Nine Eleven

[brice_fallsteen]

Originally Posted by BlueAngel

Look, pal.

There are two theories about 911.

(1) The terrorist organization Al Qaeda was responsible.

(2) The CIA terrorist organization Al Qaeda was responsible.

Learn this.

Thanks, friend.

Those are the only two theories about September 11th? In your research those are the only two theories that you've found? Wow, and here I thought it may be a little more complex than that. Just two theories.

And yes, I do feel the thread was veering off topic and tried to steer it back by discussing the September 11th pentagon episode of Conspiracy Theory with The Conspiracist. I assume there are other threads to discuss the JFK assassination and how mischievous the CIA may be.

[brice_fallsteen]

Originally Posted by BlueAngel

Yes.

There are two theories, as I stated, regarding the 911 attack.

I think your lifetime on this forum will be very short-lived.

Interesting. While I'm new to this conspiracy game, I've read several different theories on the September 11th attacks. While you COULD lump them into two very large groups...it makes it harder to identify and discuss the different aspects of each theory and neglects to give people all the information that's available to make their own informed decision.

Very akin to lumping every species into one kingdom and discussing only the kingdom...doesn't give a lot of detail.

[MOrbid_Desire]

Originally Posted by BlueAngel

Since you are new to this conspiracy game, we will forgive you for being ignorant.

There are two scenarios, as I said.

I will repeat.

(1) Al Qaeda was responsible for the 911 attack.

(2) The CIA's terrorist organization, Al Qaeda AND ISRAEL'S MOSSAD, was responsible for the 911 attack

Capice?

FYP

[brice_fallsteen]

So is it safe to assume, BlueAngel, that Israel's Mossad had nothing to do with the September 11th attacks since it doesn't fit in to your two wide swaths of conspiracy clumps.

[brice_fallsteen]

So where does the Mossad fit in to that? Is it an anti Israeli conspiracy to link them to the attacks?

[brice_fallsteen]

Originally Posted by BlueAngel

It is safe to assume that anyone who is a member of this forum and is capable of editing my post, will be banned.

Did he edit your post? It looks like he quoted you, and then made some changes in his post.

[brice_fallsteen]

This thread hasn't even managed to stay on topic for an hour. Would be handy if there were some moderators that moderated the threads and kept the discussion of September 11th Attacks open and encouraging to discussing all possible theories. See what's possible, plausible, if there's any evidence to support the claims. Ya know, get some where.

[brice_fallsteen]

Originally Posted by BlueAngel

Yes, dear.

He edited my post.

Hmm, maybe I need to refresh my cookies or something. Your post still looks the same way it did. On my workstation it looks as though he quoted your post, put that into his post, and then edited his own post.

[theconspiracist]

Originally Posted by brice_fallsteen

So you don't put much stock in what was on the show?

While he didn't have a lot of substantial evidence, I felt the pictures he showed and the absence of an airplane a lot more convincing than most theories that I've heard about the World Trade Center buildings.

Ok, Brice...correct me if I am wrong, but I don't believe that Jesse was the first to "alert" the media, and most American people about the fact (or theories) on the substantial evidence. There were many before him. I think he just "stole" it for publicy and used it to his benefit for his show. It's like me telling you one thing, and make it so believeable, then you (in general) take that, and use in other forms. Meaning, you "steal" it from me, and use for your own pleasure demise. That is what he does. I don't believe much into Jesse Ventura. To me, the former governor wanted pretty much to "if you can't fight them, you may as well as join them" approach. And, make a "show" out of it. You think he would ever surive an episode of "Suvivor"? I doubt it. He's just a showbiz, trying to make some dough. Just like everyone else in that spectrum (or in that field). JMO

[brice_fallsteen]

Originally Posted by theconspiracist

Ok, Brice...correct me if I am wrong, but I don't believe that Jesse was the first to "alert" the media, and most American people about the fact (or theories) on the substantial evidence. There were many before him. I think he just "stole" it for publicy and used it to his benefit for his show. It's like me telling you one thing, and make it so believeable, then you (in general) take that, and use in other forms. Meaning, you "steal" it from me, and use for your own pleasure demise. That is what he does. I don't believe much into Jesse Ventura. To me, the former governor wanted pretty much to "if you can't fight them, you may as well as join them" approach. And, make a "show" out of it. You think he would ever surive an episode of "Suvivor"? I doubt it. He's just a showbiz, trying to make some dough. Just like everyone else in that spectrum (or in that field). JMO

Awesome, I appreciate your opinion on the guy. I watched the fema/deathcamp/population control episode and it spurred me to start watching more and reading on the internet about a variety of theories. I'll watch it for entertainment and take it with a grain of salt :-)

I certainly won't argue that he throws a lot of showbiz in it, and I would assume getting sponsors and making a buck are high on his list of things to do.