Go Back   Club Conspiracy Forums > General Conspiracy Discussion > General Conspiracy Discussion
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-23-2005, 06:14 PM
Thumper Thumper is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 763
Default ATTN Dew J: some ammo to use against the iidb homos

The Chronic Denial of Conspiracy as a Pathological Response Pattern.

Some here have postulated that there is a "Conspiracy Mindset"; a type of paranoid behavior that causes certain individuals to view unrelated events as somehow related, attributing vast powers to an "Unseen" enemy or organization and making illogical leaps and twists to support their personal position or delusion.

I actually think that this is a valid supposition in many cases, where the information truly is unconnected and there exists no solid link between separate, disparate events. It is sometimes too simple for some to put together information that while similar in nature has nor clear link.

This natural instinct to "group like things" is the basis for such things as prejudice and racism for instance. A few examples of a group become "tags" or hallmarks for the entire group. So if a member of a given group say, steals from you, then all members of that group are identified as being thieves, ETC.

What I would put forth here, is a possible condition that is in many ways the opposite, yet corollary of the above condition.


Put simply, it seems that some individual are incapable of seeing emergent patterns of information that have a high ratio of crossover and clear indicators of being linked together.

This is a serious disorder, as even when a large group (such as the United States government) admits to the conspiratorial behavior, these individuals will go to almost any length to ignore the factual information given by reliable sources, in order to maintain their delusional state.

For instance. For over twenty years, there has been a slow link of information about a mind control program named MKULTRA being run by the government of the United States. This was almost universally labeled a "conspiracy theory" by individuals with this disorder and others. (Not every person that denies this kind of information has a delusional disorder. Other factors may be involved, so a case by case examination is needed.)

In the early part of 2005 the United States government released over fifty thousand pages of documents detailing the particulars of the MKALTRA mind control program that ran for over twenty years, including their use of unwitting "subjects" and a very high level of correspondence to the leaks and rumors, as well as first hand accounts that have been given for years by individuals that claimed involvement.
This evidence was enough to allow a Canadian court to find portions of the U.S. government guilty of crimes against some of their citizens for these actions last week.

Regardless of this however, even having seen this information, many people with this disorder continue to deny that this program ever took place, as it would indicate a large conspiracy of individuals, that in there minds is impossible.

They continue to believe that a normal level of organization could not result in a large conspiracy, and to claim a need for "super-human" levels of organization that, by their way of thinking cannot exist. This leads them to erroneously believe that this information does not exist.

Indeed this is not an isolated case, but a wide spread pattern of delusional behavior.

These same people cannot see simple emergent patterns even when pointed out to them, if these patterns require examination of motives of a group, rather than single individuals.

This is not to say, in any way, that every conspiracy theory is real, but rather that there is a vocal minority of people that are equally confused (and therefore often in error) that deny the reality of any conspiracy, regardless of the evidence to the contrary.


\"six or seven men can plunge the nation into war, or, what is perhaps equally disastrous, commit it to entangling alliances without consulting Parliament at all.\"

--Andrew Carnegie
Reply With Quote
Old 12-25-2005, 10:27 PM
Drew_J Drew_J is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 142
Send a message via MSN to Drew_J
Default Re: ATTN Dew J: some ammo to use against the iidb homos

Richard Falk's foreward to Griffin's "The New Pearl Harbor."

Ever since 9/11 the mainstream media have worked hand-in-glove with the government in orchestrating a mood of patriotic fervor making any expressions of doubts about the official leadership of the country tantamount to disloyalty...Waving the American flag became a substitute for critical and independent thought, and slogans such as "United We Stand" were used as blankets to smother whatever critical impulses existed...

As the spell cast by patrioteering has begun to wear off, there is another related dynamic at work to keep as from the truth - what psychistrists describe as denial...Part of the impulse to deny is a desperate wish to avoid coming face-to-face with the gruesome realities that are embedded in the power structure of government that controls our lives...

There is no excuse at this stage of American development for a posture of political innocence, including an unquestioning acceptance of the good faith of our government. After all, there has been a long history of manipulated public beliefs, especially in matters of war and peace...

The breaking of trust between government and citizenry in the United States has deep historical roots. Historians are in increasing agreemtnt that the facts were manipulated (1) in the explosion of the USS Maine to justify the start of the Spanish-American War (1898), (2) with respect to the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor to justify the previously unpopular entry into World War II, (3) in the Gulf of Tonkin incident of 1964, used by the White House to justify the dramatic extension of the Vietnam War to North Vietnam, and, most recently, (4) to portray Iraq as harboring a menacing arsenal of weaponry of mass destruction, in order to justify recourse to war in defiance of international law and the United Nations...Why should the official account of 9/11 be treated as sacrosanct and accepted at face value?
\"Permit me to issue and control the money of a nation, and I care not who makes its laws.\"
-Mayer Amschel Rothschild (1743-1812)
Reply With Quote

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
ATTN UK CC members: What does anyone know about provisional 'Community Support Officers'? Thumper Europe 6 03-27-2008 03:48 AM
ATTN truebeliever: I just saw that NWO lecture about the deliberate de-industrialization of theWest Thumper General Conspiracy Discussion 0 12-10-2005 01:00 PM
I'm getting denial of service attacks from entering the iidb.org forum... FBI? NSA? Thumper General Conspiracy Discussion 7 12-03-2005 12:21 PM

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:41 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.12
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.