Are the Masons evil?

[KSigMason]

Originally Posted by BlueAngel

OMG!

How awful!

They don't follow the same rules and don't have the same requirements and refuse to follow the traditions and allow atheists into their movements.

I say off with their heads!

That's a little extreme, I am content with them no receiving recognition, but to each his own I guess.

[JBoy]

baby mason boy:
Is PIKE a liar ??
Manly ???
BESANT....CROWLEY....Manson????? HITLER.....Son of sam ???

all evil as hell, as u are. a nobody no nothing gutter rat
i suppose i can gather ALL the names and ...and ofcourse, to u all liars, never was in the masons. how bizarres ur ???

[KSigMason]

Originally Posted by JBoy

baby mason boy:
Is PIKE a liar ??
Manly ???
BESANT....CROWLEY....Manson????? HITLER.....Son of sam ???

all evil as hell, as u are. a nobody no nothing gutter rat
i suppose i can gather ALL the names and ...and ofcourse, to u all liars, never was in the masons. how bizarres ur ???

Manly P Hall and Pike were Masons, but the rest you named are not. Sorry little boy.

[JBoy]

November 2, 2007

SAN FRANCISCO -- The LAPD and the Boy Scouts of America may not be held liable for alleged sexual abuse of teenage boys by a former police chief, the California Supreme Court ruled unanimously Thursday. The state high court said the alleged victims had failed to show that the LAPD and the scouting group knew or should have known that retired Deputy Police Chief David Kalish had committed sexual misconduct with other minors before he was accused by the teenagers. The decision clarified a law that permits victims of child abuse older than 26 to sue a molester's employer or organization if they can show the employer "knew or had reason to know or was otherwise on notice" of any sexual misconduct by the employee or volunteer. Without such evidence, a victim older than 26 is barred from suing by legal time limits.

[KSigMason]

Originally Posted by JBoy

November 2, 2007

SAN FRANCISCO -- The LAPD and the Boy Scouts of America may not be held liable for alleged sexual abuse of teenage boys by a former police chief, the California Supreme Court ruled unanimously Thursday. The state high court said the alleged victims had failed to show that the LAPD and the scouting group knew or should have known that retired Deputy Police Chief David Kalish had committed sexual misconduct with other minors before he was accused by the teenagers. The decision clarified a law that permits victims of child abuse older than 26 to sue a molester's employer or organization if they can show the employer "knew or had reason to know or was otherwise on notice" of any sexual misconduct by the employee or volunteer. Without such evidence, a victim older than 26 is barred from suing by legal time limits.

And what does this have to do with the Masons?

[JBoy]

Brain Dead !!!!

[KSigMason]

You assume too much little boy.

[JBoy]

You wish i was a "little boy", dont u ??

[JBoy]

Now, I cant be clearer....GOOD cops dont do this !!!
ONLY bad cops...ANYTHING bad has a stamp on it..MASONRY.
They rot everything they touch..then cesspools form..then sewer rats appear...real simple bird brain !!!

About 1.75 years later we now have 1,730 threads about cops committing sex offenses out of 10,431 total threads in the news section, which is about 16.6%. There are sure a lot of cops out there committing sex offenses. Most of the stories appear to be offenses committed against children. Cops must like them young. Maybe they resist less, and are easily manipulated by someone they are taught to look up too. Sworn officers of the law committing a sex offense against someone in custody appears to be on the rise. The person might have to perform a sexual act to get out of some traffic infraction, or perform sexual acts if they are already incarcerated for the sexual gratification of those in charge of their welfare.

Keep in mind that this is only the tip of the iceberg when it comes to reporting sex offenses committed by sworn officers of the law. I am only scanning a limited amount of these stories online, and lots more are missed. Please help out an post stories along with pictures of these officers in the Law Enforcement Sex Offender thread. They need to be exposed for the safety of the children. More often then not, their information won't appear on the various offender registries because SOL's tend to be a protected class of citizens even when they commit a sex crime. People can come here instead to find their information; although, they won't have a current address.

Please write and tell your representatives in government that cops must not be a protected class. Some legislators are trying to pass bills into law that would protect SOL's information from being displayed online. Supposedly it is to protect the SOL's and their families. However equal protection of the law should apply to everyone, and cops shouldn't become a protected class when displaying information. Especially when SOL's are so eager to display information about you online if you have been convicted of a crime. In some cases, such as in Ohio, you don't even have to be convicted of the crime for your information to appear online.

Read about all the sex abuses in this forum
http://www.copwatch.net/forums/foru...?s=&forumid=108

[JBoy]

Stop child abuse and perverted Masons