Aliens would find us boring.

[BlueAngel]

Originally Posted by upagainstit

Turns out to be, the way things are going with me.
Mostly from being "induced".

How is it you are being induced?

[BlueAngel]

Originally Posted by upagainstit

This didn't show up when quoting your post previously.

by Algebra -
All the knowledge we have is created by us. Can we be trusted?

Quite unlikely.

Don't you love how some of the members of CC speak as if they speak for all of us.

As in Algebra's post.

Can WE be trusted?

Speak for yourself.

Do away with the WE.

Ask if YOU can be trusted and not if WE can be trusted.

I trust myself inexplicably.

And, upagainst it replies:

Quite unlikely.

upagainstit doesn't trust himself.

[upagainstit]

Originally Posted by BlueAngel

Don't you love how some of the members of CC speak as if they speak for all of us.

As in Algebra's post.

Can WE be trusted?

Speak for yourself, pal.

Do away with the WE.

We mix it both ways. Sometimes we say ourselves.
Sometimes we seem to include people with us.

Ask if YOU can be trusted and not if WE can be trusted.

We probably all TRUST ourselves. We probably can't be "trusted" by
others, purely. There WILL be times, when one, cannot be overlooked.

I trust myself inexplicably.

Your trusting yourself so, probably won't do anything for me, from you.
You have lots of post. You show through, however, we see you.

And, upagainst it replies:

Quite unlikely.

upagainstit doesn't trust himself.

Your editing kept getting in the way of my trying to post,
to your comment at first.

I actually trust the "I" of me.
Not too cozy with the rest of me.
Mighty fine lines in here.

Other comments are in bold in quoted above.

[BlueAngel]

Originally Posted by upagainstit

Your editing kept getting in the way of my trying to post,
to your comment at first.

I actually trust the "I" of me.
Not too cozy with the rest of me.
Mighty fine lines in here.

Other comments are in bold in quoted above.

So sorry my editing interfered with your trying to post to my comment.

Like I said, do away with the WE.

Speak for yourself.

Or, don't speak at all.

I, personally, don't care about your other comments that are in bold.

You trust the "I" of "me."

Do you realize that "I' and "me" are one in the same or, in your case, are they split?

Like in SPLIT personalities?

[upagainstit]

Originally Posted by BlueAngel

How is it you are being induced?

Some kind of "automatically" happening - machine workings.

Chances are it's(?) on - involuntary mode - now, anymore.

Trying to crank me out - differnt of - however I will be.

Got my head above the water-line, as far as "I" go.

[BlueAngel]

Originally Posted by upagainstit

Some kind of "automatically" happening - machine workings.

Chances are it's(?) on - involuntary mode - now, anymore.

Trying to crank me out - differnt of - however I will be.

Got my head above the water-line, as far as "I" go.

Yep.

Chances are.

That involuntary mode, forevermore.

Different as you may be, however it is.

Crank it out, head above that water-line.

As far as you go, we'll see.

Those automatically happening machine workings.

What a b*tch.

Makes perfect sense, doesn't it people?

[upagainstit]

Originally Posted by BlueAngel

So sorry my editing interfered with your trying to post to my comment.

Like I said, do away with the WE.

Speak for yourself.

Or, don't speak at all.

I, personally, don't care about your other comments that are in bold.

We all decide for ourselves.
You don't care for it, yourself, personally, not our concern.
You - don't decide - for us.

You trust the "I" of "me."

Do you realize that "I' and "me" are one in the same or, in your case, are they split?

Like in SPLIT personalities?

For sure I realize that the - I and me - would be - one and the same.
Do you realize that - I and me - CAN be seperated.

I do not have a "split" personality, directly - as myself.
However, I can "already" be induced - as not outright I -
and for all - intents and purposes - I would see it as me.

Bottom line is - I am more I than I am me.

Sometimes I, include me, BUT we are not "outright" - one and the same.

Feel free to comment for more "clarity" if you need it.

Also other comment in quoted above in this post.

[BlueAngel]

Originally Posted by upagainstit

For sure I realize that the - I and me - would be - one and the same.
Do you realize that - I and me - CAN be seperated.

I do not have a "split" personality, directly - as myself.
However, I can "already" be induced - as not outright I -
and for all - intents and purposes - I would see it as me.

Bottom line is - I am more I than I am me.

Sometimes I, include me, BUT we are not "outright" - one and the same.

Feel free to comment for more "clarity" if you need it.

Also other comment in quoted above in this post.

Trust me, I don't need you to tell me to feel free to comment about anything and asking you for more clarity is futile.

Sounds to me as if you have an identity crisis going on.

Do you realize that "I" and "Me" are one in the same?

Obviously not.

They can't be separated.

And, if they are, that means you are not one.

[BlueAngel]

If you are not the "I" in "me" than who are you?

Three?

[upagainstit]

Originally Posted by BlueAngel

Yep.

Chances are.

That involuntary mode, forevermore.

Different as you may be, however it is.

Crank it out, head above that water-line.

As far as you go, we'll see.

Those automatically happening machine workings.

What a b*tch.

Makes perfect sense, doesn't it people?

Commenting on your question at the bottom.

People may not be that unaware - they are mostly in different states.
Most people - may not fight it.(?)
Most people - may not have a hard time with it.
IMO

Found this site - that has - maybe all - of Ralph Waldo Emersons' - essays -
Site Map: Emerson Texts
pretty-well, all of his writings, are - what I see - as like-minded - from within.
Where he writes from.
However: he gives the impression that he is "over-ridden",
more than I am of mind to be.