[albie]

9/11 is BORING. Going over the same points over and over again is BORING.

if you want my opinion then do as I say and go and google it. I've never seen a 9/11 discussion go anywhere exciting. It always ends in vagueness vs vagueness. Like most conspiracy discussions.

[jane doe]

Who was the american president who kept saying "a thousand points of light"?

[albie]

Analogy is no safe place to base an argument.

[jane doe]

Originally Posted by albie

Analogy is no safe place to base an argument.

arguments are unsafe. analogies are not places.

[BlueAngel]

Originally Posted by albie

9/11 is BORING. Going over the same points over and over again is BORING.

if you want my opinion then do as I say and go and google it. I've never seen a 9/11 discussion go anywhere exciting. It always ends in vagueness vs vagueness. Like most conspiracy discussions.

You haven't gone over any points about 911.

You just say that you have.

Just the same as you say you've debunked every 911 conspiracy theory and the government's version, but haven't.

How shall I google your opinion?

"What is albie's opinion of 911?"

I highly doubt I would find anything.

[BlueAngel]

Originally Posted by jane doe

arguments are unsafe. analogies are not places.

Arguments aren't unsafe.

[BlueAngel]

Originally Posted by jane doe

Who was the american president who kept saying "a thousand points of light"?

How 'bout you tell us.