Family of US Muslim who killed 14 says they don't believe official account of the massacre and even suggest the Sandy Hook slaying didn't take place
By Ben Ashford In San Bernardino For Dailymail.com and Nick Enoch for MailOnline10:31 04 Dec 2015, updated 20:02 04 Dec 2015
A lawyer representing the family of San Bernardino gunman Syed Farook has questioned accounts of the massacre which saw Farook and his wife, Tashfeen Malik kill 14 at a holiday party on Wednesday morning.
Attorney David Chesley said they doubted the accuracy of information released by the police and FBI.*
Farook, 28, and his Pakistan-born wife Malik, 27, died in a gun battle with police after the mass shooting at the Inland Regional Center.
To illustrate his point, Chesley made a bizarre reference to the Sandy Hook massacre, suggesting it didn't take place as described in the official narrative.*
'There have been suggestions that it may be something that was related to their work, that somehow he was a disgruntled employee,' he said.*
'But it doesn't seem plausible to us that this petite woman [Malik] would be involved in this sort of hyper-caricatured, Bonnie and Clyde crazy scenario.*
'There were a lot of questions drawn with Sandy Hook and whether or not that was a real incident or not.*
'But I mean obviously these things were found there, how they got there we don't know.'*
The Sandy Hook shootings occurred in December 2012, when gunman Adam Lanza, 20, shot his way into the front entrance of the school in Newtown, Connecticut, which was locked at the time, and killed 20 children and six teachers, then shot himself to death.
When Chesley was asked if he doubted the events of Sandy Hook, he said: 'There has been a lot speculation about it is all I would say.
Active shooter drills carried out EVERY MONTH at San Bernardino Inland Regional Center... staff tweeted 'drill started' as police raid began
Thursday, December 03, 2015
by*Mike Adams, the Health Ranger
NaturalNews) Get this: The location where the shooting was carried out today in San Bernardino -- the Inland Regional Center -- has been subjected to*monthly active shooter drills, we're now learning.
This adds even more evidence to the notion that this may be a*staged false flag event*to provide Obama justification for outlawing private firearms ownership among law-abiding citizens.
From the*LA Times:
At the Inland Regional Center, where she's a nurse, the staff works with clients and parents of clients who are sometimes angry. They have active-shooter drills every month or so.
"Drill started," she texted her husband, Mark, around 11 a.m.
She walked to a window nearby and filmed a video as law enforcement sprinted toward the building.
Astronomically unlucky shooters?Yes, this woman actually texted, "Drill started." She recognized the pattern of movement that law enforcement has drilled countless times before. It's the same thing they've been drilling for*every single month.
California Shooter studied at Al-Huda institute: teacher
AFP*—*UPDATED*DEC 07, 2015*02:05PM
Tashfeen Malik, 29, studied at the Al-Huda Institute in Multan, which admits middle-class women and also has offices in the US, the UAE, India and the UK, the teacher at the teaching centre who gave her name only as Muqadas said.
"It was a two-year course, but she did not finish it," the teacher Muqadas said. "She was a good girl. I don't know why she left and what happened to her."
The teacher did not say when Malik studied at the Al-Huda institute, but fellow classmates at the Bahauddin Zakariya University said she had attended the institute after classes at the university, which she attended from 2007-2013.
Secretive “Khawlah Division” Warned Behind*San Bernardino*Massacre; More Attacks Warned To Follow
A very concerning Federal Security Services (FSB) report circulating in the Kremlin today states that the 2 December*San Bernardino massacre*that killed 14 innocent people was carried out by a secretive Islamic “woman only” combat organization known as the “Khawlah Division” having roots in Pakistan, and*funded by Saudi Arabia,*which Federation intelligence analysts had sent a “SECRET/URGENT” warning about on 27 November to both the United States and Thailand—and which the*warning to Thailand was, briefly, made public.
Supreme Court rejects challenge to assault weapon ban
Lawrence Hurley1 hr ago
WASHINGTON, Dec 7 (Reuters) - The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday rejected a challenge by gun rights activists to a Chicago suburb's ordinance banning assault weapons and large-capacity magazines, handing a victory to gun control advocates amid a fierce debate over the nation's firearms laws.
The 2013 ordinance passed by the city of Highland Park, Illinois will remain in place. By opting not to hear an appeal of a lower-court ruling that upheld the measure, the justices declined to take up what would have been a high-profile gun rights case following a succession of mass shootings including the one last week in San Bernardino, California.
The Highland Park measure bans various semi-automatic weapons, including well-known guns such as the AR-15 and AK-47, in addition to magazines holding more than 10 rounds of bullets.
Two conservatives on the nine-member court, Clarence Thomas and Antonin Scalia, said the justices should have taken the case.
Thomas wrote a six-page dissent in which he said that despite recent pro-gun rights rulings by the conservative-leaning high court, several lower courts "have upheld categorical bans on firearms that millions of Americans commonly own for lawful purposes."
The U.S. Constitution's Second Amendment guarantees the right to bear arms, but there is a longstanding legal debate over its scope.
Semi-automatic rifles are popular, with the vast majority of owners using them for lawful purposes, Thomas said. "Under our precedents, that is all that is needed for citizens to have a right under the Second Amendment to keep such weapons," he said.
'A SECOND-CLASS RIGHT'
In April, the Chicago-based 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals rejected the challenge to Highland Park's ordinance. Thomas said the high court should have heard the appeal of that ruling in order to prevent that appeals court "from relegating the Second Amendment to a second-class right."
The plaintiffs were gun owner Arie Friedman, a pediatrician, and the Illinois State Rifle Association. The National Rifle Association, the influential gun rights group, and 24 U.S. states urged the high court to hear the case.
The Supreme Court has not taken up a major gun case since 2010. In the 2008 District of Columbia v. Heller case, the court held for the first time that the Second Amendment guaranteed an individual right to bear arms, but the ruling applied only to firearms kept in the home for self-defense. Two years later, in the case McDonald v. City of Chicago, the court held that the earlier ruling applied to the states.
In defending the ban, Highland Park's lawyers noted that it was enacted "following a series of tragic mass shootings across the nation" including the 2012 shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Connecticut in which 20 young pupils and six adults were killed.
They also pointed out that seven states, including California and New York, have similar laws on the books.
A nationwide assault weapons ban law expired in 2004 when the bitterly divided U.S. Congress failed to renew it, with many Republicans opposing gun control measures. The federal law had barred the manufacture and sale of semi-automatic guns with military-style features as well as magazines holding more than 10 rounds of ammunition.
In his speech to the nation on Sunday night, President Barack Obama noted that the husband-and-wife shooters who killed 14 people in San Bernardino had stockpiled assault weapons and ammunition. Obama called for new limits on assault weapons.
Obama’s Planned Gun Control Regulations to be Incrementally Imposed After the Holidays
by Dave Hodges
According to my sources, Obama will ultimately implement the following gun control regulations, mostly through a series of Executive Orders.
1.Tax ammunition into oblivion and encourage the prosecution of gun manufacturers and bullet producers for shootings using their products. This is a given and will be rolled out very early in the form of an Executive Order.
2.The Federal government will purchase as much ammunition as possible in order to create shortages, thus, driving up the price of ammunition.
3.The prohibition of purchasing a gun in one state and transporting that same gun across state lines.
4.New Federal regulations which will permit, without a warrant, any civil authority to enter a home of a registered gun owner to check for gun safety when it comes to the “proper” storage of guns. Said gun can be confiscated and the owner will be subject to arrest and fines if a gun does not meet governmental storage regulations. The new regulations will be devised to prevent one from using the gun in a moment’s notice.
5.There is discussion among DoJ officials about limiting how guns, in the aggregate, that can be stored in one geographic area. This will amount to gun rationing.
6.Gun owners will eventually be required to attend and pass gun safety courses in the same manner as one renews their drivers license. This will, again, drive up the cost of owning a gun.
From Gods' mind to your Computer Screen. In what will perhaps be the most "Crucial Year" in all of American History, Regarding the 2nd Amendment, and indeed the very Document that gives freedom to Americans, The United States Constitution!
I won't beat around the bush here, IF HILLARY CLINTON IS ELECTED PRESIDENT in 2016, you can pretty much kiss those FREEDOMS away permanently under a NEW WORLD ORDER Government. It means that she will more than likely appoint 3, possibly 4, Supreme Court Justices to the Court of all Courts. This means that what you have witnessed under the dictatorship of Barack Obama, will be childs play by comparison under her dictatorship over America. WACO come to mind???
Bloomberg-backed group presents gun safety proposal to White House
By ARDEN FARHI, STEPHANIE CONDON CBS NEWS November 12, 2015, 6:00 AM
After a gunman killed nine people at an Oregon community college in early October, President Obama made a familiar walk to the White House briefing room to express sadness and outrage over another mass shooting.
"Somehow this has become routine. The reporting is routine. My response here at this podium ends up being routine. The conversation in the aftermath of it. We've become numb to this," President Obama said, citing the proliferation of guns as a root cause of mass shootings.
It was the eleventh such statement of his presidency.
A false flag formula is becoming readily apparent in the face of so many mass shootings and bombings in the US. The phenomenon has become so commonplace in the last 3 years that it’s becoming more American than apple pie. According to ShootingTracker.com, there have been 353 mass shootings in the USA for 2015 so far. However, as scary as that number is, the good news is that you don’t have to be afraid of them like you may think. A very large number of them – and all of them with any mass media significance and attention – are false flag staged terror events.
Some have real victims, some do not, but either way, the most criminal of all institutions – the Government – is the orchestrating force behind them. They are scripted, pre-planned operations which are definitely not the result of random gun violence. Just as Obama stated (by hiding the truth in plain sight), there is a pattern behind these mass shootings. The Controllers are following a definite false flag formula. Below is a list of the top 15 elements of this formula, which you can now use to detect a false flag operation as it occurs:
False Flag Formula #1: Drill at the Same or Nearby Time and Place
The exercise or drill – at the same time, at the same place – has became the sine qua non or indispensable element of the recent false flag operation. Sometimes there are slight variations on this when the Government plans a drill nearby (a few miles away) rather than at the exact place, or plans a drill earlier on in the day, so it can just coincidentally “go live”. There was a twist in the case of the recent San Bernardino shooting: the Government planned regular drills in the building where the shooting took place every month! (Think about it – what are the chances of a real mass shooting occurring in a building used for mass shooting drills?)
As Captain Eric H. May, a former US Army military intelligence officer, stated:
The easiest way to carry out a false flag attack is by setting up a military exercise that simulates the very attack you want to carry out.
In the case of 9/11, there were no less than 46 drills occurring simultaneously during the event, according to Webster Tarpley, author of Synthetic Terror: Made in USA. In the case of the London 7/7 bombings, Peter Power admitted on radio that he was leading a team who were training for that exact scenario when it unfolded! There were active shooter drills in all of the false flag attacks of Sandy Hook, Boston Marathon, Charleston, San Bernardino, the Norway attack, the 2nd Paris attack of 2015 and many many more.
What’s the point of having a drill at the same time and place? Here are a few of its purposes:
Distract and remove key personnel who would otherwise be at the scene to contain and investigate it;
Confuse other personnel who will treat the whole event in a different way if they think it is a drill rather than a real event;
Slow down, reduce or eliminate an effective response, especially of police and other law enforcement, given the removal and confusion of personnel;
Distract and confuse witnesses, the media and the public in general;
Provide a great cover and period of lower defenses and security to carry out an attack, which would otherwise be difficult or impossible if defenses were at their usual or optimal operating level.
It is America's most powerful police force--made up of an elite team of Special Agents secretly patrolling the nation--and the world. While its patriotic mission is public knowledge, the FBI's tactics are classified. We'll go undercover to reveal the secret training, special operations and state-of-the-art tools used in today's 21st century crime fighting. How far can the FBI go to prevent crime and protect Americans? What are ghost agents, and how are they used for undercover surveillance? Who is the most notorious double agent? How has the internet changed the way the FBI works? While its global reach and sophisticated technology helps keep America safe, the FBI's greatest strength is its ability to keep its crime fighting tactics secret...until now.
THE FBI AND SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER KNEW IN ADVANCE ABOUT THE OKLAHOMA CITY BOMBING
DECEMBER 16, 2015 COACH COLLINS 5 COMMENTS
By Doug Book, editor
In a January 5th 1996 teletype to select FBI field offices, FBI Director Louis Freeh revealed that the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC), the far-left group founded by civil rights lawyer Morris Dees, had an informant living in Elohim City, a white supremacist compound whose inhabitants have been closely linked to the Oklahoma City bombing.
The Freeh teletype also revealed that Tim McVeigh, executed in 2001 for the murder of 168 people in Oklahoma City, had telephoned Elohim City asking that German national Andreas Strassmeir provide more assistance in completing the bomb which devastated the Alfred P. Murrah building. The call took place on April 17 of 1995, 2 days before the bombing.
The teletype makes it clear that the FBI had prior knowledge of the bombing plot and the SPLC had at least one informant on the inside. This individual has never been publicly identified. Neither is it known whether he reported to the FBI, to SPLC founder Morris Dees or to both.
THE SAN BERNARDINO SHOOTING – What Really Happened Behind The Scenes?
DECEMBER 13, 2015 BY SHAWN HELTON 42 COMMENTS
The latest media driven shooting attack said to have taken place in San Bernardino, California over a week ago now – and still there’s a growing list of details that don’t add up.
After a week of whitewashed reports, a media scripted ransacking of the alleged ‘shooters’ home (tampering with a potential crime scene) and eyewitness accounts that contradict the official narrative, we also learn that in the very room where 14 people were reportedly killed (along with 21 injured) during a deadly shooting attack at the Inland Regional Center, there was an “active-shooter” training drill involving some of the victims almost a year before the attack.
Here’s what doesn’t add up…
WITNESS SAYS PARIS ATTACKERS WERE CLEAN SHAVEN WHITE MEN IN A NEW MERCEDES-BENZ
Published: November 18, 2015
Share | Print This
According to witness testimony that has been mostly overlooked by the international media, the attackers were described as clean-shaven white men who were driving a brand-new black Mercedes-Benz.
According to the UK’s Mirror, an eyewitness by the name of Mahoud Admo said that he witnessed the initial drive by shooting, and saw the attackers without masks as they passed by in Mercedes-Benz calmly firing machine guns into the crowd.
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
2nd Amendment Annotations
Prior to the Supreme Court's 2008 decision in District of Columbia v. Heller,1 the courts had yet to definitively state what right the Second Amendment protected. The opposing theories, perhaps oversimplified, were (1) an "individual rights" approach, whereby the Amendment protected individuals' rights to firearm ownership, possession, and transportation; and (2) a "states' rights" approach, under which the Amendment only protected the right to keep and bear arms in connection with organized state militia units.2 Moreover, it was generally believed that the Amendment was only a bar to federal action, not to state or municipal restraints.3
However, the Supreme Court has now definitively held that the Second Amendment protects an individual's right to possess a firearm unconnected with service in a militia, and to use that weapon for traditionally lawful purposes, such as self-defense within the home. Moreover, this right applies not just to the federal government, but to states and municipalities as well.
In Heller, the Court held that (1) the District of Columbia's total ban on handgun possession in the home amounted to a prohibition on an entire class of "arms" that Americans overwhelmingly chose for the lawful purpose of self-defense, and thus violated the Second Amendment; and (2) the District's requirement that any lawful firearm in the home be disassembled or bound by a trigger lock also violated the Second Amendment, because the law made it impossible for citizens to use arms for the core lawful purpose of self-defense.
The Court reasoned that the Amendment's prefatory clause, i.e., "[a] well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State," announced the Amendment's purpose, but did not limit or expand the scope of the operative clause, i.e., "the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." Moreover, the prefatory clause's history comported with the Court's interpretation, because the prefatory clause stemmed from the Anti-Federalists' concern that the federal government would disarm the people in order to disable the citizens' militia, enabling a politicized standing army or a select militia to rule.
Further, the Court distinguished United States v.Miller,4 in which the Court upheld a statute requiring registration under the National Firearms Act of sawed-off shotguns, on the ground that Miller limited the type of weapon to which the Second Amendment right applied to those in common use for lawful purposes.
In McDonald v. Chicago,5 the Court struck down laws enacted by Chicago and the village of Oak Park effectively banning handgun possession by almost all private citizens, holding that the Fourteenth Amendment incorporated the Second Amendment right, recognized in Heller, to keep and bear arms for the purpose of self-defense.
The Court reasoned that this right is fundamental to the nation's scheme of ordered liberty, given that self-defense was a basic right recognized by many legal systems from ancient times to the present, and Heller held that individual self-defense was "the central component" of the Second Amendment right. Moreover, a survey of the contemporaneous history also demonstrated clearly that the Fourteenth Amendment's Framers and ratifiers counted the right to keep and bear arms among those fundamental rights necessary to the Nation's system of ordered liberty.
Obama Hosts Secret White House Meeting With Hillary Clinton
by Charlie Spiering7 Dec 2015
President Obama met secretly with former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton this afternoon for what the White House described as an “informal lunch.”
The meeting was not on the president’s schedule, but was revealed by White House Press Secretary Josh Earnest who issued a statement to reporters after the meeting:
When their schedules permit, President Obama and Secretary Clinton enjoy the opportunity to catch-up in person. This afternoon they met privately for an informal lunch here at the White House for about an hour and a half. They discussed a wide array of topics, but this was mostly a social occasion.
The president’s schedule was left open for much of the day after Obama received his daily presidential briefing. He is expected to attend the Congressional Ball at the White House later this evening for members of Congress.
Behavioral Insights Team: How Obama Plans to Control the American Public
By Susanne Posel – August 2, 2013
The Obama administration has decided that with the advances in “social and behavioral sciences” public policies can be better designed to coerce the general public through the use of propaganda.
Based on the Behavioral Insights Team (BIT) created by UK Prime Minister David Cameron (a.k.a. The Nudge Unit) was created “to influence British policies through insights from Behavioral Economics in order to achieve the coalition Government’s goal of finding ‘intelligent ways to encourage, support and enable people to make better choices for themselves’.”
BIT is overseen by Richard Thaler , Professor of Behavioral Science and Economics at University of Chicago Booth School of Business.
David Halpern, lead for the Institute for Government, is the spearhead for BIT because of his contribution to the MINDSPACE report which was the foundation for “behavioral insights in British public policy.”
A “nudge” is defined as “any aspect of the choice architecture that alters people’s behavior in a predictable way without forbidding any options or significantly changing their economic incentives. To count as a mere nudge, the intervention must be easy and cheap to avoid.”
The BIT team could be implemented to form policies such as tax collection to “increase net taxes collected”.
A new BIT team is “currently creating a new team that will help build federal capacity to experiment with these approaches, and to scale behavioral interventions that have been rigorously evaluated, using, where possible, randomized controlled trials.”
“Selected individuals” who are “experts in behavioral sciences, experimental design and evaluation” to be part of the Intergovernmental Personnel Act (IPA) which is “for the temporary assignment of employees between the Federal Government and State, local, and Indian tribal governments, institutions of higher education and other eligible organizations.”
In the name of efficiency in government and society, this team for BIT in the US will work with governmental agencies such as the Department of Agriculture (USDA) and the Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS).
Cass Sustein, former administrator for the Obama administration Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (IORA), wrote the book entitled, “Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth and Happiness” that describes how humans make choices and how to steer them into making “better ones”.
In fact, Sustein and Thaler co-authored the book together which offers “a new perspective on preventing the countless mistakes we make—ill-advised personal investments, consumption of unhealthy foods, neglect of our natural resources—and show us how sensible ‘choice architecture’ can successfully nudge people toward the best decisions.”
NEW OBAMA CZAR WILL HUNT 'RIGHT-WING' EXTREMISTS
Americans seen as possibly more threatening than Islamic jihadists
Published: 10/15/2015 at 9:04 PM
Just two weeks after it announced a plan to globalize local police departments through the “Strong Cities Network,” the Obama administration has added a new tool in its fight against “violent extremism.”
A new position within the Justice Department – yet to be filled – will focus on investigating lone-wolf domestic terrorists or “extremists.”
The person who heads this new effort will target extremists who plan mass shootings, hold racist, bigoted or anti-government views or see themselves as “sovereign citizens.”
The new position at the Justice Department, dubbed the “domestic terrorism counsel,” will serve as the main point of contact for U.S. attorney offices nationwide and will identify trends across cases, help shape strategy and “analyze legal gaps that need to be closed,” said Assistant Attorney General John Carlin.
It is not clear what Carlin meant by that statement.
“The legal gaps are probably laws that need to be changed,” said John Whitehead, founder of the Rutherford Institute and a longtime constitutional attorney.
“I’m sure it’s gun laws,” said Tom Fitton, president of Judicial Watch, another watchdog agency. Fitton says the Justice Department is teaming up with the Southern Poverty Law Center to “go after” the Obama administration’s political enemies while downplaying the threat of Islamic terrorism on U.S. soil.
The FBI has confirmed it has active ISIS investigations in all 50 states. And Islamic-inspired attacks have occurred in recent years in Chattanooga, Tennessee; Garland, Texas, and Fort Hood, Texas. Other examples include the Boston Marathon bombing and the Oklahoma City beheading of a Christian woman.
But the Justice Department sees Islamic jihadists as no more dangerous than mentally ill actors such as Dylann Roof, the Charleston, South Carolina, church shooter who killed nine black Christians.
In fact, Justice officials have indicated these home-grown “right wingers” are possibly more numerous and dangerous than the jihadists.
In announcing the new position Wednesday, Carlin referred to a study by the New America Foundation that found nearly twice as many Americans have been killed by “right-wing” extremists since Sept. 11 than by Islamic terrorists.
“Looking back over the past few years, it is clear that domestic terrorists and homegrown violent extremists remain a real and present danger to the United States,” he said. “We recognize that, over the past few years, more people have died in this country in attacks by domestic extremists than in attacks associated with international terrorist groups.”
However, a look at the funding sources of the New America Foundation show its financial support comes from billionaire George Soros’ Open Society Foundations and the Carnegie Corp. of New York, which has funded causes such as Common Core and mass immigration.
New America Foundation’s list of terror attacks since 9/11 includes the Charleston church shooting among 19 “right-wing” attacks, despite evidence that Roof has a history of severe mental health issues.
The study could find only seven “jihadist” attacks that killed 26 people since Sept. 11. Nowhere to be found on the foundation’s list is the Chattanooga shooter, Muhammad Youssef Abdulazeez, who killed five U.S. servicemen. Also absent on the list is John Muhammad, the Washington, D.C., sniper who killed at least 10 people in 2002 with his young accomplice, Lee Malvo.
Scalia: Constitution Is 'Dead, Dead, Dead'
The Huffington Post | By Chris Gentilviso
Posted: 01/29/2013 1:50 pm EST Updated: 01/29/2013 4:00 pm EST
Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia is still frustrated that Americans don't understand how to read the supreme law of the land.
Appearing Monday evening at Southern Methodist University in Dallas, Texas, Scalia dismissed the modern vision of the U.S. Constitution as a living document.
“It’s not a living document," he said, according to the Dallas Morning News. "It’s dead, dead, dead."
This is not the first instance of Scalia expressing thoughts of this nature. Back in December, he appeared at Princeton University in New Jersey, echoing similar views about the "living" nature of the document.
"The fairest reading of the text is what the law means," he said during that appearance.
Back in February 2009, however, Scalia spoke at a Stanford University Hoover Institution talk, calling the document a "morphing" piece of writing. In turn, the Supreme Court guides that evolution.
"The Constitution changes from decade to decade to comport with -- and this is a phrase we use in our Eighth Amendment jurisprudence, we the court does -- to comport with 'the evolving standards of decency that mark the progress of a maturing society.'"
Federal Government Researchs Tech To Remotely Track, Disrupt, Destroy Guns
Posted by Bob Owens on September 23, 2015 at 3:41 pm
Scratch many people in the tech sector and you’ll find a totalitarian underneath. They sincerely think that technology can save the world… provided that they’re the ones controlling it, of course.
I guess it shouldn’t be surprising, then, that these high tech totalitarians are conspiring with the Obama Administration to undermine the Second Amendment.
The right to bear arms is hot topic in our society; many polls show a slight majority of the American public leaning towards the Second Amendment. So, for a moment, let’s take getting rid of guns off the table and think outside the box. Let’s turn off our pro- or anti-gun sentiments and click on our tech knowledge.
One idea slowly garnishing interest and influence is GPS tracking in guns. This is not a new idea. The federal government has been experimenting with using wireless Nano and GPS technologies to track, disrupt, and even self-destruct firearms for at least two years. The project – known as micro-electromechanical system (MEMS) – utilizes Nano devices created by engineers that can affect a weapon’s operation. MEMS capabilities could be built into U.S. weapons within three to five years and the market for this technology would be around $1.1 billion dollars, Bloomberg Businessweek reported.
The author amazingly doesn’t feel that giving government the ability to “track, disrupt, and even self-destruct” firearms is an “infringment” on the natural right to armed self-defense.
I’ll go ahead and make several predictions:
anti-gun liberals will attempt to mandate MEMS technology for all new commercial U.S. firearms once the technology is in a working prototype stage. Some will demand that this technology be retrofitted to existing firearms.
Some anti-gun liberals will attempt to force federal and state agencies to adopt MEMS. These agencies will resist out of fears that the needlessly complex technology is a threat to their officers, and the concept will die.
any gun company that incorporates this MEMS technology into their firearms will be abandoned by a commercial market which dwarfs the much smaller government market.
People will quickly find a way to hack the technology, for better or worse.
I’m a little surprised that this is the first I’ve heard of MEMS being used to disable the civilian firearms market, but then, it isn’t something they’d want to popularize, is it?
Paul Craig Roberts – This Now Threatens To Destroy Our Civilization
December 24, 2015
December 24 (King World News) – The Greatest Gift For All
Christmas is a time of traditions. If you have found time in the rush before Christmas to decorate a tree, you are sharing in a relatively new tradition. Although the Christmas tree has ancient roots, at the beginning of the 20th century only 1 in 5 American families put up a tree. It was 1920 before the Christmas tree became the hallmark of the season. Calvin Coolidge was the first President to light a national Christmas tree on the White House lawn…
Gifts are another shared custom. This tradition comes from the wise men or three kings who brought gifts to baby Jesus. When I was a kid, gifts were more modest than they are now, but even then people were complaining about the commercialization of Christmas. We have grown accustomed to the commercialization. Christmas sales are the backbone of many businesses. Gift giving causes us to remember others and to take time from our harried lives to give them thought.
The decorations and gifts of Christmas are one of our connections to a Christian culture that has held Western civilization together for 2,000 years.
In our culture the individual counts. This permits an individual person to put his or her foot down, to take a stand on principle, to become a reformer and to take on injustice.
This empowerment of the individual is unique to Western civilization. It has made the individual a citizen equal in rights to all other citizens, protected from tyrannical government by the rule of law and free speech. These achievements are the products of centuries of struggle, but they all flow from the teaching that God so values the individual’s soul that he sent his son to die so we might live. By so elevating the individual, Christianity gave him a voice.
Formerly only those with power had a voice. But in Western civilization people with integrity have a voice. So do people with a sense of justice, of honor, of duty, of fair play. Reformers can reform, investors can invest, and entrepreneurs can create commercial enterprises, new products and new occupations.
The result was a land of opportunity. The United States attracted immigrants who shared our values and reflected them in their own lives. Our culture was absorbed by a diverse people who became one.
Professor Blames Mass Shootings on ‘White Male Privilege’
Kyle Olson | Dec 19, 2012
Some opinions only get attention because they come from people with advanced degrees who make their living on the taxpayer dime. That’s certainly the case for Hugo Schwyzer, a history and gender studies professor at Pasadena City College.
He has a history of blaming white men for most of the mass killings that take place in the United States. Friday’s tragic shootings in Newtown, Connecticut gave him a great opportunity to spout his nonsense once again.
Less than 40 minutes after the events – while (woefully inaccurate) news was still breaking – he tweeted, “MEN committing acts of Mass Violence is an epidemic that the U.S. needs to immediately address!”
About 16 minutes later, he re-tweeted a statement that came from his children’s pediatrician: “If there is anybody on Twitter who thinks we do not need gun control, go f**k yourselves.”
SATURDAY, AUG 23, 2014 09:00 AM -0700
White privilege: An insidious virus that’s eating America from within
Ferguson offers white people a chance to understand the price of our privilege
ANDREW O'HEHIR Follow
Organized Community Defense Is America’s Last Hope
Wednesday, 06 August 2014 02:42 Brandon Smith
Not long ago, I felt compelled to address the idea of self defense as a moral imperative in an article titled “Violence In The Face Of Tyranny Is Often Necessary.” My intention was to perhaps undo some of the propaganda conditioning that Americans have suffered over the decades that has taught them that “all” forms of violent action are “immoral”, including the defense of one’s person, one’s property, and one’s freedom.
The recent uprising at Bundy Ranch in Bunkerville, Nev., confirmed my predictions that many Americans are tired of playing by rules chartered by the establishment and are ready to take measures outside of the boundaries set by the system. The reality is that change will never come without consequence and cost, and when faced with an entrenched tyranny, if the citizenry cannot present the threat of physical consequence to their oppressors, the oppressors have no motivation to relinquish power.
To use the schoolyard analogy yet again, it is a fact of life that the class bully will not leave a victim in peace because he is enthralled with the feeling of power over others. The bully will not stop because he has no incentive. Protesting only encourages him. Using the system as a shield only amuses him. Logic and reason only anger him. Punching the bully in the teeth is the only incentive he will respect. If you show that you can disrupt a tyrant’s abuse of power anytime you wish, if you show that you can hurt him back, only then will he take you seriously.
APPLEZEBRA11: The Jared Lee Loughner Investigation
October 23, 2012 by POPEYE
Filed under Mind Control, Featured Stories
(FEDERALJACK) On these two editions of DTRH Popeye welcomes investigative journalist Stephanie Sledge to the broadcast. They go over the shooting of Gabrielle “Gabby” Giffords and all of the weirdness surrounding it. Stephanie has put together a report over 400 pages long on the whole incident available at her website. Since there is so much information this had to be a two part broadcast.
Having been an active figure in the conspiracy community over 7 years now, I can safely and confidently say that Alex Jones and David Icke, the world's two most popular conspiracy theorists, and Above Top Secret, the world's biggest conspiracy forum, are in fact controlled opposition working directly with the government / corporate powers that be. In the following videos I expose facts like Alex Jones' and AboveTopSecret's C.I.A. connections and explain the nature of intelligence agency honeypots, how they effectively gather intel, poison the well, and control the conspiracy opposition by leading it.
James Holmes, and how the CIA hid their MKULTRA mind-control program Mar
by Jon Rappoport
James Holmes, and how the CIA hid the MKULTRA mind-control program
by Jon Rappoport
March 20, 2013
Back in the early 1990s, I interviewed John Marks, author of Search for the Manchurian Candidate. This was the book that exposed the existence of the infamous CIA MKULTRA program.
I bring up this interview now, because James Holmes may well be on the receiving end of MKULTRA, as his lawyers try to navigate an insanity plea in the Aurora massacre case.
Holmes will be given “truth drugs” to “refresh his memory” about his state of mind at the time of the killings. If that sounds absurd, it is. I wrote a piece the other day detailing how such drugs are often given to produce extreme terror in patients. In other words, the drugs don’t elicit the truth. They’re used as threats to force the patient/suspect to confess to whatever his torturers want him to confess to.
Hillary Clinton Says the United States Embarrasses Her
By Rebecca Oas, Ph.D. | September 17, 2014
EW YORK, September 19 (C-Fam) “It is embarrassing, I mean, really, it’s embarrassing.”
Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton told a conference room of international feminists and abortion advocates that the US is a long way from ratifying the UN treaty on discrimination against women, “not for lack of trying, but for absence of support.”
Clinton was the final speaker last Friday at a two-day feminist conference called “Women and Girls Rising” at the Ford Foundation in New York., which began with remarks by Gloria Steinem and was organized by the author of a glowing biography of Margaret Sanger. Former Clinton administration chief of staff John Podesta also expressed embarrassment over the non-ratification of CEDAW, adding that many “think that the United States can’t ratify anything these days.”
Bombshell Evidence Suggests Jade Helm Is Connected To Massive Cyber Event, Planned Since 2013
April 14, 2015
By now most have heard of the planned Jade Helm 15 military training exercises due to take place throughout America from July 15 through September 15, 2015, which many believe is the US government preparations for martial law, where multiple states are listed as "hostile," with the US military training for "uncoventional warfare," with surgical strikes and extractions, among other things. These exercises have been dubbed "unprecedented and dangerous," by former military members. There will be a related links to ANP's coverage, starting back on March 13, 2015 when Stefan Stanford first published the leaked documents of this planned event.
Videographer DAHBOO77 has highlighted the latest Jade Helm 15 bombshell, where evidence has emerged that these exercises have been planned since 2013, and since at least 2014, have included a connection to a "massive cyber event."
Links provided in DAHBOO's video details take us to a couple of LinkedIn pages.
Mia Kelly, with a job description that states "Cyber/IO Planner for Exercise JADE HELM at ICE," from August 2014 to present, showing that from January 2014 to August she was the "Cyber/IO Planner - Jade Helm for the VATC.
Militia takes over Malheur National Wildlife Refuge headquarters
Update at 9:15 p.m.: Statement from Harney County Sheriff Dave Ward: "After the peaceful rally was completed today, a group of outside militants drove to the Malheur Wildlife Refuge, where they seized and occupied the refuge headquarters. A collective effort from multiple agencies is currently working on a solution. For the time being please stay away from that area. More information will be provided as it becomes available. Please maintain a peaceful and united front and allow us to work through this situation."
The Bundy family of Nevada joined with hard-core militiamen Saturday to take over the headquarters of the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge, vowing to occupy the remote federal outpost 30 miles southeast of Burns for years.
The occupation came shortly after an estimated 300 marchers — militia and local citizens both — paraded through Burns to protest the prosecution of two Harney County ranchers, Dwight Hammond Jr. and Steven Hammond, who are to report to prison on Monday.
Among the occupiers is Ammon Bundy, son of Nevada rancher Cliven Bundy, and two of his brothers. Militia members at the refuge claimed they had as many as 100 supporters with them. The refuge, federal property managed by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, was closed and unoccupied for the holiday weekend.
In phone interviews from inside the occupied building Saturday night, Ammon Bundy and his brother, Ryan Bundy, said they are not looking to hurt anyone. But they would not rule out violence if police tried to remove them, they said.
"The facility has been the tool to do all the tyranny that has been placed upon the Hammonds," Ammon Bundy said.
"We're planning on staying here for years, absolutely," he added. "This is not a decision we've made at the last minute."
Full Story on What’s Going on In Oregon – Militia Take Over Malheur National Wildlife Refuge In Protest to Hammond Family Persecution…
Grab a coffee, because this is soup-to-nuts.Many people will awaken today to the news of approximately 100 to 150 armed militia taking control of a closed Wildlife Park Headquarters, and not know the full back-story – so here it is:
The short summary is:* in an effort to draw attention to a ridiculous arrest of a father and son pair of Oregon Ranchers (“Dwight Lincoln Hammond, Jr., 73, and his son, Steven Dwight Hammond, 46,) who are scheduled to begin five year prison sentences (turning themselves in tomorrow January 4th 2016), three brothers from the Cliven Bundy family and approximately 100/150 (and growing) heavily armed militia (former U.S. service members) have taken control of*Malheur Wildlife Refuge Headquarters*in the wildlife reserve.* They are prepared to stay there indefinitely.
Here’s the long version:*including history, details, links video(s) and explanations:
(aa) The Harney Basin (were the Hammond ranch is established) was settled in the 1870’s. The valley was settled by multiple ranchers and was known to have run over 300,000 head of cattle. These ranchers developed a state of the art irrigated system to water the meadows, and it soon became a favorite stopping place for migrating birds on their annual trek north.
(ab) In 1908 President Theodor Roosevelt, in a political scheme, create an “Indian reservation” around the Malheur, Mud & Harney Lakes and declared it “as a preserve and breeding ground for native birds”. Later this “Indian reservation” (without Indians) became the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge.
(a) In 1964 the Hammonds purchased their ranch in the Harney Basin. The purchase included approximately 6000 acres of private property, 4 grazing rights on public land, a small ranch house and 3 water rights. The ranch is around 53 miles South of Burns, Oregon.
(a1) By the 1970’s nearly all the ranches adjacent to the Blitzen Valley were purchased by the US Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) and added to the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge. The refuge covers over 187,000 acres and stretches over 45 miles long and 37 miles wide. The expansion of the refuge grew and surrounds to the Hammond’s ranch. Being approached many times by the FWS, the Hammonds refused to sell. Other ranchers also choose not to sell.
(a2) During the 1970’s the Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS), in conjunction with the Bureau of Land Management (BLM), took a different approach to get the ranchers to sell. Ranchers were told that, “grazing was detrimental to wildlife and must be reduced”. 32 out of 53 permits were revoked and many ranchers were forced to leave. Grazing fees were raised significantly for those who were allowed to remain. Refuge personnel took over the irrigation system claiming it as their own.
(a3) By 1980 a conflict was well on its way over water allocations on the adjacent privately owned Silvies Plain. The FWS wanted to acquire the ranch lands on the Silvies Plain to add to their already vast holdings. Refuge personnel intentional diverted the water to bypassing the vast meadowlands, directing the water into the rising Malheur Lakes. Within a few short years the surface area of the lakes doubled. Thirty-one ranches on the Silvies plains were flooded. Homes, corrals, barns and graze-land were washed a way and destroyed. The ranchers that once fought to keep the FWS from taking their land, now broke and destroyed, begged the FWS to acquire their useless ranches. In 1989 the waters began to recede and now the once thriving privately owned Silvies pains are a proud part of the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge claimed by the FWS.
(a4) By the 1990’s the Hammonds were one of the very few ranchers that still owned private property adjacent to the refuge. Susie Hammond in an effort to make sense of what was going on began compiling fact about the refuge. In a hidden public record she found a study that was done by the FWS in 1975. The study showed that the “no use” policies of the FWS on the refuge were causing the wildlife to leave the refuge and move to private property. The study showed that the private property adjacent to the Malheur Wildlife Refuge produced 4 times more ducks and geese than the refuge did. It also showed that the migrating birds were 13 times more likely to land on private property than on the refuge. When Susie brought this to the attention of the FWS and refuge personnel, her and her family became the subjects of a long train of abuses and corruptions.
b) In the early 1990’s the Hammonds filed on a livestock water source and obtained a deed for the water right from the State of Oregon. When the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) and US Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) found out that the Hammonds obtained new water rights near the Malhuer Wildlife Refuge, they were agitated and became belligerent and vindictive towards the Hammonds. The US Fish and Wildlife Service challenged the Hammonds right to the water in an Oregon State Circuit Court. The court found that the Hammonds legally obtained rights to the water in accordance to State law and therefore the use of the water belongs to the Hammonds.*
(c) In August 1994 the BLM & FWS illegally began building a fence around the Hammonds water source. Owning the water rights and knowing that their cattle relied on that water source daily the Hammonds tried to stop the building of the fence. The BLM & FWS called the Harney County Sheriff department and had Dwight Hammond (Father) arrested and charged with “disturbing and interfering with” federal officials or federal contractors (two counts, each a felony). He spent one night in the Deschutes County Jail in Bend, and a second night behind bars in Portland before he was hauled before a federal magistrate and released without bail. A hearing on the charges was postponed and the federal judge never set another date.
NRA Board Member Ted Nugent Suggests Jews Are "Behind" Gun Safety LawsBlog*›››*February 8, 2016 5:22 PM EST*››› ALEX KAPLAN
National Rifle Association board member Ted Nugent shared a graphic suggesting that Jews are "really behind" gun-safety laws. The image was previously posted on Stormfront, the most prominent American white supremacist website.
In a*February 8*post on his Facebook page, Nugent shared an image headlined, "So who is really behind gun control?" with Israeli flags next to faces of 12 Jewish American politicians and gun violence prevention advocates. Some of the pictures feature descriptions such as "Jew York city mayor Mikey Bloomberg." Nugent captioned the image, "Know these punks. They hate freedom, they hate good over evil, they would deny us the basic human right to self defense & to KEEP & BEAR ARMS while many of them have tax paid hired ARMED security! Know them well. Tell every1 you know how evil they are. Let us raise maximum hell to shut them down":
Ted Nugent: Jews That Support Gun Control Are ‘Nazis in Disguise’
by*Josh Feldman*| 2:07 pm, February 9th, 2016
Note how it says “ISRAEL FIRSTER” underAlan Dershowitz*and “Gave Russian Jew immigrants your tax money” under late New Jersey Senator*Frank Lautenberg.
Well, after that, Nugent*got excoriatedpretty strongly*online, and the Anti-Defamation League demanded he take down this*“conspiratorial anti-semitism.”
Well, if you thought that was out there, wait until you get a load of his follow-up, in which he actually said, “What sort of racist prejudiced POS could possibly not know that Jews for guncontrol are nazis in disguise?” No, seriously:
Oh, and just to top off this extremely classy rant, Nugent brought up the Holocaust victims and remarked, “Soulless sheep to slaughter”
And for the sake of context here, a few months ago Nugent*liked a commenter’s conspiracy theory*about Israel being responsible for 9/11, and*he seems to*really like*his Nazi comparisons.
[featured image via Shutterstock]
When Victims Rule: A Critique of Jewish Pre-Eminence in America
a clearinghouse for information featuring over 10,000 citations from about 4,000 scholarly and mainstream bibliographic sources
Who is Behind Gun Control?
Most U.S. Federal gun control legislation has been written, introduced, and sponsored by Jewish Congressmen and Jewish Senators.
U.S. Federal Gun Control Legislation, 1968 – present
1968: The Gun Control Act of 1968 comes from*Congressman Emanuel Celler’s*House bill H.R.17735. It expands legislation already attempted by the non-Jewish Senator Thomas Dodd.America’s biggest and most far-reaching gun law came from a Jew.
1988:*Senator Howard Metzenbaum*sponsors Senate bill S.1523. It proposes legislation turning every violation of the Gun Control Act of 1968 into a RICO predicate offense, allowing a gun owner to be charged with federal racketeering offenses.
1988:*Senator Howard Metzenbaum*co-sponsors a bill – S.2180 – to ban, or limit/restrict, so-called “plastic guns.”
1990:*Senator Herbert Kohl*introduces bill S.2070, the Gun-Free School Zones Act of 1990, which bans gun possession in a school zone. The law will later be struck down in court as unconstitutional.
1993:*Senator Howard Metzenbaum*sponsors Senate bill S.653. It bans specific semiautomatic rifles, but also gives the Secretary of the Treasury the power to add any semiautomatic firearm to the list at a later date.
February, 1994: The Brady Law, which requires waiting periods to buy handguns, becomes effective.*Senator Howard Metzenbaumwrote the Brady Bill.*Senator Metzenbaum*sponsored the bill in the Senate. The sponsor of the bill in the House was*Congressman Charles Schumer.
1994:*Senator Howard Metzenbaum*introduces S.1878, the Gun Violence Prevention Act of 1994, aka “Brady II.”*Congressman Charles Schumer*sponsored “Brady II” sister legislation [H.R. 1321] in the U.S. House of Representatives.
September, 1994: The Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994 goes into effect, including a provision that bans the manufacture and possession of semiautomatic rifles described as “assault weapons.” [Note: true assault weapons are fully automatic, not semiautomatic]. That gun-ban provision was authored in the Senate by*Senator Dianne Feinstein*and authored in the House by*Congressman Charles Schumer.
1995:*Senators Kohl, Specter, Feinstein, Lautenberg*and others introduce the Gun-Free School Zones Act of 1995, an amended version of the 1990 school-zone law which was struck down in court as being unconstitutional.
September, 1996: The*Lautenberg*Domestic Confiscation provision becomes law. It is part of a larger omnibus appropriations bill. It was sponsored by*Senator Frank Lautenberg. It bans people convicted of misdemeanor domestic violence from ever owning a gun.
1997: Senate bill S.54, the Federal Gang Violence Act of 1997, proposes much harsher sentences for people violating minor gun laws, including mandatory prison sentences and forfeiture of property. It was introduced by*Senator Dianne Feinstein*and Senator Hatch, among others. It returns the idea of turning every violation of the Gun Control Act of 1968 into a RICO predicate offense.
January, 1999:*Senator Barbara Boxer*introduces bill S.193, the American Handgun Standards Act of 1999.
January, 1999:*Senator Herbert Kohl*introduces bill S.149, the Child Safety Lock Act of 1999. It would require a child safety lock in connection with transfer of a handgun.
February,1999:*Senator Frank Lautenberg*introduces bill S.407, the Stop Gun Trafficking Act of 1999.
February, 1999:*Senator Frank Lautenberg*introduces S.443, the Gun Show Accountability Act of 1999.
March, 1999:*Senator Frank Lautenberg*introduces bill S.560, the Gun Industry Accountability Act of 1999.
March, 1999:*Senator Dianne Feinstein*introduces bill S.594, the Large Capacity Ammunition Magazine Import Ban Act of 1999.
May, 2000:*Senators Feinstein, Boxer, Lautenberg, and Schumer*sponsor Senate bill S.2515, the Firearm Licensing and Record of Sale Act of 2000. It is a plan for a national firearms licensing system.
January, 2001:*Senators Feinstein, Schumer, and Boxer*sponsor Senate bill S.25, the Firearm Licensing and Record of Sale Act of 2001. It is a nation-wide gun registration plan [apparently there were two versions of that Firearm Licensing and Record of Sale Act bill].
May, 2003:*Senators Feinstein, Schumer, Boxer,*and others introduce legislation that would reauthorize the 1994 federal assault weapons ban, and, close a loophole in the law that allows large-capacity ammunition magazines to be imported into the U.S. The ban expired in September, 2004.
October, 2003:*Senators Feinstein, Lautenberg, Levin, and Schumer*co-sponsor bill S.1774, designed to stop the sunset [ending] of the Undetectable Firearms Act of 1988.
March, 2005:*Senator Frank Lautenberg*introduces bill S.645, “to reinstate the Public Safety and Recreational Firearms Use Protection Act,” in other words, to reinstate the 1994 assault-rifle ban [also known as the “Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994”] which expired in late 2004.
March, 2005:*Senator Dianne Feinstein*introduces bill S.620, “to reinstate the Public Safety and Recreational Firearms Use Protection Act,” in other words, to reinstate the 1994 assault-rifle ban [also known as the “Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994”] which expired in late 2004.
July, 2005:*Senator Dianne Feinstein*introduces bill S.A.1621 – Fifty-Caliber Sniper Weapons. This amendment would convert all .50 BMG firearms to NFA weapons.
July, 2005:*Senator Dianne Feinstein*introduces bill S.A.1622 – Fifty-Caliber Exclusion to S.397. This amendment would modify S.397 to allow suits when the firearm involved was a .50 caliber weapon.
July, 2005:*Senator Barbara Boxer*introduces bill S.A.1633 – BATFE Safety Standards. This amendment allows law suits to continue/be brought if the product did not meet the safety standards as defined by the BATFE.
July, 2005:*Senator Barbara Boxer*introduces bill S.A.1634 – ‘Sporting Use’ on Domestic Handguns. Applying ’sporting use’ clause requirements to domestic handguns could, almost completely, dry up the handgun availability in the United States
White House indicates Obama will miss Scalia funeral
By*NICOLE DURAN*(@DURANNI1)*•*2/17/16 2:38 PM
The White House indicated Wednesday that President Obama would not be joining Vice President Joe Biden when Biden attends Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia's funeral in Washington, D.C., on Saturday.
Spokesman Josh Earnest confirmed that Obama and First Lady Michelle Obama will go to the Supreme Court Friday, when Scalia will be lying in repose. But when asked if Obama would be going to the funeral, Earnest dodged the direct question, but implied Obama would be skipping it.
"I can tell you that Vice President Biden and Dr. Jill Biden will attend Justice Scalia's federal at the Basilica" of the National Shrine of the Immaculate Conception in northeast Washington on Saturday, Earnest replied.
When asked again if Obama plans to join mourners at the shrine, the largest Catholic church in North America, Earnest said: "The president will pay his respects at the Supreme Court on Friday and he'll be joined with the first lady when he does that."
Earnest also wouldn't say if Obama is attending a private ceremony that the Supreme Court is holding for the longest-serving current justice on Friday.
We'll have more details" later, Earnest said. "[b]ut it will be an opportunity for the president and the first lady to pay their respects to Justice Scalia," a visit that Earnest described as appropriate.
Earnest also dodged a question about whether Obama has golf plans for Saturday, and said he didn't "have a sense of what the president's plans are for Saturday."
But Earnest said Obama believes it is important to the "institution of the presidency to pay his respects to somebody who dedicated three decades of his life to the institution of the Supreme Court."
Beyond praising Scalia in remarks Saturday, attending Friday's event at the Supreme Court "is important, not just on a personal level, but also on an institutional level," Earnest added.
"It will be an important moment and we will have more details for you about the president's plans for both Friday and Saturday," he said.
U.S. Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia found dead at West Texas ranch
Gary Martin, Guillermo Contreras*|*February 13, 2016
Associate Justice Antonin Scalia was found dead of apparent natural causes Saturday on a luxury resort in West Texas, federal officials said.
Scalia, 79, was a guest at the Cibolo Creek Ranch, a resort in the Big Bend region south of Marfa.
Scalia arrived at the 30,000-acre ranch on Friday and attended a private party with about 40 people that night, according to a federal official.
He left the party and retired to bed earlier than others, according to Donna Sellers, a spokeswoman with the U.S. Marshals Service.
When he failed to appear at breakfast, a person involved with the ranch went to his room, where he discovered his body. A priest was called to administer last rites.
MARFA, Tex. —*In the cloistered chambers of the Supreme Court, Justice Antonin Scalia’s days were highly regulated and predictable. He met with clerks, wrote opinions and appeared for arguments in the august courtroom on a schedule set months in advance.
Yet as details of Scalia’s sudden death trickled in Sunday, it appeared that the hours afterward were anything but orderly. The man known for his elegant legal opinions and profound intellect was found dead in his room at a hunting resort by the resort’s owner, who grew worried when Scalia didn’t appear at breakfast Saturday morning.
It then took hours for authorities in remote West Texas to find a justice of the peace, officials said Sunday. When they did, Presidio County Judge Cinderela Guevara pronounced Scalia dead of natural causes without seeing the body — which is permissible under Texas law — and without ordering an autopsy
As official Washington tried to process what his demise means for politics and the law, some details of Scalia’s final hours remained opaque. As late as Sunday afternoon, for example, there were conflicting reports about whether an autopsy should have been performed. A manager at the El Paso funeral home where Scalia’s body was taken said that his family made it clear they did not want one.
One of two other officials who were called but couldn’t get to Scalia’s body in time said that she would have made a different decision on the autopsy.
Cibolo Creek Ranch owner recalls Scalia’s last hours in Texas
John MacCormack*|*February 14, 2016
MARFA — A first-time guest to the Cibolo Creek Ranch, U.S. Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia was animated and engaged during dinner Friday night, as one of three dozen invitees to an event that had nothing to do with law or politics, according to the ranch owner.
Just hours later, he would be found dead of sapparent natural causes, which media outlets were reporting Sunday was a heart attack.*
"He was seated near me and I had a chance to observe him. He was very entertaining. But about 9 p.m. he said, 'it's been a long day and a long week, I want to get some sleep," recalled Houston businessman John Poindexter, who owns the 30,000-acre luxury ranch.
When Poindexter tried to awaken Scalia about 8:30 the next morning, the judge's door was locked and he did not answer. Three hours later, Poindexter returned after an outing, with a friend of Scalia who had come from Washington with him.
We discovered the judge in bed, a pillow over his head. His bed clothes were unwrinkled," said Poindexter.
"He was lying very restfully. It looked like he had not quite awakened from a nap," he said.
Scalia,79, did not have a pulse and his body was cold, and after consulting with a doctor at a hospital in Alpine, Poindexter concluded resuscitation would have been futile, He then contacted federal authorities, at first encountering a series of answering services because he was calling on a weekend.
"Ultimately they became available and handled it superbly. They flew in by helicopter. They told me to secure the ranch, which I did until this morning," he said.
Scalia was just the latest newsworthy guest to visit the celebrity hideaway that covers 30,000 acres near the Chinati Mountains. Mick Jagger, Julia Roberts and Tommy Lee Jones have also partaken of its scenic vistas and luxury accomodations.
Established in 1857 by Milton Faver, known as the first Texas cattle baron west of the Pecos, the ranch retains 19th Century constructions, including "El Fortin de Cibolo," a primitive fort designed to protect settlers from Apaches.
Justice Scalia Dies At Ranch Resort Owned By Democrat Party Donor & Obama Award Winner
Posted on*February 14, 2016*by*DCWhispers
That will be for you the*readers*to decide.
The photo below is Barack Obama shaking hands with a man by the name of John Poindexter, a Texas millionaire businessman also noted for being a donor to the*Democrat Party*and who also received an award from Barack Obama related to his military service in Vietnam.
Poindexter is the owner of the very Cibolo Creek Ranch*Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia was found dead at earlier this week.
It has been long-standing policy for the Obama*administration*to grant presidential awards to those who are among the president’s most prized political donors.
It was Poindexter who reportedly was among those who initially discovered the Justice’s body, and who then coordinated with local*officials*to have Justice Scalia*declared*dead via a*phone*conversation with the area medical examiner – but without an actual medical*examination*of the body.
Mr. Poindexter was also said to be the primary point man between the ranch*location*and federal authorities who were notably slow to arrive on scene.
To date, there is said to have been no request for an autopsy even though initial reports suggest the Supreme Court Justice was found with a “pillow over his head” and had died alone in his room without any apparent witnesses. Scalia was described as having been in good spirits in the hours prior to his death.
FORMER INTEL OFFICER SUSPECTS FOUL PLAY IN DEATH OF ANTONIN SCALIA"Who dies with a pillow over their head?"
Paul Joseph Watson -*FEBRUARY 15, 2016*1602 Comments*
A former U.S. Army intelligence officer who had a top secret clearance suspects foul play in the death of Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia.
“The circumstances surrounding Supreme Court Judge Antonin Scalia’s death are growing more suspicious by the minute,”*writes*Ray Starmann, whoworked in Army intelligence for eight years*before becoming a journalist.
Starmann points to the fact that the story appears to keep changing, with initial reports that Scalia had died of a heart attack later denied. He also questions why no autopsy was performed and why Scalia’s body was quickly embalmed, “erasing any chances for the coroner to conduct efficient toxicoloSandyBrown
The same people who want you to believe Scalia died of a heart attack or natural causes are the same people who want you to believe that Hillary won the Iowa Caucuses with six coin tosses and the same people who want you to believe after fifty years that Lee Harvey Oswald was the lone assassin of President Kennedy,” he writes, adding, “Of course the MSM has reported on none of this. Even Fox News refuses to cover the strange occurrences in Texas.”
Starmann even suspects that reports of Scalia having a pillow over his head when he was found dead could represent a message being sent in the style of*The Godfather.
“Luca Brasi sleeps with the fishes. The pillow over Scalia’s head wasn’t put there by a Hispanic maid. The pillow over the head is a warning,” he writes.
Now that Scalia is gone and likely to be replaced by a leftist activist judge, Starmann fears that the constitution is about to be eviscerated.
“Scalia was the tie breaking judge, the man who could push back any liberal policies being shoved through the court. With Scalia’s death, the Obama Administration or a future Hillary Clinton Administration has a green door to confiscate guns, flood the country with illegals and wreck the Constitution,” he writes.
As we*reported earlier, suspicion surrounding the circumstances of Scalia’s death continues to build, with a poll showing 79% of over 40,000 respondents believing there was foul play.
If This Report Is Correct Mitch McConnell May Have Given Obama a Supreme Court Victory
Jim Hoft*Feb 14th, 2016 2:09 pm*105 Comments
Just when you thought the news could news could not get any worse comes this…
Elizabeth Price Foley*at*Instapundit*today argues that Barack Obama can indeed make a recess appointment to replace Justice Scalia on the Supreme Court because the US Senate, under the leadership of Mitch McConnell, scheduled a recess for over 10 days.
The appointment would last until the end of the 114th Congress, which occurs on January 3, 2017.
COULD OBAMA MAKE A RECESS APPOINTMENT TO REPLACE SCALIA?: The answer appears to be “yes,” because (once again), the GOP-controlled Senate voluntarily has left itself vulnerable to the exercise of such presidential power. Article II, section 2 of the Constitution gives the President power to fill vacancies “during the recess of the Senate”:
The President shall have Power to fill up all Vacancies that may happen during the Recess of the Senate, by granting Commissions which shall expire at the End of their next Session.
There’s a lot of misinformation out there. For example,*a report by*Fox News*mistakenly focuses on the*Adjournment Clause of Article I, section 5, which merely states that neither House of Congress may adjourn for more than three days without the consent of the other…
a Senate recess of fewer than 3 days is not enough to trigger the President’s recess appointment power; the Senate’s recess must be at least ten days in duration.
So how long is the Senate’s present recess? It began on Friday, February 12, with the*passage of S. Con. Res. 31*which states:
That when the Senate recesses or adjourns on any day from Thursday, February 11, 2016, through Saturday, February 20, 2016,*on a motion offered pursuant to this concurrent resolution by its Majority Leader or his designee, it*stand recessed or adjourned until 12:00 noon on Monday, February 22, 2016, or such other time on that day as may be specified by its Majority Leader or his designee in the motion to recess or adjourn, or until the time of any reassembly pursuant to section 2 of this concurrent resolution, whichever occurs first; . . .
Sec. 2. (A)*The Majority Leader of the Senate or his designee,after concurrence with the Minority Leader of the Senate, shall notify the Members of the Senate to reassemble at such place and time as he may designate if, in his opinion, the public interest shall warrant it.
Anti-Defamation League honoring officials involved in San Bernardino massacre
POSTED BY*DEBBIE L. SKLAR*ON*MARCH 2, 2016*INCRIME*| 166 VIEWS |*LEAVE A RESPONSE
The various law enforcement agencies that responded to and are investigating the*mass shooting*at the Inland Regional Center in San Bernardino will be honored in Los Angeles next week by the*Anti-Defamation League*for their bravery and their work to investigate threats to the community.
The agencies will be collectively honored as one of three group recipients of the “Helene & Joseph Sherwood Family Prize for Combating Hate.” Other groups being honored are the Los Angeles Police Department for its Community Safety Partnership Program, a collaboration with the Los Angeles Housing Authority; and human-trafficking investigators from the state Attorney General’s Office, Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department and Long Beach Police Department and City Prosecutors Office.
Carrie Braun, public affairs manager for the Orange County Sheriff’s Department, will be honored individually for creating the Diversity Advisory Council that works to foster relationships between law enforcement and the black community, Turkish Muslims and LGBT residents.
This year’s honorees have taken creative and effective steps to make our communities safer,” said Amanda Susskind, director of the ADL’s Pacific Southwest Region. “Their contributions range from fighting terrorism to reducing hate against the most vulnerable in our society. What they have in common is that they make a tangible difference in protecting the community.”
The agencies that will be honored for their work on the San Bernardino attack that killed 14 people include the San Bernardino Police Department, FBI, San Bernardino County Sheriff’s Department, California Highway Patrol, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, U.S. Attorney’s Office and police departments from Colton, Fontana, Redlands and Rialto.
Syed Rizwan Farook, 28, and his emigree wife, 27-year-old Tashfeen Malik, carried out the Dec. 2 massacre at the Inland Regional Center immediately following a Christmas party there, according to federal authorities. Fourteen people were killed in the mass shooting and 22 others were wounded.
The husband and wife were killed in a shootout with law enforcement officers a few hours later.
The ADL honor will recognize “the bravery and quick response of numerous law enforcement personnel at the time of the attack, as well as those behind the scenes who continue to work tirelessly to investigate ongoing threats and safeguard our community.”
The Sherwood Prizes will be awarded Tuesday at the Skirball Cultural Center. The prize was created in 1996 by Joe and Helene Sherwood, founders of Daniel’s Jewelers, to recognize members of the law enforcement community “that go above and beyond their job descriptions in combating extremism, bigotry and hatred.”
Tuesday’s ceremony will also feature a tribute to Joseph Sherwood, who will turn 99 on March 12.
FBI, San Bernardino Police Chief Among Law Enforcement Trained by ADL
June 9, 2015
Two law enforcement officials from ADL’s Pacific Southwest Region attended ADL’s*Advanced Training School (ATS)*course on Extremist and Terrorist Threats.* This course, held May 31 to June 2 in Washington, DC, is recognized as one of the premier counterterrorism trainings in the country.
Chief Jarrod Burguan of the San Bernardino Police Department and Assistant Special Agent in Charge Dan Kennedy of FBI-Los Angeles participated from the Pacific Southwest Region.* Upon their return from the training, both expressed gratitude to ADL for offering this type of program for senior level law enforcement.* They also noted the impressive level of expertise of the speakers and trainers.
Assistant Special Agent in Charge Kennedy said, “I found the training very beneficial and would highly recommend it to law enforcement officials at every level.* The instructors were clearly subject matter experts who provided detailed information about a number of [international and domestic terrorist] threat groups.* More important however, was their analysis and assessments provided on current and future trends of these groups.* This insight was informative for executives in positions to determine resource allocation.”
San Bernardino Police Chief Burguan remarked that ATS “is an opportunity that every law enforcement executive should take advantage of. The interaction and networking with professionals from around the country is invaluable and the training itself is contemporary and on target. We understand that fighting terrorism in this country is simply the new norm; it’s easy to get caught up in the day to day business of policing that often does not involve the current issues of extremism and hate. This training is a great reminder to bring it back into perspective and to remember that it remains a threat to our democracy and our way of life.”
The course included a combination of both ADL’s own subject matter experts on white supremacy, anti-government extremism, homegrown radicalization, and international terrorist groups, as well as briefings on the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS) from expert research fellows from various world-renowned think tanks, the Boston Marathon bombings from a Lieutenant Colonel from the Massachusetts State Police, and Israel’s best practices and lessons learned in fighting terrorism from the Chief Superintendent of the Israel Police.
The class was composed of 42 law enforcement executives and commanders representing major federal agencies (including the Federal Bureau of Investigation; Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms & Explosives; Naval Criminal Investigative Service; US Immigration and Customs Enforcement’s Homeland Security Investigations; US Customs and Border Protection; US Marshals Service; US Coast Guard; and the Drug Enforcement Administration), as well as commanders from some of the largest local agencies in the country (including the New York City, Chicago, Philadelphia, Boston, San Diego, Austin, Miami Beach, Oklahoma City, and Richmond Police Departments), and commanders from several major state agencies (such as the Arizona Department of Public Safety, Massachusetts State Police, Maryland State Police, and Colorado Bureau of Investigation).
ATS has now trained over 1,000, representing nearly 250 different agencies from across the country, since the course was first launched in 2003.
ATS’s three day sessions, held twice a year in Washington, D.C., are designed to provide chiefs and executives from federal, state, local, and military law enforcement agencies from across the country with practical information, resources, and contacts to help them combat domestic and international extremist and terrorist threats.**There is no other program like it.
Florida pastor who endorses Donald Trump is a Sandy Hook 'truther': Rev. Carl Gallups claims no one died in Newtown shootings and grieving parents are Hollywood actors*
By Khaleda Rahman For Dailymail.com00:21 09 Mar 2016, updated 04:08 09 Mar 2016
Rev. Carl Gallups gave the invocation at January rally in Pensacola**
Trump said at the time he was delighted to have Gallup's endorsement
*But on a radio show, Gallups claimed Newtown massacre never happened*
He insists David and Francine Wheeler, who lost their son Ben, are actors*
A pastor who endorsed Donald Trump - and delivered the invocation at a rally for the GOP frontrunner in January - is a Sandy Hook 'truther' who claims the grieving parents of the young victims in the Newtown massacre are Hollywood actors.
The Rev. Carl Gallups, a Southern Baptist pastor from Milton, Florida, gave the invocation at Trump's Pensacola rally - which attracted more than 10,000 people - on January 14.
At the time, Trump said it was a 'great honor' to receive the endorsement of Gallups and several other Florida community leaders.
Mike Adams & Dave Hodges Being Setup by the Washington Post and NY Times
Welcome to the twisted and dishonest world of the mainstream media. Specifically, I am referring to the New York Times and the Washington Post. As far as the MSM goes, investigative journalism with regard to seeking the truth, is dead. The MSM is all about propaganda, at best, and setting people up for a fall based upon creating a false light impression, at worst.
The New York Times
People like Anderson Cooper and Wolf Blitzer of CNN would sell their birth mothers into slavery if it meant furthering a story to benefit their NWO masters (i.e. six corporations in total, who own 95% of the MSM).
Subsequently, when I was approached by a NY Times reporter about the specter of a Clinton presidency, my alarm bells went off
Request for Interview from the NY Times
Request for Interview from the NY Times
Hi Dave, Jonathan Mahler of the New York Times here. We’re working on a story that looks at how Trump supporters would view a Hillary victory, and what sorts of protest movements might emerge in the event that she is elected.
I do not trust the MSM any further than I can throw them. However, I was willing to give Mr. Mahler the benefit of the doubt and I granted him an interview. I may have been born at night, but not last night, I covered my backside with a follow up email. Further, I published the following on my website and several others to establish what I indeed said and what my positions are.
Please talking to you. For your convenience, here are my talking points in reference to your questions Dave Hodges
The Issues Surrounding Hillary
1.Clinton is an illegitimate candidate from the classified emails to Benghazi. She belongs in jail, not running for President.
2.There is already rampant election fraud taking place in America (e.g. 7 million democrats registered to vote in two different states, undocumented aliens being rushed to citizenship so they can vote, etc.). The people and Donald Trump have a right to challenge the election results. However, Trump expressed his potential need to challenge the vote counting etc., very poorly. One the fraud has been investigated, the candidates have an obligation to respect the results, so long as the results were fairly determined.
3.How can the military follow Clinton into battle against the Russians, when she sold uranium to the Russians? I view this as treason. This event was carried in a story carried by the New York Times in 2015.
4.The Clinton Foundation was given $2 billion dollars to help the people of Haiti. According to Gary Heavin, who has already spent $12 million dollars of his own money to help the Haitian people, the Clinton Foundation is nowhere to be found.
5. I consistently assert that Hillary will dramatically raise taxes by $1.3 trillion and this be the death blow to an already fragile middle class.
6.Hillary said she opposed free trade agreements during the debate. She is lying. As we know, she has her public and her private position. She has told Wall Street that and moderator of the 3rd debate, Chris Wallace, called her out on this point as well. Hillary is a ticking time bomb for those in the middle class whether they be Black, White, Latino, male or female, et al.
7.Hillary will erase our national borders with an amnesty program and that will be the end of the sovereignty of the United States.
To the question of whether, or not, I have any knowledge of any planned protests or counter-reactions to a Clinton reaction, here is my response:
1.I categorically state that if it was implied that there would be violence, I do not know of any planned events. I also would oppose such a violent response. I would support a boycott against the major banks and the big corporations who support the free trade agreements. Shop locally is what I advise. the people to do. As I have often stated, I am calling for a boycott from any institution that benefits from a free trade agreement. Do not shop or bank with the corporations. Invest your money into the local economy. Turn off CNN/Fox/ABC, it is paid for propaganda representing the financial interests behind Hillary Clinton.
2. I believe that if the people are going to engage in civil disobedience, or even start a revolution, I am totally unaware of any such plans by any individual or group. I mentioned that I am fundamentally opposed to violence, due to the fact that I am a Christian. However, I say for the record that Clinton better not come after the guns because that could set off an unfortunate and unpredictable set of events.
3.I am still awaiting justice for Hillary Clinton.
Lightening Strikes Twice: The Washington Post and Mike Adams
One day after my interview with the NY Times, Mike Adams contacted me and let me know that he was asked the same exact questions by a reporter from the Washington Post.
From Mike Adams:
Dave, a WashPost reporter called me about the same topics the NYT asked you. I was extremely careful in my responses and recorded the entire conversation. Also told the WashPost guy his entire paper has zero credibility and that no one trusts the media anymore.”
I stopped believing in coincidences years ago when I discovered in the same year that the Easter Bunny and Santa Claus were not real.
Please allow me to state the obvious. It is apparent that the Main Stream Media is engaged in an orchestrated effort to discredit the Donald Trump populist movement and the media who support it. The obvious implication is that people like myself and Mike Adams will be advocating for an extreme backlash should Hillary steal the election. Nothing could be further from the truth. However, I would support legal action against the ongoing voter fraud that is taking place as I write these words.
The NY Times and the Washington Post have been reduced to a singular purpose: Their newspapers make excellent material from which one can use to housebreak their dog. Not only should we boycott the MSM, we should inform their sponsors as well.
In the final analysis, it is now clear that the MSM is attempting to blame any post-election violence on Newstarget.com and The Common Sense Show. Undoubtedly, more truth-telling websites will be implicated in the days and weeks ahead.
Below is a brief podcast summary, which also contains additional material, that the readers may wish to forward to their contact list.
Agenda 21 Will Bring Witchcraft, Corruption, Trafficking and Foreign Troops to Your Town
Alex Jones is have been helping Larry Nichols expose Hillary Clinton for being a 4th degree Witch who routinely travels to LA to participate in what witches do.
These claims seem unbelievable and some have told me that Alex has lost his mind. On the contrary, I think, from what I have learned, is that Alex Jones is being conservative.
I have been investigating and reporting on these kinds of activities for years and now a pattern is beginning to form.
When a Presidential candidate, Hillary Clinton, is engaged in witchcraft, there is much more to the story.
We know the global elite serve Satan. This article will set the stage for in depth future reporting reporting on the interconnectedness of vile and perverse behavior on the part of elected officials, the presence of Agenda 21 forces, and the presence of covert DHS, US military and foreign troop activity within a lost community.
Connecting the Dots of Agenda 21 Dominated Communities
In my work, I have covered communities who have fallen into the abyss of Agenda 21. And what I have found in that time shows a distinct pattern of criminality and perversion that is unparalleled.
The pattern consists of the following:
2. Corrupt government, law enforcement, and the courts.
3. DHS involvement
4. Us military involvement
5. Foreign troop involvement in the local area
6. Child Sex Trafficking
7.. An extreme element of fear within the impacted community.
Fort Collins, Colorad0: The Jewel of ICLEI Empire
As governments attempt to make more guns and gun ownership illegal, they succeed in doing so. It does not mean that fewer criminals are armed. Overall crime does not drop when controls are implemented. One of the reasons is that guns are fairly easy to make, and the materials to make them are virtually impossible for an industrial society to control. An unintended consequence is that submachine guns or machine pistols may be substituted for ordinary pistols. They are easier to make, because they are a simpler mechanism.
The above machine pistol/ submachine gun, based on the MAC design is
homemade, as is the silencer/suppressor. Both are illegal for the nearly everyone to possess in Canada. This machine pistol was taken in a drug raid. From globalnews.ca:
Officials said the two busts resulted in police seizing large quantities of fentanyl, meth and crack cocaine, along with seven handguns, and tens of thousands of dollars.
“We have taken significant amounts of drugs and firearms off the streets,” RCMP Insp. Robert Thorainson said.
An identical version was seized a year ago in Alberta.
Nova Armory files Lawsuit Against Officials for Bullying Tactics, Intimidation
Posted on May 1, 2016
The popular gunshop NOVA Armory opened in Arlington, VA on March 26th. The store was filled with customers, in spite of opposition from a small group of anti-rights activists. The bullying activists were joined with several members of the local government who attempted to force the gunshop to close. One landlord had already broken a lease under pressure from the local disarmists. NOVA had warned the politicians that they would sue if the harrassment continued. From NOVA Armory:
March 4, 2016, ARLINGTON, VA — The gun shop planning to open in Arlington, Virginia this month has responded to a letter local politicians sent to its landlord. In response, NOVA Armory has issued report cards with failing grades for each of the seven elected officials who signed the letter to the landlord. Additionally, NOVA Armory warned the politicians and the local anti-Second Amendment activists they could find themselves in court if the gun shop fails to open.
On March 2, NOVA Armory’s landlord received the letter signed by various Virginia office-holders representing Arlington. They were Senator Barbara Favola, Senator Janet Howell, Senator Adam Ebbin, Delegate Patrick Hope, Delegate Alfonso Lopez, Delegate Richard Sullivan, and Delegate Mark Levine.
“The authors released the letter publicly on the official letterhead of the Virginia legislature, yet their letter contained a typo, it confused our gun shop with an unrelated business, and it relied on numerous false premises,” explained NOVA Armory’s owner-in training, Lauren Pratte. “When I see such a poorly written letter in the business world, I take my business elsewhere,” Pratte continued. “Unfortunately tax payers don’t have that choice, and we must suffer under this sort of incompetence.”
In the letter, printed on official letterhead of the General Assembly of the Commonwealth of Virginia, the politicians said they “strongly urge” the landlord to cancel the lease with NOVA Armory. The letter made its arguments by claiming a disconnect between the “nature” of NOVA’s business with the “character” of the neighborhood. The letter also suggested NOVA Armory would give rise to a “black market” and “drug dealing” because of its accessibility to residents of the District of Columbia.
NRA’s Wayne LaPierre: Hillary Clinton ‘Will Come For Your Guns” ~ VIDEO
Video | Posted on October 21, 2016 by NRA News
NRA Executive Vice President and Chief Executive Officer Wayne LaPierre delivered an urgent message to America’s 100 million gun owners, declaring Hillary Clinton an enemy to the Second Amendment. “If, God forbid, Hillary Clinton is elected, she will launch an all-out war on the Second Amendment. She will come for your guns,” says LaPierre. “She will attack your right to carry. She will attack your most basic right to defend your family with a firearm in your home.”
Before asserting that Hillary Clinton “dreams of twisting a knife into the heart of the one freedom that separates us from the rest of the world,” LaPierre outlined the failures of Barrack Obama. “While radical Islamic terrorists shot, bombed and butchered innocent Americans on our own soil, Barack Obama attacked you harder than he attacked ISIS,” says LaPierre. “He used the terrorism his own weakness and failures made possible to try to gut your right to shoot back at the terrorists he refused to kill.”
AZ: Governor Ducey Vetoes HB 2524, Protection Against Bloomberg Referendum
For two years, the Arizona Citizens Defense League (AZCDL) has been pushing to pass a bill to enact a compact between states. The purpose of the bill is to prevent a billionaire funded referendum from imposing Universal Background Checks (UBC), a precursor to firearms registration in Arizona. Compacts between the states take precedence over state statutes; if another state signed on the the Compact created by SB2524, a Bloomberg funded referendum would not be able to impose UBCs on Arizona. That, at least, is the theory.
A few weeks ago, SB2524 passed the Arizona legislature. If it had become law, and another state agreed to the compact, it would have prevented Arizona from enacting firearm transfer requirements that are more restrictive than federal law. Yesterday, 10 May, Governor Ducey vetoed the bill.
It is hard to understand why. The compact would only have gone into effect if another state signed on, and would only have required that Arizona restrictions on firearm transfers be no stricter than federal law. In the veto letter(pdf), Governor Ducey says that he sees no reason to tie Arizona decisions about firearms to another state.
“I see no reason for Arizona to tie ourselves to other states’ decisions on public policy relating to the transfer of firearms. We know what’s best for our state, and I trust the citizens of Arizona and their elected leaders to continue to make wise decisions to protect our Second Amendment rights, whenever and wherever those rights are infringed.”
Either he does not believe that the Bloomberg referendum is a serious threat, he has been influenced by Bloomberg lobbiests, or he sincerely believes that Arizona should not tie its legislative hands for future firearms legislation.
None of those options bode well for the future of firearms law reform in Arizona.
Meet Connecticut’s New Gun Grab Law
June 2, 2016 by Chris Buskirk 0 Comments
new connecticut law allows police to seize guns
Connecticut has a new anti-gun law. Governor Dannel Malloy signed the law that makes it illegal for any person subject to a temporary restraining order (“TRO”) to possess a firearm of any sort. People subject to a temporary restraining order must surrender all firearms to the police within 24 hours or face jail time. The new law deprives citizens who have been convicted of no crime of their Constitutional rights without due process.
Gun grabbers cheered the action. Temporary restraining orders are routinely granted with little or no examination of the underlying facts and based wholly on one-sided testimony. Such a process is certainly appropriate in cases of domestic abuse, stalking, and the like. But with the implementation of this new law the subject of the restraining order is punished without ever having his day in court. In fact, they are punished without ever even being accused of, let alone convicted of, a crime. The TRO does not require a crime to have been committed – just a feeling of danger. This should not – cannot – be the basis for depriving someone of their most basic Constitutional liberties.
DARPA Teams Up With Mainstream Media to Push Microchips for Your Children
May 25, 2016
Phillip Schneider, Staff
It’s hard to imagine the mainstream media stooping to an even lower low than where they’re at right now, but rest assured, if you start to become comfortable with them they’ll push that line even farther.
This time, NBC is pushing that Orwellian envelope to an extreme level as it advocates for human microchipping of children “sooner rather than later”.
In a recently televised report from NBC News, they liken having your child microchipped by the state at birth to something as societally normalized as bar codes for consumer goods.
“When barcodes first came out in the late 1960s, people were appalled. They were wary of them and did not understand the concept. Today, it is so commonplace, we don’t even notice it. A microchip would work much in the same way” – NBC
This statement reveals the mentality that these types of people have, thinking of us not as human beings, but as cattle needing to be tagged by their our owners.
DHS Using “Compromised Communities” to Train and Launch Martial Law
By Dave Hodges with Katy Whelan
I have covered the travesties going on in Larimer County, Colorado with regard to the Stacy Lynne child abduction case. I found everything from a totally corrupt court system, to a completely compromised Larimer County Sheriff’s Department to evil public officials who still get elected besides the will of the people. From the locals, when they heard what I was doing to try and get Stacy’s son, Jaden, back, they were telling similar stories. The courts would take their children and some found that their child was being trafficked. Despite report that were filed, no local agency would investigate. I have made many friends as a result of my going on five year investigation.
The People’s Republic of Larimer County
As I indicated in yesterday’s article, I found witches and witchcraft at the center of these Agenda 21/2030 policies. And as I said in yesterday’s article, the Larry Nichols revelations that when he was working for Hillary and Bill, he had firsthand knowledge of Hillary’s activities as a witch. It has also been my research conclusion that when one finds witchcraft, child sex trafficking and blood sacrifices are not far behind. Since the 1970’s, Larimer County has been compromised by witchcraft in its leadership positions and Sheriff’s Department. Since the mid 1990’s, Agenda 21 policies have dominated the people. I spoke with local resident, Virginia Farver, last week, and she reiterated the mantra that Ft. Collins, located within Larimer County, is beautiful on the outside, but it is hopelessly compromised on the inside. The conditions make Agenda 21 dominated Larimer County and ideal to headquarter occupation troops to be rolled out when needed. And with the Gurkhas located alongside Russian commados in nearbye /la Porte, CO., the case is made
If you want to know about this compromised community and what it means to to roll our of martial law, simply put Stacy Lynne into the search engine of the Common Sense Show’s website.
The People’s Republic of Carbon County (Rawlins), Wyoming
Hawaii becomes first state to put gun owners in federal database
Published June 24, 2016
Hawaii signed a bill Thursday to become the first state to enter gun owners into an FBI database that will automatically notify police if an island resident is arrested anywhere else in the country.
Gov. David Ige said in a statement that the legislation is about community safety and responsible gun ownership. He said it will help law enforcement agencies protect Hawaii residents and visitors.
State Sen. Will Espero, who introduced the bill, and the Honolulu Police Department said the measure could serve as a model for other states. However, critics believe gun owners shouldn’t have to be entered in a database to practice a constitutional right.
Most people entered in the program, known as the “Rap Back” database, are in “positions of trust,” such as school teachers and bus drivers Stephen Fischer of the FBI's Criminal Justice Information Services Division said in May. Hawaii is the first to add gun owners.
Supporters say the law would make Hawaii a leader in safe gun laws. Allison Anderman, a staff attorney at the Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence, said the bill was "groundbreaking," and that she hadn't heard of other states introducing similar measures.
Yet others say gun owners shouldn't have to be entered in a database to practice a constitutional right.
October 29, 2014
DHS Whistleblower Says War On Terror Is A Charade – Real Targets Are American Patriots
Julia Davis, a former Customs and Border Protections Officer, was falsely declared a domestic terrorist and subjected to retaliatory efforts against her by the Department of Homeland Security. Her home was raided by a 27 man “special response team.” She was twice falsely arrested and imprisoned, but later exonerated. She is now a national security expert and has put out a historical documentary titled Top Priority: The Terror Within. She claims that the War On Terror by the Department of Homeland Security is a charade and that the agency seems to be targeting concerned American patriots.
Davis says her documentary is about her time with DHS in dealing with applicants from countries with ties to terrorism, who are seeking to come into the United States.
She says that they had “very specific alerts” that on July 4, 2004 that members of Al-Qaeda would be attempting to cross the border from Mexico into the US. The land port where Ms. Davis worked is the largest and busiest land port in the world, San Ysidro Port. She says that Islamic clerics say this is the best place to breech the US border because of the large number of people coming through.
Highly anticipated all-metal Trinus 3D printer/laser engraver ready for shipping
Oct 14, 2016 | By Alec
Remember the Trinus 3D printer? While 3D printing startups have previously been responsible for some huge crowdfunding successes on Kickstarter, Kodama and their Trinus 3D printer showed the world how it’s done by raising more than $1.64 million USD during their extremely successful campaign. That achievement grew out of the appeal of the all-metal Trinus 3D printer, the first all-metal 3D printer to dip below the $500 price point. In fact, early bird pledgers picked one up for just $199. While huge Kickstarter successes sometimes create equally huge logistic challenges, Kodama seems to have thought of everything and the first batch of Trinus 3D printers are ready for shipping already.
Despite its Japanese name, startup Kodama is actually a small team of San Francisco-based artists, designers, and engineers. Their name is a tribute to Hideo Kodama, the Japanese engineer who developed the world’s first working 3D printed prototype back in 1981. And their huge success is even more remarkable because the Trinus is actually their first creation.
Blacks are 13% of US population 37.6% of prisoners and 71% of shooters in Chicago
Jun 23, 2015 12:30 PM
Over the last couple of years, one of the dinner discussions our family has had relates to the observation that many, if not most, of the alleged perpetrators of violent crimes whose photographs appear in the mugshot section of our local newspaper's crime report are black. We live in a very white area of what used to be rural farms and ranches, but is now being quickly developed with multi-family housing and strip malls. A large metropolitan city is a short drive.
Sandy Hook Lead Investigator Maj. William Podgorski Dies Suddenly
Connnecticut State Police Maj. William Podgorski, one of the lead investigator in the Sandy Hook shooting investigation, died earlier this week. Podgorski, 49, died on Monday following a brief illness and surgery.
The illness was undisclosed, but the New Haven Register reports:
Sometime after surgery on Friday, Podgorski was transferred to Yale-New Haven Hospital from another hospital, Grant said. He died there Monday morning surrounded by his family.
According to his obituary:
A state police major from Farmington died Monday at Yale-New Haven Hospital after a brief illness.
William Podgorski, 49, was commander of the state police western district, which includes the barracks in Canaan, Litchfield, Southbury and Bridgeport.
Trooper Kelly Grant said Podgorski underwent surgery on Friday, and then was transferred to Yale-New Haven, where he died. She said she did not know the cause of Podgorski’s death.
Podgorski was a 24-year veteran of the state police and served in a variety of assignments, including the traffic division, the forensic lab, the governor’s security detail and homeland security.
He is survived by his wife and three children, aged 11, 12 and 14.
Wikileaks: Hillary Clinton Had Gun Control Supporters Planted In Town Hall Audience
by AWR HAWKINS
23 Oct 2016
One of the emails contained in the Wikileaks’ Podesta email release shows that Hillary Clinton had gun control supporters planted in a town hall audience in Manchester, New Hampshire.
The town hall occurred on October 5, 2015; just four days after a man opened fire on Umpqua Community College campus in Oregon.
In the email thread, dated October 4, 2015, a “speech draft” was passed around “on behalf of Megan Rooney.” The email contained “talking points” for Clinton to use to discuss guns in Manchester.
The first part of the email reminded other campaign staffers that the town hall had no specific focus, although gun control would be highlighted:
Here are short TPs about guns for the NH community college town hall >>> tomorrow. This is not a town hall exclusively about gun violence — it’s just a >>> regular town hall.
26 of the Democrats Who Participated in the Gun Control Sit-In Own Guns
By Jillian Kay Melchior2:13 pm, June 23, 201
Congressional Democrats ended their 25-hour sit-in on the House floor this afternoon, failing to force a vote on two pieces of gun legislation. The controversial sit-in included 26 Democratic lawmakers who themselves own guns, Heat Street learned after examining 2013 USA Today data on congressional firearms ownership. The participants also included 12 more Democrats in Congress who either didn’t respond to USA Today’s gun survey or declined to say whether or not they possessed a firearm.
The sit-in, launched by civil-rights leader Rep. John Lewis, centered on two pieces of proposed gun legislation. One would expand background checks to cover all commercial gun sales; the other seeks tougher prohibitions against gun purchases for terror suspects.